T1B

Wagon Wank, do you actually suckle on the scrotum of Tony Snowjob and Charles Krauntenhammer? Are you really such a Ditto-head retread that you actually believe the drivel you spew (in tiny rivulets--you don't dare flesh out ONE of your silly spins)?

Look:

Militarily--the U.S. army is NOT prepared to fight anywhere. We're bogged down in a gigantic quagmire at present--the vast majority of the soldiers want OUT NOW. America has never fought a war with a volunteer army--except WWII, and then we only won with NUKES on civilian targets.

Economically--The U.S. is currently carrying the most indebted nation in the history of the known universe--and with the astronomical "defense" spending ($10 Billion per month on the Quagmire alone) it's only getting MUCH worse.

Morally--America used to be the beacon of Individual Liberties and Civil Rights. Now we're the rogue fascistic marauder, blatantly ignoring international law and steamrolling our own constitution and Bill of Rights.

Environmentally--This administration seems to hate the earth, in short. Perhaps this is the "James Watt" factor ("When the last tree falls, Christ will return"--actual quote), or perhaps just swine-like greed.

Politically--the Chimp n' Cheney cabal has polarized American politics to an unprecedented level. Through their minions like Rusp Limpdick, they've actually tried to villify the ENTIRE mainstream media. This is VERY much in the style of the German National Socialists of 1934.


So, you're "rebuttal" is a joke--easily swatted like a dying fly--and of course this grotesque excuse for a president stumbles on into infamy and further disgrace.

You must be the most depressed mutha fucka on the planet. I bet you have no friends. Who the fuck would want to have listen to your cuntflaps, queef like a bitch, all day long?


Your life as a citizen has not gotten any worse since Bush took office. Gore or Kerry would have had to face the same 9/11, stock market hit and war on terror. I guarantee if I dropped you off over in Asia, the Middle East, or Europe that in 6 months time you would be begging to come back here.

LTS TRN 2 wrote: ...and of course this grotesque excuse for a president stumbles on into infamy and further disgrace.

You're an hysterical buffoon, plain and simple. Your mindless rantings aren't even worth a serious response.

Perhaps you should stand on a busy street corner somewhere wearing a sign that says "Prepare To Meet Thy Doom - The End Is Near!!!" and screaming at the top of your lungs that it's all Bush's fault.

Maybe then someone will pay attention to you rather than just ruefully shake their head that such an alarmist miscreant has access to the internet.

Then again, you'd probably get doused with a bag of piss, so I can see why you're here instead.

BSmack wrote:Bush doesn't support gay marraige. Therefore he is as immoral as you can get.

Dumbest take ever.


Buttfucker 'marriage' has only come into being in this generation of human existence.
Throughout ALL time, in ALL places, it has never been.
All people, in all time have therefore been 'as immoral as you can get' ... ?

It is only now, when the mush-brains have convinced enough of the other mush-brains, that buttfucking men ought to be considered married if they want to, have we risen out of our immorality as human beings...?

Sick.

poptart wrote:

BSmack wrote:Bush doesn't support gay marraige. Therefore he is as immoral as you can get.

Dumbest take ever.

Only to a hate filled "Christain".

If you think only 'hate-filled Christians' would laugh at the blatant stupidity of your take you've just squared your idiocy.

BSmack wrote:

poptart wrote:

BSmack wrote:Bush doesn't support gay marraige. Therefore he is as immoral as you can get.

Dumbest take ever.

Only to a hate filled "Christain".

I am about as non religeous as a person can be....and I don't support gay marriage. Personally the thought of the government being at all concerned with a group of people that share a fetish is mind blowing. They are less then 1% of the population. Oh and spare me the genetics crap. Can you tell me how gays pass on their genetics?

I think too much is made of this. We have far greater problems to deal with than a bunch of genetic dead ends who want to validate themselves.


