T1B

^^^

tears, spray...tears.

L-R: M Club, poptart

poptart wrote:The next thing to point out to your dumb face is that your point that "Some football players score HIGHER on their SAT than the general student population" ... only serves to make things WORSE for your case.

Self ass kick, hello.

lol

what exactly is your counterpoint here? for one thing, it's probably not the wisest strategy to begin with the premise that i'm right before trying to prove me wrong. otherwise, you say there are retarded football players. have i said differently?

Let's take the U. of Georgia as an example, since the numbers were given in the article I cited.

uh, let's not. we've already seen how good you are with numbers. what'd you get out of all that number crunching anyhow? that if you remove the best scores from a population sample that the average drops? outstanding work. you must work in finance. why don't you remove all the uga honors students from that study and see what happens to the general student body's average sat scores, though that would require you to rework your math to account for the extra few players you now have to add to the 20 you assumed had better scores than your average work-a-day student.

and yes, you're so obviously right: setting insurance premiums has nothing to do with complex algorithms because all it really takes is to add these and divide by that. dumbfuck.

poptart wrote:

L-R: M Club, poptart

is that what this was?

poptart wrote:This, in attempt to downplay the fact that knuckle-dragging college football players score 20+% lower than the college body at large on the SAT, remains one of THE most hilarious things evar posted:

M Club wrote:here's how math works, vagina:

a closer gives up 2 runs over 12 innings while converting his first 10 saves. his era is 1.50. his next game he gives up a walk-off grand slam. his era is now 4.38. average tells the full story here, right?

First, his era is 1.66, not 1.50, if he has given up 2 runs over 12 innings - so you fucked that up.
Second, his era goes up to 4.61, not 4.38, if he has then given up 6 runs in 13 innings, as you say in your example - so you fucked that up, too.

Not that any of your small fuck ups matter at all in this discussion, but it's fun to note that you FAILED in a simple math example.

Funny and predictable that you would try to hang your hat on a minor brain fart of mine (which has NOTHING to do with the topic) for which I IMMEDIATELY came correct on.

You, on the other hand, have turned into a virtual Maytag Deluxe on the actual CONTENT of the thread - spin x forever.

You begged for an example of policy based on average, and I gave one - health insurance, and you found that to be ... not pleasant, I guess.

There is no basis for disagreement with my answer - but you just ... do.

lol

Hint: If you want to toss the word DUMBFUCK around, don't be one.

yw

M Clueless wrote:why don't you remove all the uga honors students from that study and see what happens to the general student body's average sat scores

Now why would we do that?

Oh, I get it -- to remove a portion of the cock from your @ss.

The honor students make up a part of the whole, you moronic rube.

That's why it's this thing called an average.

LMAO



Tell ya what, twat, let's slice through all of your denial and insanity and ask a couple of simple questions.

I know it comes at the tremendous risk of you responding with "I don't like that you are a Christian," "You called your wife a slant," "Name a policy based on average," "Let's not count the numbers that fuck me over," or "The sky isn't really blue," but what the hey, let's give it a shot.

1. Do you acknowlege the reality that, based on the cited study, maybe 15-20 (or more) of U. of Georgia's fooball players scored 30-50% (some maybe more) lower on their SATs than the general student population average?

2. If no, why do you not agree with that blatant reality?

3. If yes, how can such seriously intellectually-lacking individuals be expected to go through a legitimate college curriculum, and especially in consideration of the fact that they already have VERY BIG time and energy requirements on their plate by virtue of being in the football program?

poptart wrote:Funny and predictable that you would try to hang your hat on a minor brain fart of mine (which has NOTHING to do with the topic) for which I IMMEDIATELY came correct on.

i've hung my hat on every one of your posts. that one, though, was brilliant on your part. basically just took the "your stupid" gaffe and made a whole weekend out of it.

