T1B

Asking for explainations after ducking every single question that's been asked of you in this thread?

Awesome.

OK...ONCE AGAIN...


At which times do you believe it is acceptable to aim a firearm in the general direction of a human head?


I even gave you the NRA's answer to this question to help you with your research, but now I'm interested in YOUR answer.


Fire away. It's the issue that is at the center of this discussion(aka "beating"), yet you won't adress it.

Wonder why that is?

Hey Bri, just ignore for a minute that the pic is of Al Gore, ok ... ?

And forget that anyone is trying to make any point other than that a soldier is mishandling a weapon.

Can we get to that point ... ?



Is the soldier in the pic mishandling a weapon ... ?


y or n ?

<OBJECTIVE COMMENTARY>
I think BSmack is implying that the weapon's barrel is not pointed at his head. While it might LOOK like it's pointing there .... it might not actually be.

Meanwhile the vast majority of people who have handled weapons are suggested it's poor form, no matter what it looks like.
<OBJECTIVE COMMENTARY>





I'll offer an answer to Master Dinsdale's question .....

"It is acceptable to aim a firearm in the general direction of a human head when you plan on killing owner of said human head".

Dinsdale wrote:At which times do you believe it is acceptable to aim a firearm in the general direction of a human head?

Again, I don't see the gun aimed at Gore's head. I see it tilted to the side.



Notice how Gore is clearly leaning to the right?

Notice also how Gore's hands are both on the strap? Yet the gun barrel is clearly outside the scope of Gore's hands?

But hey, I'm sure the drugs are better up in the U&L.

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:You're looking at one picture, frozen in time, and presuming that Gore did not check the chamber?

Tears Jerry. Tears.

Yes, I'm going to presume that he did not clear the chamber. In that one photo alone there are two very serious safety violations that would get you tossed from any range on the planet, so there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to believe that he suddenly remembered to clear the chamber.

That wasn't a firing range, that was in the field. Under God knows what conditions.

He was a Gomer. You're just going to have to deal with it. Christ, he makes Dubya look like Sgt. York.

Yea, that Dubya sure did make Austin safe from the Viet Cong.

Tom In VA wrote: "It is acceptable to aim a firearm in the general direction of a human head when you plan on killing owner of said human head".

We have a winner!

BASIC GUN SAFETY RULES - Anyone who touches a firearm should know these by heart.


1. Treat every firearm as if it were loaded.

2. Never allow the muzzle to point at anything you are not willing to see destroyed.

BSmack wrote:Notice how Gore is clearly leaning to the right?

I notice you bending over and leaning forward.

Gee, Pop...when you put it that way, and take it out of context, that becomes some serious sig material.

Dins,

I'm going to give you one last chance to back away from the dittotard propaganda.

BSmack wrote:

B, anybody handling a gun like that should not be handling weapons of any kind.....ever........

end of story......

BSmack wrote:I'm going to give you one last chance to back away from the dittotard propaganda.

Holy. Fucking. Shit.


OK, I know this will be ignored, but I'll give it a whirl anyway --

Would you care to quote where I bought into any "dittotard propaganda?"

Uhm...I'll take your answer off the air?



Let today be known as the day that BSmack decided that proper handling of firearms is now a partisan political issue.


And if that's the case, then kiss my ass and call me the Senate Majority Leader. I guess it's off to the voter registration office for me.


LONG LIVE RONALD REAGAN!!!! GOD BLESS THE GOP!!!!!



Never thought I'd say that in a million years....but apparently someone put a gun to my head and made me do it.

Felix wrote:

BSmack wrote:

B, anybody handling a gun like that should not be handling weapons of any kind.....ever........

end of story......

OK Pinky, you're buying into this garbage as well? Shouldn't you know by now that things (like your picture) can easily be wytched?

Allow me to demonstrate...







:wink:

When you use that super close-up shot it looks like there's some 'fluid' on his upper right thigh.


sayin'

Well it's obvious someone was gunning for AL.

I've never seen a more apt messageboard moment to drop a
































:facepalm:

:facepalm: ing is part of the vast right wing conspiracy

mvscal wrote:

Mister Bushice wrote:Well it's obvious someone was gunning for AL.

