T1B

Gaydar and RadioSoccerbitch hand and hand...whoda thunk it.

Archive!!!

Steve, seriously, bow out now, gracefully.

You're desperately trying to turn a pile on Polly thread into a pile on Steve thread, not a feat which many have been able to accomplish before.

Continue if you must, but this isn't going to go well.

WolverineSteve wrote:
Archive!!!

The only thing archiveworthy thus far is your meltage and threatening to kick my ass if im in your neck of the woods in that MLB forum thread.







P.S. Let me streamline it here-you'd lose, twat.

Sorry, stay on Polly. I'm trying to win a poker tourney right now but I'll be in MLB, or CFB if you need me.

Carry on.

WolverineSteve wrote:Sorry, stay on Polly. I'm trying to win a poker tourney right now but I'll be in MLB, or CFB if you need me.

Carry on.

You've been run, bitch.



..........and Poptart wasnt even in the building.



Fuckin' Ponderous.

RadioFan wrote: You're desperately trying to turn a pile on Polly thread...

Last I checked, this thread was about Ty Law now being a Chief. Paul, per usual, has brought the wood to this bonfire.

Where's this alleged "pile on" of brother Paul?

From you?



Here's a hint, skippy.

Paul is a charter fucking member of TDOTRF, and that's never going to change.

Take your weak-ass "pile-on" elsewhere, before it gets turned on YOU.

Raydah James wrote: Who the hell is "IndyFriscunt" and why should I give 2 fucks about this takeless slit again?

He tries to sells barbeque sauce on ebay and advertises here. Some folks actually buy that slop and then post about what a wonderful product it is. Ballsuckers, to say the least.

Hell, it may be the shit, but is this the place to advertise your wares?

Methinks IndyFriscoe took a wrong turn somewhere along the line when one his little CFB bitches PM'd him thinking they could step to the NFL forum...got all arrogant and stuff.

Well, Indy...welcome to the crucible.

Let's see what the fuck you have to say once the NFL season starts.

The wheat gets seperated from the chaff fairly quick.

War Myopia wrote:Where's this alleged "pile on" of brother Paul?

From you?

Nope, just an observation, Wags.

War Myopia wrote:Here's a hint, skippy.

Paul is a charter fucking member of TDOTRF, and that's never going to change.

Take your weak-ass "pile-on" elsewhere, before it gets turned on YOU.

Oh ... ok.



Wags, it was a good signing. Nothing more, nothing less. We'll all SEE.

Sept. 16 looks good on the College Football calender (as I posted in the CF forum), but it may suck ass.

Point is, Law's signing isn't an end-all/be-all, just as Sept. 16 isn't necessarily the end-all/be-all to CF.

P.S. RACK Indy for stirring things up in here.

Every team has the normal fans and the white trash fans. In KC, Whitey and RuPaul fall under the latter and the manbander RJ falls under that category for the Raiders. Hell, more than 90% of the fans of both the Chiefs and Raiders are fucking white trash. Whitey and FatPaul are WT personified. :wink:

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:

Dumbass wrote:

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Who the hell is "Polly"?

Point proven.

WRONG, fucko- you just don't get it. You haven't gotten it before, and you never will.

Yea, I don't get it.



Got any more quality jokes? That one's pretty funny.

I don't get it...me....yea, we believe that around here, especially coming from you.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You crack me up bro.

Wagon wrote:KC is now a legit SB contender.

Paul wrote:this signing officially made the Chiefs the odds-on favorites to win the AFC West OUTRIGHT.

No, and ..... no.

Nobody other than the most sheepish homer would say such things and actually believe them.

These type of statements are why Chef fan gets laughed at on this board.

Denver is clearly the AFC West favorite, and there are a few AFC teams that a rational person would list as SB contenders.
Kansas City isn't one of them.


KC missed the playoffs last year.
KC's aging offense is a year older, and at this point they are not honing their craft, getting better, ... etc. ... NO, they are hanging on ...... and quite possibly ready for a fade.
KC's defense (if you call it that) gave up 5.4 yds per play last year, and only 4 teams in the league did WORSE than that crap.
A new coaching regime has been brought in, and the head man has not particulary distinguished himself in the league.
In fact, his team LAST year totally tanked on him.


So KC drafted defense and they brought in a good, but past-his-prime, CB.

This jumps them ahead of Denver as the West favorite ..... ?

No, it does not.


This makes them a 'legit' SB contender ..... ?

No, it does not.


All it means is that they made some moves which they HOPE will improve the team.

Sort of the same thing that nearly EVERY team in the league did in the off-season.

Dumbshits.

