T1B

War Wagon wrote:

Truman wrote: What can I do for you, Wags?

Re-read what I posted and get back to me.

I read what you posted. I don't need to re-read what I see as an intrangient position.

twas disingenious of you to post that list of demands but not include the disclaimer, just as libs indiscriminate branding of the Tea Party isn't right.

Perhaps they both have good points, perhaps there is some common ground.

I tire of the 'us against them' mentality. There's no winner in this debate, ever, just constant finger pointing.

NEVER mention this movement of dirty cockaroaches and parasites with the TEA PARTY again.
WHAT A JOKE, this protest is full of sick fucks who want free money and free entitlements, ALL of which would come from an " out of control", bloated government, a government corrupt and broke, full of anti-freedom red diaper doper babies.

The Tea Party wants less government, they want liberty and freedom, which is what the founders intended. The founding fathers said, "the Purpose of the federal government is to PROTECT LIBERTY!"

Is their anyone on this board who doesnt understand that?

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Carson wrote:

mvscal wrote:

This picture is three fuglies away from being a gay pride sausage fest.

Spoken from experience?

WOW, do you guys see the scumbags in this crowd? Parasites and leeches, and a good amount of faggotts too, less than human cockaroaches who want what others have. I have more respect for filthy disease -filled maggotts than this crowd.

How do you feel about poor women who fuck like dirty whores, bring multiple babies into the world, and then complain about being in poverty? If you are already poor, why the fuck would you bring several children into the world? Can someone ask Oprah Winfrey this question? You make one bad choice after another, and its the rich republicans fault?

President Obama is fanning the flames of these protests. Instead of being the current president, He would be much better at being the organizer of these protests. He would feel more at home.

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Carson wrote:

mvscal wrote:

This picture is three fuglies away from being a gay pride sausage fest.

Spoken from experience?

Written from easy observation, diddler.

...and thanks for giving me another opportunity to copy this picture into this thread. One of mv's best finds.

The super-rich are your masters.

Worship them and their opulence as you would a golden calf.

Go occupy a bacon plant or a brewery, commie.

Martyred wrote:The super-rich are your masters.

Worship them and their opulence as you would a golden calf.

That's always been the case. Good call, Marty.

That picture makes no sense. The occupy movement is targeting Wall Street. What would make sense would be to have a picture of a dollar bill with the words "controlled by Wall Street investment banks" next to it. Again, the people who want to hate are trying to have it both ways. They alternately denounce the protesters as dirty hippies and then post pictures of them wearing Gap and J Crew. Try to make some sense folks.

BSmack wrote:They alternately denounce the protesters as dirty hippies and then post pictures of them wearing Gap and J Crew. Try to make some sense folks.

So they're fashionably unclean. Try to keep up, B. :wink:

BSmack wrote:That picture makes no sense.

It does to morons like mvscal who believe:

"You obviously don't like manufactured goods. Become a hair-shirt aesthete."


But the Right will always have their "shock troops". That's the way a capitalist hierarchy functions.
You can always get the lowest, most rag-ass adherent of any rotten system to participate as long as you can sell the notion that there's someone beneath them on the social ladder.

Google "last-place aversion" economic theory. It'll explain to you exactly the way Americans think and operate in a structure that does not have their best interests at heart.

Truman wrote:

BSmack wrote:They alternately denounce the protesters as dirty hippies and then post pictures of them wearing Gap and J Crew. Try to make some sense folks.

So they're fashionably unclean. Try to keep up, B. :wink:

That Gap shirt didn't look dirty to me.

Martyred wrote:

BSmack wrote:That picture makes no sense.

It does to morons like mvscal who believe:

"You obviously don't like manufactured goods. Become a hair-shirt aesthete."


But the Right will always have their "shock troops". That's the way a capitalist hierarchy functions.
You can always get the lowest, most rag-ass adherent of any rotten system to participate as long as you can sell the notion that there's someone beneath them on the social ladder.

Google "last-place aversion" economic theory. It'll explain to you exactly the way Americans think and operate in a structure that does not have their best interests at heart.

It is still ALL about the choices we make in a free society. You can talk all you want about the evil rich,
BUT, I can show you that people are evil and sick regardless of wether they are rich or poor.

How many sick poor folks milk the system? If a whore decides to fuck like a cockroach, and bring 4 or 5 babies into the world, when she herself is already poor? That is criminal thinking.

Just like the left demonizes Bernie Madoff, and they should, he is criminal, WE ALSO neeed to show the criminal thinking that allows a poor woman to bring multiple babies to feed into the world.

If you dont understand that its sick criminal thinking to bring lives into the world, when you are barely making it yourself? Then you are a dellusional idiot.

