T1B

Papa Willie wrote:I don't know the answer to this (because I'm not a fag or a liberal), but since liberals have such a problem with religion, why are they so hell bent on fags engaging in a religious union? Wouldn't it be better if the powers that suck just said "Here's your civil union papers, and here's your tax break".

Wouldn't that make everybody happier?

Yes & no.

First off, liberals don't have a problem with religion per se. They only have a problem with it when it's used to create laws (see Establishment Clause, written by known liberal Thomas Jefferson )

Secondly, marriage isn't just a religious event. It's also a legal contract that has legal implications on whether one is entitled to some privileges.

Lastly, what you're suggesting for a solution to the situation is known as "separate but equal." SCOTUS is already on record as viewing separate rarely equating an equal outcome. The only way that solution would work is to eliminate the legal recognition of religious marriages & make all unions civil. Good luck getting the holy rollers to go for that.

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Papa Willie wrote:I don't know the answer to this (because I'm not a fag or a liberal), but since liberals have such a problem with religion, why are they so hell bent on fags engaging in a religious union? Wouldn't it be better if the powers that suck just said "Here's your civil union papers, and here's your tax break".

Wouldn't that make everybody happier?

Yes & no.

First off, liberals don't have a problem with religion per se. They only have a problem with it when it's used to create laws (see Establishment Clause, written by known liberal Thomas Jefferson )

Secondly, marriage isn't just a religious event. It's also a legal contract that has legal implications on whether one is entitled to some privileges.

Lastly, what you're suggesting for a solution to the situation is known as "separate but equal." SCOTUS is already on record as viewing separate rarely equating an equal outcome. The only way that solution would work is to eliminate the legal recognition of religious marriages & make all unions civil. Good luck getting the holy rollers to go for that.

Papa Willie and Diego engaging in lawyer like smack (i.e. 88, Terry, jsc) is fucking hilarious.

Your witness .....

Says the person who can't find an ESL course.....

Coods wrote:he said "pre-schoolers don't know how sexy they can be sometimes"

allegedPedoinSeattle wrote:crickets

the jury deliberates while the accused takes the 5th.

short recess, this shouldn't take long...

Why do you think I've come up with the name "Pedo in Seattle" in the first place? How many years have I been calling him that?

Atomic Punk wrote:Why do you think I've come up with the name "Pedo in Seattle" in the first place? How many years have I been calling him that?

As many years as you've been cross-dressing?

Atomic Punk wrote:Why do you think I've come up with the name "Pedo in Seattle" in the first place? How many years have I been calling him that?

Can I get in your sig?

Atomic Punk wrote:Why do you think I've come up with the name "Pedo in Seattle" in the first place? How many years have I been calling him that?

Well look who shows up in the sexual deviancy thread calling out everybody else..shocking. Do you just troll these threads and then jump on the perversion ones ?

Panty wearing cross dresser (proven) calls out alleged pedo...this win goes to Atomic Cunt.

Atomic Punk wrote:Why do you think I've come up with the name "Pedo in Seattle" in the first place? How many years have I been calling him that?

You have been thinking that to be very clever and funny now for too many years. But I doubt you thought of it, trite as it is, it would easily come up in any group of serious drunks.

Facts being as they are, as Derron points out, You are the cross dresser and you are the slobbering drunk. All the rest is talk.

Imus wrote:

Atomic Punk wrote:Why do you think I've come up with the name "Pedo in Seattle" in the first place? How many years have I been calling him that?

You are the cross dresser and you are the slobbering drunk...

...who accused someone of rape when no such crime had been committed. Credibility is not a strong suit here.

Didn’t the whole pedo thing start after someone posted a link to a website that had something like an 8 year old girl as a “model”? I thought it was on SCIII and it was Baby Huey who linked the site and then the famous comment was made. Baby Huey was banned and his IP reported to the authorities, if I remember correct. But that was 10+ years ago. I could be pulling a Clemens and “mis-remember” the timeline of events.

Papa Willie wrote:"Give them their little piece of paper if it will make them just shut the fuck up"...

Someone once gave me a little piece of paper and I couldn't shut up for 6-8 hours.

Of course, it was an acid blotter...the carpet turned into a carrot patch...I saw electrons...

Martyred wrote:Someone once gave me a little piece of paper and I couldn't shut up for 6-8 hours.

You can't shaddup for 24 hours, now is any different how?

Rack your acid trip.

War Wagon wrote: You can't shaddup for 24 hours, now is any different how?

Rack your acid trip.

I agree. Sounds like a great time.