T1B

mvscal wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Frederick Douglass and William Welles Brown.

Frederick Douglass was an ordained minister, you stupid asshole.

Once again, let's turd shows us he's the bruce lee of KYOA.

Tom In VA wrote:Unless of course you plan on some sort of genocide. Which, knowing the left - that's precisely what underscores a vast majority of its platform.

The Democrats are planning genocide? You are really a piece of work.

Goober McTuber wrote:The Democrats are planning genocide?

They might not be planning it per se, but that's where their policies are headed. Massive debt fueling spiraling inflation. Rising energy costs choking economic growth and stragling consumers. Hostile regulatory climates preventing any expansion of business.

This country is going down in flames and brainless fucktards like you are too goddamn stupid to see it.

And..right wing agendas of deregulation, NAFTA, union-busting, and attacks on women's rights and the environment are supposed to help things?

Now is a perfect time for a massive WPA-type program. That's right, just like it worked in the 1930's, it can work again--even better.

88 wrote:
Well, "technically" they weren't open about it, just stupid. Neither senator suck-off, or congressman bare-chest seemed like they wanted to get caught--

I was talking about the DemocRats, dipshit. You know... the ones you said weren't getting "caught"? And Ted Haggard was taking it up the ass from one of your heros: a DemocRat.[/quote]

Prick, you're confused. NO Democrats have been caught in any such perv cases. Standard hetero dalliances, yes. But no perv shit. Or what, can you cite an example? As for the masseuse who was porking the pastor being a democrat, are you kidding?[/quote]

[/quote]

SS, this is another barometer of the sheer stupidity of your ilk.

Are you suggesting that because Barney Frank is openly gay (or privately) that this is a scandal of "perv" proportions? You're kidding, right? I mean, Frank has never been arrested or the subject of any kind of underage or "pages" or payoffs or public men's rooms. Nothing. But your Deuteronomy programmed head space just automatically attacks him? You're pathetic.

And where is an actual perv scandal on the Demos' side anyway? C'mon, ya phony lil' punk.

mvscal wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:The Democrats are planning genocide?

They might not be planning it per se, but that's where their policies are headed. Massive debt fueling spiraling inflation. Rising energy costs choking economic growth and stragling consumers. Hostile regulatory climates preventing any expansion of business.

This country is going down in flames and brainless fucktards like you are too goddamn stupid to see it.

Oh yeah, genocide. Like Tom said.

You really have become a pathetic caricature of your former self.

LTS TRN 2 wrote: Frank has never been arrested or the subject of any kind of underage or "pages" or payoffs or public men's rooms. Nothing. .

Glad to see you defend Barney's running a gay brothel out of his Georgetown Townhouse as "nothing"

As far as the DiS thing... This guy was a republican, right?



Oh wait... he didn't get arrested, so it doesn't count, right?

Good job or scouring around, SS, but your examples pale before the truly perv antics of only the most recent two GOP/Christer resignees.

I mean Mel Reynolds? C'mon, the dude was pulling some tender young tail--female. Okay, that's very stupid but not perv action.

The gay governor would seem a good prospect for pervness, but no, he copped to it and openly declared both his regret and his proper destiny. In other words, he wasn't hiding, lying, or proclaiming anti-gay sentiments and legislation. You see, no hypocrisy.

Same with Barney Frank. He immediately copped to the improprieties of the situation--came clean before congress and was reelected by a landslide. Not exactly the same as with senator suck-off ("widestance")--who in fact has crawled back as a lobbyist ("Hey, nothing's changed").


No, the plain facts reveal that the truly fucked up perv hypocrisy of the modern American political scene is a GOP affair. And why is this? Well, start with the staple religion and its warped features, then consider the twisted social agenda. Attacking teachers unions?

Goober McTuber wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Unless of course you plan on some sort of genocide. Which, knowing the left - that's precisely what underscores a vast majority of its platform.

The Democrats are planning genocide? You are really a piece of work.

Wow "Democrats are planning genocide" didn't even appear in my post, a post that you quoted. You're a magician. I guess I didn't realize how much the left wing extremists had infiltrated the DNC. To be fair, right wing extremists are just as maniacal, they just don't exist within the Republican party to the degree that - I guess according to you - left wing extremists exist in the DNC.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:And..right wing agendas of... NAFTA.

You really are a clueless fuck.

...with much consideration and emotional discussion the House of Representatives approved NAFTA on November 17, 1993, by a vote of 234 to 200. The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. NAFTA passed the Senate 61-38. Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; it went into effect on January 1, 1994. Clinton while signing the NAFTA bill stated: "…NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement.”

Tom In VA wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Unless of course you plan on some sort of genocide. Which, knowing the left - that's precisely what underscores a vast majority of its platform.

The Democrats are planning genocide? You are really a piece of work.

Wow "Democrats are planning genocide" didn't even appear in my post, a post that you quoted. You're a magician. I guess I didn't realize how much the left wing extremists had infiltrated the DNC. To be fair, right wing extremists are just as maniacal, they just don't exist within the Republican party to the degree that - I guess according to you - left wing extremists exist in the DNC.

You really believe that a significant portion of the left is planning some sort of genocide? I mean, that's what your post suggests. You referenced the left. Not left wing extremist, but the left.

Goober McTuber wrote: You really believe that a significant portion of the left is planning some sort of genocide? I mean, that's what your post suggests. You referenced the left. Not left wing extremist, but the left.