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Gee, imagine THAT....Kaley coming in with his rather lame and inevitable pile-on, acting as if he's all that and a big-ass bag of Ruffles.

Tell ya what, Sport....since you are absolutely positively INCAPABLE of posting an intelligent thought-provoking FOOTBALL TAKE on this here board, then maybe you need to stuff that pen holder/pocket protector back in your shirt pocket, slide on those black thick-rimmed glasses and move your fat motherfucking ASS on down the road.

See folks, Kaley derives MUCH pleasure in calling ME fat, but Dude is AT LEAST as big or BIGGER than I am. In fact, Kaley is the epitome of the class geek....hence the pocket protector and the glasses (which he actually wears). He clearly ankle-bites the likes of myself on this here board because he's so used to getting his ass kicked by guys like me in real life that this is his small way of payback.

Too damn funny.

The impending Kaley meltdown of truly EPIC proportions begins in 5....4....3....2....1....

I'm just telling the truth, which you can't handle. Every year you and Whitey come in proclaiming the Chiefs are the best team in the NFL. Every year you are proven wrong. Most of the Chiefs fans in here are realistic. You and Whitey are not, just like the majority of white trash Chief fans I have seen at every home game and dozens of road games since 1991. Enjoy your Board Bitch status.

poptart wrote:

Wagon wrote:KC is now a legit SB contender.

Paul wrote:this signing officially made the Chiefs the odds-on favorites to win the AFC West OUTRIGHT.

No, and ..... no.

Nobody other than the most sheepish homer would say such things and actually believe them.

These type of statements are why Chef fan gets laughed at on this board.

Denver is clearly the AFC West favorite, and there are a few AFC teams that a rational person would list as SB contenders.
Kansas City isn't one of them.


KC missed the playoffs last year.
KC's aging offense is a year older, and at this point they are not honing their craft, getting better, ... etc. ... NO, they are hanging on ...... and quite possibly ready for a fade.
KC's defense (if you call it that) gave up 5.4 yds per play last year, and only 4 teams in the league did WORSE than that crap.
A new coaching regime has been brought in, and the head man has not particulary distinguished himself in the league.
In fact, his team LAST year totally tanked on him.


So KC drafted defense and they brought in a good, but past-his-prime, CB.

This jumps them ahead of Denver as the West favorite ..... ?

No, it does not.


This makes them a 'legit' SB contender ..... ?

No, it does not.


All it means is that they made some moves which they HOPE will improve the team.

Sort of the same thing that nearly EVERY team in the league did in the off-season.

Dumbshits.

Rack this take. Well done Pops.

Kansas City Kid wrote:Every year you and Whitey come in proclaiming the Chiefs are the best team in the NFL.

Yeah, but Wagon said that this time he means it.

Ok. I think I may be ready to step up to the plate in the NFL forum. Let me know if this is the correct order.

Wagon and James,

You are takeless sacks of shit. The next time you have a take will be the first.

Your dripping manginas are really causing a mess up in here. Did I mention your cunt is blithering? Oh, did your clit quiver at that last blast!

Here, you may need this.



Why are you melting?



You’ve been run. I have mad bode.

P.S. Please mop your menstrual manjuice up on your way out, you melted, takeless, no bode having bitch who I just ran outa here.

:roll: x infinity


So, did I miss anything?

And save the “we’ll see what you got once the season starts” shit. You won’t see much of me at all in here. Just here to stir the shit and I’d say Mission Accomplished.

Bye bye, now.

Oh, and what poptart said too. Kinda what I was sayin all along.

One last thing. PM me if you'd like to buy some BBQ sauce.

Hammer, meet nail.

Pops take is ok. However, I disagree with the Chiefs offense aging part. It's true they are a veteran group. Injuries are a big concern. However, media and rival fans have been saying the same thing for 3 years now. The offense has also went out there an proved them wrong for 3 years now.

They will do it again if they stay healthy. They may drop off a little. Even if they do they're still a top 10 offense.

I can't deny the Chiefs didn't make the playoffs last year. However, how many teams in the history of the NFL have won 10 games and not made the playoffs again? They didn't get it done but your point is kinda irrelevant to this season anyway.

Nice job of pointing out Herm's LAST year with the Jets. I'm sure injuries had minimal effect on that teams performance. :roll:

I can come up with a list much like Pop's for every team in the NFL. Big fucking deal.

I will say Denver is still the favorite to win the AFC West. However, don't bet on it. The team that wins the AFC West seems to change nearly every year.

I-70 is calling, Paul ..... & Kaley.

Us here, we're fatigued by your feud.

It serves no FOOTBALL TALK purpose.

