Page 3 of 4
Re: SEC!
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:56 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Sudden Sam wrote:
Maybe if Penn State comes in and puts a whuppin' on Alabama next month some more Big Ten schools will dip a toe in the SEC waters.
Why would they have to wait for that? I remember Northern Illinois wiping the field with you shitheads a few years back.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:59 pm
by buckeye_in_sc
I know OSU has gone to BR (in the later 80s)...they won in BR and tied at the Shoe...
plus OSU is playing UT...
I would like a SEC team to come up north during November when it is nice and cold and snowy...we saw how Gold Toof U and South Carolina played in that type of weather against Wisconsin and UCONN (Seriously did a SEC team lose to UCONN)...
Re: SEC!
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 7:30 pm
by Killian
buckeye_in_sc wrote:I would like a SEC team to come up north during November when it is nice and cold and snowy...we saw how Gold Toof U and South Carolina played in that type of weather against Wisconsin and UCONN (Seriously did a SEC team lose to UCONN)...
LSU made a November roadie to ND in 1998. One of the most fun games you'll ever watch. Then Bob Davie had Jarious Jackson intentionally take a safety and the rest is history.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:22 pm
by M Club
Papa Willie wrote:Actually, we're playing Clemson this year - FAR better than any of your OOC faggots. Far better than ND, too. You might want to look at things before you start nipping at my cock, Pussy.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
of course you're fat. i know who's on your ooc: chattanooga, la-monroe, ark state, and:
M Club wrote:who's the crown jewel on your ooc? i'm pretty sure some team who can't compete in the acc is a much better opponent than notre dame.
please let us know when clemson's ever done anything other than flail around in a shite conference.
edit: er, win the acc last year.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:12 am
by Dinsdale
Papa Willie wrote:
Like UM in the 3 years they made to the west? They were 0-3 in those games, btw.
Yeah, I remember
one of them pretty well.
The name Haloti Ngata comes to mind.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:37 am
by Dinsdale
Papa Willie wrote:
Far easier to play in the cold than it is in 100 degrees.
I beg to differ.
Sin,
Common Sense
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:20 am
by Dinsdale
Auburn, AL has never had a 100 degree day during football season, as per weather.com.
Neither have most of the other SEC cities.
Not arguing that the SE isn't hot, just merely pointing out facts, since they never seem to be a friend of SECBSH.
Matter of fact, Eugene has logged more 100 degree days during football season than Auburn and Gainesville combined (since both Auburn and Gainesville combine for a grand total of... zero).
Again, not particularly germane, just factual.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:54 am
by M Club
Papa Willie wrote:
A. I've actually lost quite a bit of weight. Losing weight is possible. Fixing being a dumb cunt it not. You're unfortunately stuck with that until the day you die. UConn? A huge opponent? You aren't going there, are you? Shit team, who will probably beat you. ND? Has beens. Massachewshits? Are you fucking kidding me? Is this your Delaware State replacement? Bowling Brown? Are you fucking kidding me?
so you're still fat then. great news. you called me a dumb cunt. that must mean i'm doing pretty well for myself. when's the next dick/scat joke?
did i say uconn was a HUGE opponent? i said they're a legitimate opponent. and yes, home and home, as opposed to that
we're not traveling to yours but whaaah, why won't you come play in our stadiums?!?! pussy shit you guys drop on the entire country.
please let us know when clemson's ever done anything other than flail around in a shite conference.
edit: er, win the acc last year.
Holy fuck. You just can't improvise with stufuckingpidity like that, can you?
ja, i suppose i could have just deleted it and pretended i never wrote that, but that move is reserved for pussies like you who drop a few tears in a bucket because they've been defriended on facebook right before following a bunch of losers to some other board because they're you're only friends.
too bad you're left defending clemson like they make up for your unwillingness to travel. they're just some middling acc team who finally won the weak half of the conference because someone has to every year and upset a better team. you could stick about 20 other teams in the acc and they would have won the conference instead. clemson is no better than notre dame aside from the fact they're on your schedule.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:55 am
by M Club
Papa Willie wrote:Dinsdale wrote:Papa Willie wrote:
Far easier to play in the cold than it is in 100 degrees.