Yeah...Al.

Even if everything BDumbfuck said was true and algore was in no absolutely no danger at all, it means that he wasn't trusted with ammunition while out in the field...and you can see why.

Which brings us back to the inevitable conclusion that he was a complete Gomer.

A classic example of if A=B then B=C logic if I ever saw it. You have no way to ascertain that fact, but you spew it as if it were.

If there is an ABC to this thread it's in your basket.

Already Been Cornholed

I would hardly expect someone who belives in fairy tales like Noah's Ark and Creation "Science" to understand that he is being lied to.

The best pile-ons are always the ones where the pile-ee insists they're right, all the way to the end.


Beautiful.

mvscal wrote:Actually the formula is: blah blah blah

Then why is Gore looking to his left as he is leaning right? If he was looking down the barrel of the gun, he would be looking TOWARDS the camera.

Why is it so hard to accept that Al Gore was looking down the barrel of a gun in that pic? He did exactly the same in the 2000 election campaign.

mvscal wrote:It's pointed straight in his fucking face.

Only in your fantasy world.

Just some food for thought.

No clip, what me worry

10:51 a.m. June 2, 2006

SAN DIEGO – A man who brought an assault rifle to a Mount Hope auto shop accidentally shot and wounded a 17-year-old co-worker Friday morning as he was showing the gun off.

The shooting happened at Fleet Supply Inc. on Market Street near 41st Street at 8:21 a.m., said San Diego police Detective Gary Hassen.

Advertisement
The 42-year-old man who brought the Kalashnikov rifle, commonly known as an AK-47, to work did not know the gun was loaded, Hassen said.

There was no ammunition clip in the gun, but it still had a round in the chamber that discharged when the man pulled the trigger, police said.

The teenager was hospitalized with wounds to his right hip and left buttock, police said.

The gun's owner was arrested on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon.

No one else was injured in the incident, police said.

What up Bri, you seem to be more obtuse than your usual self today. The wife promise you sex last night but you fell asleep watching the Spelling B before you could do the deed?

atomicdad wrote:Just some food for thought.

No clip, what me worry

Doin the A=B=C thing as well eh? Of course nobody said that you shouldn't clear the chamber. But hey, let's not let facts get in the way now.

B, just providing an up to date story showing that rounds may still be in a chamber after the clip is removed.

You are the one using the Already Been Cornholed* logic by assuming that Gore cleared the chamber before he leaned his melon near the business end of his gun disregarding common sense gun safety.


*RACK Poptart, that was a good one

I must have missed something...


since when is it cool to point a firearm at or near a human head, regardless whether one has checked the chamber or not?

Did I miss something?


And as far as your stupid fucking "it's pointed to the side" argument...


His head isn't turned up and behind him. He has no way of verifying whether it is aimed at any of his fellow soldiers' heads or not.


Yup...still in violation of Rule #1, regardless whether it's aimed directly at his melon or not, and regardless whether he checked the chamber or not.

PSUFAN wrote:Why is it so hard to accept that Al Gore was looking down the barrel of a gun in that pic? He did exactly the same in the 2000 election campaign.

finally. welcome aboard.

Al leans to the left, then leans to the right,
I wish he ate a bullet and did it right!

Dinsdale wrote:I must have missed something...since when is it cool to point a firearm at or near a human head, regardless whether one has checked the chamber or not?

Did I miss something?

And as far as your stupid fucking "it's pointed to the side" argument... His head isn't turned up and behind him. He has no way of verifying whether it is aimed at any of his fellow soldiers' heads or not.

What other soldiers? There's no other humans in the picture. Unless there was a Huey directly overhead, he wasn't aiming that weapon at any human beings.

Al was just getting the proper photos taken for his article about properly prepping the small bore mortar launcher in the battlefield. You'll notice he's leaning away from the tube.

BSmack wrote: What other soldiers? There's no other humans in the picture. Unless there was a Huey directly overhead, he wasn't aiming that weapon at any human beings.

You really just don't fucking get it, do you?

Take a gun safety course sometime, and get back to us. You might then agree with...let's see....every single person in this thread who has.

Maybe there isn't any humans in the direction that weapon is aimed. The part you're not catching on to, is that IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER.

