Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 10:35 am
by Diogenes
mvscal wrote:Headhunter wrote:Cowboys 28
Amazing. You clowns have what? Two wins in the last three years on the road and now you're just going waltz in and score 28 points?!?
Riiiight.
With your secondary?
Not a problem.
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 10:50 am
by Diogenes
orcinus wrote:Diogenes wrote:Cowboys will focus on stopping LT
So beautiful on paper.
And if Brees had one decent reciever to pass to, LT would have a 100+ yards easy against this team.
Unfortunatly for you, Gates isn't playing.
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:18 pm
by Joe in PB
Bwhaha look a Tardinals fan, I didn't think there were any of those around. You must have quite a nose Diogenes, the stench permeating out of AZ the last 10 years would make New Orleans smell like a candy factory.
Talk about holes, have you checked to see who's your starting QB?
Warner will be sacked 6-8 times Vs the Giants, not to mention his ball still flutters like a pigeon with a broken wing.
McCown will be the starter by week 7.
But will it matter?
Probably not, and in a weak NFC.....but at least you'll have the usual amount of time (4 qtrs) to check out the cheerleaders.....
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:04 pm
by Cross Traffic
Chargers 27
Boys 10
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:07 pm
by ChargerMike
^^^^^^^^
...I'll take zip for 200 Alex.
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:07 pm
by Headhunter
They're the worlds foremost authority on getting their asses kicked by the Cowboys.
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:28 pm
by atomicdad
Well, at least they have that going for them.
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:56 pm
by Diogenes
mvscal wrote:Diogenes wrote:mvscal wrote:
Amazing. You clowns have what? Two wins in the last three years on the road and now you're just going waltz in and score 28 points?!?
Riiiight.
With your secondary?
Not a problem.
What the fuck does a Cardinal fan who's lived in San Diego the last 20 years know....about anything?
More than you, obviously.
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:07 pm
by Diogenes
Joe in PB wrote:Bwhaha look a Tardinals fan, I didn't think there were any of those around. You must have quite a nose Diogenes, the stench permeating out of AZ the last 10 years would make New Orleans smell like a candy factory.
Living in San Diego, I haven't noticed.
It must be the stench of your suckass team that blocks it out.
You've had you're decannual trip to the playoffs, back to normal now.
Talk about holes, have you checked to see who's your starting QB?
Warner will be sacked 6-8 times Vs the Giants, not to mention his ball still flutters like a pigeon with a broken wing.
McCown will be the starter by week 7.
Dream on, loser.
But will it matter?
Probably not, and in a weak NFC.....but at least you'll have the usual amount of time (4 qtrs) to check out the cheerleaders.....
Weak NFC?
The only reason the Dolts manage to back into the playoffs once a decade is the overall suckage of your division.
Put the Cards in that bitch, they're a perrenial playoff contender too.
The fact they've sucked the last few years notwithstanding.
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:10 pm
by Diogenes
mvscal wrote:What? Is the game over?
Idiot.
No, it's still thursday.
And your secondary will still look like the Aztecs' second string come Sunday.
Moron.
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:21 pm
by Joe in PB
The only reason the Dolts manage to back into the playoffs once a decade is the overall suckage of your division.
Put the Cards in that bitch, they're a perrenial playoff contender too.
WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined sniffing glue is detrimental to mental health. Possible side effect include drooling, scrotum shrinkage and becoming a Cardinals fan.
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:09 pm
by jackass007
I must agree that the Dolts kinda won that division by default last year, not by being the best team, but not sucking as bad as the rest of the division. and proved my point by sucking the glass cock vs the J-E-T-S jets, jets ,jets in the playoffs
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:30 pm
by Diogenes
Joe in PB wrote:The only reason the Dolts manage to back into the playoffs once a decade is the overall suckage of your division.
Put the Cards in that bitch, they're a perrenial playoff contender too.
WARNING: The Surgeon General has determined sucking cock is detrimental to mental health. Possible side effect include drooling, scrotum shrinkage and becoming a Chargers fan.
Didn't know about the scrotum shrinkage, but I'll take your word on it.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:07 am
by atomicdad
Addendum, DF, I want you to agree that you you will not bs on the length of the sig or the content of said sig as some pussy posters here, (ahem, Paul Walker Lindh), have in the past.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:42 am
by DallasFanatic
hell no adad....I honor every bet down to a tee....but you don't have to worry about me... :D
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:05 pm
by Headhunter
mvscal wrote:Headhunter wrote:Cowboys 28
Amazing. You clowns have what? Two wins in the last three years on the road and now you're just going waltz in and score 28 points?!?
Riiiight.
Yeah, you're right. That won't happen!
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:15 pm
by Loganfan
Very unhappy with the bolt's play.
too many stupid penalties
not enough LT......
Marty outcoached by the Tuna
CERTAINLY LT should have been given the ball at least ONCE on that last series, since they still had a time out left.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 2:36 pm
by jackass007
Loganfan wrote:CERTAINLY LT should have been given the ball at least ONCE on that last series, since they still had a time out left.
Yeah, he was just kicking ass all game :roll:
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:06 pm
by Loganfan
jackass007 wrote:Loganfan wrote:CERTAINLY LT should have been given the ball at least ONCE on that last series, since they still had a time out left.
