T1B

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:52 pm m2, the Guillen family loves Trump. They’re voting for him.

Grief is a bitch. Would you want to believe that a President that said he would pay for your son's funeral. Then when your family isn't around... says he's not going to pay because it doesn't cost $60,000 to bury fucking "poor white trash"!

Psst... he NEVER paid the bill!

The family's attorney varified that Trump NEVER paid the bill.

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:52 pmI shot down your bullshit Atlantic story earlier.

No you didn't. And you obviously NEVER read the story as usual. if you did... I wouldn't have had to explain the first part to you.


As far as the Abraham Accords... it didn't start with Trump like you've been brainwashed to believe.
It started with the Obama administration. Watch the video and learn something.

The Seer wrote: ↑Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:41 pm Please list all the verifiable actions he performed in that capacity that suggest he's just like Hitler.

Well let’s just go down the long list, this might take a while. First of all, Dump is a known (fact-checked!) fascist, racist and homophobe of the Third Reich as far back as 1981 when he was instigating 30-minute book burning sessions in the parking lot after his sit downs with Oprah and Phil Donahue. He also consistently humiliates and denigrates persons from other countries who have walked across our borders without paperwork, but does not apply the same scrutiny to persons of similar nationalities who have completed their paperwork and obtained proper visas which is plain hypocrisy! I thought there were “good people on both sides” but apparently Schlump only likes people who file their paperwork on time and who are well scrubbed. This is completely in line with Hitler’s germaphobe tendencies and obsession with “papers please!”

Most glaringly, Glump’s economic policies are nearly identical to that of Adolph’s. To combat inflation and the horrors of depression, Adolph’s administration instituted price controls, wage controls and rent controls and ramped up threats of war to his continental neighbors so he could run a full-on military economy. This is the EXACT same thing that Flump did in his first term!! Wars everywhere! And Russian collusion!! Look it up, it’s true! Google it! Rachel Maddow exposed these truths on her show after one of Grump’s fake/staged assassination attempts! Hitler also faked his own assassination twice in the 1930s, while giving a speech and playing (frisbee) golf.

Blump promised to implement price controls to combat the inflation he himself caused in 2021-24, this policy is plastered all over his website. Actually, I digress a little bit, price controls was a smart move by Hitler and will be a smart move by Zie Troomp as it will bring equity to people of all races and creeds and will bury those stupid white trash farmers in the dirt where they belong.

But otherwise, Clump is a xenophobic member of the Nazi Socialist Party— he hates all Jews and Blacks and Transgenders and threatens to kill them by the thousands! Remember he said “blood bath”??? That’s what he was talking about! He also wants to be a dictator, just like he was in his first term and just like Hitler was in his first seven terms. The similarities are simply stunning, especially their shared economic policies!!!

General Peters wrote: ↑Wed Oct 23, 2024 12:08 pmI vote based on policies

Would you be so kind as to watch this video of trump and let us know what about that you support?

"Putin and the whole group. Kim Jong Un. They are tough guys out there. They're tough and they're smart and they're streetwise and they're at the top of their game."’

Roux wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2024 10:53 am Would you be so kind as to watch this video of trump and let us know what about that you support?

Spends first half of the video slurring his words, whining about Biden, then lauding authoritarians. Grandpa needs to be institutionalized. Fortunately after he loses the election, he'll have the change to get the mental health he needs when he's incarcerated.

Doesn’t Trump do enough to fuck himself over? But the left has to continue with their concocting bullshit.

From The Guardian:

Natalie Khawam, an attorney for the Guillén family, also disparaged the Atlantic piece and the author online.

“After having dealt with hundreds of reporters in my legal career, this is unfortunately the first time I have to go on record and call out Jeffrey Goldberg@the Atlantic: not only did he misrepresent our conversation but he outright LIED in HIS sensational story,” Khawam said. “More importantly, he used and exploited my clients, and Vanessa Guillen’s murder … for cheap political gain.”

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2024 2:38 pm Doesn’t Trump do enough to fuck himself over?

You would think so.

But considering that a significant percentage of Americans still support him, the sad truth is that no, trump has not yet done enough to fuck himself over.

Dump is a disgrace.
The GOP is a total disgrace for putting him up as a presidential nominee.

If your party (Dims) nominates a cr@p individual who cannot muster enough support to get over on that, then stop blaming the GOP and Dump voters.

This is on the Dims.

It is actually quite funny.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2024 9:16 pm Dump is a disgrace.
The GOP is a total disgrace for putting him up as a presidential nominee.

If your party (Dims) nominates a cr@p individual who cannot muster enough support to get over on that, then stop blaming the GOP and Dump voters.

This is on the Dims.

It is actually quite funny.

Exactly. If the Dems had even a decent candidate, they’d walk away with this election.

Actually, now that I think about it, the same could be said for the Republicans!

Once again, we have two horrible candidates. Trump’s policies I can get behind for the most part, but he’s a fuckin’ jerk and not bright.

Harris is pitiful and shouldn’t be in this position. Her positions are not remotely appealing except to warmongers and LGBTQers.

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2024 10:20 pm Harris is pitiful and shouldn’t be in this position. Her positions are not remotely appealing except to warmongers and LGBTQers.

Totally inaccurate— her positions are easy drives down the middle of the fairway for those of us economic valedictorians (like me, Diego and Screwy). We just don’t care for any of that “trickle down” stuff, it’s super cringy and we also don’t like Elon or Bezos because they aren’t paying their fair share. At least millionaires like Michelle and Oprah and DeNiro are providing real value to society.

Trumpers are getting desperate.


https://www.opb.org/article/2024/10/28/ ... vancouver/


Too funny.

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2024 10:20 pm Trump’s policies I can get behind for the most part

How about this one?

