Page 3 of 3

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:41 am
by Mace
Toddowen wrote:If I'm a whisky fan right now, I go into rebellion mode.
Rebel against whom? The officials got it right.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:42 am
by Van
The ghosts of 1917, exorcized!

Oregon finally gets off the Big Game OOC shneid. Congrats to the Ducks, and a hearty "fuck you!" to Dins for not coming in here and representing.

Congrats anyway, though. You won a damn Rose Bowl, dude!

Then there's Cal. Will there ever be a rainbow?

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:44 am
by Van
Mikey wrote:RACK the Ducks. Finally the PAC10 PAC 12 picks up a bowl win.

Going for two in a few minutes.
Hey, blow us. What are we, chopped enema?

-Utah

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 1:48 am
by Mace
Props to the Ducks. Seeing the Badgers lose is never a bad thing.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:11 am
by Van
If you think they got it right, why should they have given Wisky another play? That seriously makes zero sense.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:22 am
by Mace
Toddowen wrote:
Van wrote:If you think they got it right, why should they have given Wisky another play? That seriously makes zero sense.

Because it was teetering on the edge of a call that could go one way or the other. And to let the game continue could have possibly sent the game into OT.
The clock either ran out before Wilson spiked the ball, or it didn't. It did. Game over.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:22 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Because it was teetering on the edge of a call that could go one way or the other. And to let the game continue could have possibly sent the game into OT.
Unless you work in the janitor's closet of a Buffalo Wild Wings that still makes zero sense.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:34 am
by Van
Toddowen wrote:
Van wrote:If you think they got it right, why should they have given Wisky another play? That seriously makes zero sense.
Because it was teetering on the edge of a call that could go one way or the other. And to let the game continue could have possibly sent the game into OT.
Their job isn't to try to put the game into OT. Their job is to get the call right, regardless of which team or circumstance the call will favor.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:34 am
by Mace
Toddowen wrote:Oh, come on. The zebs make their own rules whenever they can get away with it.

"Please reset the timeclock to read ONE second."


Done.
With no instant replay, that might very well have happened but, with it, they were able to determine that the clock, like your brain, had expired.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:59 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Rose Bowl Losers. Booger eaters.

Image

Wisconsin Badgers.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:04 am
by Van
You're right, even though you admit the officials made the correct call?

Uh...okay!

:lol:

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:04 am
by Mace
I don't think anyone is believing that you're not a lush.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:13 am
by Van
No, it would've been the incorrect call.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:13 am
by Mace
Toddowen wrote:
Van wrote:You're right, even though you admit the officials made the correct call?

Uh...okay!

:lol:
The correct call is the one the officials make.


If they had ruled to add one second onto the clock, that would have been the correct call.
Take another drink and pass out. Please.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:16 am
by Mace
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Rose Bowl Losers. Booger eaters.

Image

Wisconsin Badgers.
I'd heard they were trying to cut back on eating shit. Now we know their new diet.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:50 pm
by Goober McTuber
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Rose Bowl Losers.

Wisconsin Badgers.
Well, you have to get there in order to lose there.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:53 pm
by Dinsdale
Props to Wisky for a great game -- good fun.


Goober McTuber wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Rose Bowl Losers.

Wisconsin Badgers.
Well, you have to get there in order to lose there.
Exactly -- when you routinely play in bigtime games, you lose some here and there.

Doesn't mean you're a loser, it means you find ways into bigtime bowls.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:03 pm
by Go Coogs'
Did Les Miles tell Wilson to spike it?

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:17 pm
by Van
He meant...other than the team that gave LSU their best game this year, Oregon was the team that gave LSU their best game this year.

Re: Rose Bowl in game...

Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:45 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Dinsdale wrote:Props to Wisky for a great game -- good fun.


Goober McTuber wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Rose Bowl Losers.

Wisconsin Badgers.
Well, you have to get there in order to lose there.
Exactly -- when you routinely play in bigtime games, you lose some here and there.

Doesn't mean you're a loser, it means you find ways into bigtime bowls.
Geez, it was just a caption for a coach eating his own boogers on national tv.