Someone dial 911!


We are getting skecthy reports but early indications are that most of the damage was caused by the rock hard melon of a Kansas City native. It seems nothing has ever been able to penetrate the rock hard stupidity that is Polly's dome and even when slammed from all angles, Polly walks away unscathed, remaining free from all forms of intelligence and rationality. He is The Rock, The Iron Melon, The Titanium Dome, He is The Mighty Moron, Polly!

poptart wrote: Us here, we're fatigued by your feud.

It serves no FOOTBALL TALK purpose.

amen brother......

something tells me this horseshit is going to come to a screeching fucking halt.......

IndyFrisco wrote:
And save the “we’ll see what you got once the season starts” shit. You won’t see much of me at all in here. Just here to stir the shit and I’d say Mission Accomplished.

Ok. So the next time your ignorant ass will decide to drop in here and edumacate us about how an aging Ty Law and KC are doomed to inevitable failure will be right about never...or 6 months from now.

I get it.

poptart wrote:

Kansas City Kid wrote:Every year you and Whitey come in proclaiming the Chiefs are the best team in the NFL.

Yeah, but Wagon said that this time he means it.

"tart quoting a Kaley post?

That's just sad.

I do mean it pops, and the fact that I've been RIGHT more than you about the NFL should cause some pause.

For instance, how many times straight have the Chiefs made the 'duhs their bitch?

About 6, at last count.

And yet you've been in here all along these past few years saying beforehand that that wasn't going to happen.

Tell me again about how you have any semblance of a clue of what you're talking about.

I'll hang up and wait for your answer.

Kaley did you really shag LK_Pickster?

Sorry, that's off topic.

:!:

It was a menage du troix with JayHawk.

The details are revolting.

They kept flipping a coin to decide who got heads and who got tails.

In the end, LK got tired of waiting and went to Dennys to get some breakfast.

Kaley and JayHawk wound up trying to molest each other, but neither one of their shriveled pencil dicks could penetrate the folds of fat.

They both went home frustrated around 3.00 am and GTJO to a Paris Hilton dvd they had been saving up for just such an occasion.

Damn.......

Spend a week in Mexico and come home to find all of this?

First things First:

Chiefs Signing Law is huge. Just fucking Huge.

Why?

The Chiefs of 2005, with a defense of wet tissue paper, were one game away from the playoffs. A Wildcard spot was one game away. And Who won the fuckin' Super Bowl? A wildcard team.

So what would Law have meant on last years team? My thought is at least two wins - Dallas, Philly or Buffalo - Take your pick. Law is not only an outstanding corner, but more importantly a leader on field. The KC defense actually has some fucking athletes - They just seemed to get that deer in the headlights thing late in games and shit got away. My guess is it doesn't happen with Law out there.

Do we really need to discuss the Chiefs Offense? Lead the League in Yards and # 6 in total Points. Returning the entire unit in tact. Toss in that Larry Johnson, based on his average in the 9 games he started, would have broken the single season rushing record had he started from day one and I don't think there's too much shit you Haytahs can stick to that wall.

This is the last run for the KC O - Shields and Roaf will retire after 2006.
But if the Chiefs stay healthy there's no reason KC can't contend for the AFC crown.

---------------------------------

Onto the bitch slapping -

Doink fans - Who's your running back this year? Is Plummer gonna suddenly start making all the right decisions? How's he gonna play with the rook looking over his shoulder? Good team - that got tore down in a home playoff game. Yeah..... it sounds familiar.

Blot Fan - Martyball with Rivers at QB. Sweeeeet. Here's how it will sound:
"LT around the left side for 3 yards. LT up the middle for 2 yards. 3rd and 5 Rivers passes to Gates for 3 yards. On comes the punting unit"

Tart & RJ - I gotta hand it to you two. Here I sit having taken your cash year in and year out and yet you still wanna bang bang? Shit..... you were 2 losses away from the Worst record in the league. Tart had his check in the mail to me after week 7. Bwa at you and the raggedy ass Duh's who should once again be in competition for # 1........... draft pick that is. Watching RJ melt after Brooks hits 14 INTs by week 6 should be woth a few more Hee Haws. As always I'll lay my $50 the Chiefs have a better record by season end. The only easier money than this is shorting any company with .com in their name right before earnings.

As for my KC brethren and fellow DOTRF:

KC has ruled the Rome NFL boards since their inception. While it is a right we have won through many battles, it has not been without it's tribulations that some of you have caused

Paul - take a pill, forget you have emoticons and don't ever feel the necessity to post Hiroshima pic again. Seriously. Do I need to start writing your posts again for you? :wink:

Wags - if you were a McDonalds sandwich you'd be the McTard. Your penchent for using words you've recently found in Roget's notwithstanding, you've been at the bottom of more piles than anyone not named jess or M2. While the chronic cric in your neck is usually due to sucking, this year it will be from looking up at me in the JAFFL standings.