You, on the other hand, have turned into a virtual Maytag Deluxe on the actual CONTENT of the thread - spin x forever.

i've been wholly consistent. point out where i haven't. i've maintained the entire time that while, yes, there are quite a few neanderthals on everyone's football team, there are also many players who have no issue succeeding as students, and strong-arming them into some gay football curriculum because their teammates are only slightly more intelligent than you is a stupid fucking idea that would never fly.

You begged for an example of policy based on average, and I gave one - health insurance, and you found that to be ... not pleasant, I guess.

There is no basis for disagreement with my answer - but you just ... do.

lol

i don't disagree with your answer so much as it's just wrong. insurance premiums aren't set by calculating simple averages.

M Clueless wrote:why don't you remove all the uga honors students from that study and see what happens to the general student body's average sat scores

Now why would we do that?

Oh, I get it -- to remove a portion of the cock from your @ss.

The honor students make up a part of the whole, you moronic rube.

That's why it's this thing called an average.

LMAO

m clueless? is that part of your 'bode? you're going on an on about how football players can't hack the general curriculum when, in fact, there are quite a few students enrolled in the general curriculum with piss poor sat scores as well. they're decidedly less-than-average but still allowed to maintain the pretense of being "real students?"

Tell ya what, twat, let's slice through all of your denial and insanity and ask a couple of simple questions.

I know it comes at the tremendous risk of you responding with "I don't like that you are a Christian," "You called your wife a slant," "Name a policy based on average," "Let's not count the numbers that fuck me over," or "The sky isn't really blue," but what the hey, let's give it a shot.

1. Do you acknowlege the reality that, based on the cited study, maybe 15-20 (or more) of U. of Georgia's fooball players scored 30-50% (some maybe more) lower on their SATs than the general student population average?

2. If no, why do you not agree with that blatant reality?

3. If yes, how can such seriously intellectually-lacking individuals be expected to go through a legitimate college curriculum, and especially in consideration of the fact that they already have VERY BIG time and energy requirements on their plate by virtue of being in the football program?

i really don't care that you're a christian; you just make a horrible case for it. calling your wife a slant is a personality defect; that's on you. still waiting for a policy implemented after calculating for simple average.

as for your questions, i've answered 1 repeatedly. i think that you don't know my answer is an indictment against your ability to think. or that you're a sociopath.

your football curriculum is gay and dumb and retarded and amusing. you should have just said you were talking out of your ass and called it a day. "oh, let's have a football curriculum because it sounds like a good idea." when pressed for an actual explanation you said they should take some basic requirements and an occasional class in their major. oh, so basically you suggested they should do what they're already doing. great fucking proposal, monkey.

M Chub wrote:still waiting for a policy implemented after calculating for simple average.

You got your answer and now, because it's stuck in your @ss, you're trying to spin your question into something else.

EAD and enjoy it from both ends, faggot.


Do you want to answer the three questions, or not, dickless?

Same piss-weak bullshit you pulled in the other thread.

FAIL to address direct questions and instead ramble on with your own sensless and unrelated diatribes.


Grow a brain, and balls, in that order.

poptart wrote: You got your answer and now, because it's stuck in your @ss, you're trying to spin your question into something else.

EAD and enjoy it from both ends, faggot.

spin my question into something else?

Do you want to answer the three questions, or not, dickless?

Same piss-weak bullshit you pulled in the other thread.

FAIL to address direct questions and instead ramble on with your own sensless and unrelated diatribes.

why should i answer the same questions i've answered numerous times already, dick stopper? if you cared to know my answer you could read something i've already written. it'd probably save you from looking like the flailing, sociopathic dildo smack you are were you to stop trying to convince me there are stupid football players. i suppose it's your own choice to continue sounding like this guy:

poptart: Do you want to answer the three questions, or not, dickless?


M Crud:

i suppose we'll call that your white flag. hope your weekend is better than any of that shite smack you run.

The white flag, obviously, was your gonad-lacking failure (again lol) to answer the direct questions put to you.
Duh.





