Page 3 of 3

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:19 pm
by Atomic Punk
Goobs, trust me... I know what every team schedule is and have seen many of the contenders play. It's just I don't see them actually play for a month or two.

I've always said Boise plays nobody except when they have time to prep. The Boise fans don't travel well for games so they get snubbed from a BCS game. Notice they are joining the Big lEast for football only?

Look at Iowa State's results. Boise State would kill Iowa State without a month of prep time but Okie Lite lost to ISU. The BCS got it right this year.

Georgia exposed LSU's defense, however they folded after the dropped balls in the 1st half. Did you see Georgia's defensive line dominate LSU's O line? It's all about match up ups. What is idiotic about that?

Don't forget to show up 15 minutes early for your next Brazilian wax. Even I wouldn't do that.

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:17 am
by Truman
Sudden Sam wrote:
M2 wrote:We've seen that game ...
So you'd rather see LSU - 42, OSU - 14?
Color me a scenario where that's even possiblity, Sammie.

Three Mattieu punt returns for touchdowns? Gotta think that even the Pokes would be sharp enough to start kickin' 'em out-of bounds after the first one.

Regardless, it wouldn't make any difference with LSU lookin' up at 56.

Did it ever occur to you that Oke State's D has such a poor showing because they're up 40 every game? 9-6 games would be a bit out of reach for most anybody when you're in prevent after the first quarter.

LSU's O blows goats. Hell, those people don't even know which quarterback to play half the time. And 'bama's aint any better. Send SEC offensive game film to Gitmo and we wouldn't be bombed for ten years.

The voters did us a disservice. Enjoy your circle-jerk, Sam.

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:04 pm
by Goober McTuber
Jsc810 wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:Georgia exposed LSU's defense
:lol:
Come on. They were 20-51 passing with 2 ints, averaged 2.3 yards per rushing attempt. Now that’s how you expose a defense. And AP knows a bit about exposing.

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:19 pm
by M2
I think we all can remember when Jsc was asked to name 3 players on the LSU team... and he couldn't come up with it.

Thats all you need to know about... ( guy with 42 favorite teams ) .

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:03 pm
by Atomic Punk
Goober McTuber wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:Georgia exposed LSU's defense
:lol:
Come on. They were 20-51 passing with 2 ints, averaged 2.3 yards per rushing attempt. Now that’s how you expose a defense. And AP knows a bit about exposing.
Georgia had LSU early and since they couldn't make 1+1=2 in the passing game they started running the ball against the 2nd best defense in the country. Don't play "Stats Guy" with me as it's about match ups. If you've watched the game you would have seen Georgia defensive linemen running through LSU's offensive line during the game.

Have you figured out why the previous LSU - 'Bama game was a defensive battle yet? If you've watched them actually play and not read stats then it may click for you.

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:30 pm
by Goober McTuber
Atomic Punk wrote:Georgia had LSU early and since they couldn't make 1+1=2 in the passing game they started running the ball against the 2nd best defense in the country. Don't play "Stats Guy" with me as it's about match ups. If you've watched the game you would have seen Georgia defensive linemen running through LSU's offensive line during the game.
So are you now changing your argument to "Georgia's defense exposed LSU's offense?

Atomic Punk wrote:Have you figured out why the previous LSU - 'Bama game was a defensive battle yet? If you've watched them actually play and not read stats then it may click for you.
Because Alabama wasn't able to "expose" LSU's defense the way Georgia did? You do understand that Georgia averaged less than 3.5 yards per offensive play against LSU? You are just a complete fucking mess.

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:37 pm
by Atomic Punk
Goobs, why are you intellectually dishonest?

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:57 pm
by Goober McTuber
Atomic Pantload, why are you shitfaced at 1:30 in the afternoon? Please point out what was dishonest?

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:10 pm
by Atomic Punk
Goober McTuber wrote:Atomic Pantload, why are you shitfaced at 1:30 in the afternoon? Please point out what was dishonest?
Because trev is serving some fine drinks and wearing high heels with a short maid's uniform. She's not very good at cleaning this place but I appreciate the service, if you will.

I've already laid it out in this thread and you throw stats at me. Did you even watch the games I've mentioned? If so, then you are intellectually dishonest. I can't wait for 'Bama to beat LSU and I'll remind you of this thread and you'll be a bigger jackass than you are now.

Listen to me dummy, Jim McElwain will figure out what went wrong the 1st time around on the offensive side. 'Bama's defense is a bit better than LSU's, so that creates a stalemate on the defensive side. Did you watch the Georgia - LSU game and see how Georgia blew apart the LSU O-line? It's all about match-ups with personnel on any level.

Hey trev, bring me another one. I need to keep this buzz going.

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:38 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
So Georgia "exposed" LSU up until the point they started getting their asses kicked. Umm, good for them? Does that mean they cracked AP's top 5 because they played one good quarter of football? I sure hope Georgia can expose Michigan State in the same way.

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 3:01 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
I think it will be a good game, but who knows. I feel much better about MSU's D vs Georgia's O than I do MSU's O vs Georgia's D. MSU really struggled against the 3-4 the last couple times they faced it (Bama, ND).

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:44 pm
by Goober McTuber
Atomic Punk wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Atomic Pantload, why are you shitfaced at 1:30 in the afternoon? Please point out what was dishonest?
Because trev is serving some fine drinks and wearing high heels with a short maid's uniform. She's not very good at cleaning this place but I appreciate the service, if you will.

I've already laid it out in this thread and you throw stats at me. Did you even watch the games I've mentioned? If so, then you are intellectually dishonest. I can't wait for 'Bama to beat LSU and I'll remind you of this thread and you'll be a bigger jackass than you are now.
Bama could beat LSU 50-0 and that would not change the fact that you are a complete idiot who posts absolute nonsense. Does Victoria's Secret have a Big and Tall section, you drunken cross-dressing tard?

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:07 am
by Python
Goober McTuber wrote: Does Victoria's Secret have a Big and Tall section?
Yes.

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:09 pm
by Goober McTuber
Python wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote: Does Victoria's Secret have a Big and Tall section?
Yes.
Wow. Do you have a big and tall wife?

Re: BCS Title game

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:50 pm
by Goober McTuber
Python wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote: Does Victoria's Secret have a Big and Tall section?
Yes.
Does AP know about this?