Orc - A little Myopic homerism was a nice touch. Now get back to work, I'm not paying you for intelligent football commentary.

Nix, 6 Pac, RadioFan and anybody I forgot - Welcome back my Friends to the show that never ends.

Too any of you I may have forgotten - I forgot.

War Mas Tequilia in a special numbered bottle - I am out.

Rack it.

3rd

KC Scott wrote:The Chiefs of 2005, with a defense of wet tissue paper, were one game away from the playoffs. A Wildcard spot was one game away. And Who won the fuckin' Super Bowl? A wildcard team.

Nice freaking L E A P, Scott.

Only had to Evel Knievel over the Grand Canyon to get to the fantasy conclusion that the Chefs were ..... THIS ..... close to winning the whole ball of wax last year.

Wagon and Paul jizzed to that, but nobody above single-digit IQ is buying that nonsense.

'Tard.

Scotty wrote:Do we really need to discuss the Chiefs Offense?
Returning the entire unit in tact

Yes, there are some things to talk about.

Age.
New Head coach.
New O-Coordinator.

Tony Richardson .... ?!?

He was a beast for KC for a number of years, and you guys rightfully sang his praises.
Now that he's gone you act like it's no biggie ... ?
Bwahahaha

Doink fans - Who's your running back this year? Is Plummer gonna suddenly start making all the right decisions? How's he gonna play with the rook looking over his shoulder? Good team - that got tore down in a home playoff game. Yeah..... it sounds familiar.

Sure the Hee Haws have their questions, as does every team.
I briefly hit on a few of your OWN team's questions earlier.
Yeah, there's quite a few of 'em.
More than the Mules, IMO.
And strangely, you didn't choose to address any of 'em.
You sign a cornerback and *BANG* ..... you suddenly think you've made yourself as good as Denver ... ?
Bwa .....

Until further notice, your squad is 3 games WORSE than Dunger's.


AFC 'contenders' at this point would be Pittsburgh, Denver, Indy, maybe New England.

After that you'd have a group of wannabe teams including the Cincinnati's, Jacksonville's, Miami's, Kansas City's, & San Diego's of the world.

KC's not in the first tier in the conference, and the 4 teams in the '2nd tier' that I listed can all make their OWN case for being ready to take the next step.

Frankly, the only thing that brings particular notice to the Chefs at all is the fans in here who are making noise (again) about how Jupiter is ready to align with Mars.

Scotty wrote:KC has ruled the Rome NFL boards since their inception.

Biggest LOL'er in the post.

Chef fan has crapped the bed year after friggin' year, Scott.

Everyone who's been around knows that.

If endless in-fighting, m0ronic proclamations of impending greatness, and bedding of trailer trash ho's is your version of 'ruling' things, yeah champ, you fellas have it.


As far as Oakland goes, my take is that they've got a LOT of work to do just to become competetive in the West again.

Art's pushing a lot of the right buttons, IMO, and I'm hopeful that it translates into many more W's this year.

I think Oakland will be 3-5 wins better than last year.

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:

Kansas City Kid wrote:Every year you and Whitey come in proclaiming the Chiefs are the best team in the NFL.

That's a big NEGATORY, good buddy.

But every year YOU do nothing but come in and spew your worthless BULLSHIT and act like the fuckhole that you really are. Seriously, are you like 10 years old? You add NOTHING to this forum, Kaley. PERIOD. You're nothing but a fucking pussy hiding behind a keyboard. You've been banned TWICE from the predecessors to this board because you're such an ignorant dipshit- hell, I blame the mods of this board for your incessant dumbass spewing your ignorant shit as well.

Bottom line, Kalette: Please kill yourself. By whatever means possible. You're stealing valuable atmosphere from the rest of the human race.

Listen here, three-time Board Bitch , you could die right now and not one fucking person in the world would give two shits. You add absolutely ZERO to anyone's life on the planet. Only your local grocer, baker, and pants-widener even give a little bit of a shit since you keep them in regular business, FATTY.

Take your white trash Chief homerism, your shit and piss-stained zubaz pants, and your gigantic lard ass to the edge of a cliff and roll yourself over the edge you fucking retarded mess of turd.

Thanks, Scott.

Hey pop, your fly is open.

KC Scott wrote: So what would Law have meant on last years team? My thought is at least two wins - Dallas, Philly or Buffalo - Take your pick.

