T1B

Posted: **Thu Nov 21, 2024 9:49 pm**

Roach wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2024 8:20 pm
HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2024 5:48 pm Mike Lee
Bottom feeding knuckle dragging zealot-cultist narcissist cockroach. Other than slobbering syncopath his Peter principle level is beet weeding supervisor.

If they are looking for a spineless robot then that might work.

Enough with the subtlety, Roach. How do you really feel about him?

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:02 am**

Rack Roach!

Lee is worthless.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:07 pm**

I know hes older than dirt, but id like to see Alan Dershowitz do it for at least a year or two.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:08 pm**

It would be yet another example of Trump adding former democrats to his team.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:28 pm**

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:07 pm I know hes older than dirt, but id like to see Alan Dershowitz do it for at least a year or two.

No possible way that would occur. Dershowitz has made it his life's mission to keep people out of jail. He would never go become the country's chief prosecutor.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:01 pm**

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:07 pm I know hes older than dirt, but id like to see Alan Dershowitz do it for at least a year or two.

Hard pass.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:09 pm**

Interesting read about Matt Gaetz

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:54 pm**

Pam Bondi, former AG for Florida is next up. She was announced a few hours after Gaetz stepped aside. Gaetz was a head fake.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:19 pm**

Democrats two weeks ago wrote:dOnaLd TrUmP dOeSn'T hAvE aNy StRoNg WoMeN aRoUnD hIm!!!111!!!111! Durr durr..

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:11 pm**

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:19 pm
Democrats two weeks ago wrote:dOnaLd TrUmP dOeSn'T hAvE aNy StRoNg WoMeN aRoUnD hIm!!!111!!!111! Durr durr..

Link?

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:16 pm**

mvscal wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:54 pm Gaetz was a head fake.

If you say so.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:38 pm**

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:19 pm
Democrats two weeks ago wrote:dOnaLd TrUmP dOeSn'T hAvE aNy StRoNg WoMeN aRoUnD hIm!!!111!!!111! Durr durr..

This looks like a strong woman. Perhaps Trump could retain Levine.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 7:14 pm**

Safe to say voters from New York's 14th District would agree with you.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:26 pm**

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:19 pm
Democrats two weeks ago wrote:dOnaLd TrUmP dOeSn'T hAvE aNy StRoNg WoMeN aRoUnD hIm!!!111!!!111! Durr durr..

Hurr... Durr...

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:40 pm**

https://youtu.be/BkSUE7esjG8?si=SYxcIVFdYQZBDRO2

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:48 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 8:40 pm https://youtu.be/BkSUE7esjG8?si=SYxcIVFdYQZBDRO2

And your point is…?

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:18 am**

I haven't clicked on Diego's video link. Lemme guess it's another attempt at changing the subject. That's all the moron has to offer these days. He is literally getting dumber in real time.

Thanks, Pfizer

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2024 4:46 am**

Mikey wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 6:11 pm
HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:19 pm
Democrats two weeks ago wrote:dOnaLd TrUmP dOeSn'T hAvE aNy StRoNg WoMeN aRoUnD hIm!!!111!!!111! Durr durr..

Link?

Mark Cuban's Trump Women Remark Sparks MAGA Rage: 'Profoundly Offensive'

Mark Cuban, a supporter of Vice President Kamala Harris, is being ripped by the Trump campaign after saying the former president is never surrounded by "strong, intelligent women."

The comments were made during Thursday's episode of ABC's The View after co-host and former Trump aide Alyssa Farah Griffin asked the entrepreneur his thoughts on former President Donald Trump not asking ex-South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley to help him reach women voters.

"I mean...it will put [Harris] over the edge with Nikki Haley supporters," Cuban said. "Donald Trump, you never see him around strong, intelligent women. Ever. It's just that simple. They're intimidating to him. He doesn't like to be challenged by them."

https://www.newsweek.com/mark-cuban-don ... ga-1978217

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:15 am**

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:18 am I haven't clicked on Diego's video link. Lemme guess it's another attempt at changing the subject. That's all the moron has to offer these days. He is literally getting dumber in real time.