However, I would love to see how Bsmack spins himself out of this take:

Bush doesn't support gay marraige. Therefore he is as immoral as you can get.

are you just trolling, or do you actually see some logic train there? I suppose it depends on how you define the word Immoral, but going with the standard widely accepted definition of the word immoral, I don't see where you're going with this one.

Neely8 wrote:I am about as non religeous as a person can be....and I don't support gay marriage. Personally the thought of the government being at all concerned with a group of people that share a fetish is mind blowing. They are less then 1% of the population. Oh and spare me the genetics crap. Can you tell me how gays pass on their genetics?

Apparently the concept of genetic mutation is beyond you?

BSmack wrote:

Neely8 wrote:I am about as non religeous as a person can be....and I don't support gay marriage. Personally the thought of the government being at all concerned with a group of people that share a fetish is mind blowing. They are less then 1% of the population. Oh and spare me the genetics crap. Can you tell me how gays pass on their genetics?

Apparently the concept of genetic mutation is beyond you?

So homosexuals are mutants?

Neely8 wrote:Can you tell me how gays pass on their genetics?

I can.

First off, if homosexuality IS genetic, it could be caused by a recessive allele, which would mean that it could be "masked" by a dominant "heterosexual" allele and passed down for generations. This is basically how lethal traits like hemophilia could get passed down through families.

Another possibility is that sexuality is a polygenetic trait, meaning that several different genes actually control a spectrum of sexuality. Polygenic traits are things like eye color (the old "big B is brown eyes, little b is blue eyes, and solve kids' possible eye colors with a four-box Punnett square" model is frigging WRONG).

Another strong possibility is that because many (most?) societies had/have strong taboos regarding same-sex coupling, that since the dawn of civilization, homosexuals have closeted themselves and assumed hetero identities - marrying and producing offspring....and thus passing down the trait. If this continued long enough, the trait would be widespread enough to be prevalent in most cultures at some low level, with its 'open expression' now being permitted in the recent stages of history.

Of course, this assumes that homosexuality/heterosexuality is genetic, and the fact remains that the scientific jury is still out on that one. There is at this time no compelling, hard proof that human sexual 'preference' is genetic, merely correlations and speculations.

And even if it is genetic, there is absolutely nothing to stop some folks from considering it a genetic disease to be treated and cured, like cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anemia, Huntington's disease, etc.

And btw, all of you that can drink milk as adults - you're all frigging mutants. Not as cool as Magneto, but as someone who can't eat ice cream without taking a pill, IMO it's a useful genetic glitch.

Now.....back to your rants.

I think that psychologists/psychiatrists did a
huge disfavor when they summarily eliminated
homosexuality from the list of mental malfunctions.
Sexuality is such a powerful emotional part of our
psyches that one cannot discount the possibility that
early life experiences have on its development.
Which is one reason i think impriniting plays a huge
role in human sexuality.

mvscal wrote:So why should mutant perverts be given special treatment?

Perversion is in the eye of the beholder.

It's not in my eye, that's for sure.

BSmack wrote:

The Seer wrote:Worst. President. Ever.



Not even close.

Billy Carter's stupid brother....

I think we already covered why even the Federalist Society doesn't agree with your take.

BTW: Carter's hostage strategy worked a lot better than Reagan's.

Go easy on him, Bri.

A good percentage of this board has had its entire reason for being a Republican, i.e., the belief that it is undiputed that Carter was the worst President ever, blown out of the water here. Keep pushing the issue, and their heads might explode.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:Go easy on him, Bri.

A good percentage of this board has had its entire reason for being a Republican, i.e., the belief that it is undiputed that Carter was the worst President ever, blown out of the water here. Keep pushing the issue, and their heads might explode.

You say that like it's a bad thing?

mvscal wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:, the belief that it is undiputed that Carter was the worst President ever, blown out of the water here.

Link?

B Smack posted one earlier. And it was hardly a source that's likely to give Carter the benefit of the doubt.