I beg to differ.
Sin,
Common Sense
I've played football in snow. I've played football in 100 degrees. Sure - you may fall down and slide a little more in the snow. In snow - you might get a little chilly. You stick a coat on and warm up. When you're in 100 degrees and high humidity - it's pretty easy to die. It was far less stress on the body playing in the snow, fyi.
great take from the perspective of a fat man. obviously you've never hit anyone in any of those football games.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:43 pm
by Goober McTuber
Papa Willie wrote:M Club wrote:of course you're fat. i know who's on your ooc: chattanooga, la-monroe, ark state, and:
A. I've actually lost quite a bit of weight.
It's not lost, it's
temporarily misplaced.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:02 pm
by Killian
Papa Willie wrote:Killian wrote:Papa Willie wrote:Actually, we're playing Clemson this year - FAR better than any of your OOC faggots. Far better than ND, too. You might want to look at things before you start nipping at my cock, Pussy.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Sig bet? ND finishes with a better record and ranked higher than Clemson this year.
Also, you failed to address the larger point. Michigan has proven a willingness to travel. Has Auburn?
Okay - you're speaking out of emotion now.
Firstly - Clemson is normally always better than ND. They don't have the benefit of having their own personal network (NBC), as well as the other ones sucking them off. Clemson would have easily beaten ND in each of the last 5 years. Your team is dead. Has been dead. Accept, move on.
Secondly. Before speaking out of your no-knowledge ass, you might want to consider looking at schedules. Since 2000, the only note-worthy travels UM has made were to UCLA in '00, Washington in '01, and Oregon in '03. Auburn went to Syracuse in '01 and USC in '02. There goes your "willing to travel" theory. Other than that, South Bend is about as far as UM goes. Oh wait - maybe Wiscy is further? Yay?
Thirdly, other than ND, look at who Michigan is playing OOC - take last year - Western Michigan? Eastern Michigan? What in the fuck is a Delaware State? Year before last. Miami-OHIO? Toledo? Get BEAT by Appalachian State? :D
See? UM's playing shit teams as well. Funny how some of you dumbasses never notice that.
So no sig bet for you? Fine, pussy. And you want to talk about "no knowledge ass"? This post proves how little you actually follow college football. In the last 5 years, ND would have beaten Clemson in 2005 and 2006, and 2008 would have been a toss-up. That's right along the lines of "normally always better". Network sucking off has nothing to do with the quality of teams put on the field. We'll count you in the "ND is dead, they're never coming back" category.
In the time frame you cited, UofM went cross country 3 times. Auburn did it once, and travled north (in the same time zone) once. Bravo. Why don't you look back 5 more years? UofM went to BC, to Colorado, to Hawaii and to Syracuse. Auburn went to Virginia. And the 10 years preceding that, UofM went to Boston College, UCLA, Hawaii and South Carolina. Auburn went to Texas and North Carolina.
Do a little more research befor you come in this forum. UofM has proven that they will travel. Auburn has not. And we've called out their shit schedule as well.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:10 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
M Club wrote:Papa Willie wrote:]
please let us know when clemson's ever done anything other than flail around in a shite conference.
edit: er, win the acc last year.
Holy fuck. You just can't improvise with stufuckingpidity like that, can you?
ja, i suppose i could have just deleted it and pretended i never wrote that, but that move is reserved for pussies like you who drop a few tears in a bucket because they've been defriended on facebook right before following a bunch of losers to some other board because they're you're only friends.
too bad you're left defending clemson like they make up for your unwillingness to travel. they're just some middling acc team who finally won the weak half of the conference because someone has to every year and upset a better team. you could stick about 20 other teams in the acc and they would have won the conference instead. clemson is no better than notre dame aside from the fact they're on your schedule.