A single woman in poverty, if she makes the right choices in life, would have a comfortable life. Go to work at a wendys, work your ass off for a couple years, make manager, then a couple more years, be the GM. Easily live a comfortable life making 40 to 50 grand a year. BUT, go ahead and fuck like a cockaroach, bringing cockroaches into the world?
YOU made your bed, now lie in the warm shit. you pig.
Then, after your bad choices, go get rev jesse jackson and al sharpton to blame the evil rich.

Just as their are sick criminal rich folk, THERE are also plenty of sick criminal poor folk who make their own bed.
So I dont want to hear anymore one-sided bullshit about how only rich are to blame.

You want to criminalise reproductive behaviour?

I thought you said you were a Tea Party supporter?

Just to summarise:

- You want to shoot teachers in the kneecaps

- You want to jail pregnant women




Dude, you need to get laid badly.

Ask Screw_Michigan for help in re-wording your Plenty Of Fish ad. He's a "journalist". He knows about these things.

Martyred wrote:

BSmack wrote:That picture makes no sense.

It does to morons like mvscal who believe:

"You obviously don't like manufactured goods. Become a hair-shirt aesthete."


But the Right will always have their "shock troops". That's the way a capitalist hierarchy functions.
You can always get the lowest, most rag-ass adherent of any rotten system to participate as long as you can sell the notion that there's someone beneath them on the social ladder.

Google "last-place aversion" economic theory. It'll explain to you exactly the way Americans think and operate in a structure that does not have their best interests at heart.

It is really no different than how rich southern whites kept control of the poor white majority in the days of segregation. There's always an enemy (terrorists) and an underclass (Them Mexicans are stealing yer jobs!) that the rich can use to manipulate the fears of the largest segment (white America) so as the rich can maintain their wealth and status. Conversely, we are taught to emulate the super rich with the slim promise that if we're good enough we might just get that 5th golden ticket to Wonka's Factory.

What interests me (in an academic way, not a Stanley Pickle way) is what will happen when poor white America is outnumbered by brown America. Something tells me the flavor of the rhetoric will change. Perhaps some of the pasty underclass will realize how badly they have been duped. By then it will be too late.

BSmack wrote: It is really no different than how rich southern whites kept control of the poor white majority in the days of segregation. There's always an enemy (terrorists) and an underclass (Them Mexicans are stealing yer jobs!) that the rich can use to manipulate the fears of the largest segment (white America) so as the rich can maintain their wealth and status.

That's John C. "The-Marx-Of-The-Master-Class" Calhoun in a nutshell.

BTW B_Smack...I like your new avatar.

BSmack wrote:

Truman wrote:

BSmack wrote:They alternately denounce the protesters as dirty hippies and then post pictures of them wearing Gap and J Crew. Try to make some sense folks.

So they're fashionably unclean. Try to keep up, B. :wink:

That Gap shirt didn't look dirty to me.

It was the smell. I thought everbody's Interwebs came with scratch-n-sniff.

Martyred wrote:You want to criminalise reproductive behaviour?

I thought you said you were a Tea Party supporter?

NO NO, dont mis-understand me here, I said its the same sick criminal thinking, DONT punish them, JUST dont blame the rich. IN OTHER WORDS, dont say its Bush's fault that there is poverty in the black community. Dont say BUSH made those filthy women open their vaginas for criminals to stick their aids infested cocks in, and make aids infested babies. STOP making rich folks the villians for poor peoples bad choices.
AGAIN, if a poor woman makes the right choices as I laid out, she will have a comfortable life.

Martyred wrote:

BSmack wrote: It is really no different than how rich southern whites kept control of the poor white majority in the days of segregation. There's always an enemy (terrorists) and an underclass (Them Mexicans are stealing yer jobs!) that the rich can use to manipulate the fears of the largest segment (white America) so as the rich can maintain their wealth and status.

That's John C. "The-Marx-Of-The-Master-Class" Calhoun in a nutshell.

That is exactly who I was channeling. The divide and conquer method goes back to Sun-Tzu and was the natural fallback position when "Do what we say or you will go to a fiery hell" started to lose its resonance post Enlightenment.

BSmack wrote:It is really no different than how rich southern whites kept control of the poor white majority in the days of segregation. There's always an enemy (terrorists) and an underclass (Them Mexicans are stealing yer jobs!) that the rich can use to manipulate the fears of the largest segment (white America) so as the rich can maintain their wealth and status. Conversely, we are taught to emulate the super rich with the slim promise that if we're good enough we might just get that 5th golden ticket to Wonka's Factory.