Take into account my linguistic deficiencies, "genocide" and "mass murder" to me mean the same thing, although genocide is typically reserved for certain things like a specific race, religion, etc. Do I think that left wingers are planning genocide? Not conciously. I don't think they hold meetings on it.

The point I was trying to make Goobs is to contrast LTS's ramblings on Christers and Right Wings. Genocide happens from the left and from Atheisism as well. Genocide happens because of human beings. That's it, that's history, the idealogical, religious or bullshit propaganda that the actors use to justify their genocide - don't mean shit. LTS would be quite content to have Christers and Conservatives continuously painted in a light that they and they alone are guilty of all humanities ills. That is false.

I'm not so sure many of the genocides and mass murders that have taken place were necessarily planned. Typically they occur during the struggle for power - when no central balancing power exists OR after one side assumes power, becoming the central power.

The Law of Unintended Consequences.

Tom In VA wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote: You really believe that a significant portion of the left is planning some sort of genocide? I mean, that's what your post suggests. You referenced the left. Not left wing extremist, but the left.

Take into account my linguistic deficiencies, "genocide" and "mass murder" to me mean the same thing, although genocide is typically reserved for certain things like a specific race, religion, etc. Do I think that left wingers are planning genocide? Not conciously. I don't think they hold meetings on it.

The point I was trying to make Goobs is to contrast LTS's ramblings on Christers and Right Wings. Genocide happens from the left and from Atheisism as well. Genocide happens because of human beings. That's it, that's history, the idealogical, religious or bullshit propaganda that the actors use to justify their genocide - don't mean shit. LTS would be quite content to have Christers and Conservatives continuously painted in a light that they and they alone are guilty of all humanities ills. That is false.

I'm not so sure many of the genocides and mass murders that have taken place were necessarily planned. Typically they occur during the struggle for power - when no central balancing power exists OR after one side assumes power, becoming the central power.

The Law of Unintended Consequences.

But you suggested that the left has a platform based on genocide. Which appears to be total bullshit. Unless you care to back it up. Or just spin and backpedal some more. Either one. I don’t care.

Goober McTuber wrote:Either one. I don’t care.

Good. Here's a hint though, check out what's really driving the Global Warming stuff. It ain't the heat.

Tom In VA wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:Either one. I don’t care.

Good. Here's a hint though, check out what's really driving the Global Warming stuff. It ain't the heat.

Of course not. It's the left wing's genocide agenda. You pull this shit all the time, Tom. You throw out these off-base provocations, then when you get called on it you act all hurt and misunderstood.

C'mon, Tom, you can't be serious. You're reduced to hiding behind the "Leftist government genocide" card? And you're accusing me of "rambling"?

I'm still waiting for you to produce a single example of a religious based government that has resembled anything palatable to a modern person. I've named a wide and disparate variety of nations that are decidedly secular in their design. And you've offered...??...well, nothing. And no, of course I've not blamed all humanities' disasters on religious-based governments or groups. Rather, I've pointed out that wars based on religion have proven every bit as murderous as the horrid purges of Russia, China, And Cambodia, etc. And moreover, that the actual legacy of the Christers in America has in fact been a long host of "blue laws" and extremely discriminatory--and unconstitutional--laws concerning personal morality, all of which are in fact directly derived originally from Deuteronomy. And there's nothing else the Christers have offered, despite the unfounded and lazy assumptions. The current politicized Christer is a scared and seething racist moron if we are to use the Tea Baggers as a litmus. And they would indeed insist that they are the modern vanguard of the Word, etc. Pathetic.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:I'm still waiting for you to produce a single example of a religious based government that has resembled anything palatable to a modern person.

You're going to have define what you mean by a "modern person". And "palatable" doesn't mean shit.

Show me a government with laws. I'll show you a government that has religious influence.

That's a completely reductive approach. It's like suggesting that the "Golden Rule" is somehow a Christian proposition. Sure, it's a staple of the Christian teachings, but it was clearly derived from Confucious, who lived four hundred years prior. Okay? You're apparently attempting to assume the same sort of derivative approach to...??..the modern Women's Rights movement? Civil Rights? Gay Rights? The right to sue major corporations?

These are the sort of laws upon which a society might be called modern. Now...where do find any specific religious base for this?

In point of fact, the modern society--here and in other continents, is based on repealing the variety of religious based laws. And as you know, this is a long odious list of ignorance and intolerance. I mean who do you suppose insisted that "witches' be murdered? That homosexuals be persecuted? That interracial relationships are wrong? That women remain docile and uneducated? Of course it was religions, both here in the Christer cult form, and elsewhere under the guise of Islam. And non-monotheisitc religions are often just as bad. In Africa, for example, the religious laws of various cultures demand the execution of "witches" to this day.

The difference is that we in America have (largely) moved beyond the religious based law system. The Tea Baggers, of course, represent a regression. It's not to hard to understand.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:The Tea Baggers, of course, represent a regression. It's not to hard to understand.

The 'Baggers aren't part of any religious revival.

At all.

No, b-juice, the Tea Bagger movement is decidedly based on a Christer cult foundation. It's not your good gentle Lutheran approach, but it is religious and acts in all manner of a revival movement. Try to keep up.

Damn thread hijackers. Let's get back on subject of AP. More photos have emerged, this one apparently shot by a close associate of his.

Sorry, but unless this "AP" is taking it up the tailpipe from a transvestite Climate Change denialist while screaming to treble the wealth of the Koch brothers, he's playing catch up.

And..who are you?