T1B

Posted: **Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:31 am**

Are you two guys the same person? Anyway, you seem to suggest that everyone's "libertarian" freedom should allow them to discriminate in any way they choose. This is simplistic and irrational. That is, do you think a business should be allowed to deny customers service based on their ethnicity? Religion? If not, why should sexual orientation be fair game for discrimination? As usual, the homophobic element like yourself never even attempts to explain or justify your bigotry. I'm assuming you're not Christers, but this may be mistaken. But even they, the most ignorant and intolerant of the bigots can't offer a reasonable "threat' posed by gay people. What's your excuse?

Posted: **Wed Apr 01, 2015 3:17 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote:
mvscal wrote:My logic is, "Why the fuck would I go to Italian caterer for tacos?" Similarly, "Why the fuck would I go to a fundy Christian florist to cater a gay wedding?"
Care to share with us how one would know that it was a fundie florist? Unless it was called Thumper's Flowers or Fairy Tale Flowers, what was it about the shop that would establish a prima facie case for it being a fundie christian florist?

This might be in indication:

Posted: **Wed Apr 01, 2015 3:21 pm**

LTS TRN 2 wrote:That is, do you think a business should be allowed to deny customers service based on their ethnicity? Religion?

Absolutely. A business owner should be free to sell or not sell to whomever they please. If that offends you, you are likewise free to not patronize the establishment and tell all your friends...assuming , of course, that you have any.

That is the way a free market and free people operate.

Posted: **Wed Apr 01, 2015 3:23 pm**

Papa Willie wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Are you two guys the same person? Anyway, you seem to suggest that everyone's "libertarian" freedom should allow them to discriminate in any way they choose. This is simplistic and irrational. That is, do you think a business should be allowed to deny customers service based on their ethnicity? Religion? If not, why should sexual orientation be fair game for discrimination? As usual, the homophobic element like yourself never even attempts to explain or justify your bigotry. I'm assuming you're not Christers, but this may be mistaken. But even they, the most ignorant and intolerant of the bigots can't offer a reasonable "threat' posed by gay people. What's your excuse?
Why are you such a bigot towards conservatives?

Because tolerance has become a one-way street. If you have a difference of opinion from a progressive thinking you are either a bigot, racist, misogynist ... choose your label and wear it.

Posted: **Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:56 pm**

LTS TaRD 2 wrote:Oh, a very interesting story indeed. How about the Brooklyn rabbi mohel who recently gave the baby herpes while sucking him off? Should he be assured of kosher jizz in the joint? Oh that's right, he slithered away--with a reasonable settlement to the pissed parents.

Posted: **Fri Apr 10, 2015 11:56 am**

mvscal wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:That is, do you think a business should be allowed to deny customers service based on their ethnicity? Religion?
Absolutely. A business owner should be free to sell or not sell to whomever they please. If that offends you, you are likewise free to not patronize the establishment and tell all your friends...assuming , of course, that you have any.

That is the way a free market and free people operate.

This really is the only sensible solution to the mess we have today.

Allow people to be racist/homophobe/whatever the fukk. Thanks to the interwebs, everyone will know about it in about 7 minutes.

Posted: **Fri Apr 10, 2015 12:04 pm**

What about dress codes in public places?

Have these been challenged as being prejudiced?

Posted: **Fri Apr 10, 2015 7:12 pm**

What happened to freedom? What happened to free association? What happened to your last brain cell?

Posted: **Fri Apr 10, 2015 7:19 pm**

mvscal wrote:What happened to freedom? What happened to free association? What happened to your last brain cell?

So in your feeble brain the 2nd Amendment also has been destroyed by the prevention of the average private citizen from owning fully auto rifles & or a LAW?

Great logic there, skippy.

Posted: **Fri Apr 10, 2015 7:23 pm**

Jsc810 wrote:What happened to wrong is wrong? Have we completely forgotten our history?

I'm sure that I'm not the only one who still feels that discrimination is wrong. Well discrimination clothed as religious freedom is still discrimination, and it is still wrong.

So your ok with schools telling female students they can't cover their heads on campus?

Your also ok with schools telling male students they can't wear a beard on campus?

Your also ok with different minimum thresholds for different groups of people?

Why do you hate freedom?

Further, your wrong is wrong sounds good, but I doubt you really agree with that.

Also, still waiting for an example where a religious freedom restoration act was used by a court as the basis to deny services to gays.

Posted: **Fri Apr 10, 2015 7:26 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote:
mvscal wrote:What happened to freedom? What happened to free association? What happened to your last brain cell?
So in your feeble brain the 2nd Amendment also has been destroyed by the prevention of the average private citizen from owning fully auto rifles & or a LAW?

Destroyed? No, not entirely. It has been seriously compromised by blatantly unconstitutional legislation and specious rulings from the judicial branch, though.

Posted: **Fri Apr 10, 2015 7:57 pm**

Left Seater wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:What happened to wrong is wrong? Have we completely forgotten our history?

I'm sure that I'm not the only one who still feels that discrimination is wrong. Well discrimination clothed as religious freedom is still discrimination, and it is still wrong.

So your ok with schools telling female students they can't cover their heads on campus?

Your also ok with schools telling male students they can't wear a beard on campus?

Your also ok with different minimum thresholds for different groups of people?

Why do you hate freedom?

Further, your wrong is wrong sounds good, but I doubt you really agree with that.

Also, still waiting for an example where a religious freedom restoration act was used by a court as the basis to deny services to gays.

Did the board's member of the media teach you the difference between "your" & "you're" in between mopping floors?

