Re: Trump/GOP bullshit
Posted: Thu May 10, 2018 3:52 pm
Nice meltdown.
http://www.kpbs.org/news/2018/may/09/tr ... -ask-bord/Trump Fact Check: San Diego County Did Not Ask For Border Wall
President Trump said Wednesday that San Diego has asked him to start building its section of the border wall; a San Diego County spokesman told KPBS that the county has not made any such request.
The San Diego County Board of Supervisors did vote to support a federal lawsuit against California sanctuary laws last month, but that didn’t include a request for the wall.
"This county has taken no action with regard to the wall," said County spokesman Michael Workman.
The projects in question involve replacing 14 miles of primary border fencing along San Diego County's border, and eventually 14 miles of secondary fencing that runs parallel to the main fence. Congress authorized funding for fiscal years 2017 and 2018.
A spokesman for San Diego sector's Border Patrol said the agency was aware of "nothing new" in regards to the projects and that they do not yet have a start date for construction.
Here’s what President Trump told reporters in the White House:
“San Diego has asked us to go forward with their section of the wall in California.”
A White House official told KPBS on background that the president might have been referring to some San Diego area residents.
Joe in PB wrote:
Joe in PB wrote:
Don't melt too hard, snowflake....
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-FfS0HNk2pQc/ ... /Yikes.gif
If they're blind, how would they read the question? That's one of the most difficult rank 'em photos I've ever seen.88 wrote:Only you would ask a question so insensitive to blind people.Diego in Seattle wrote:Can anyone see the problem with this picture?
Diego in Seattle wrote:40% of military personnel are non-white. Why isn't that reflected in this picture?
And this event was to celebrate "Military Spouse Appreciation Day." Where are the husbands?
Just because nobody cares about you doesn't mean that they don't care about anything else.Sirfindafold wrote:Diego in Seattle wrote:40% of military personnel are non-white. Why isn't that reflected in this picture?
And this event was to celebrate "Military Spouse Appreciation Day." Where are the husbands?
nobody cares.
And that has what to do with excluding balcks and men from this event?Papa Willie wrote:Diego in Seattle wrote:40% of military personnel are non-white. Why isn't that reflected in this picture?
And this event was to celebrate "Military Spouse Appreciation Day." Where are the husbands?
White Americans (including White Hispanics) constitute the majority, with a total of about 246,660,710, or 77.35% of the population as of 2014.
Stop projecting.Feel stupid now? You should.
Look at their legs. They're at least 75% white.Papa Willie wrote:
White Americans (including White Hispanics) constitute the majority, with a total of about 246,660,710, or 77.35% of the population as of 2014.
Feel stupid now? You should.
I don't know if anyone feels stupid, but you look like a complete moron.Papa Willie wrote:Diego in Seattle wrote:40% of military personnel are non-white. Why isn't that reflected in this picture?
And this event was to celebrate "Military Spouse Appreciation Day." Where are the husbands?
White Americans (including White Hispanics) constitute the majority, with a total of about 246,660,710, or 77.35% of the population as of 2014.
Feel stupid now? You should.
Please provide a link showing no minorities were invited.Diego in Seattle wrote:The Princess Royal & Kellyanne Conway hosted a "Military Spouse Appreciation Day" event at the White House.
Can anyone see the problem with this picture?
This thread has over 800 replies and over 4,000 views. Go fuck yourself, snowflake.Joe in PB wrote:This thread, complain about Trump daily deserves the Trots treatment.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tardtalk
You're right, I did find a releavent take.
You can't even spell "relevant", you fucking halfwit.Joe in PB wrote:You're right, I did find a releavent take.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Again, 800+ replies, 4,000+ views. You really aren't very smart.Joe in PB wrote:I can spell irrelevant, which applies to you, & this thread.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tardtalk
Somebody's getting really good at KHOA here.Joe in PB wrote:I can spell irrelevant, which applies to you, & this thread.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
And you are still a slack-jawed fuckwit, who has never even sniffed progress.Joe in PB wrote:But you're a good proof reader and would make an above average secretary, so we have made progress.
