T1B

LTS TRN 2 wrote:As for how they rigged the controlled demolitions of the WTC towers, what makes you think "millions" of people would have noticed crews at night pretending to inspect and maintain the buildings? However, millions did see the three towers drop in obvious controlled fashion, and the subsequent assertions of this were systematically buried or dismissed. Shameless spin efforts like the PM piece were part of the cover-up. Remember, this ghastly plan was years in the making.

LTS TRN 2 wrote: Remember, this ghastly plan was years in the making.

That's the point. The bad bad men spent years crafting this intricate and ghastly plan to take down WTC, but when it came to the pentagon, the same bad bad men just flippantly blew it up and said "anyone see that plane?"

Hey, Nicky, here's another conspiracy for your collection:

http://www.petition2congress.com/12595/ ... on-is-real

R-Jack wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote: Remember, this ghastly plan was years in the making.

That's the point. The bad bad men spent years crafting this intricate and ghastly plan to take down WTC, but when it came to the pentagon, the same bad bad men just flippantly blew it up and said "anyone see that plane?"

And the answer is?

I'm short on answers big guy. You okay with me getting clarification from the person who has them?

You have no answers because you are an idiot.

Then don't beat around the bush. Explain how the detailed shadow attack could be equal parts calculated and reckless.

While you're at it, can you help your buddy on the whole "mainstream media releasing Bin Laden's death photo" thingy?

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Actually it's not such an effort to dash off a few posts. It's hardly the bulk of my efforts. As to why waste basic concern on tedious and bitter fools like you, well, perhaps you should consider yourselves as representative of America's muzzled intellect, its stunted curiosity, and its callow abdication of this nation's basic civic duties. Perhaps you should believe that you matter. Not that you're interesting or versed or possessed of such qualities that would ennoble a community, a nation, or a planet.

So you're just going to avoid the direct question as you always do. Let's try this again.

What have you ever done outside of this board and your basement, to contribute to building a case against the US Government to prove your theories about 9/11? Where is your own research? Your proof? If we are all so tedious and bitter, why bother to continue to spend your time spreading your agenda here?

Well, at least you have a very tiny, angry and confused midget on your side, so there is that...

I've never read an LTS post.

I'm not ignoring anything. In fact I'm calling attention to the plain fact--as demonstrated in the clear photo provided--that a 757 obviously did not make that small hole in the side of the pentagon--let alone penetrate three rings deep. For some reason you choose to ignore this. Similarly, you choose to ignore the obvious fact of the three towers falling in controlled demolition. You offer nothing to explain why they might have collapsed so quickly--and due to a fire. Nothing. So why do you suppose you're standing on some reasonable footing?

As for your claim that the pentagon strike was flippant, well this is false. The immediate seizing of all the tapes indicates a concerted and careful effort, as did as the astonishing management of the mainstream news. Face it, I'm simply pointing out that the official story doesn't stand up. What is it you're insisting? That it does? That Rumsfeld and Cheney were telling the truth? Think about the bizarre conspiracy that makes up the official story. And...why are you defending it? And for that matter, what part can you actually defend? Why attack me if you certainly can't refute hundreds of architects, engineers, and pilots? Why do attempt to reduce this very important issue to some pissy playground personal matter? Are you a moron like willers?

Post a link to a respected, peer-reviewed publication or conference proceedings that back up your claims. