T1B

Posted: **Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:51 pm**

Believe the Heupel wrote:
Adelpiero wrote:
Believe the Heupel wrote: Wow, it's almost like ONLY Missouri's turnovers had any kind of effect on the game. Never mind that OU turned the ball over on their side of the field twice, without which Missouri would have never even been close. And it's not like Missouri didn't gain a ton of yards when they were down 17 with less than 2 minutes to go in the game. All these things count, though.

What it says about OU is that OU managed to win a game against Missouri's supposed best team in decades, and a Missouri fan's first thought was that OU is a bunch of cheaters. You know, instead of "Hey, great game."
IF IF thats all im seeing from your bitter twat ass. what about the 2 dropped easy interceptions Pig Browns had??? If he catches them OU doesnt have 14 points on the board, thus MU is winning. see how that works dumbfuck.

you were actually arguing with"ctrl-copy ctrl-paste a take" Paul. way to go assfuck

they gained 80 yards while down 17. they went down and scored, funny, when you score a late cheapie, you tend to put up some yards. They had 300+ yards before the late turnovers.

I havent said one word about the game, hey fuckhead i expected them to lose, OU is a very good team, but to pull this 2nd tier shit is something that pussies do. Ive seen your bullshit in threads before, being a bitter cunt, then claiming you were drinking :m200l: And if it wasnt you and another OU fan(KU schedule thread) i could give a fuck, then your another bitter puss oozen cunt.

I didnt realize cramps were that bad, need some pamprin, cunt?

Good to see OUmo,Radio, king, and dit in here talking about the game and not being baited by KCPauls post, only a fucking idiot would be baited by his post, congrats on you being the only dillhole to fall on the sword.
QED.

If only Missouri had made plays, they would have won.

They didn't.

I'm stone-cold sober right now, AND can type coherently and Missouri is STILL a second-tier program. Get back to me when Missouri wins a conference championship in your lifetime. Based on the Mad-Lib-esque quality of your alleged "smack" there (insert compound dirty word, insert reference to vagina, noun, verb, etc.) I'm guessing you're significantly younger than the 38 you'd need to be to have witnessed the last time Missouri won something significant.

Funny, all you see is "if" and the word doesn't appear once in what I wrote that you quoted.

so this isn't a what if?

Wow, it's almost like ONLY Missouri's turnovers had any kind of effect on the game. Never mind that OU turned the ball over on their side of the field twice, without which Missouri would have never even been close. And it's not like Missouri didn't gain a ton of yards when they were down 17 with less than 2 minutes to go in the game. All these things count, though.

so claiming that if OU didnt turn the ball over it would of been a blow out? Wow, that really sounds like a what if, kinda like if your grandma had a dick, she would be your grandpa type of thing.

What if Maclin takes that handoff, the play was wide open, he didnt, it was a fumble and a OU defensive TD a backbreaker, game over. See what ifs dont work.

Posted: **Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:57 pm**

Congrats on win by OU

MU gave them a good game and OU took advantage of a tunrover and got their running game going, which stoops said they would at Halftime.

nothing more to say in the thread, its becoming a m2ool thread, excuses and bullshit from both sides.

still a tough schedule to come for MU. i had them 10-2 at worst, with OU and KST as their losses.They get Tech,aTm and home which makes a big difference.

games left

Tech W
aTm W
ISU W
Col W
KST L
KU W game is in KC, ku lost home field advantage, i give KU advantage if in Lawrence!

Posted: **Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:10 pm**

it was a M2 thread from the beginning....but that's not your fault.

KU is hating life losing that one in Larryville, this of all years.

i bet MU loses two of Tech, ATM, Colorado, KSU, KU.

Posted: **Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:20 pm**

King Crimson wrote:it was a M2 thread from the beginning....but that's not your fault.

KU is hating life losing that one in Larryville, this of all years.

i bet MU loses two of Tech, ATM, Colorado, KSU, KU.

could they lose 2?? sure, havent won in little apple in a loooooooooooooooooooong time. Havent won i boulder in a long time, but this is their best chance.

should they lose 2, No. the defense is getting a lot better, which will help at CU and against KU.

I know one thing, not taking my cousins to KU game, its going to be a nightmare at Arrowhead. It wont be safe for anyone having children of each fanbase. It could get real ugly this year, especially if the North is up for grabs. Ive seen it get borderline, and each was fighting for 6 wins to end the season, more at risk and a possible 3-4ish gamtime(more hours to drink), YIKES! Royal/Jayhawk tards are bad enough, when they can get more of the slimeballs into a stadium is much much worse!

Posted: **Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:22 pm**

Believe the Heupel wrote: I said a Missouri fan. Police your own so I don't have to. ;)

There's no policing Paul, that'd be a total waste of time. But I won't allow myself to be lumped in with him and be guilty by association. The best thing is to just ignore him. Tell me you knew.

Posted: **Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:26 pm**

War Wagon wrote:
Believe the Heupel wrote: I said a Missouri fan. Police your own so I don't have to. ;)
There's no policing Paul, that'd be a total waste of time. But I won't allow myself to be lumped in with him and be guilty by association. The best thing is to just ignore him. Tell me you knew.

doesnt everyone already do that?

copy-paste paul is a legend on THE

Posted: **Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:35 pm**

War Wagon wrote:
Believe the Heupel wrote: I said a Missouri fan. Police your own so I don't have to. ;)
There's no policing Paul, that'd be a total waste of time. But I won't allow myself to be lumped in with him and be guilty by association. The best thing is to just ignore him. Tell me you knew.

Mega Dittos

Re; Mizzou - no excuses here either. They played tough, but OU was better.

Matter of fact, I think OU won is spite of their coaching last night, so that says a lot about the kids on the field

Posted: **Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:37 pm**

Adelpiero wrote:the defense is getting a lot better, which will help at CU and against KU.

Y'know, in all my years as a CFB fan, I've actually noticed something --

Having your defense play well can be a strategic advantage against a lot of teams besides CU and KU.

Posted: **Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:40 pm**

KC Scott wrote:
War Wagon wrote:
Believe the Heupel wrote: I said a Missouri fan. Police your own so I don't have to. ;)
There's no policing Paul, that'd be a total waste of time. But I won't allow myself to be lumped in with him and be guilty by association. The best thing is to just ignore him. Tell me you knew.
Mega Dittos

Stay on topic, folks.

T1B

OU/MU