Yeah, the basketball players earned their positions. It has nothing to do with race. You wear your stupidity proudly, like it's some kind of badge.Papa Willie wrote:He was bringing up a stupid "there's not enough minorities in the picture" scenario, so I responded with one that hopefully he could understand. I didn't expect you to get it, you inbred ball of cunt.Goober McTuber wrote:I don't know if anyone feels stupid, but you look like a complete moron.Papa Willie wrote:White Americans (including White Hispanics) constitute the majority, with a total of about 246,660,710, or 77.35% of the population as of 2014.
Feel stupid now? You should.
Damn that fucking black privilege.Papa Willie wrote:And you're too fucking stupid to understand that perhaps those white people earned their spots as well.Goober McTuber wrote:Yeah, the basketball players earned their positions. It has nothing to do with race. You wear your stupidity proudly, like it's some kind of badge.
You are wrong. As per usual. Your item was stupid and in no way relevant to the discussion. And if you have a problem with me voicing my opinion, that's just so terribly amusing.Papa Willie wrote:Both items presented were stupid. I responded to DiS's statement with (again) something I thought he might grasp. You injected yourself into the conversation like a fag. No surprise.Goober McTuber wrote:Damn that fucking black privilege.
Once those people made it through basic they earned a spot for their spouses. And 40% of them are minorities.Papa Willie wrote:And you're too fucking stupid to understand that perhaps those white people earned their spots as well. Don't be such a jizz-coated liberal.Goober McTuber wrote:Yeah, the basketball players earned their positions. It has nothing to do with race. You wear your stupidity proudly, like it's some kind of badge.
Well since you are posting it, my first thought was that was way too much pussy in one spot for your brain to handle. Then I read a few most posts and see that your point was actually there was not any balcks in there. There are no dudes in their either you one trick pony faggot. Why not take up the cause for the gays too ?? I guess one or two of them could be pussy eating bull dykes, but one of them would have to be a " person of color".Diego in Seattle wrote:The Princess Royal & Kellyanne Conway hosted a "Military Spouse Appreciation Day" event at the White House.
Can anyone see the problem with this picture?
I didn't see any men in that picture either.Diego in Seattle wrote:40% of military personnel are non-white. Why isn't that reflected in this picture?
And this event was to celebrate "Military Spouse Appreciation Day." Where are the husbands?
He already did -- almost 20 years ago.Papa Willie wrote: Why don't you run to Washington and cry?
So, we are all in agreement then. For whatever reason, balck dudes tend to make better basketball players. There is a genetic factor.Goober McTuber wrote:
Yeah, the basketball players earned their positions. It has nothing to do with race. You wear your stupidity proudly, like it's some kind of badge.
It is likely a white guy getting the snot beat out of him by the police doesn't make the news, so who really knows how often it happens? If true that blacks are on the wrong end of a police baton more often, I don't believe it has anything to do with genetics. More like an environment where blacks don't have good parents as mentors, dilapidated schools and neighborhoods, and the NAACP setting the bar low & making excuses for underachievement. Leading to more crime and distrust of police.So, we are all in agreement then. For whatever reason, balck dudes tend to make better basketball players. There is a genetic factor.
Given this assumption, might it be possible that white dudes are simply better at not getting themselves in a situation where they end up on the wrong end of a police beating?
smackaholic wrote: Seems like libtard has no problem accepting that balck dude on average, is simply a better athlete, but completely unwilling to accept that there are areas where they are a little behind other groups.
No, we are not all in agreement. The fact that a particular race is dominant in a particular area is not proof that genetics are the cause, so your conclusion is unsubstantiated. I'm not saying it may not be true or at least that genetics may be a significant contributor, but other factors may be more to blame.smackaholic wrote:So, we are all in agreement then. For whatever reason, balck dudes tend to make better basketball players. There is a genetic factor.
It has been known since the 70s that in general blacks have more fast twitch muscle in their legs than other races. Which is why they dominate track and field sprinting events, and are better in basketball because they also jump higher/are great leapers.Smackie Chan wrote:No, we are not all in agreement. The fact that a particular race is dominant in a particular area is not proof that genetics are the cause, so your conclusion is unsubstantiated.