Not sure why this mystifies you so much, apart from sheer stupidity.

He's not looking in the direction the barrel is aimed. He has no way of knowing what it's aoimed at. Period. Non-negotiable. That JUST IS NOT DONE. EVER.

Not sure which part of that you're struggling with...seriously.

He is in violation of gun safety rule #1. Period. End of fucking story. Just because it's convenient for you to rewrite the rules of gun safety that have been in place for over a century because it's convenient for the sake of your (moronic) argument, it doesn't make it so.


Sorry, bud. If you aren't looking that way, you don't aim a gun that way...ever. And in that pic, he is CLEARLY(your word of the day) not looking in the direction his weapon is aimed...just NOT DONE.

Dinsdale wrote:

BSmack wrote: What other soldiers? There's no other humans in the picture. Unless there was a Huey directly overhead, he wasn't aiming that weapon at any human beings.

You really just don't fucking get it, do you?

Take a gun safety course sometime, and get back to us. You might then agree with...let's see....every single person in this thread who has.

Maybe there isn't any humans in the direction that weapon is aimed. The part you're not catching on to, is that IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER.

Not sure why this mystifies you so much, apart from sheer stupidity.

He's not looking in the direction the barrel is aimed. He has no way of knowing what it's aoimed at. Period. Non-negotiable. That JUST IS NOT DONE. EVER.

Not sure which part of that you're struggling with...seriously.

He is in violation of gun safety rule #1. Period. End of fucking story. Just because it's convenient for you to rewrite the rules of gun safety that have been in place for over a century because it's convenient for the sake of your (moronic) argument, it doesn't make it so.


Sorry, bud. If you aren't looking that way, you don't aim a gun that way...ever. And in that pic, he is CLEARLY(your word of the day) not looking in the direction his weapon is aimed...just NOT DONE.

So you say he wasn't looking at the gun and mv thinks he was looking square down the barrel.

Mmmmmmmm.

How about you guys get your stories straight and get back to me after my round.

If I was beating my own ass as badly as you are right now, I'd look for any diversion I could, too.

My post was based on what YOU claim was going on in the pic.

My "story" isn't the slightest bit dependent on (or concerned with) what mvscal has to say.


But you definitely need to keep ducking and running at this point...you have no other choice, you're in it DEEP.

Brian,

It doesn’t even matter if he was looking straight down the barrel or if the bullet would have simply whizzed past his ear. He is obviously mis-handling the weapon. Gun safety class teaches you that. My son learned it at age 12. God, you are truly retarded to keep arguing the point.

Goober McTuber wrote:you are truly retarded to keep arguing the point.

SHHHHHH!!!!!!


This is pretty funny to anyone whose brain doesn't rattle around in their skull.


Don't stop him...he's on a roll.

Dinsdale wrote:If I was beating my own ass as badly as you are right now, I'd look for any diversion I could, too.

Trying to declare victory and leave?

Hey, it worked for Nixon.

My post was based on what YOU claim was going on in the pic. My "story" isn't the slightest bit dependent on (or concerned with) what mvscal has to say.

That being said, how do you explain how you and mv came to the exact opposite conclusion regarding where the weapon was being pointed? Kinda goes to my whole point which is that the picture cannot possibly tell the whole story.

PSUFAN wrote:Why is it so hard to accept that Al Gore was looking down the barrel of a gun in that pic? He did exactly the same in the 2000 election campaign.

RACK.

Then why is Gore looking to his left as he is leaning right? If he was looking down the barrel of the gun, he would be looking TOWARDS the camera.

Ok.... let's grant B Monica this... maybe Boy Wonder is not looking directly down the barrel, and it is off to the left of his dome a bit.

Can we talk about muzzle blast here ??

The weapon has a flash suppressor on it, so the actual fire from the barrel will be reduced, but there is a substantial amount of concussive shock, particulate projection and NOISE when and IF the weapon discharges.

Think he can skate on any injury from those problems B Monica ??

Remember, when that photo was taken, your "fearless war president" was doing coke and being pampered by his wealthy family.

Oh, wait....he was protecting the skies of Alabama from threat of Soviet bombers.

my bad...