the second debate

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:24 am

Moving Sale wrote:
Truman wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:How has the pres been a failure in foreign policy?
Better question: What have been his successes?
Is this where I say OBL is dead and you say Bush killed him?

No. This is the part where you say Obama inherited the deficit.

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:26 am

Moving Sale wrote:I meant a reason that wasn't based in Bigotry.

Isn't that some of the core of the argument? They hate women, ya know, the other sex, 50% of who we are?

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:36 am

Truman wrote:
No. This is the part where you say Obama inherited the deficit.

Not sure what that has to do with foreign policy but then I'm not a fat flyover fuck like you.

lovebuzz · Post by **lovebuzz** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:38 am

Moving Sale wrote:I meant a reason that wasn't based in Bigotry.

Pretty much impossible around these parts.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:11 am

That's like the fifth time you've posted the food stamp graph, tubby. I know you're desperate and flailing for attention, but nobody gives a fuck. Just face it, fat boy. The number of people on foodstamps is such a non-issue only a tard like you would keep bringing it up.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:27 am

ChargerMike wrote:
War Wagon wrote:yeah, the one I took myself. It was 1-0.
make that 2 zip

Romney has always done well with the old and drunk segments of the white population.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 11:29 am

Papa Willie wrote:Please explain.

I seem to recall Obama's administration expanding the availability of Food Stamps.

I would have thought that you of all people would support people being able to eat.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:15 pm

BSmack wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:Please explain.
I seem to recall Obama's administration expanding the availability of Food Stamps.

I would have thought that you of all people would support people being able to eat.

Spray's just worried that the won't be enough food left for him.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:54 pm

Truman wrote:
The Bay-to-Breakers is the third week in May.

I'm in Vegas the third week of May at an escort's convention with some clients you fat flyover fuck.

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:21 pm

Escort convention, eh? Shopping for someone new to push your carriage around the park, are you?

Since you're only as tall as the average human's ass, I could see where running a couple of hours in a cloud of farts might be less-than-enjoyable for you....

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:25 pm

BTW a marathon is 26 miles not the 26 feet you take when you walk to the fridge for another sando and a bag of chips you fat flyover fuck.

Catching on as to how stupid you sound with your shit takes yet you fat flyover fuck?

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:27 pm

I haven't decided. I didn't realize smart people kept chips in the fridge.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:29 pm

Well I have heard that fat fucks like you have the cupboards filled with cookies so I figured that is where you kept your chips.

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:37 pm

You're flailing poorly, Spanky. Step up your smack, please, as you're beginning to bore me.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:52 pm

Moving Bowels new phrase for today is "fat flyover fuck. "

Need to change it up there a bit midget boy..that phrase is as tired as your takes are.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:36 pm

Truman wrote:You're flailing poorly, Spanky.

Yea but what do you know? You are just a stupid fat flyover fuck. And how is me calling you a fat flyover fuck for a few days any more boring than you going shorty shorty shorty day in and day out?
Don't like the sauce then don't order the pizza you fat stupid pos.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:27 pm

Moving Sale wrote:
Truman wrote:
The Bay-to-Breakers is the third week in May.
I'm in Vegas the third week of May at an escort's convention with some clients

Is this one of them?

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:34 pm

Moving Sale wrote:
Truman wrote:You're flailing poorly, Spanky.
Yea but what do you know?

That the read of your posts have fallen to Kaley-like depths?

And how is me calling you a fat flyover fuck for a few days any more boring than you going shorty shorty shorty day in and day out?

Ah. So I'll be a fat, flyover fuck only briefly? I was wondering when that might be lessened. Glad to see such a smack assault short-lived. I'll try to be concise with my words, and, with respect to the fact that you seem to be a little sensitive about your height, shorten my reply to the charge-at-hand. In a nutshell, your decreased and diminished ability to live up to your own short-comings summarizes the abbreviated responses you receive from this board. Try posting something marginally clever, pithy, or interesting shortly, and I KNOW things will work out better for you in the short-term.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:35 pm

Papa Willie wrote:There is no other statistic in the world that gives such an accurate representation of the economy and what it's status is. I think y'all know that, too.

Again, Obama EXPANDED the Food Stamp program so that more people in need could get assistance. Obviously it follows that if you EXPAND the program that MORE people will be using Food Stamps. You are not taking into account that expansion, therefore that cute little chart of yours makes as much sense as the average TVO post.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:40 pm

BSmack wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:There is no other statistic in the world that gives such an accurate representation of the economy and what it's status is. I think y'all know that, too.
Again, Obama EXPANDED the Food Stamp program so that more people in need could get assistance. Obviously it follows that if you EXPAND the program that MORE people will be using Food Stamps. You are not taking into account that expansion, therefore that cute little chart of yours ~~makes as much sense~~ falls short like the average TVO post.

