Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 6:26 pm
Yea, cause I'm sure you NEVER got behind the wheel of a car in an impaired state EVER.Dinsdale wrote:None of the minor infractions of the law I allegedly commit ever put others at risk.
There is that.
Yea, cause I'm sure you NEVER got behind the wheel of a car in an impaired state EVER.Dinsdale wrote:None of the minor infractions of the law I allegedly commit ever put others at risk.
There is that.
Wasn't spinsdale the one who told the story of some fat skank shitting all over his dick after he ass banged her, then she sucked him off?OCmike wrote:I'm calling bullshit.Dinsdale wrote:None of the minor infractions of the law I allegedly commit ever put others at risk.
There is that.
Having unprotected sex is most definitely putting your future unborn child "at risk". Good lord, I'd rather have Mike Backer as my Old Man.
Mister Bushice wrote: FYI Any time you get behind the wheel of a car drunk or high you put every one else out there on the road at risk, you stupid fuck.
So you did it when you were younger eh? Like maybe 18?Dinsdale wrote:Thanks, Marcus.Mister Bushice wrote:FYI Any time you get behind the wheel of a car drunk or high you put every one else out there on the road at risk, you stupid fuck.
Of course, I'm not seeing any LINK to where I've done that in about 20 years.
Oh, so it was ok that you did it 20 years ago? I didn't realize there was a statute of limitations on idiocy in the U&L.Dinsdale wrote:Mister Bushice wrote: FYI Any time you get behind the wheel of a car drunk or high you put every one else out there on the road at risk, you stupid fuck.
Thanks, Marcus.
Of course, I'm not seeing any LINK to where I've done that in about 20 years.
How was it illegal? I'm not too up on NY traffic laws.Dinsdale wrote: They're defending a girl who careless killed 4 other people while illegally operating a vehicle, in some very warped effort to reach the unattainable goal of "getting over on Dinsdale."
No, this is all about you, and your hypocrisy, and your desperate attempts to spin yourself out of it.Dinsdale wrote: They're defending a girl who careless killed 4 other people while illegally operating a vehicle, in some very warped effort to reach the unattainable goal of "getting over on Dinsdale."
Freaking hilarious.
Moving Sale wrote: How was it illegal? I'm not too up on NY traffic laws.
Which one are you then?smackaholic wrote:I am not happy
Upon further review...Dinsdale wrote:Wasn't licensed to drive after 9PM, nor with passengers.
But she was a good kid, really.
Quite likely she was a good kid who made a horrible mistake at the worst possible time. And you are the last fucking person in the world to cast aspersions on someone for breaking the law. So have a nice weekend and go fuck yourself.Dinsdale wrote:Wasn't licensed to drive after 9PM, nor with passengers.Moving Sale wrote: How was it illegal? I'm not too up on NY traffic laws.
But she was a good kid, really.
My car didn't come out looking too good, as well. And "technically" it was a huge light pole.Dinsdale wrote:TenTallBen took a bunch of shit for not keeping his car in the assigned lane, and all he hurt was a tree.
what a bitch. So you didn't get laid. That's a tragedy. It's also tragic that as a college student you were reaching back to high school for date material.RumpleForeskin wrote:What a damn shame. When I was a freshman in college, I started talking to this girl who was a senior in high-school. We went out a couple of times and before anything could really develop, she died in a car accident.
This article does a decent job of explaining junior licenses in New York.Moving Sale wrote:How was it illegal? I'm not too up on NY traffic laws.Dinsdale wrote:They're defending a girl who careless killed 4 other people while illegally operating a vehicle, in some very warped effort to reach the unattainable goal of "getting over on Dinsdale."
BSmack wrote:Yea, cause I'm sure you NEVER got behind the wheel of a car in an impaired state EVER.Dinsdale wrote:None of the minor infractions of the law I allegedly commit ever put others at risk.
There is that.
Ponderous indeed...........an impaired state
Including you. You posted fake suicide comments on two different occasions, so you deserve whatever the fuck you get around here.Toddowen wrote:Thanks Dins.....you're truly one of the more compassionate people on this board.Dinsdale wrote: this board, where encouraging Toddowen to kill himself is considered high comedy.
This thread is abounding in hypocrites
Todd,Toddowen wrote:'cause I can't stand dealing with douchestains such as yourself anymore.
Mike, thanks for reminding me why I rarely post here. The intellectual trough is nearly empty, which leads me to question why you post here as often as you do.Mike the Lab Rat wrote:As someone now immersed in high school culture, I've got to agree with Goob.
Some of my most hard-working, conscientious, and bright students happened to be cheerleaders. It's funny to stereotype every damned one of them as backstabbing, shallow, anti-intellectual children of privilege, but like most stereotypes, it's a shortcut to actual thinking. If you want to stick to stereotypes, as a "frat boy," I'm supposed to be little more than a cheap-beer-swilling, gang-raping loser who got a job only through daddy's connections. We all know how true THAT stereotype is, eh?
One of the smartest women I know - a successful businesswoman - was a former high school cheerleader. She also happens to be my wife.
Long story short: five kids with promising lives ahead of them died tragically and needlessly. To demean their deaths because they happened to be cheerleaders is -ironically- more shallow than the stereotype folks are dredging up. Way to go, assholes.
Glad I could help, Mike. WAR RAISING THE BAR.Mike the Lab Rat wrote:If you want to stick to stereotypes, as a "frat boy," I'm supposed to be little more than a cheap-beer-swilling, gang-raping loser who got a job only through daddy's connections.
Ya think?BSmack wrote:One of the local TV channels deemed this flash show to be newsworthy.
[flash width=350 height=350]http://ipserv3.whec.com/~jstratton/accident.swf[/flash]
I guess we can expect a solid 5 more days of saturation coverage.
Dear God no. You mean Rochester isn't the "murder capital of New York"???Terry in Crapchester wrote:Ya think?
I'll be the first one to say this is a tragedy, but lead story coverage for an entire week? Then again, this area does have a Mayberry-esque quality to it at times.
The fact that they were able to keep it in the lead story capacity for so long should clue the local media in to the fact that this is not the crime mecca they make it out to be. But we both know that won't happen.