So I suppose moneybags (we'll use Bill Gates) should pay this person's salary for years, pay for this person's training, and pay for the equiptment and office space that this person uses to create a product, yet in the end should release the individual creator of all legal obligations and allow him to reap all financial rewards. Um...mix in an Econ 101 class, please.When Moneybags employees come up with an innovation, Moneybags himself is rewarded by the government with copyright laws, patents, trademarks which restricts ideas and protects him from competition from his enemy, Mr. Cashbox. (think of all the innovators Microsoft has made 'deals' with).
Big shock that the President of the Soviet Fan Club would be a fan of copying another person's work for your own gain.It's true that some workers make big money off brilliant inventions, but the vast majority of creators and innovators are hindered or completely prevented from doing their work at all because of copyrights, or don't have the business sense to leverage their creation properly.
Yet any person who had knowledge of all three countries' medical programs would choose to have their affliction treated in the USA 100% of the time. They can keep their pioneering bovine treatments of hemorroids and use of dog placenta to treat cancer. I'd rather be treated by aCreation is human nature, not invisible people nature. It's been that way before Capitalism and now. All you have to do is look at the accomplishments of the Soviet Union and Cuba (in terms of medical research) to prove that money has almost nil to do with motivation.
doctor than 2005's version of Dr. Mengele.real