Uhhh, Clemson didn't win the ACC last year. They won the Atlantic Division, but lost in the CCG to Georgia Tech.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_ACC_Championship_Game
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:03 pm
by Screw_Michigan
The only things you hurt are the intellects of posters at this fair board and your recliner you plop your fat fucking ass in every night.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:27 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Papa Willie wrote:you aren't even IN a conference.
You say this like it's a bad thing.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:35 pm
by Mace
Papa Willie wrote:Dinsdale wrote:Papa Willie wrote:
Far easier to play in the cold than it is in 100 degrees.
I beg to differ.
Sin,
Common Sense
I've played football in snow. I've played football in 100 degrees. Sure - you may fall down and slide a little more in the snow. In snow - you might get a little chilly. You stick a coat on and warm up. When you're in 100 degrees and high humidity - it's pretty easy to die. It was far less stress on the body playing in the snow, fyi.
I've played and officiated in both weather extremes.....high heat index and extremely low wind chill.....and I prefer the heat to the cold. Two a day practices in high heat and humidity were tortuous, so game nights, regardless of the heat, was easy. Playing/officiating in sub freezing temps with 30 mph cold winds out of the north are much more uncomfortable....at least for me.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:42 pm
by MuchoBulls
I'd agree with Willie on that. This summer has been terrible with the heat index. I have gone to a few of our games where the wind chill was about zero and I didn't mind it at all.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:56 pm
by Killian
Papa Willie wrote:Killian wrote:SUCK
"Wet's doo a sig bet"!!!! Yay!!!!!
![Rolling Eyes :meds:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Nice - if it's 2001. Faggot.
You "pull" for a team that is a has-been, hence your unhappiness. You HAVE to travel, because you aren't even IN a conference. Oh - you're sort of a Big East team, but that's about it.
I would say that UM & Auburn BOTH need to do more traveling. Your take on that?
So what's more "2001", a sig bet or dropping "faggot" on someone? :? It's really the only way to put your money where your mouth is.
I do find it funny how quickly you decide to change the direction of your argument once you are proven wrong. So before it was: Auburn travled as much as UofM. But once proven wrong it has changed to: Auburn and UofM both need to travel more? I have a hard time keeping up with your m2 like spin moves.
Notre Dame wants to travel. Hence them wanting to stay independent and scheduling games against Miami and Texas, and having talks with Oklahoma and Alabama. I know that's hard for an SEC fan to comprehend, but it's the truth.
No unhappiness here. Notre Dame has been in the worst 15 year stretch in their history. And they just hired the two time coach of the year. Maybe they are a has been. I guess that is better than a never was, never will be.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 9:03 pm
by Goober McTuber
Sudden Sam wrote:my brain goes dead in extreme heat.
You don't have air conditioning at your house, do you? :wink:
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 9:24 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Sudden Sam wrote:I much prefer playing any sport in cold weather.
No, you wouldn't. Not if you knew what cold really was.
Sincerely,
Dude who spent 12 years in Florida and 15 years in Michigan
The thing with hot vs cold weather is, we're not just talking about personal preference here. We're talking about playing an actual, physical sport in the respective conditions. Cold weather affects the body and the game in ways the heat simply doesn't. There is a reason why you'll often see 10-6 type games in cold weather, that might normally be scored in the 60s. Guys can't run. Can't throw. Hits are much more difficult to absorb. The weather doesn't just affect your body, it affects the way the game is actually played. Game planning, play calling, etc., becomes altered.
Heat? Sure, some guys are cramping, they're sucking down water like crazy, and spending every possible moment huddled around the Cool Zone, but they're not slinging the ball around the yard any less. They're still doing everything on the field just as they practice.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 9:46 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
That might be relevant if we were talking about cross country. We're talking about playing football.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:47 pm
by buckeye_in_sc
I have no basis as to the validity of say WR's from say Northern, Mid Western U & L (Sup Ocho Cinco, TJ WHOOSeyourmomma)...but why can't Dwayne Bowe catch much past October?
Just a question...the cold affects the ball...obviously making it harder, etc...again just observations...I have been to games in both types of weather and I would much rather be in a Heat environment to watch a game than say 35 degrees and a cold sleet mixture (PSU's first game at OSU in the Shoe in 1993)...
