Page 3 of 3

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:08 am
by Moby Dick
less OU/TT

more

Image

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:10 am
by orcinus
Damn.

Just about got him ... freaking dragon.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:11 am
by Adelpiero
orcinus wrote:Nothing to hunt if we lose tonight, though, Adel.

You can have your Big XII titles ... OU fans have been spoiled over the years with the big prize, after all.

Not smack, either. It's a GREAT season to be KU and MU fan. I envy you guys right now, but still wouldn't trade. Better to flame out trying than suck rocks save for once every blue moon and stuff.
knocking out ku or MU would be a great finish for OU and a BCS bowl, not bad for a team that is young

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:12 am
by orcinus
Without Bradford, we'll be hard-pressed to win another game.

Unless we get Alabama in a bowl, of course. We'd destroy Sabin.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:14 am
by Moby Dick
orcinus wrote:Without Bradford, we'll be hard-pressed to win another game.

Unless we get Alabama in a bowl, of course.

i really dont know why we just didnt go to the easy quick slants...or the dump offs to the TEs..with lots of running when Halzle first came in.

think MO said it best..we've always had some stubborn assed OCs that REALLY dont like to change gameplans.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:16 am
by orcinus
Adelpiero wrote:
knocking out ku or MU would be a great finish for OU and a BCS bowl, not bad for a team that is young
Agree with your assessment, btw. It's just hard to be satisfied with a Big XII title when you're in the hunt for the big prize. This only sets up everyone in the XII for heartache, should OU take the title and knock KU or MU from the BCS chase, as well.

Misery loves company, after all.

BTW ... how far has Spurrier fallen? Digorno's ads?

BWAHSAHAHAHAHA

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:17 am
by Adelpiero
Moby Dick wrote:
orcinus wrote:Without Bradford, we'll be hard-pressed to win another game.

Unless we get Alabama in a bowl, of course.

i really dont know why we just didnt go to the easy quick slants...or the dump offs to the TEs..with lots of running when Halzle first came in.

think MO said it best..we've always had some stubborn assed OCs that REALLY dont like to change gameplans.
dude, u think they are stubborn

Mu has rb's running at a 9 per clip and they throw for 3 1/2 quarters before figuring it out


i still hate dave c

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:30 am
by Moby Dick
props to TT's O-line.

just sick how they protected Harrell.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:34 am
by orcinus
Q: How do you know when your team is taking the shithammer?

A: You get to see clips of the television crew bowling

:bag:

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:56 am
by Moby Dick
we just got jobbed on that one...in lubbock...again.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:07 am
by OUMO
Jsc810 wrote:I thought that was a TD.
I did too, but OU did not show up. Props to Tech.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:10 am
by SoCalTrjn
prevent defenses are a joke, so are prevent offenses


do other teams fans hate tribute to troy and fight on as much as I hate that OU song? for fucks sake at least USC plays more than just 1 song and that 1 song they play is lame

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:17 am
by Moby Dick
SoCalTrjn wrote:prevent defenses are a joke, so are prevent offenses


do other teams fans hate tribute to troy and fight on as much as I hate that OU song? for fucks sake at least USC plays more than just 1 song and that 1 song they play is lame

Tusk doesnt count :twisted:

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:20 am
by Harvdog
snicker....snicker.... :hfal:

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:16 am
by SoCalTrjn
OU still win the south? if they knock out the mizzou/ku winner in the bcs title game, west virginia makes the bcs title game?