T1B

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 3:46 am Are they eating these wild animals raw?

bungle clone wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 4:06 pm so saith the Imanje Blew:
"Fuck you and your entire bloodline."





thanks for the melt! and to think, all I had to do is cite some basic facts!

ty
xoxoxo

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 7:45 pmYes. Fuck you and your entire bloodline.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 9:47 pm So why cape for jewish persons if you are not one?

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 1:20 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 9:47 pm So why cape for jewish persons if you are not one?

I had to look up the meaning of "cape" in your sentence. I learn something every day.

Clearly, you are not a fan of "jewish persons" (and before you ask, I am not one of them). If you were in charge of everything on Earth (flat or otherwise), what would you do insofar as jewish persons are concerned?

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 9:47 pm Sounds like a threat. There's enough of that in real life. You can parade that toxic racial co-dependency elsewhere. The secret history of freedmen and jewish persons is one of manipulation, gaslighting, backstabbing and undermining independence in order to better control one partner.

It's an emotionally abusive marriage. The divorce is long overdue.

So why cape for jewish persons if you are not one? It's just a troll? How nice for you.

The Seer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 3:15 pm So rather than continue spewing your pathological hatred of all things Jew, why not switch to an extensive dialogue of the massive contributions to the country, mankind, and the planet in general made by blacks in recorded history?

“It’s because the Jews have the longest record of history that they can call themselves the Chosen People. The Christians can’t call themselves the Chosen People because their history is not long enough. They can’t go back to the time when the choice was being made. The Hebrews, the so-called Jews, can go back so far they can lay claim to that which is actually not theirs. But the reason they can claim it is that nobody else they are dealing with can go back far enough to disprove them. Except the Muslims… Remember, Abraham’s religion was Islam. Abraham wasn’t a Jew, Abraham wasn’t a Christian, Abraham wasn’t a Buddhist, Abraham was a Muslim, which means he obeyed God… Who is the seed of Abraham? Is it this blue-eyed, blond-haired, pale-skinned Jew? Or is it the so-called Negro — you? Who is it? And what makes it so pitiful, many of our people would rather believe that the Jews are God’s Chosen People than to believe that they are God’s Chosen People. They would rather believe that the Jew is better than anybody else.

This is a Negro. Nobody else would put everybody else above him but the Negro. I mean the American Negro. Remember, God said that the people would be strangers. The Jews aren’t strangers. The Jews know their history, the Jews know their culture, the Jews know their language; they know everything there is to know about themselves. They know how to rob you, they know how to be your landlord, they know how to be your grocer, they know how to be your lawyer, they know how to join the NAACP and become the president -right or wrong? They know how to control everything you’ve got. You can’t say they’re lost… Isn’t that what the Jews told Jesus? Now look at it. If the Jews said to Jesus, two thousand years after Moses supposedly led the Hebrews out of bondage, that they had never been in bondage -now you know the Jews had Moses’ history, they knew who Moses was- how could they stand up and tell Jesus they had never been in bondage? Not these things that you call Jews.

They weren’t in Egypt, they weren’t the people that Moses led out of Egypt, and the Jews know this. But the Bible is written in such a tricky way, when you read it you think that Moses led the Jews out of bondage. But if you get a Jew in a good solid conversation today and you know how to talk to him, he’ll have to admit this, that it wasn’t out of bondage that Moses brought them – it was out of somewhere else- and where Moses really brought them is their secret, but, thanks to Almighty God,

The Honorable Elijah Muhammad knows their secret, and he told it to us and we’re going to tell it to you… at the end of time one would come who would destroy the whole white race. Moses taught them (the Jews) this. And this is why when the Jews, two thousand years later, were looking for the Messiah, they thought that Jesus was the Messiah and they put him to death because they knew when the Messiah came he was going to destroy that whole race of devils.

The Jews knew this, so they put him to death thinking that they could stop him from destroying them. But actually, they made a mistake because Jesus two thousand years ago wasn’t the Messiah. Their time wasn’t up two thousand years ago. Their time would not be up until two thousand years later, the day and time that we’re living in right now. So, brothers and sisters, my time has expired.

I just wanted to point out that the white man, a race of devils, was made six thousand years ago. This doesn’t mean to tell you that this implies any kind of hate. They’re just a race of devils. They were made six thousand years ago, they were made to rule for six thousand years."

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 4:55 am No.

The Seer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 3:30 am

The Seer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 3:15 pm So rather than continue spewing your pathological hatred of all things Jew, why not switch to an extensive dialogue of the massive contributions to the country, mankind, and the planet in general made by blacks in recorded history?

The Seer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 8:17 am

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 4:55 am No.

Lack of content?

Misinterpreting the Thief (John 10:10)
Gary Manning Jr — April 28, 2016
Talbot School of Theology Faculty Blog


In Jesus’ Shepherd Discourse in John 10, Jesus contrasts himself with “the thief.” “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I came that they may have life and have it in abundance.” If you hear this verse quoted in a sermon, or see how people use this verse online, you will usually hear that the thief is Satan. But is that what Jesus meant?

