T1B

Posted: **Fri Oct 07, 2011 4:31 pm**

Ya'know, giving this matter more thought...

With all the CRAP in the HoF, how the living FUCK is Tommy James not in?

Posted: **Fri Oct 07, 2011 4:34 pm**

Martyred wrote: Van, what were you doing when the cool kids were sneaking six packs into the woods to party around bonfires with their ghetto-blasters?

I was one of the "cool kids," except we'd haul kegs into the woods.

I was the guy throwing the tard who cranked up the Beastie Boys onto the bonfire.

Posted: **Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:27 pm**

My fave:

Posted: **Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:18 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:
Martyred wrote: Van, what were you doing when the cool kids were sneaking six packs into the woods to party around bonfires with their ghetto-blasters?
I was one of the "cool kids," except we'd haul kegs into the woods.

I was the guy throwing the tard who cranked up the Beastie Boys onto the bonfire.

I wasn't specifically referencing the Beastie Boys as "bonfire rock".

Back In Black = greatest bonfire album ever recorded

...and, no I don't mean "Yeah, it should be thrown into the bonfire"...

Besides, Sudden Sam's wax cylinders would melt anywhere near a bonfire.

Posted: **Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:29 pm**

I got your waxed cylinder right here.

Posted: **Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:46 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:I got your waxed cylinder right here.

Well played.

Posted: **Fri Oct 07, 2011 7:00 pm**

A masterful rejoinder.

Posted: **Sat Oct 08, 2011 2:56 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:"Period of time, chronologically speaking, for enough of a while, at this point in time, to have lasted -- in regards to the calender, to have persevered, long enough, through the ages..."

Though it somehow needs to start with "To be fair" and end with "IMHO."

Posted: **Sat Oct 08, 2011 3:02 pm**

The Beastie Boys are one of the most overrated acts of all time. Just pure dreck.

Posted: **Sat Oct 08, 2011 3:52 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:didn't stick around for a long enough period of time, chronologically speaking, to merit inclusion.
We should forward this sentence to the person who attempted to teach you English, to see if they have a stroke.

If a "redundancy" involves using two words that mean the same thing together to describe something, what do you call it when you use five?

Not two, not three... fucking five.

The problem with the Beastie Boys is that they didn't have a scrap of musical talent between them, got sued for every penny the had for stealing music (from a true R&R HoFer), and were offensive to the eardrums.

But if you're going to put them in because of their skin color (surprised to see this from Terry, of all people) in regards to "innovation," then House Of Pain goes in too, right?

Lighten up, Dins. Have you ever read a legal document? George Will thinks you're sideways....

Clearly, attorneys are paid by the word. They can't he'p it. Why use three words to make a point where 11 will easily suffice?

Posted: **Sat Oct 08, 2011 4:22 pm**

I like a lot of words also, I mean, what good is the spoken word and the written word if you cant use as many as possible?

Its like sex, you wouldnt want to just stick it in, dump ur load, and leave? NO, you want to take your sweet time, make it last, unless your partner looks like roseanne barr.

Posted: **Sat Oct 08, 2011 10:12 pm**

KC Scott wrote:

It's a puffy raincoat Scott!

sin

KC Paul

T1B

(!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: (!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: (!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: (!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: (!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: (!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: (!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: (!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: (!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: (!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: Rock and Roll Hall of Fame

Re: (!) Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (!)

Re: Rock and Roll Hall of Fame