Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:53 pm
= crickets = cricketsPage 3 of 3
= cricketsPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:12 pm
Ultimately this particular match of wits is about whether or not Dins "hex nut" dale is doing the 'know-it-all' act.
There is published material out there which is probably what informed his main assertion in the first place.
In championing the biological basis school of thought with what is his last best information so corroborated, he's not patently full of shit on this score.
velocet
There is published material out there which is probably what informed his main assertion in the first place.
In championing the biological basis school of thought with what is his last best information so corroborated, he's not patently full of shit on this score.
velocet
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:01 pm
aww, velo... Dins holds several patents on being full of shit, and this is another for him to proudly tack up the wall.
Funny how I don't see him rushing in here to refute Mace's testimony.... he probably wishes this had dropped off page one by now.
Funny how I don't see him rushing in here to refute Mace's testimony.... he probably wishes this had dropped off page one by now.
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:30 pm
Not to change the direction of this thread but........velocet wrote:Ultimately this particular match of wits is about whether or not Dins "hex nut" dale is doing the 'know-it-all' act.
There is published material out there which is probably what informed his main assertion in the first place.
In championing the biological basis school of thought with what is his last best information so corroborated, he's not patently full of shit on this score.
velocet
I read a LOT of posts and I'll go give rackage where it's due; Dins is spot on with more than 90% of the shit he puts up.
He'd Slay on Jeopardy, all I'm sayin'
Back onto topic..........
Just found out My wife and I are "invited" to an interdiction for my loser brother in law.
Really looking forward to that.
He's 42 divorced, no kids (luckily) and back living with my in laws.
Classic case of ex -rock and roller that never bothered to grow up.
I asked wifey why we had to be there and she said her Dad told her we had to all confront him and give him no alternative than to go into rehab. I said we were never an alternative beacuse if her Dad kicked him out he could sleep in the car, in the street or in whatever bar he passed out in beacuse there was no way he was staying with us.
Unwar loser relatives
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:31 pm
Nah... ya' think?KC Scott wrote: He'd Slay on Jeopardy, all I'm sayin'
Alex: "I'm sorry, Dins. You didn't phrase that Daily Double response in the form of a question again, and I'm afraid that's going to cost all of your wager. This IS the Double Jeopardy round, you know."
Dins: Say WHAT?!? Tears, Alex, tears.. Do you know who I am? I can't stop laughing over here. I actually studied for this, you pissant, while you're just reading the answers off a cuecard. I'm 10 times smarter than you are, and I fucked your mother yesterday after the taping. Got it all on video, too, beyotch! I demand a retraction! I demand that those numbers be put back up there! PUT those numbers back up... arrrgghhh.......
Alex: "Security..."
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:49 pm
Just a heads up. Those things are usually BYOB.KC Scott wrote: Just found out My wife and I are "invited" to an interdiction for my loser brother in law.
Really looking forward to that.
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:57 pm
KC Scott wrote:...rackage where it's due...
On that note, Rack War Wagon. Good one.
velocet
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 12:29 am
What border will he be crossing?KC Scott wrote:Just found out My wife and I are "invited" to an interdiction for my loser brother in law.
Sorry, had to bust your balls.
Seriously, good luck with the intervention. Even if he is a loser.
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 1:31 am
As far as I know, there's no Google enabled Jeopardy show.KC Scott wrote:Dins is spot on with more than 90% of the shit he puts up.
He'd Slay on Jeopardy, all I'm sayin'