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:55 pm
by M Club
Papa Willie wrote:
And you completely ignored the facts that you were presented.
![Rolling Eyes :meds:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
I reckon you're just stupid, in denial, and/or both. Go back and read the facts I gave you, THEN discuss it. You know - this thread was pretty much dead until YOU brought it back up. Sorry your little labia got scuffed up.
what facts? your bitch ass was defending the sec's philosophy of never leave home by making fun of other teams' ooc schedules that, funny, tend to be wholly more impressive than the sec's, even despite the directional cupcakes everyone throws on their schedule.
your little pooter was sore just because i made fun of auburn. too bad everyone makes fun of auburn. your shit team is so useless they went undefeated and no one bothered to take them seriously. you say it's a problem everyone plays bitch teams but instead of saying so does auburn you try to convince everyone one mediocre bcs team > two mediocre bcs teams. and wow, i don't have my acc football straight, which means clemson is even more shite than i originally thought.
ja, i suppose i could have just deleted it and pretended i never wrote that, but that move is reserved for pussies like you who drop a few tears in a bucket because they've been defriended on facebook right before following a bunch of losers to some other board because they're you're only friends.
ja? The fuck is that? PMS drool? Nah - you're a stupid fag. Hope you understand.
i suppose there are stupid fags because some fat fuck who controls his hypertension with smiley faces says so and there are stupid fags who break down and pout when his message board friends call some dumb cunt a dumb cunt. "i'm leaving you, dave." who's the homo?
Too bad you're in denial about a "Delaware State" (barely a fucking state, anyway).
Besides - you got beaten by APPALACHIAN STATE. How long do you think THAT is going to pinch your clit? :D
ja, app state. the suck. i generally console myself by watching a replay of the last time michigan played auburn.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:59 pm
by M Club
Papa Willie wrote:M Club wrote:
great take from the perspective of a fat man. obviously you've never hit anyone in any of those football games.
I've hurt people in both. You're a pussy, so the only pain you've ever probably felt was a 10 incher smashing your shit-port.
oh look, a poop joke and something made up wholly out of thin air to 'prove' your made up shit about playing football.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:15 am
by Goober McTuber
Papa Willie wrote:MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:That might be relevant if we were talking about cross country. We're talking about playing football.
I've played in 20. I've played in 100. 100 kicked the shit out of me WAY more than 20 did. Hell - 75 kicked my ass more than 20 did!
Of course it did. You're a fat fuck with multiple layers of blubber. Most of us normal folk found it more difficult to play football in extreme cold. :P
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:34 am
by M Club
Papa Willie wrote:
Again, you ignore the facts. Your task is to read the facts and learn. Until you do so, you are wasting my fucking time. It's hard for me sometimes to relate to pigshit-dumbasses. Smarten up a little, fucker.
i'm wasting your time? is that why you spend so much time replying, you worked-up cow? and my task? like i'm going to read up on your facts and "learn." your facts are characterized as either [1] SECBSH or [2] scat. solid intellect there, queer.
Your team got beaten by Appalachian State. As long as you live, you'll never live that down. And THEY had to make the trip to Gay Arbor. :D
i have lived it down. if you're going to be one of those losers who assigns character to whether or not his team does well then you should start rooting for someone who can at least hack .500 in their conference.
I leave smiley faces for people like you, only because I know it sticks deeply within your shit. To make matters worse - THEN you comment on it.
says some inbred who's had to learn how to not take this board so seriously. watch your cholesterol and you can leave as many smileys as you'd like.
There it is again - "ja". Fuck man - that's weird. I mean - it's bad enough to see an uneducated/dumbfuck like yourself not even have the common decency to begin sentences with capital letters, but what in the fuck is this "ja" shit? Is that kind of like explaining that you're taking a breath or the sound of the exit of a cock from your mouth?
Fag removes cock from GayClub's mouth.
GayClub says "ja"..