Yeah, too bad we didn't have union thugs like Jimmy Hoffa to tell us that businesses are the enemy.

Solidarity forever, y'all.

Union Shop




Non-Union Shop






Spare me your "Mace...second from the left" emails. I'm not reading them. ~crumple~crumple~

Carson wrote:Yeah, too bad we didn't have union thugs like Jimmy Hoffa to tell us that businesses are the enemy.

Solidarity forever, y'all.

How you doing my fellow 99 Percenter? How's your health insurance? How about those stagnant wages? You like those gas prices? You like the idea of poisoning the water table for the next 10,000 years so we can keep oil and gas company profits high?

Enjoy the teens.

Posting dirty pics of little kids?

I'm pretty sure that was taken prior to child labor laws.

...and probably not in the US.

Carson wrote: I'm pretty sure that was taken prior to child labor laws.

...and probably not in the US.

You are an idiot.

Child labour laws weren't handed down by benevolent mining companies, nor were they granted by concerned governments.

They were fought for (with blood many times) by the very "union thugs" you so ignorantly deride.



Learn your own history.

How's your health insurance?

Just fine, thank you.

How about those stagnant wages?

Uhh, six raises and two promotions in the last 8 years.

You like those gas prices?

No, but we're not allowed to drill in our own oil fields.

You like the idea of poisoning the water table for the next 10,000 years so we can keep oil and gas company profits high?

You actually believe that bullshit?

Enjoy the teens.

I plan on it, once we get that union sex doll out of office.

Martyred wrote:

Carson wrote: I'm pretty sure that was taken prior to child labor laws.

...and probably not in the US.

You are an idiot.

Child labour laws weren't handed down by benevolent mining companies, nor were they granted by concerned governments.

They were fought for (with blood many times) by the very "union thugs" you so ignorantly deride.



Learn your own history.

Rack. "Last Place Aversion" is perfectly applicable to Carson.

Screwey the cyberpunk rides again.

Commie: so which country was that picture taken in?

Here's what poor America would look like with no unions.

So if second and third world countries were to unionize, all their problems would be gone?

Go tell that to Egypt and Libya before they fuck everything up.

Carson wrote:So if second and third world countries were to unionize, all their problems would be gone?

Unions don't end all problems. Only an ignorant fucktard would think that.

Go tell that to Egypt and Libya before they fuck everything up.

Egypt and Libya will be fine as long as the west doesn't meddle.

Never mind. They're fucked.

Carson wrote:
Commie: so which country was that picture taken in?

All of them, and every country that puts and has put profits before people, including yours.

Learn your country's own history.

Toddowen wrote:

Martyred wrote:Union Job

Have you ever been in a union shop? The one thing you can bet a union shop obsesses about is safety. If that was a union shop he would be sleeping in the cab.

BSmack wrote:Here's what poor America would look like with no unions.

Congratulations, Bri.

The Tea Party just got Diego's vote. Hope you can live with yourself.

Commie: I'm still waiting for a specific answer to my picture question, not a philosophical rambling from an leftist Celine Dion groupie.

I kinda dig the unions -- because of those fools donating their paycheck so their masters can buy off politicians, my non-union ass gets to pull down some tasty prevailing wage, although I'm sure plenty of people would be happy to do my job for half what I get paid.

Kinda fucks the taxpayer, but those people only exist to enrich the political elite, a heap on which the unions sit atop of.


Works for me.

Carson wrote:Commie: I'm still waiting for a specific answer to my picture question,

You have a tiny brain.

I answered your question, you pedantic dipshit.



Do you want me to Google a pic of an American child labourer? Are you that obtuse?


The image of a child labourer is symbolic.

Dinsdale wrote:I kinda dig the unions -- because of those fools donating their paycheck so their masters can buy off politicians, my non-union ass gets to pull down some tasty prevailing wage, although I'm sure plenty of people would be happy to do my job for half what I get paid.

Kinda fucks the taxpayer, but those people only exist to enrich the political elite, a heap on which the unions sit atop of.


Works for me.

Another idiot that's never cracked a history book.
What would your wage be without the struggle of organised labour? Equating some union corruption with every benefit fought and won by working people is cowardly...bordering on lunatic thinking.


Shut the fuck up, dumbass.

Surely those children were taken from their parents by The Child Snatcher and forced by Baron Bomburst to work in his toy factory.

Keep minimizing personal responsibility, idiot.

Carson wrote:...personal responsibility...

Absolutely, unequivocally, without a doubt, the most subjective term in the American vocabulary.
Ever.

Agreed.

And as it gets progressively minimized, so goes America's greatness.

Pretty soon we'll all be drones. At least those willing to work...