FTFY

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:42 pm

BSmack wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:There is no other statistic in the world that gives such an accurate representation of the economy and what it's status is. I think y'all know that, too.
Again, Obama EXPANDED the Food Stamp program so that more ~~people in need could get assistance.~~will vote for him. Obviously it follows that if you EXPAND the program that MORE people will ~~be using Food Stamps.~~ voting for him. You are not taking into account that ~~expansion~~, purchase of votes, so therefore that cute little chart of yours makes as much sense as the average TVO post.

FTFY.

Van · Post by **Van** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:54 pm

This is kind of fun! In fact...

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:29 pm

And how there is a lot of violence in big cities....

Obama: I also share your belief that weapons that were designed for soldiers in war theaters don’t belong on our streets. And so what I’m trying to do is to get a broader conversation about how do we reduce the violence generally. Part of it is seeing if we can get an assault weapons ban reintroduced, but part of it is also looking at other sources of the violence, because frankly, in my hometown of Chicago, there’s an awful lot of violence, and they’re not using AK-47s, they’re using cheap handguns.

And so what can we do to intervene to make sure that young people have opportunity, that our schools are working, that if there’s violence on the streets, that working with faith groups and law enforcement, we can catch it before it gets out of control?

And so what I want is a — is a comprehensive strategy. Part of it is seeing if we can get automatic weapons that kill folks in amazing numbers out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill. But part of it is also going deeper and seeing if we can get into these communities and making sure we catch violent impulses before they occur.

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:32 pm

gaysc10 sighting (the second guy):

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/hilario ... -happened/

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:30 am

Truman wrote:I haven't decided. I didn't realize smart people kept chips in the fridge.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:08 am

Van wrote:His campaign promises regarding the economy during the run up to the '08 election vis a vis his utter failure to deliver on those promises: specifically, the exploding debt and the ridiculous unemployment numbers.

Here's another gem from the debate:

Well, think about what the governor -- think about what the governor just said. He said when I took office, the price of gasoline was $1.80, $1.86. Why is that? Because the economy was on the verge of collapse, because we were about to go through the worst recession since the Great Depression, as a consequence of some of the same policies that Governor Romney's now promoting. So, it's conceivable that Governor Romney could bring down gas prices because with his policies, we might be back in that same mess.

The purple-lipped Kenyan faggot is so fucking stupid that he sincerely believes that low gas prices are bad for the economy. His imbecility is breathtaking.

Dumbest Pres__nt ever...

Terry in Crapchester · Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:27 am

Sudden Sam wrote:
BSmack wrote: I would have thought that you of all people would support people being able to eat.
I have to feed 6 people now.

I thought all your kids were in their 60's by now. Why are you still supporting them?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:48 am

mvscal wrote:
Well, think about what the governor -- think about what the governor just said. He said when I took office, the price of gasoline was $1.80, $1.86. Why is that? Because the economy was on the verge of collapse, because we were about to go through the worst recession since the Great Depression, as a consequence of some of the same policies that Governor Romney's now promoting. So, it's conceivable that Governor Romney could bring down gas prices because with his policies, we might be back in that same mess.

The purple-lipped Kenyan faggot is so fucking stupid that he sincerely believes that low gas prices are bad for the economy. His imbecility is breathtaking.

Dumbest Pres__nt ever...

He was talking about how DEMAND for gas had cratered in 2009. And yes, zero demand will equal very low gas prices. You really want to go back to that?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:15 pm

Papa Willie wrote:
mvscal wrote:The purple-lipped Kenyan faggot is so fucking stupid that he sincerely believes that low gas prices are bad for the economy. His imbecility is breathtaking.

Dumbest Pres__nt ever...
This ^ is further proof of your fucking idiocy.

FTFY.

Don't bother to thank me. You're welcome.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 1:28 pm

BSmack wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Well, think about what the governor -- think about what the governor just said. He said when I took office, the price of gasoline was $1.80, $1.86. Why is that? Because the economy was on the verge of collapse, because we were about to go through the worst recession since the Great Depression, as a consequence of some of the same policies that Governor Romney's now promoting. So, it's conceivable that Governor Romney could bring down gas prices because with his policies, we might be back in that same mess.

The purple-lipped Kenyan faggot is so fucking stupid that he sincerely believes that low gas prices are bad for the economy. His imbecility is breathtaking.