The video is of Anderson Cooper badgering Pam Bondi, repeatedly asking her if she will be “a champion for the LGBTQ community” in Florida, as if they deserve special consideration.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2024 5:23 pm**

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:15 am
HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:18 am I haven't clicked on Diego's video link. Lemme guess it's another attempt at changing the subject. That's all the moron has to offer these days. He is literally getting dumber in real time.
The video is of Anderson Cooper badgering Pam Bondi, repeatedly asking her if she will be “a champion for the LGBTQ community” in Florida, as if they deserve special consideration.

This was in 2016 after the Orlando nightclub shooting. Evidently, Anderthon doesn't understand how she could express support for the alphabet people after dozens were massacred by a Muslim lunatic due to her prior opposition to gay marriage.

Progtard faggots aren't very bright.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2024 9:10 pm**

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:15 am
HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:18 am I haven't clicked on Diego's video link. Lemme guess it's another attempt at changing the subject. That's all the moron has to offer these days. He is literally getting dumber in real time.
The video is of Anderson Cooper badgering Pam Bondi, repeatedly asking her if she will be “a champion for the LGBTQ community” in Florida, as if they deserve special consideration.

If that had been a court of law the judge would have compelled the witness to answer the questions. It never would have come to having to "badgering" the witness.

Posted: **Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:18 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 9:10 pm
If that had been a court of law the judge would have compelled the witness to answer the questions. It never would have come to having to "badgering" the witness.

That's rich coming from a supporter of Mr Dementia and Ms Word Salad.

Posted: **Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:09 pm**

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:18 pm
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 9:10 pm
If that had been a court of law the judge would have compelled the witness to answer the questions. It never would have come to having to "badgering" the witness.
That's rich coming from a supporter of Mr Dementia and Ms Word Salad.

She's far more articulate than the convicted felon & the couch fucker....

Posted: **Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:12 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:09 pm
Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:18 pm
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 9:10 pm
If that had been a court of law the judge would have compelled the witness to answer the questions. It never would have come to having to "badgering" the witness.
That's rich coming from a supporter of Mr Dementia and Ms Word Salad.
She's far more articulate than the convicted felon & the couch fucker....

But her laugh…!!!

Posted: **Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:54 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:09 pm
Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:18 pm
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2024 9:10 pm
If that had been a court of law the judge would have compelled the witness to answer the questions. It never would have come to having to "badgering" the witness.
That's rich coming from a supporter of Mr Dementia and Ms Word Salad.
She's far more articulate than the convicted felon & the couch fucker....

Word salad answers do not make one articulate.

Posted: **Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:43 pm**

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 8:54 pm
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:09 pm
Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:18 pm

That's rich coming from a supporter of Mr Dementia and Ms Word Salad.
She's far more articulate than the convicted felon & the couch fucker....
Word salad answers do not make one articulate.

If that were the case then you wouldn't be supporting the felon. Stop projecting.

Posted: **Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:29 pm**

Neither Trump nor Harris sound presidential (like W did…

). You can accuse neither of being even remotely articulate.

Posted: **Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:38 pm**

Agreed, but you are taking away Diego’s straw man.

Posted: **Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:17 am**

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:29 pm Neither Trump nor Harris sound presidential (like W did…). You can accuse neither of being even remotely articulate.

Did you come up with that while drinking your covfefe? And since when were their airports during the Revolutionary War?

Your only problems with her stem from a dislike of her laugh along with the color of her skin.

Posted: **Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:38 am**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:17 am
Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:29 pm Neither Trump nor Harris sound presidential (like W did…). You can accuse neither of being even remotely articulate.
Your only problems with her stem from a dislike of her laugh along with the color of her skin.

Fuck you. The color of her skin matters absolutely nothing to me. If Candace Owens was running, I’d prefer her to Trump. WTF made you say something that ignorant?