Roux wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:18 am

Sudden Sam wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2024 10:20 pm Trump’s policies I can get behind for the most part

How about this one?

I’m at 3:30 into it and no Trump policies have been mentioned. What are you referring to?

Not the video.

Read the article.

How much debt is acceptable?



What do you believe is appropriate under the circumstances? Should we increase the debt burden on future generations? Or should we pay down what we have borrowed so that the future generations are unburdened by what has been?

How do you pay down the trillions in debt? If you do, who is going to feel it the most?

You do realize that if you took all of the money from all of the billionaires, you wouldn't cover a fifth of the debt.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/20 ... 453346007/

Maybe cutting the spending on wars and social programs that have proven to be complete failures over the last 60 years would be a good start. Do you think that government spending is efficient and effective? You can bitch and stuff. But whatchagonnadoaboutit?

Roux wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 1:00 am Not the video.

Read the article.

I laughed.

That's going to leave Sam out.

Roux wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 1:00 am Not the video.

Read the article.

Ah, thanks.

Interesting. Getting our debt under control sounds good. I’m all for that. However, if his intent is to cut Social Security, I’d not be happy at all. I paid for that. That’s MY money. I can see lots of other cuts. There’s so much waste that could be cut out.

Yeah, it would be good for all of us if we had to tighten up a bit for the national good. However, Musk would have to be overseen closely.

Well now I'm curious as to Harris' plan is, if she has one.

Something to do for tomorrow, and I'll post what I find.

88 wrote:

It is actually up to almost 36 trillion now.

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 1:27 am How much debt is acceptable?



What do you believe is appropriate under the circumstances? Should we increase the debt burden on future generations? Or should we pay down what we have borrowed so that the future generations are unburdened by what has been?

How do you pay down the trillions in debt? If you do, who is going to feel it the most?

You do realize that if you took all of the money from all of the billionaires, you wouldn't cover a fifth of the debt.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/20 ... 453346007/

Maybe cutting the spending on wars and social programs that have proven to be complete failures over the last 60 years would be a good start. Do you think that government spending is efficient and effective? You can bitch and stuff. But whatchagonnadoaboutit?

Says the guy who wants more tax cuts for the rich.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:04 pm Says the guy who wants more tax cuts for the rich.

Although the rich pay far more than their fair share, when did I suggest tax cuts for the rich? You are a wind-up toy programmed to spew lies.

I want spending cuts. The U.S. does not have a tax revenue problem. The U.S. has a borrowing and spending problem.

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:09 pm Although the rich pay far more than their fair share, when did I suggest tax cuts for the rich? You are a wind-up toy programmed to spew lies.

I want spending cuts. The U.S. does not have a tax revenue problem. The U.S. has a borrowing and spending problem.

The US does not have a borrowing and spending problem. It only does to right wing cranks who want to use this phony concern as a weapon against social programs. Hope that helps.

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:09 pm
I want spending cuts. The U.S. does not have a tax revenue problem. The U.S. has a borrowing and spending problem.

Hear hear!

After Trump cut the corporate tax rate the IRS collected record revenue. Screwy wouldn't know this because nobody spelled it out in his alphabet soup or forced him to read a news article before he could have a pudding pop.

Please watch this.

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 2:35 pm

88BuckeyeGrad wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 12:09 pm
I want spending cuts. The U.S. does not have a tax revenue problem. The U.S. has a borrowing and spending problem.

Hear hear!

After Trump cut the corporate tax rate the IRS collected record revenue. Screwy wouldn't know this because nobody spelled it out in his alphabet soup or forced him to read a news article before he could have a pudding pop.

And that larger pool of tax revenue… hmmm… I wonder. I bet the top 1% wage earners covered 0% of it!

It was entirely paid into by the middle class and the poor. Because that’s what “trickle down” means to me!!

Roux wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 6:44 pm Please watch this.

I'll watch this if you agree to watch the full Rogan Trump interview.

Or even 1/2 of it, or 1/4 of it, or....

Oh wait, hold up. Your fascist party has forced Youtube to remove it. My bad.

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Wed Oct 30, 2024 7:52 pm
I'll watch this if you agree to watch the full Rogan Trump interview.

Or even 1/2 of it, or 1/4 of it, or....

Oh wait, hold up. Your fascist party has forced Youtube to remove it. My bad.

The Kimmel video is 20 min while the Dump interview is 3 hours long. Big difference there, champ.

Try a little harder not to suck so bad.

I'll watch 20 minutes of it.

You can even pick which 20 minutes.

Rack Arnold!


"I will always be an American before I am a Republican"

Photo of the year

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 12:41 am Photo of the year

Indeed.

Trolling Level: Expert

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 2:43 am The Dump Truck Story is hilarious.

Actually, it is yet another example that he is too old.

Roux wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 11:52 am

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 2:43 am The Dump Truck Story is hilarious.

Actually, it is yet another example that he is too old.

I hope Dump gets the mental help he needs when he's incarcerated.

Carson wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 5:39 am Indeed.

Trolling Level: Expert

Well, if your stupid party wouldn't keep calling us names, we wouldn't have to do this.

Biden hates Harris, and wants her to lose.

Yes, trump had to do that. Really, he did.

Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 6:18 pm Well, if your stupid party wouldn't keep calling us names, we wouldn't have to do this.

Biden hates Harris, and wants her to lose.

Does the word "scum" ring a bell?

HighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Thu Oct 31, 2024 2:43 am The Dump Truck Story is hilarious.

Do you find this hilarious as well?

Damnit how is it possible that so many of you continue to support this historically horrible candidate?

How low is too low? Is there anything at all that he could say that would make you think 'hey he's finally gone too far now'?

This is absolutely 100% wrong, especially coming from a presidential candidate.