Page 3 of 3
Re: Stanford-VT
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:41 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Auburn is a good team, but it's not like they've blown people away 95 Huskers style. No reason to think Oregon can't hang. Tough game to get a read on. I picked Auburn but if I could get a re-do I'd probably go with Oregon. There is still uncertainty over suspended players, yes? Dunno, just seems like Oregon's time.
Re: Stanford-VT
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:52 pm
by Dinsdale
MONEY wrote:
All those loses came against the PAC.
Silly me -- I'd totally forgotten that Nevada joined the PAC a few years ago.
But I see ya working -- when Oregon beats Auburn by more than 2 points... the MTransitive Property kicks in, giving Kal their 18th straight.
Re: Stanford-VT
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:54 pm
by Dinsdale
stuckinia wrote:Props to Stanford for kicking VT's ass in the second half.
PAC10 Track Meet, baby!
And what Stanford did to VT in the 2nd half, is exactly what Oregon did to Stanford in the 2nd half -- passed the baton in the 800 meter relay, and left the opponent in the dust.
Re: Stanford-VT
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:55 pm
by Dinsdale
King Crimson wrote:only a matter of time until the option is back.
About 6 days.
But it ain't your daddy's option.
Re: Stanford-VT
Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:56 pm
by SoCalTrjn
USC should have hired David Shaw last year, hopefully they fix that problem this year and hire him