From: poptart

To: M Chug

i answered it, homo. is that the fourth or seventeenth time i said as much? you lost.

You said you answered? lol

Who gives a fuck?

The fact is, you did NOT answer them.

Why do you lie, M Chump?

Nobody noticed, right?

The reason you will not answer is because you know the answers will damn you.
The answers will lead you to deeper questions and to the ugly reality you want to sweep under the rug.

Instead of answering and confronting, you wish to float around on the periphery of the issue and act as if you acknowledge there is some issue - while happily sheeping along with the status quo charade in place.

Like this ...

M Club wrote:besides, it's not like virtual football majors don't already exist. they're called 'general studies' or 'kinesiology.'

If this is your take, you're deep in denial - or an idiot.
One or the other.

A degree in either requires a person to be a legit student (unless of course some ... monkey business ... is going on) who must make it through a number of legitimately challenging courses - especially when you are a person who has scored 30-50% lower than average on an SAT and is already loaded down by a serious time and energy commitment to a football program.



These are the questions.


1. Do you acknowlege the reality that, based on the cited study, maybe 15-20 (or more) of U. of Georgia's fooball players scored 30-50% (some maybe more) lower on their SATs than the general student population average?

2. If no, why do you not agree with that blatant reality?

3. If yes, how can such seriously intellectually-lacking individuals be expected to go through a legitimate college curriculum, and especially in consideration of the fact that they already have VERY BIG time and energy requirements on their plate by virtue of being in the football program?


Last chance, twat.



You may GO ...

Tremendous input, FLW Drunkguy.

I'd search your posts to see if you've ... ever ... produced a worthwhile take, but witnessing you inject such a tuly fatuous offering as that into the thread, I already have my answer.

Your takes suck and you have absolutely nothing to offer.
And to top it off, you have all the mental skills of a fart-obsessed 9 yr old.

Other than that, I'm sure you're top drawer.

Thanks!

poptart wrote:Other than that, I'm sure you're top drawer.

Thanks!

Anytime!

Reminds me of the story my buddy told me back in the mid/late 80's...

Said it Oregon State, he had one of those big auditorium classes with a buhzillion people. He said he frequently sat next to Gary Payton, who always appeared to be a very short Asian gal... but answered "he-ruh" to "Gary Payton" the couple of times they had a rollcall, and signed her papers as such...

He always told Gary "wow, you look so much taller on TV."

He of course always tried to sit next to Gary Payton, because he said "he" was hot and he wanted to get in "his" pants.

poptart wrote:You said you answered? lol

Who gives a fuck?

The fact is, you did NOT answer them.

Why do you lie, M Chump?

Nobody noticed, right?

er, i answered. it's not like i can say otherwise since there aren't any edits in any of my posts.

The reason you will not answer is because you know the answers will damn you.
The answers will lead you to deeper questions and to the ugly reality you want to sweep under the rug.

hahahahahaha. wtf is that? your end-of-days church bullshit?

Last chance, twat.

like last time where you wouldn't post anymore unless i answer them before dropping three more pages of whatever it is you ramble on about?

Papa Willie wrote: No shit.

remember that time you were all boo hoo, psu, why did you delete me from your facebook friends whaaah? that was gay.

whah, psu, why won't you accept my facebook request??????

homo.

didn't you run off to some other board with that cunt and her midget troll.

g'eh.

poptart's running around like a retard asking me to answer some pointless question i've already answered. you're just mad because you asked psu to be your boyfriend and he said no.

Papa Willie wrote:

M Club wrote:whah, psu, why won't you accept my facebook request??????

homo.

didn't you run off to some other board with that cunt and her midget troll.

g'eh.

Are you letting drool collect out of the side of your mouth as Poptart kicks your cock through your pelvic area and out your asshole? Seems like it.

