T1B

Left Seater wrote:
Yet another example of facts not mattering one bit to those who want to cause unrest.

The "facts" you are citing dont matter. As I said before he could be Jack the Ripper and the cops still can't shot him unless he was dangerous, and nothing from either side shows he was dangerous when shot.

War Wagon wrote:Nogs wait for cover of darkness to perform their misdeeds, like the chickenshits they truly are.

The racism is strong in this one.

Moving Sale wrote:

Left Seater wrote:
Yet another example of facts not mattering one bit to those who want to cause unrest.

The "facts" you are citing dont matter. As I said before he could be Jack the Ripper and the cops still can't shot him unless he was dangerous, and nothing from either side shows he was dangerous when shot.

You seem to be making a point about what the cops can and can't do, meanwhile I was talking about the facts in the article and the outrage shown by the community despite the 2nd thief admitting to the same.

They have very right to be pissed because it's irrelevant and it was released before the incident report on the death was released. In addition it was released in the same presser as the name of the shooter like they were somehow related when the police admitted that the shooter didn't contact big mike because of the theft call. Now if you are saying they shouldn't deny its big mike in the vid when it clearly is then yea, that's stupid.

Moving Sale wrote:Now if you are saying they shouldn't deny its big mike in the vid when it clearly is then yea, that's stupid.

Winner!


I also enjoy some of the interviews I heard on radio and the lady was saying she was protesting because her sister lost her welfare benefits. What?

But it's still irrelevant.

Papa Willie wrote:1. This severe Nazi police state shit is bizarre. Tanks & shit. Sorry - but that's just fucked up.

2. Let 'em loot and shit. If the place is 94% black, they're only fucking themselves...

1. Amen
2. 67%

Watching the talking heads programs this morning, most are saying some sort of version of what MS said about jobs. Although MS said it would need an amendment, which he is correct about. The main fix most are spewing is to make the police and fire department the same make up as the town or 67% black. They also think all the leadership should be black, all officers should live in the city they work in, and promotions should favor the racial majority of the community.

That is all well and good, but to do that it will require changing existing Federal law and practice. For example, in my town, the racial make up is about 20% hispanic, 75% white, 3% Asian, 1% pacific islander, and 1% everything else. So the department here would have to fire the black police officers and a few Hispanic officers, while hiring an Asian officer.

Left Seater wrote:
That is all well and good, but to do that it will require changing existing Federal law and practice. For example, in my town, the racial make up is about 20% hispanic, 75% white, 3% Asian, 1% pacific islander, and 1% everything else. So the department here would have to fire the black police officers and a few Hispanic officers, while hiring an Asian officer.

Towns with 75% whites don't need to have 75% white officers. They can have zero whites and still be ok. This only works one way. It's only the 75% black towns that need 75% blacks on their force because whites have never been owned and stuff, so there is no (proper) mistrust of black officers. I know it seems unfair, but that's what you get when you live in a country that has been so unfair for so long to blacks.

88 wrote:This is the only country on the planet that fought a civil war to emancipate blacks.

Uh oh...

here we go...

Moving Sale wrote: This only works one way.

And that is why it will never work. At least you want to attach an amendment to it.

But let me repeat an earlier question that went unanswered. If this type of policy and or amendment were to be adopted, would there be a sunset date to it? Or another way, how long will blacks be made superior to all other races?

88,
Irsh slaves were indentured for a period of time, which rarely exceeded 20 years. Therefore, there were not the large numbers for children born into slavery in the irsh population. This means the black slave population was much higher no matter the original numbers (which I don't think you have right.) On top of that there is no historical similarities in the way they were treated post slavery. All in all ,that was a pretty weak post on your part.

Left Seater wrote:Or another way, how long will blacks be made superior to all other races?

75 yrs. (the approx time from constitution to civil war), then we revisit it every decade for the next hundred years after that (the approx time from civil war to voting rights act).

I know, I'm a genius.

88,
One more thing. The constitution recognized Irsh slave as free and thus excluded from the 3/5ths compromise.

Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

RACK this guy -- and RACK his Planet of the Apes Part III balst at 5:10.

I've never understood the behavior of urban communities after something like this happens. What good could possibly come out of rioting and looting?

That guy in the video nailed it. I don't understand why there is no public outcry from the NAACP, Rev Al Sharpton, and others about all those shootings in Chicago. The media may be liberal but they are also a bunch of racist piece of shits for not covering those stories about the Chicago gang shootings.

Moving Sale wrote:88,
One more thing. The constitution recognized Irsh slave as free and thus excluded from the 3/5ths compromise.

Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3:

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

What the fuck does any of that have to do with niqqers 150 years later running riot through the streets of Ferguson, Missouri and "Gettin day loot on"?

Once again, you want to be treated with dignity and respect? Act like a fucking human being instead of some kind of feral primate.

Because life doesn't happen in a vacum you stupid racist piece of shit.

Nice white flag you got there, surrender monkey.

