Re: Rose Bowl in game...
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:41 am
Rebel against whom? The officials got it right.Toddowen wrote:If I'm a whisky fan right now, I go into rebellion mode.
Rebel against whom? The officials got it right.Toddowen wrote:If I'm a whisky fan right now, I go into rebellion mode.
Hey, blow us. What are we, chopped enema?Mikey wrote:RACK the Ducks. Finally thePAC10PAC 12 picks up a bowl win.
Going for two in a few minutes.
The clock either ran out before Wilson spiked the ball, or it didn't. It did. Game over.Toddowen wrote:Van wrote:If you think they got it right, why should they have given Wisky another play? That seriously makes zero sense.
Because it was teetering on the edge of a call that could go one way or the other. And to let the game continue could have possibly sent the game into OT.
Unless you work in the janitor's closet of a Buffalo Wild Wings that still makes zero sense.Because it was teetering on the edge of a call that could go one way or the other. And to let the game continue could have possibly sent the game into OT.
Their job isn't to try to put the game into OT. Their job is to get the call right, regardless of which team or circumstance the call will favor.Toddowen wrote:Because it was teetering on the edge of a call that could go one way or the other. And to let the game continue could have possibly sent the game into OT.Van wrote:If you think they got it right, why should they have given Wisky another play? That seriously makes zero sense.
With no instant replay, that might very well have happened but, with it, they were able to determine that the clock, like your brain, had expired.Toddowen wrote:Oh, come on. The zebs make their own rules whenever they can get away with it.
"Please reset the timeclock to read ONE second."
Done.
Take another drink and pass out. Please.Toddowen wrote:The correct call is the one the officials make.Van wrote:You're right, even though you admit the officials made the correct call?
Uh...okay!
If they had ruled to add one second onto the clock, that would have been the correct call.
I'd heard they were trying to cut back on eating shit. Now we know their new diet.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Rose Bowl Losers. Booger eaters.
Wisconsin Badgers.
Well, you have to get there in order to lose there.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Rose Bowl Losers.
Wisconsin Badgers.
Exactly -- when you routinely play in bigtime games, you lose some here and there.Goober McTuber wrote:Well, you have to get there in order to lose there.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Rose Bowl Losers.
Wisconsin Badgers.
Geez, it was just a caption for a coach eating his own boogers on national tv.Dinsdale wrote:Props to Wisky for a great game -- good fun.
Exactly -- when you routinely play in bigtime games, you lose some here and there.Goober McTuber wrote:Well, you have to get there in order to lose there.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Rose Bowl Losers.
Wisconsin Badgers.
Doesn't mean you're a loser, it means you find ways into bigtime bowls.