We're talking present. You're living in the past (as I guess maybe you must always do). I'll send somebody to scoop up your little shit-covered dick on aisle 3 when 'Tart finishes with you.

So this is where you've been hiding, and predictably, getting your ass kicked with your limp-wristed comebacks including shit on dicks. You're as repetitive as a printing press. Die during liposuction.

M Club wrote:

Papa Willie wrote: No shit.

remember that time you were all boo hoo, psu, why did you delete me from your facebook friends whaaah? that was gay.

Bwaaaaaaa.

Sorry - shutyomouth's just not attractive to me.

Papa Willie wrote:When the thing with Katy & Perk went down, Dave didn't want to be friends anymore.

Evidently, board life was no different from real life with Dave.

No, you fat fucking idiot. When board life BECAME no different from real life when the woman you play colostomy bag for decided to merge board life/real life, I can understand PSU's desire not to affiliate in real life with any of you retards.

Christ, you're dumb.

shutyomouth - you've pretty much always been welcome in the CFB forum. You're accusing others of losing perspective...yet here you are crying about stuff that has happened on other forums here and on other websites? That pretty clearly demonstrates that your perspective is badly slipping. I say forget about that shit and be the CFB poster we all have enjoyed in here.

Papa Willie wrote: Honestly - that's absolutely fine with me. BUT - I'm not crying about shit - I'm merely responding to questions pertaining to the subject, so I ain't bringing it up.

of course you're not bringing it up. how often does someone draw attention to the time their gay advances weren't reciprocated? but i like that you're all

Sincerely,
February

considering your spreadsheet's probably over a gig.

psu and i went to a michigan/ohio state game once. michigan even won. i have what you want.

Papa Willie wrote: I'm sure you did go to a game with Dave. Did you luck up and let him stutter on your ballz? Prolly.

Oh well, Chief - you started the shit here. You know good and well that I can go on longer than any motherfucker you've ever seen - or - you can just shut your stupid mouth and repair your pussy from what 'tart did to you. Your call.

ja, homie, props to you: no matter how homo-dissed you are in real life you can keep submitting a bunch of dick-on-shit or other arbitrary gay references. i suppose everyone has their niche. yours is the fat, worthless homo cruising T1B for facebook friends to talk scat dick with. not going to fight you on that one.

Take it to CDS, assholes.


"Smack boards" are for funnin'...


This is our fucking religion*, motherfuckers, and I'd appreciate you treating it as such.


If you wanna say "You're a godless fucking piece of shit who fucks several small species of furry animals because you root for Michigan," then all good.


The childish " you're a fag because you fuck men" can go...

Not that I make the rules here. My religion has just been insulted, is all.


TIA



* -- Hell, I think it's damn-near an ethnic group.

Papa Willie wrote: Have you got any fucking idea how I'm toying with you, shit-for-brains? Look at you melting. Look at how fucking angry you are. God damn, dude - get a fucking grip. Don't be so god damned dumb and fucking gullible! :D

wait, are you toying with me?

Agreed. He shat on MY thread, though - then he (like a dumbass because he was pussy hurt by 'tart) started it with me. You know how I am about that.

or are you dropping the smack?

can't keep two thoughts straight past a single post, eh. it's a shame you're like every other inbred southern fat fuck who made it through half of grade 6 on three separate occasions. then you'd be able to explain exactly how poptart "hurt my pussy" in terms other than i'll just say so b/c i have nothing else in my quiver.

M Flub wrote:then you'd be able to explain exactly how poptart "hurt my pussy"

I bruised your pussy because a point was reached in the "discussion" where I asked you a direct Y or N question, and you refused to answer it.

You obviously lack balls, so yeah, it means you've got a pussy - which, after pinning your ankles behind your ears, I battered and bruised.

The extreme irony is that the question I was asking you to give a simple Y or N to was AN ANSWER TO THE QUESTION YOU ASKED, as you came into the thread accusing me of "painting with a broad brush."

You said ...