What mattered was: Her policies. Her ineptness as VP. Her inability to communicate. Her lack of knowledge. Her affinity for wokeness.

Seriously, go fuck yourself.

Posted: **Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:47 am**

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:38 am
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:17 am
Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:29 pm Neither Trump nor Harris sound presidential (like W did…). You can accuse neither of being even remotely articulate.
Your only problems with her stem from a dislike of her laugh along with the color of her skin.
Fuck you. The color of her skin matters absolutely nothing to me. If Candace Owens was running, I’d prefer her to Trump. WTF made you say something that ignorant?

What mattered was: Her policies. Her ineptness as VP. Her inability to communicate. Her lack of knowledge. Her affinity for wokeness.

Seriously, go fuck yourself.

Ah, more of the "she didn't do anything during her time in office." Never mind that VPOTUS doesn't determine national policy, POTUS does.

And the fact that you won't respond to what Trump has said speaks volumes...

Posted: **Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:54 am**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:47 am
Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:38 am
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:17 am
Your only problems with her stem from a dislike of her laugh along with the color of her skin.
Fuck you. The color of her skin matters absolutely nothing to me. If Candace Owens was running, I’d prefer her to Trump. WTF made you say something that ignorant?

What mattered was: Her policies. Her ineptness as VP. Her inability to communicate. Her lack of knowledge. Her affinity for wokeness.

Seriously, go fuck yourself.
Ah, more of the "she didn't do anything during her time in office." Never mind that VPOTUS doesn't determine national policy, POTUS does.

And the fact that you won't respond to what Trump has said speaks volumes...

She didn’t do her job(s).

I ignored that part of your post to save you some embarrassment. You don’t even know what articulate means.

Posted: **Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:47 am**

https://x.com/_johnnymaga/status/186155 ... 23056?s=42

Posted: **Wed Nov 27, 2024 3:02 am**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:47 am https://x.com/_johnnymaga/status/186155 ... 23056?s=42

She looks tired as hell, but I see no signs of an inability to articulate.

No covfefe.
No taking over airports during the Revolutionary War.
No wanting to buy Greenland.
Ect. Ect.

Posted: **Wed Nov 27, 2024 3:11 am**

ButTrump

Play #2 in your playbook.

Posted: **Wed Nov 27, 2024 7:48 am**

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2024 3:11 am My emperor is fully clothed 100% of the time.

Posted: **Wed Nov 27, 2024 1:55 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2024 3:02 am
88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:47 am https://x.com/_johnnymaga/status/186155 ... 23056?s=42
She looks tired as hell, but I see no signs of an inability to articulate.

That is the problem. To anyone who is objective, she is a marble mouthed moron who has no leadership skills whatsoever and was chosen for you because she easily controlled by the puppet masters that run the Team D grift. But when you put her on the scales next to Biden, who was also selected for you due to similar qualities and who you also worshipped, you see exceptional talent.

Posted: **Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:17 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2024 3:02 am
88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:47 am https://x.com/_johnnymaga/status/186155 ... 23056?s=42
She looks tired as hell, but I see no signs of an inability to articulate.

So, jet lag and a bad cold. Must be contagious.

Posted: **Thu Nov 28, 2024 5:08 am**

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2024 1:55 pm
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2024 3:02 am
88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:47 am https://x.com/_johnnymaga/status/186155 ... 23056?s=42
She looks tired as hell, but I see no signs of an inability to articulate.

That is the problem. To anyone who is objective, she is a marble mouthed moron who has no leadership skills whatsoever and was chosen for you because she easily controlled by the puppet masters that run the Team D grift. But when you put her on the scales next to Biden, who was also selected for you due to similar qualities and who you also worshipped, you see exceptional talent.

She was giving a pep talk to her supporters, not discussing policy in minutia (something that Trump has never done but you never call him out on that).

And objective people would never accept Infowars as a legitimate source, so there's that....

T1B

Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG

Re: Gaetz nominated for AG