Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:54 am
Timeout? What is that?
Sin,
Bielsma
Sin,
Bielsma
Page 3 of 4
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:56 am
Well, at least they scored with enough time left to give up a 90-second return TD drive by Okie St and still march down and win on their final drive.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:56 am
It's their version of the "pistol." It worked well a lot of times this season. It looks like Okie State is just ready for it. I would think after two fails they'd drop it completely.Van wrote:Mikey, wtf is up with that Gaffney/direct snap play? Is it just a deal where they run it a couple of times knowing it'll get destroyed, then, on the third try, they actually have him throw the ball to Luck? Or something?
It's up to the defense now...
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:57 am
Is that some kind of euphemism in the Castro?Mikey wrote:These guys sure wait a long time to blow the whistle.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:58 am
Nah, it'll still end up being on the offense. The defense will give up the tying score. May as well give Luck another shot by surrendering it quickly, right?
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:01 am
Wow.
Will Gundy trust his defense enough to punt here?
Nope! Bwaaaaa.
And Blackmon kills them again.
Will Gundy trust his defense enough to punt here?
Nope! Bwaaaaa.
And Blackmon kills them again.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:02 am
Yep, Okie St, you left way too much time on the clock for Stanford.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:04 am
How will the Indians respond ?
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:04 am
Go for two!
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:05 am
helluva game keeping me up late when I have to be up early tomorrow.
No matter who wins, RACK both of these teams.
No matter who wins, RACK both of these teams.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:06 am
Does this one have an overwhelming feeling of inevitability, or what?
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:08 am
Shit, Stanford, don't you go scoring too quickly too!
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:08 am
No matter what the Heisman voters say, you're seeing the best QB in the country at work right here.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:09 am
The Indians need 6 for a win.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:10 am
Yards after catch.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:11 am
Mikey wrote:No matter what the Heisman voters say, you're seeing the bestQBfootball player in the country at work right here.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:14 am
Jesus fuck.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:14 am
Waiting to ice him I imagine.Papa Willie wrote:And OS isn't taking their final timeout. That's just stupid.
The Stanford kicker. Not Mikey.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:14 am
bwhahahaha
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:14 am
FUCK!!!
OT
OT
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:14 am
bwahahaha
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:16 am
God, what a choke by that Stanford kicker.
OT, with these two teams? This one could end up 109-103.
OT, with these two teams? This one could end up 109-103.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:16 am
M2 wrote:The Indians need 6 for a win.
m2 is the truth
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:17 am
Ummm, M2? Three would've won it.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:19 am
Van wrote:Ummm, M2? Three would've won it.
Pssst... they NEED 6 to win it.
Going for 3 didn't do it... did it ?
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:22 am
Jordan Williamson may never get laid again.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:22 am
What a fucking way to lose.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:23 am
Papa Willie wrote:Terrible play-calling by the trees. FG missed. Trees are now fucked.
M2 wrote:The Indians need 6 for a win.
Thanks for playing... shit for brains.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:23 am
Just disgusting.
Good night.
Good night.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:24 am
Condolences, Mikey. Brutal way to go down. That was Mgo-esque.
(The half-yard here won't matter.)
(The half-yard here won't matter.)
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:26 am
Cruel lifeline
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:26 am
M2 wrote:The Indians need 6 for a win.
m2 is the truth
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:27 am
M2 is also wrong.
Too funny.
Too funny.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:29 am
Fucking kickers.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:29 am
Van wrote:M2 is also wrong.
Too funny.
Going for 3 didn't work... now did it ???
They needed to go for 6.
the truth
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:31 am
You said they "needed 6." You were wrong. You remain wrong.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:34 am
Van wrote:You said they "needed 6." You were wrong. You remain wrong.
They could have won with a 1 point play... but, they don't sell those as well.
They needed 6 or they were going to lose... and, well
m2 is the truth
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:39 am
Wrong. He wasn't even the best QB in this game.Mikey wrote:No matter what the Heisman voters say, you're seeing the best QB in the country at work right here.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:39 am
yeah, EAD, tree hugger.Mikey wrote:What a fucking way to lose.
send them back to the flyover as winners, that's what you meant to say.
Re: Fiester Bowel.
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:44 am
Actually, we'll never know. Only the dumbest kind of coaching would prompt what could be the best QB in a long time to call run plays up the middle to end the game and also in OT...That level of stupidity should be bottled and used as a weapon somewhere.campinfool wrote:Wrong. He wasn't even the best QB in this game.Mikey wrote:No matter what the Heisman voters say, you're seeing the best QB in the country at work right here.