Yeah, he was just kicking ass all game :roll:
He touched the ball 18 times...... :roll:
Not nearly enough for him, genius.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 4:11 pm
by Joe in PB
Props to the Cowboys. The better team and defense won.
No excuses here.
God Damn that was hard.......
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 8:15 pm
by jackass007
Joe in PB wrote:Props to the Cowboys. The better team and defense won.
No excuses here.
God Damn that was hard.......
Now why can't Chargermike flush the sand out of his vagina and say the same thing, instead of "we beat ourselves" bullshit..
Doesn't he know the bad karma he's unleashing on his team?
Props to you PB, but I guess your aunts second cousins brother didn't get it right about Glover's predictions this year
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 8:23 pm
by jiminphilly
Headhunter wrote:mvscal wrote:Headhunter wrote:Cowboys 28
Amazing. You clowns have what? Two wins in the last three years on the road and now you're just going waltz in and score 28 points?!?
Riiiight.
Yeah, you're right. That won't happen!
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 8:45 pm
by jiminphilly
mvscal wrote:Yeah that fucking figures. 2-14 here we come.
Playoffs?!? Playoffs?!?
When does Brees get the hook? LT didn't avg 4 yards a game last year nor did he do it yesterday. Is this a trend the Chargers need to worry about?
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:11 pm
by ChargerMike
jackass007 wrote:Joe in PB wrote:Props to the Cowboys. The better team and defense won.
No excuses here.
God Damn that was hard.......
Now why can't Chargermike flush the sand out of his vagina and say the same thing, instead of "we beat ourselves" bullshit..
Doesn't he know the bad karma he's unleashing on his team?
Props to you PB, but I guess your aunts second cousins brother didn't get it right about Glover's predictions this year
Jackass, I asked you nicely to quit embarrassing yourself....I should have realized, that's an impossibility....
Here are my comment on the Bolt's loss, apparently you're reading the tripe in your dome instead of what I actually penned..
1>>Raider-like penalties gave the game to Dallas, and the Bolt's only need look in the mirror as to why they lost. Additionally, Bleedsoe drilled our secondary senseless, and it had nothing to do with JJ. He was dropped behind the line 15 times today.
2>>It's 1 win against a mediocre team...Exactly
3>>You don't blame a loss on "them penalties"....our secondary committed THOSE penalties. The replays clearly showed Jammer was jamming half way down the field because he couldn't cover his man. They have rules to keep the game semi under control. You commit stupid penalties, you lose!
4>>We lost the game because our secondary couldn't cover a freekin dime with a bedspread.
Now..if that's not sacking up, then your dumber than you are ugly.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:22 pm
by Joe in PB
Jim I think the Bolts will end up trading Rivers and keeping Brees. Rivers might have more upside, but he's 2 seasons away from being able to run the offense as effectively as Drew. He's not as composed in the pocket & checks down almost every play, something Drew did quite frequently a couple of years ago.
The Charger pass defense sucks, not enough pressure or coverage. Bloodhole converting 64% on 3rd down and the team having no idea how to replace Gates or work the middle of the field in his absence is what killed them. Memo to Marty the moron, split LT out in the slot and have him work the middle of the field, then defenses won't blitz every play up the gut when Gates isn't in the line up. Fuck I'm pissed the team was ill prepared to deal with the self imposed loss of Gates......despite having weeks to prepare. :x
Agree with mvscal that Marty has gotten about as much as he's gong to get out of this team. The Chargers should have cleaned house before they used....make that... wasted last years top pick....who if they do trade, they'll be lucky to get a 3rd or 4th rder because of his salary.
End of rant.........
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 9:27 pm
by jackass007
As the owner of the Dallas cowboys I offer Roy Williams and Drew Henson for Phillip Rivers... You in?
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 10:41 pm
by War Wagon
ChargerMike wrote:
Now..if that's not sacking up...
I read your bitch/excuse list Mike, and no, that isn't sacking up.
Sacking up involves at least giving a teensy bit of props to the other team for showing up...something that you failed to do... miserably.
Shit man, even R-James has that part figured out.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:06 pm
by ChargerMike
War Wagon wrote:ChargerMike wrote:
Now..if that's not sacking up...
I read your bitch/excuse list Mike, and no, that isn't sacking up.
Sacking up involves at least giving a teensy bit of props to the other team for showing up...something that you failed to do... miserably.
Shit man, even R-James has that part figured out.
I think I mentioned that Bledsoe drilled our secondary silly, interpret that as you wish, but it certainly isn't ragging on them. Additionally, I thought Dallas brought a ton of pressure on D when it needed to, something Marty failed to do enough of in the 4th. qtr..
Both teams committed enough stupid penalties to hand the game to the other.
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:14 pm
by jackass007
^
l
l
l
Still a sacless cunt
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:27 pm
by ChargerMike
^^^^^^^^
Still spells at a 2nd. grade level....(no spell smack intended)
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2005 11:28 pm
by jackass007
you might wanna look that up zipperhead
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 12:06 am
by ChargerMike
Random House College Dictionary:
sac (sak) n. a baglike structure in an animal, plant, or fungus, esp. one containing fluid.
SAC n. Strategic Air Command
There, you stand corrected!
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2005 2:33 am
by jackass007
Right, you have no bag like structure..
now just admit MY team punked YOUR team and all will be right in the world!