Dumbest Pres__nt ever...
He was talking about how DEMAND for gas had cratered in 2009. And yes, zero demand will equal very low gas prices. You really want to go back to that?

You're correct, Bri, but I don't think mvscal is interested in the facts.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 5:14 pm

BSmack wrote:He was talking about how DEMAND for gas had cratered in 2009.

Ah, no. Squeeze his cock out of your ass and read it again. Demand didn't crater until after the recession hit, you fucking moron.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 5:35 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:He was talking about how DEMAND for gas had cratered in 2009.
Ah, no. Squeeze his cock out of your ass and read it again. Demand didn't crater until after the recession hit, you fucking moron.

You really are this stupid, aren't you? The recession began December of 2007.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:17 pm

Growth was slow but positive in Q1 2007 and unemployment was 4.6%, so spit his dick out and try again, asswipe.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:50 pm

The president can do very little to control the price of gas. Anyone who thinks otherwise is as stupid as mvscal. A strong global demand has driven up gas prices because it's the market that dictates the price of crude, not the Oval Office. Demand in the U.S. is actually declining, in part due to the recession but also because of more fuel efficient vehicles on the road today. Any president claiming they can drive the price of gas downward is full of shit because there's very little they can do.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:51 pm

mvscal wrote:Growth was slow but positive in Q1 2007 and unemployment was 4.6%, so spit his dick out and try again, asswipe.

Is December of 2007 in Q1? You can surely spin a little better than that.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:54 pm

Mace wrote:
mvscal wrote:Growth was slow but positive in Q1 2007 and unemployment was 4.6%, so spit his dick out and try again, asswipe.
Is December of 2007 in Q1? You can surely spin a little better than that.

Not likely. He seems to have forgotten about 2008 as well.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:55 pm

Mikey wrote:
Mace wrote:
mvscal wrote:Growth was slow but positive in Q1 2007 and unemployment was 4.6%, so spit his dick out and try again, asswipe.
Is December of 2007 in Q1? You can surely spin a little better than that.
Not likely. He seems to have forgotten about 2008 as well.

Well, he is a dumbfuck, you know.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:22 pm

2009 gasoline sales in January -51,108,700 gallons price was $ 1.84

http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/20 ... -2009.html

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHa ... 600001&f=M

2012 gasoline sales in January - 28,389,900 gallons - price was $ 3.44

http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/20 ... -2009.html

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHa ... 600001&f=M

Demand / sales down 55% over that time period- Price up 100% over the same time period.

Makes perfect sense.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:24 pm

mvscal wrote: The purple-lipped Kenyan faggot is so fucking stupid that he sincerely believes that low gas prices are bad for the economy. His imbecility is breathtaking.

Dumbest Pres__nt ever...

what's more moronic is idiots like you that believe opening up every bit of ground for drilling in the US would effect gas prices in the slightest......oil extracted in the US is put on the open market to compete with middle eastern and south american oil...we don't have a nationalized oil company so we have no way to control how much shell and BP sell that oil for....and if you think they're going to give us some sort of break because we're nice guys, you're seriously mistaken....start producing more here, and the Saudis start lowering production, which in turn drives the cost of oil up.....holy shit dude, this is economics 101

Romney lying about the US being energy self sufficient by 2020 is the biggest bunch of horseshit I've ever heard and you jacks swallow it hook, line and sinker....no wonder this country is fucked two ways to sunday

Derron wrote:2009 gasoline sales in January -51,108,700 gallons price was $ 1.84

2012 gasoline sales in January - 28,389,900 gallons - price was $ 3.44

Demand / sales down 55% over that time period- Price up 100% over the same time period.

Makes perfect sense.

provide me specific examples of laws passed by obama that had a direct effect on the cost of gasoline

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:36 pm

Van wrote:Again, BFD. NRA necks always get out and vote (stupidly, too, basing their entire vote on one totally worthless vanity issue), they mostly live in Red states, and you could have counted on them voting 100% 'R' long before Obama's opponent in this election was ever even decided.

Stupid necks will vote against Obama and any presidential candidate with a 'D' beside his name every time, just as every fuckmonkey woman who's well past the age of reproduction will vote for Obama and any presidential candidate with a 'D' beside his name.

Those people are already in the bank, for both sides. Their votes are not at issue.

Sorry Van, but on this topic, you sound like lets turd talking about passenger jet flight dynamics.

States like missouri, pennsylvania and ohio will decide this election and if you think that PA isn't chock full of gun toting rednecks who might rather get in a nice day in the tree stand over voting for that slick talking mormon fella, you are a special kind of dumbfukk. but now, those fukkers are on a mission.

they will vote for mitt. every last one of them.