All of John 10:1-18 hangs together as a single discourse, split up into three connected shepherd parables. So if we want to understand what Jesus meant by thief, we need to (surprise!) look at the context. Once we look at the whole discourse, it becomes clear that the thief does not refer to Satan, but to Jesus’ opponents, the self-serving human leaders of Israel.

(supporting documentation excised)

The church fathers all agreed that the thief referred to the failed leaders of Israel (like the Pharisees), or failed revolutionary leaders (like Theudas). Augustine, Chrysostom, Clement of Alexandria, Theodore of Mopsuestia and others all had this interpretation. None of them ever suggested that Jesus was talking about Satan in John 10.

The commenters of the Reformation era up through the nineteenth century all agreed that the thief referred to failed human leaders and their false teaching. I was unable to find a single commentary from those centuries that even mentioned the interpretation that the thief referred to Satan. John Calvin, as he explained that the thief referred to false teachers, mentioned that Satan is the source of false teaching, but he still did not interpret the thief as Satan.

But there was an interesting change that happened some time in the mid-1800s. A few devotional books and some Sunday School curriculum (but still a minority, and no commentaries) began to say that the thief referred to Satan. It appears that they picked this interpretation up from (it gets complicated here) Aquinas’ misinterpretation of an obscure 11th century commentary by Theophylact of Ohrid. Theophylact claimed that the thief represented revolutionary leaders of Israel, and the wolf (John 10:12) was Satan. Then he said that the wolf/Satan was like the thief in certain ways. In the process of abbreviating Theophylact’s view for his Catena Aurea, Aquinas made it sound like Theophylact taught that the thief was Satan. Finally, the view that the thief was Satan began to appear in a few mainstream commentaries in the early 1900s (Arthur Pink is a notable example). But by the mid-20th century, commentaries again began to return to the traditional view that the thief referred to false leaders....

bungle clone wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 10:05 am

The Seer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 3:30 am

The Seer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2025 3:15 pm So rather than continue spewing your pathological hatred of all things Jew, why not switch to an extensive dialogue of the massive contributions to the country, mankind, and the planet in general made by blacks in recorded history?

ask and ye shall receive:




Hannibal, one of the greatest generals ever.

even netflix agrees:

bungle clone wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 5:48 pm

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 7:46 pm

bungle clone wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 5:48 pm

No fuckin’ way. Ain’t no thumpin’ bass in the Grosse Fuge.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Mar 01, 2025 7:53 pm Africa is black... and frankly so is the European Meditterranean.

The Etruscans were black. The Berbers are black. The Carthaginians are black. The old gods were black. The Egyptians were black. That whole region was not just black, but it used to be green not desert. When everybody looks mulatto/quadroon/octoroon, nobody is white.

The truth is under miles of sand, preserved. God did it so that the truth doesn't suffer the fate of Alexandria and the New World -- all of that history, melted down for white supremacist jew banker gold, or destroyed for white supremacist arab/christian zealotry.

https://www.tuscanynowandmore.com/disco ... any-sights

The trouble is, they didn’t leave much else, either there or in Umbria, Lazio and even Campania, where they also ruled. So much of their lives and culture were destroyed or assimilated by the civilisation that followed them: the Romans.

Rome meets (and beats?) Etruria
Early Roman emperors including Augustus and Claudius mixed with descendants of Etruscan nobility. The Etruscans shaped the Romans, for sure. But they were also swallowed by them, from a historical perspective, making it hard to grasp what the Etruscans were all about as a civilisation.

On occasion, Rome deliberately destroyed Etruscan towns, including Veii (near Rome) in 396 BC, which they also buried. More often, they used soft power, negotiated, or played divide-and-rule with the locals. Significantly, when Hannibal invaded and almost conquered Rome in the 3rd century BC, most Etruscans sided with the Romans, rather than use the Carthaginian invasion as an opportunity to rebel.

Slowly but surely, Rome eased Etruscan culture out of the picture. Little of their written language survives, for example. The cultural destruction did not end with the fall of Rome or even the havoc of the Dark Ages. In the 1540s, Pope Paul III ordered almost 3,000kg (6,614 lbs.) of Etruscan bronzes melted down to decorate a church.

Even ancient writers, the likes of Herodotus and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, could not agree on who the Etruscans were, or where they originated. Modern DNA testing hasn’t helped much. In part, they will remain a mystery.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sun Mar 02, 2025 1:23 am Ass, skin, nose and hair

smackaholic wrote: ↑Sun Mar 02, 2025 3:13 am But one thing is pretty certain. IB's apparent assertion that pretty much everyone south of Scandinavia is balck, is pretty damn ridiculous.

Key points about chimpanzee and human DNA:

High similarity:
The vast majority of DNA sequences between humans and chimpanzees are identical, leading to the "99% similar" statement.

Small differences with big impact:
While the overall DNA similarity is high, the small differences in genetic code are responsible for the significant phenotypic variations between humans and chimpanzees.

Common ancestor:
This high level of genetic similarity indicates that humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor that lived several million years ago.

Meat Head wrote: ↑Sun Mar 02, 2025 2:03 pm I think it is pretty probable that most all "whites" have a little bit of "that" gene. Even if you are an eskimo.... Kabloonas were not all white either.