M Flub wrote:when you're done painting with your three-meter-wide brush maybe you can break down how many of those students don't belong in college.

So I cited the AJC study on college SAT scores - and moved with the numbers from that study to get to the point where it was understood that around 15-20 of one school's football players (U.G.) were mentally ill-equipped for college school work.

I asked you to ACKNOWLEDGE THAT REALITY, and you refused.

And even more bizarre than refusal to answer a direct question is that you tried to squish around and claim that you answered it previously.

But I didn't ASK THE QUESTION previously, pussy.

LMAO


This is a smack board, so yeah, smack is part of the game.
At the same time, there are topics where interesting conversation takes place - or can take place.

I didn't come in running smack.
I just put up a proposal -for discussion and feedback.

But M Klutz wanted to come right in with a sassy attitude - running a highly ignorant piehole.

Things will not end well for you when you engage poptart that way.

Ask your discolored pussy for verification.


It's too late to answer now, twat.

You cr@pped the bed.

Diaper up and live and learn, son.

poptart wrote:

M Flub wrote:when you're done painting with your three-meter-wide brush maybe you can break down how many of those students don't belong in college.

So I cited the AJC study on college SAT scores - and moved with the numbers from that study to get to the point where it was understood that around 15-20 of one school's football players (U.G.) were mentally ill-equipped for college school work.

I asked you to ACKNOWLEDGE THAT REALITY, and you refused.

And even more bizarre than refusal to answer a direct question is that you tried to squish around and claim that you answered it previously.

But I didn't ASK THE QUESTION previously, pussy.

er, i never refused. maybe you could explain why an answer is irrelevant if it's been provided before you asked the question. what, am i supposed to go back and change my opinion just because i dropped it without you prompting me to do so? that just speaks to your inability to carry on a conversation. let's break it down:

poptart: lots of players - despite the fact they met the minimum academic requirements set forth by the ncaa to play football - are really fucking stupid. if i saw them in a college class i would think they were legitimately retarded.

mclub: same same.

poptart: ARE CFB PLAYERS STUPID, MFLUB OR WHATEVER WITTY MONIKER I HAVE ON HAND? HUH? HUH? ANSWER THE QUESTION! ANSWER THE QUESTION! ANSWER THE QUESTION! ANSWER THE QUESTION! AAAAAAAAAANSWER THE QUESTION!

mclub: i already did. (which, since you can't keep things straight, was that i agree with you.)

poptart: ANSWER THE QUESTION! ANSWER THE QUESTION! ANSWER THE QUESTION!


and ja, great, you provided a study that says cfb players, on average, score substantially lower than their counterparts in the general student body (again, while still meeting the minimum academic standards set forth by the ncaa to play cfb). you also set forth some proposal that all cfb players should be required to enroll in a football curriculum. but, uh, statistical analysis never ends with simple averages. (you know, the statistical analysis used to consider policy?) so fine, we drop the 15-20 retards you've been talking about into your football curriculum. now we're left with a group of players who begin to resemble the general student body, except you've decided their academics must suffer because some of their teammates are stupid (despite meeting the minimum academic requirements set forth by the ncaa).

so yes, there are morons on the team who would have never been admitted to the university if it weren't for their athletic ability (which benefits the university more than my decent gpa ever did, or yours). i've never disputed this despite your constant exhortations to ANSWER THE QUESTION! there are probably some things that should be done to address the student half of the student-athlete (yes, i realize half of them are in phys ed), but your proposal would be laughed off the table before you even woke up in the morning. and it's not a proposal that you simply threw out there for feedback and discussion, because as soon as i asked what you're going to do with the all the players who can hack the academic grind you went into melt mode about STUPID PLAYERS ANSWER THE QUESTION.

you can keep typing all the "i banged your pussy's" you'd like, but you still haven't refuted a single thing i've said.

What deflection? We already know you're spinning your own wheels and deflecting all over the board.