Is that it? Seriously - relay some information on this new revelation you've suddenly created out of thin air (or stuffed asshole).
for someone whining about the uneducated, it's pretty easy to pick up on ja. that and we can compare transcripts if you'd like. though do tell about all those homo fantasies you type out for this board: are they just words that pass through your filter, or pretty colorful visualizations, or what? the best i can do is 'dude fucked dude in the ass,' but you get pretty descriptive. i know you're fat and that just sitting in a chair thinking about food makes you sweat, but does submitting posts here make you sweat even more?
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 4:52 am
by Goober McTuber
Papa Willie wrote:
You're just old. You're used to being cold (blood-thinners).
The really sad thing (for you) is that I'm 12 years older than you, and I'm probably healthier than you in every way imaginable with a greater life expectancy. [Captain Obvious]Sucks to be you.[/Captain Obvious]
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 7:24 am
by M Club
Papa Willie wrote:
Bwahaha! Now here's the "inbred" thing. Funny on several levels. Firstly, some of the worst fucking redneck hicks I've ever seen were from Michigan. Transplants down in Florida, who (for some bizarre reason) feel the need to dress in blue jeans and no shirt. Really fucking strange.
Fishing is good here. Do you understand that?
good point: there's white trash everywhere. of course it never occurred to you why a bunch of fat, worthless cousins of yours would travel down from michigan and find the south too irresistible to leave.
Melt, G Club, melt!
Before you respond, have you performed your assigned task? Oh wait - "ja"? Is that what you're going to reply with? Again - shut the fuck up, stupid. With each swish, I flick the mosquito off my ballz. I can make a stupid fuck like you dance hoops for fucking years if I want to. I'd imagine you're a fat fuck, too. Probably about 5'4". We know you're a stupid fuck - that much is blatantly obvious.
Perform your task, ball-tweaker.
melt, from a guy who couldn't possibly look at a post directed to him without hitting the submit button just to write about cock and feces. nice charade, puppet master.
i weigh 185 and have run more marathons than you've eaten donuts in the last half hour. you can assume whatever height seems reasonable.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:19 am
by M Club
Papa Willie wrote:Funny - that's seemingly all you've spoke about here recently. See? Now I've got you running in total circles. People like you are very, very easy to control.
love to see you break those circles down. or more talking out of your arse?
You've got to love the internet.
really have to love the internet. what is it, 4.00 am where you live? just had to hit submit one more time before going to bed, right? you probably tried your best to rise above the reply button, but then your eyes started bulging out of your head, the donut crumbs started collecting in the spittle on the side of your mouth, and the sweat began to make its way between your gelatinous back rolls. you just can't resist.
otherwise, you're right, i can lie all i want about how much i weigh. i still have that privilege since i haven't shared what a fat, worthless loser i am with the rest of the board. how many bypasses have you had?
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:55 pm
by Killian
I love the "nipping at my balls" comment. If you mean "shooting down my shitty points and causing me to change direction" than sure. Call it whatever you want. You haven't made a valid point that you can stand behind, yet. Are you going to start anytime soon, or just resort to shit jokes, calling people a faggot and calling them ankle/ball biters when they trash your points?
And no, you came right out and said that you didn't see any teams coming down south. Once it was pointed out to you that teams from the north have no problem going out west and out east, you changed your tune to "everyone has shitty OOC schedules!", like a typical SECBSH. Don't try to take the "I guess I should dumb it down for those less intelligent than me" because you're not that bright. You've proven it, time and again. You can't carry on a conversation about college football for more than a post or two before you revert right back to your scat/homo jokes. You should probably just stick to CDS where someone, however unlikely, might look at one of those and get a chuckle.
And yep, Notre Dame did lose to Navy. Navy was a bowl team, but they get shit on because they are an acadamy. It'd too bad ND doesn't have Vandy and Mississipi State to kick around. Oh fuck....
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:57 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Nice to see Papa Willie relegate himself to be the AP of BTPCFB. What a worthless piece of trash.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:02 pm
by Mace
Neither extreme is good for players but, for fans (at least this one), I'd much prefer sitting in the stadium in a t-shirt and shorts than being bundled up in 5 layers of clothing, freezing my ass off, and, due to everyone wearing so much cold weather gear, feeling like a sardine trying to squeeze into the limited bleacher space.