Rack the rest of the post, but this is retarded, Scott.

Do Dallas, Philly, and Buffalo get to add one player to their roster as well? if if's and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas.

Deal with this year. Not last. We can all go around and play the if game and come away with a better record. If the Cowboys don't miss feild goals they go 12-4? See how fucking stupid that sounds?

So I guess Vanderjagt makes the Cowboys a legit SB contender. :meds:

One more small item to pour ice on Chef fan's yearly pre-season stiffie.......


KC's playing the 6th most difficult schedule in the league this year (based on last year's records).

Last year they were almost exactly middle-of-the-pack in that regard.

Headhunter wrote:

KC Scott wrote: So what would Law have meant on last years team? My thought is at least two wins - Dallas, Philly or Buffalo - Take your pick.

Rack the rest of the post, but this is retarded, Scott.

Just an analaogy for those who don't view the Law pick up in it's proper perspective:

I watched Eric Warfield give away 2 TD's in Buffalo and watched Surtain drop a Game clinching INT in Dallas.

poptart wrote:One more small item to pour ice on Chef fan's yearly pre-season stiffie.......


KC's playing the 6th most difficult schedule in the league this year (based on last year's records).

Last year they were almost exactly middle-of-the-pack in that regard.

Your slipping over there in the land of Kung Pao Puppy, Tartman - Last year we played the NFC East and promptly went 1-3 with the losses to Philly, NYG & Dallas.

This year we get the NFC West and I'd wager that Seattle's 14-2 record heavily skewed our strength of schedule.

All in All I like the way our schedule looks - I'll break that down in another post.

Truth of the matter is that I've never placed a lot of stock in strength of schedule because one never really knows for sure which teams will end up hot and which ones will tank.

But it's true that KC plays the 6th most difficult this year.

Last year you got the awful Jets, Raiders x 2, Buffalo, and Houston.

This year, yeah, Seattle jacks things up.
But you also get Denver x 2, Cincy, Pitt, and Jacksonville.

On paper, it's not an easy line up.

I get perspective, Scott. But for true perspective go look up some threads from last year about how Surtain was going to fix your defense. And yet you claim he was the reason for the loss in Dallas. Look up how giddy you guys were over Kendrell Bell in the pre-season and then go look up how you guys bashed him after the Giants game that kept you out of the playoffs.

The point being is that Law has the "possibility" of improving the 2006 Chefs. Nothing more. Nothing less. You can't go back and play the "if" game on scenarios from last year unless you allow the opponent to play the if game as well.

I think Law is a good signing. I also think you fellas should temper your enthusiasm given past history.

Good to see everyone getting hyped!
Insert George Carlin’s Football VS Baseball skit here

KC Scott wrote:Damn.......Spend a week in Mexico and come home to find all of this?

I hear they speak English over there

KC Scott wrote:Doink fans - Who's your running back this year?

Ron Dane will probably carry the load for three quarters then Tatum Bell will come in with fresh legs against a tired defense… If someone else comes into the picture and takes over…he would have to be one hell of back and the rest of the league will be shitting even bigger bricks!

KC Scott wrote:Is Plummer gonna suddenly start making all the right decisions?

It wouldn’t be “sudden” he figured out last season that he doesn’t play for Arizona anymore.

KC Scott wrote:How's he gonna play with the rook looking over his shoulder?

I like it! A little competition is a good thing!

If Law was so good, the Patriots and Jets wouldn't have jettisoned him.

This was a HUGE signing...3 years ago.

Right now you lost Tony Richardson and Willie Roaf, which were 2 of the biggest reasons you could put any back in the KC offense and run the ball. You have the league's weakest WR corps and Gonzalez is aging and not the best TE in the game anymore. And who the fuck did you draft again? Nobody worthy of mention.

You've actually gotten WORSE this year. You'll be thankful the Raiders are in your division when the season ends, to save you from the cellar.

RACK Scotty and Pop..and RAAAAAAAAAACK this thread. I can feel it heating up. Now if raiduhfan doesn't come in and screw it all up :wink:

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:

godzilla2002 wrote:

KC Scott wrote:Is Plummer gonna suddenly start making all the right decisions?

It wouldn’t be “sudden” he figured out last season that he doesn’t play for Arizona anymore.

We beg to differ.

Sin,

Must... resist... urge...

BTW Paul, who threw more TDs last year? Your boy, or Jake? Who threw more INTs? Who had the higher rating? Who had more wins? And for bonus points, who was playing in the AFC Championship game?

I'll give you a hint: The answer to one of those is "Green." :wink: