Page 3 of 4

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:11 pm
by Invictus
JCT wrote:Gold hoops?


LOVE THEM!!!


- swoonX
Image
That!

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:15 pm
by Bizzarofelice
PSUFAN wrote:posting seems crazy
tards pop up
each and every day
I saw another one
just the other day,
a special new tard
I laughed.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:27 pm
by OCmike
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: This works well for you, though?::
OCmike wrote:SELECT ALL FROM "Pick my girlfriend's present this year" WHERE Poster LIKE "Ucant%" AND (Humerous Post = TRUE OR Fresh Smack = TRUE OR Remotely Clever = True)
You didn't know? Access has a humor filter that allows queries to run as long as they're funny. That said, you can only imagine how many syntax errors were highlighted when your lazy slop was kicked back.

I see a lot of multitier application debugging in your future.
I see nothing but more yawn-inducing claims of scoreboard and overuse of the word "tard" in yours. But it's not like that's ever stopped your endless need for the last word.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:40 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
GoToRecord
OCmike wrote:
SetValue = 0
Set Warnings = Tard
MsgBox = Bawahahahahaha
Echo!
ApplyFilter = Ignore Tard In Future
Close

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:46 pm
by Tom In VA
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

Code: Select all

IF rstOCMike.BOF = rstOCMike.EOF THEN
           thisPost.Punt(cnstTardRefs)
END IF
:lol:

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:48 pm
by Goober McTuber
Viper,

Print out this entire thread and give it to your “missus”. She’ll be ever so grateful that she’s not dating either the emu fucker or ucunt the bitterman.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:53 pm
by Tom In VA
Goober McTuber wrote:

Code: Select all

private void VariantPost(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
  try
  {
    throw new InvalidOperationException("You both suck.");
  }
  catch (System.Exception ex)
  {
    DisplayError(ex);
  }
}

These might be funny at .NET.


LMAO, get it ... .NET

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:55 pm
by trev
I didn't read this entire thread but upon skimming BSmack and Mikey got it right. (Which is shocking.)

A necklace and/or a cashmere scarf.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 3:58 pm
by OCmike
Tom In VA wrote:
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

Code: Select all

IF rstOCMike.BOF = rstOCMike.EOF THEN
           thisPost.Punt(cnstTardRefs)
END IF
:lol:
RACK!

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:00 pm
by OCmike
Goober McTuber wrote:Viper,

Print out this entire thread and give it to your “missus”. She’ll be ever so grateful that she’s not dating either the emu fucker or ucunt the bitterman.
I've lived a good life, have a good wife and family. I work hard and am well-respected in the community. But you fuck one emu...

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:16 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Tom In VA wrote:These might be funny at .NET.


LMAO, get it ... .NET
I'm sure they'd appreciate your use of smilies and other useless bullshit. You'd fit in very well over there.

Goodbye. I hope.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:18 pm
by The Whistle Is Screaming
I just want to congratulate you guys on a GREAT thread hijacking!

Carry on.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:19 pm
by Mikey
trev wrote:I didn't read this entire thread but upon skimming BSmack and Mikey got it right. (Which is shocking.)

A necklace and/or a cashmere scarf.
Scarf?

:meds:

Trev I think you need lessons in how to make a woman happy.

Scarves are OK, but if you really want to make in impression you need to be a little more extravagant. At least a sweater, or maybe a cashmere turtleneck AND a pullover in a complementary color. A V-neck or maybe something with a half zipper.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:22 pm
by Tom In VA
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Tom In VA wrote:These might be funny at .NET.


LMAO, get it ... .NET
I'm sure they'd appreciate your use of smilies and other useless bullshit. You'd fit in very well over there.

Goodbye. I hope.

You're absolutely right. Next time I post I'll make sure to ask myself "Will this offend ucantdoitdoggiestyle2 ?".

How inconsiderate of me, smilies, just who the fuck did I think was.


Goodbye ? Too hard to say, I might miss your zenith, only posting for a month or so and you're just hitting your stride ... no ...

Instead I'll leave you with song ('Tis the season)

"Faring thee well now.
Let your life proceed by its own design.
Nothing to tell now.
Let the words be yours, I'm done with mine"

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:25 pm
by BSmack
Tom In VA wrote:These might be funny at .NET.

LMAO, get it ... .NET
This thread is screaming for a Weird Al reset.

[video width=400 height=300]http://www.youtube.com/v/nEi0eQB-NtY[/video]

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:51 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Mikey wrote:Trev I think you need lessons in how to make a woman happy.

I doubt she can keep a man happy either. Isn't she thrice divorced or something?

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:56 pm
by BSmack
Mikey wrote:
trev wrote:I didn't read this entire thread but upon skimming BSmack and Mikey got it right. (Which is shocking.)

A necklace and/or a cashmere scarf.
Scarf?

:meds:

Trev I think you need lessons in how to make a woman happy.

Scarves are OK, but if you really want to make in impression you need to be a little more extravagant. At least a sweater, or maybe a cashmere turtleneck AND a pullover in a complementary color. A V-neck or maybe something with a half zipper.
Now isn't this a picture. She's saying she'll blow a guy for a cashmere scarf and you're trying to RAISE the bid?

Fuck you Grinch.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 4:59 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Rack BSmack.


.
.
.
.


Merry Christmas.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:05 pm
by Uncle Fester
Give her leather goods: A boot in the ass and a belt in the mouth.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(My annual Christmas joke.)

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:06 pm
by trev
BSmack wrote:
Mikey wrote:
trev wrote:I didn't read this entire thread but upon skimming BSmack and Mikey got it right. (Which is shocking.)

A necklace and/or a cashmere scarf.
Scarf?

:meds:

Trev I think you need lessons in how to make a woman happy.

Scarves are OK, but if you really want to make in impression you need to be a little more extravagant. At least a sweater, or maybe a cashmere turtleneck AND a pullover in a complementary color. A V-neck or maybe something with a half zipper.
Now isn't this a picture. She's saying she'll blow a guy for a cashmere scarf and you're trying to RAISE the bid?

Fuck you Grinch.
Bwah.

So, what did you get the Mrs.?

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:07 pm
by trev
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Mikey wrote:Trev I think you need lessons in how to make a woman happy.

I doubt she can keep a man happy either. Isn't she thrice divorced or something?
Are you asking a question or making a statement?

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:14 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
trev wrote:Are you asking a question or making a statement?

Two sentences. One period. One question mark. You figure it out.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:19 pm
by trev
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
trev wrote:Are you asking a question or making a statement?

Two sentences. One period. One question mark. You figure it out.
Well, I won't bother with it, since you weren't asking me.

Is it wrong to be divorced, Ucant?

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:29 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
trev wrote:Is it wrong to be divorced, Ucant?

Who cares? This is about your inability to keep your man happy.

.
.
.
.


The next post of yours I read had better be about you rattling some pots and pans together. Chop, chop...

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:33 pm
by trev
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
trev wrote:Is it wrong to be divorced, Ucant?

Who cares? This is about your inability to keep your man happy.

.
.
.
.


The next post of yours I read had better be about you rattling some pots and pans together. Chop, chop...
That's what I thought. Nothing wrong with divorce or break ups. I'm sure you've had some. Although I'm sure your woman was always completely satisfied with you and vice versa.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:36 pm
by Morrissey
trev wrote:Is it wrong to be divorced, Ucant?
No its not wrong but I must know.

How can someone so frumpy still be so self-assured?

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:39 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
trev wrote:Nothing wrong with divorce or break ups.

I hope you're not equating the two.


There's a slight difference between Suzy and Johnny dating for two weeks in the 7th grade before falling "madly in love with each other", and then breaking up a few days later because he forget to text her after geometry class ended... and DIVORCE.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:46 pm
by BSmack
trev wrote:That's what I thought. Nothing wrong with divorce or break ups.
There's plenty wrong with divorce. Ask your kids.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:50 pm
by trev
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
trev wrote:Nothing wrong with divorce or break ups.

I hope you're not equating the two.


There's a slight difference between Suzy and Johnny dating for two weeks in the 7th grade before falling "madly in love with each other", and then breaking up a few days later because he forget to text her after geometry class ended... and DIVORCE.
No, I wasn't talking about children and their first relationships, I was talking about adults. Kids don't get married and divorced, ucant. Did you and your bride save yourselves for each other? Is this both of your first marriages? Any kids?

Ucan't with a "Who care's...Blah, blah, blah..." in .....1, 2, 3.......

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:56 pm
by Dinsdale
People who took traditonal vows and then got divorced are known liars.

Period. End of story.

Fine lesson to teach children.

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 11:59 pm
by trev
mvscal wrote:
trev wrote:Nothing wrong with divorce or break ups.
Right, millions of fucked up kids can't be wrong.

Just bake cookies and shut your fucking hole.
Millions of kids are fucked up because of divorce?

Actually you might be right. Show me some proof that divorce fucked
up millions of kids.

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:04 am
by Dinsdale
trev wrote: Show me some proof that divorce fucked
up millions of kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=utf-8 ... ime%20rate


Does 1,120,000 hits on a search page work for you, or is that not enough to convince you that you fucked up?

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:27 am
by trev
You're awfully judgemental for someone who's deposited his sperm in God only knows how many bar skanks.

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:29 am
by Dinsdale
Nope, not "judgemental" at -- merely stating facts.

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:41 am
by trev
Dinsdale wrote:Nope, not "judgemental" at -- merely stating facts.
Do you have any kids?

I can't wait to talk more to Ucant about this.

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:43 am
by Dinsdale
trev wrote:
Do you have any kids?

Did you think this retarded attempt at diversion would in any way deflect your failure of your children?


How is my family situation in any way relavent to your failure and the lies you told?

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:00 am
by Kansas City Kid

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 2:03 am
by jtr
Image

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:57 am
by RadioFan
88 wrote:I wonder how many seconds it takes for the average consumer to pry apart the legs of the Ann Coulter doll to see if there is any delineation between her cunt and the cunt she is?
Rack.

Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 2:55 pm
by trev
Dinsdale wrote:
trev wrote:
Do you have any kids?

Did you think this retarded attempt at diversion would in any way deflect your failure of your children?


How is my family situation in any way relavent to your failure and the lies you told?
Ha!
You are a gullible fuck. Because HeCant said I was divorced "thrice" I am? I've never been divorced. Now that you've claimed nearly every child of divorce will turn out bad, go fuck yourself.