So, at what point in the distant future do niqqers actually become accountable for their anti-social behavior and stop blaming the white man for their cultural failings?

Go Coogs' wrote:not covering those stories about the Chicago gang shootings.

Idiot.

Fuck you and your white flag. I asked you many post ago what generation should have been the ones to get it, but you are too big of an idiot or too big of a pussy to answer you black cock swilling asshat.

To answer your question, as soon as the stupid racists like you all shoot themselves in the head, the rest of us can fix the problem.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Go Coogs' wrote:not covering those stories about the Chicago gang shootings.

Idiot.

Nice rebuttal.

Moving Sale wrote:Fuck you and your white flag. I asked you many post ago what generation should have been the ones to get it, but you are too big of an idiot or too big of a pussy to answer you black cock swilling asshat.

To answer your question, as soon as the stupid racists like you all shoot themselves in the head, the rest of us can fix the problem.

Nice melt, bitch.

I'm not stopping you or anyone else from "fixing the problem." I eagerly await the day when niqqers begin to walk upright and behave in a manner at least approximating human norms.

Moving Sale wrote:as soon as the stupid racists like you all shoot themselves in the head, the rest of us can fix the problem.

Have fun paying enough taxes for all the stupid programs you come up with in the think tank.

mvscal wrote:
Nice melt, bitch.

I'm not stopping you or anyone else from "fixing the problem." I eagerly await the day when niqqers begin to walk upright and behave in a manner at least approximating human norms.

So you won't answer a simple question. Gotcha. Now go fuck another black cock you self loathing brown fuckstain.

Carson wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:as soon as the stupid racists like you all shoot themselves in the head, the rest of us can fix the problem.

Have fun paying enough taxes for all the stupid programs you come up with in the think tank.

I was going to confiscate old southern plantations and tax the shit out of assholes like you.

Go Coogs' wrote: Nice rebuttal.

There's nothing more to say. Only an idiot like you would say no one has covered the Chicago shootings when it has been covered ad nauseum by almost every major news outlet in the country. Try coming up with an original take for once.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Go Coogs' wrote: Nice rebuttal.

There's nothing more to say. Only an idiot like you would say no one has covered the Chicago shootings when it has been covered ad nauseum by almost every major news outlet in the country. Try coming up with an original take for once.

What Chicago shootings? All I'm getting in slopeland is 24/7 Michael Sam coverage.

-poptah

Screw_Michigan wrote: ...when it has been covered ad nauseum by almost every major news outlet in the country.

No it hasn't.

Moving Sale wrote:

Carson wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:as soon as the stupid racists like you all shoot themselves in the head, the rest of us can fix the problem.

Have fun paying enough taxes for all the stupid programs you come up with in the think tank.

I was going to confiscate old southern plantations and tax the shit out of assholes like you.

Nope, I'll have a bullet in my skull according to your take. Looks like all you libs with your fine arts degrees will have to get jobs scrubbing dishes as a second income.

The post you responded to was aimed at ofailurecal but if you are admitting to being a stupid racist that does simplify things.

Go Coogs' wrote: No it hasn't.

Oh, OK. If you say so.

Thank you for affirming that I'm nothing like your pathetic, boring, tedious, ugly self.

No you are just a fucking stupid, piece of shit racist.

Not to defend Screwy, he can do that himself.

But a better point to make isn't that these killings in CHI haven't received any media coverage, (clearly it was reported on because we all know about them and don't live there), rather the lack of concern, outcry, statements from "Black Leadership." The reason the media isn't giving us round the clock coverage of the Chicago gang killings is because no one really cares, not even the black community. Now if Al or Jesse or the NAACP or that Bishop who makes stupid statements, or Kanye or Oprah or anyone with black skin really cared and spoke out about the Chicago killings, that would at least get it another 15 minutes on the news cycles.

But that is the big problem. None of them are making statements or protesting these gang killings because it doesn't even rate above thunderstorms on the evening news in the black community. Al, Jesse, Bishop, Kanye, etc, etc, etc only get involved whey it serves their political and PR agenda. The Chicago killings don't fit that bill.

A statistically isolated killing of one black man by one white police officer, where evidence is starting to pile up that it was a defensive shooting, though rates off the charts in their political and PR agendas.

Left Seater wrote:evidence is starting to pile up

I laffed at such "evidence." Care to provide any?

There is plenty if you aren't worried about pushing an narrative that was first reported by Brown's companion who has proven that at best he has left things out of his account, if not out right lied about his account.


There is the statement that the Cop attempted to pull Brown thru the car window and then shot him from the car while dudes hands were up

One of the gun shots hit Brown in the top of the head

Brown just robbed a store

There is audio that suggests Brown may have scuffled with the cop

I don't care what his friend said. Like I said, evidence. Care to supply any?

Screw_Michigan wrote:I don't care what his friend said. Like I said, evidence. Care to supply any?

Anecdotal evidence is a kind of evidence, isn't it?

:?

He's a semi-literate moron who doesn't understand the difference between evidence and proof.