As a player/official/coach, I was always more concerned with pulling a hamstring/muscles in cold weather, and only had to deal with cramps in the heat (something that could usually be avoided by drinking plenty of water/pickle juice/gatorade, and eating a few bananas. I've umpired high school and college baseball games where we've called the game because the snowflakes were so big that it made it dangerous for the hitters and fielders trying to see the ball, and in such extreme heat on artificial turf that it felt like the soles of your shoes were melting into the turf. Players don't usually die from playing/practicing in the cold, but there have been far too many cases where they die from the heat. That said, I'd prefer playing in hot weather (80-85 degrees, but not extreme heat) than in the extreme cold.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:25 pm
by Mace
Sudden Sam wrote: I want cold weather. Granted, cold to me would be 35-40, but that's football weather.
I'll agree with the 35-40 degrees being perfect football weather. Hell, we're still playing golf at those temps.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:43 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Stop being intellectually dishonest, Sam. Generally speaking, it's harder to execute your offense in this:
than this:
Even the most stubborn of dipshits wouldn't disagree with this.
It's all sensationalized anyway. It's Fall. Rarely do you see one extreme or the other.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 6:38 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Yeah, if we're talking personal preference, I'll take the cold. I just think there's a difference between preference and level of difficulty.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:01 pm
by M Club
Papa Willie wrote:
Hardly. The shit that tumbles from within my anus is superior to you or anything you've ever known. Hope that sets the next level of what you now know you need to strive to reach.
exactly. all you have in your quiver is:
1. you're gay, because.
2. you're retarded, because.
3. i'm slapping you around, because.
4. poop, because
5. SECBSH, because
6. nothing, because.
7. nipping at my balls, because.
you can say you're running smack/making a point/etc., but at some point you're actually going to have to. like, say, when killian jocks you re: michigan's past travel and you still continue with your original point about only three trips out west, as if SECBSH is allowed to use "only" in reference to travel.
and yes, everyone schedules a bunch of dick stoppers. the problem is most schools will schedule at least one game that requires a flight every other year or so while the sec refuses even that one tiny challenge.
It was 1:24 CST when you posted last night. 6:56 CST this morning when you first posted. I'm not the one losing sleep. :D
good work, clouseau. now figure out what time zone i live in. i generally post from the comfort of my office desk.
5. Watch - you'll keep taking the bait, followed by ranting and raving. :D
i all but dared you to walk away but you couldn't. not much self-restraint for someone pulling the strings, eh. i'm going to call you an inbred homo right now just because your calm, cool, and collected self is going to flip his shit.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 2:15 pm
by M Club
1. you're gay, because.
2. you're retarded, because.
3. i'm slapping you around, because.
4. poop, because
5. SECBSH, because
6. nothing, because.
7. nipping at my balls, because.
jesus, six of seven, you predictable wanker.
What time zone are you in, Sparky? No matter what the time zone, you made your last, went to bed for a couple of hours, and then woke up 5 hours later just to reply. Stupid fuck!
1.24 am cst is 3.24 pm where i live. 6.56 am cst is 8.56 pm. why don't you piece that together in a way that suits your whole puppet master persona.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:12 pm
by Goober McTuber
Spray has been on auto-smack for over a week now. Predictable would be an understatement.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 5:04 pm
by Goober McTuber
Papa Willie wrote:Goober McTuber wrote:Spray has been on auto-smack for over a week now. Predictable would be an understatement.
You're my grandfather. Don't worry, we'll find a home for you soon.
Yeah, because I knocked up your mother when I was 6 years old. Your time would be better spent searching for an over-sized urn to hold your ashes.
Re: SEC!
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:39 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Stop tarding up the cfb forum with this inane gibberish, dipwads.
"He started it!" in 3...2...1...
Re: SEC!
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:02 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Yeah, apparently I misunderstood you. It's all good.