Page 3 of 3

Re: Discrimination by Universities on Trial at Supreme Court

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:29 pm
by Left Seater
Moving Sale wrote: You are a lying Piece of Dogcrap.

You said "You defend Losers." I defend people charged with a crime. You know like the time your Mom got busted with 150 pounds of crack? It was defense attorney that pointed out that it was asscrack and sprung her. Or the time you beat your blowup doll with a baseball bat, you remember that? It was defense attorney that pointed out that a blowup doll is not a real person and sprung you.
Actually I know your type very well.

You try to convince juries that your client isn't guilty despite a blood sample taken an hour plus after the accident that still reads over twice the legal limit. You try to claim the victim of the accident must have run a red light despite the eyewitness account. You try to claim that the traffic light was malfunctioning despite expert testimony and camera footage showing it wasn't. You try to pin the accident on the shoulders of the dead saying the victim should have had his brights on despite the presence of a car traveling in the opposite direction.

Yeah, we know you and your type all too well.

Re: Discrimination by Universities on Trial at Supreme Court

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:47 pm
by Moving Sale
And I know you well too. You are the stupid redneck who sucks police cock and wishes for a justice system more like China's. GFY you anti-American cunt face.

Re: Discrimination by Universities on Trial at Supreme Court

Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:52 pm
by Left Seater
Most have hit the nail on the head to get the three sentence reply.

What do I win?