Posted: **Fri Apr 10, 2015 11:42 pm**

Jsc810 wrote:What happened to wrong is wrong? Have we completely forgotten our history?

This whole conversation just goes against my historical and constitutional instincts. Our country has progressed towards freedom throughout its history, and granted it did not start out that way. Certain people once were only counted as 3/5 th of a person, there were restrictions as to who could own land, vote, hold office, live in certain neighborhoods, eat at certain restaurants, attend schools, drink from water fountains, sit in certain places on buses, and on and on. All of that discrimination was wrong then and it remains wrong now. I'm sure that I'm not the only one who still feels that discrimination is wrong. Well discrimination clothed as religious freedom is still discrimination, and it is still wrong.

Who is the definer of "wrong"?

It is a completely subjective term. The best thing to do is stay the Fukk out of people's business.

Posted: **Sat Apr 11, 2015 9:55 pm**

88 wrote:It isn't PC to state the obvious these days, but discrimination is a successful evolutionary survival trait.

So is drowning weak and sickly offspring...

Posted: **Sat Apr 11, 2015 10:01 pm**

Diego in Seattle wrote:
Left Seater wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:What happened to wrong is wrong? Have we completely forgotten our history?

I'm sure that I'm not the only one who still feels that discrimination is wrong. Well discrimination clothed as religious freedom is still discrimination, and it is still wrong.

So your ok with schools telling female students they can't cover their heads on campus?

Your also ok with schools telling male students they can't wear a beard on campus?

Your also ok with different minimum thresholds for different groups of people?

Why do you hate freedom?

Further, your wrong is wrong sounds good, but I doubt you really agree with that.

Also, still waiting for an example where a religious freedom restoration act was used by a court as the basis to deny services to gays.
Did the board's member of the media teach you the difference between "your" & "you're" in between mopping floors?

Spelling and grammar smack: cards to pull when you have absolutely nothing.

Don't you have a police union's crank to suck? Did I get the punctuation right on that? Fuck off, cunt.

Posted: **Sun Apr 12, 2015 6:08 am**

The Cleveland goose-stepping in his back yard total Nazi has spoken honestly for once.

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 1:47 am**

schmick wrote:
Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
88 wrote:It isn't PC to state the obvious these days, but discrimination is a successful evolutionary survival trait.

So is drowning weak and sickly offspring...

Im ok with that, gays too, drown the gays

And we can toss the christians to the lions. Ticket sales as well as ppv would be a great way to balance the budget.

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 7:50 pm**

schmick wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:
schmick wrote: Im ok with that, gays too, drown the gays
And we can toss the christians to the lions. Ticket sales as well as ppv would be a great way to balance the budget.
works for me too, but throw the muslims to the lions first, starting with the blue gummed faggot in the white house. After the muslims are gone we can start on the scientologists and work our way through the hindus, budhists, catholics, jews, pentecostals...

Yes. Also the atheists and agnostics. They must die as well.

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 8:07 pm**

how about the entire board of directors of Goldman Sachs?

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 8:10 pm**

LTS TRN 2 wrote:how about the entire board of directors of Goldman Sachs?

ANTI-SEMITE!!!

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 8:10 pm**

LTS TRN 2 wrote:how about the entire board of directors of Goldman Sachs?

Absolutely. As well every last shit troll on the interwebs.

SLEEPY SLEEP.

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 9:35 pm**

mvscal wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:how about the entire board of directors of Goldman Sachs?

ANTI-SEMITE!!!

Wha..!? Are you suggesting that the leading investment firms and banks are somehow owned and operating under some..Jewish agenda?

That sounds like some crazy craziness...but, let's take a look and check your theory...

hmm...I suppose there's a pattern. But no proof.

Just as with 9/11 and the apparent falsity of every single aspect of the official report, any conclusions are just tantamount to "woo wooing"...

Keep yer powder dry, and refrain from anything. Just keep marching along with Hannity and Limpdick as your guides.

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 9:38 pm**

This boils my Khazarian blood, you son-of-a-bitch!

Posted: **Mon Apr 13, 2015 9:43 pm**

Settle down, have some chicken soup, keep yer hot plate on a low temp, and stay away from baby boys, you twisted creep..

Posted: **Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:47 am**

Indeed, and how can we be sure this "roach" isn't an actual cockroach...?

https://books.google.com/books?id=j7mtB ... ce&f=false

Posted: **Tue Apr 14, 2015 8:22 am**

What, this is your act? The door stop of ignorant "libertarian" whatever..? you're the dutiful dog sent out to block my posts?...

Dude...get a fucking life...

Meanwhile..
http://www.globalenvision.org/library/23/1524

and moreover, in your tedious ignorance, you're always missing the real problem..

Wake up, blanket fart, you're boring and done.. :!:

Posted: **Wed Apr 15, 2015 8:33 pm**

So LTS is a gay sleestak?

Better have someone tell Eldrick to return his sunglasses.

Posted: **Wed Apr 15, 2015 9:18 pm**

Let's be clear..here is a prominent public official--you know his name--who is obviously a closeted gay man. And perversely, he's leading the frightened herd movement against gay people in general.

Hey sailor..

As to why these twisted hypocrites are so driven in their agenda..?..well, for purposes of distraction, primarily. He and his ilk don't want you thinking about real issues, let alone taking action.

Same with this guy..

http://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/04/25 ... south-boy/

Posted: **Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:34 am**

to paraphrase Pink Floyd..

Hey, willie...leave those cows alone!

http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/highli ... 0013888066

T1B

Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Re: Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act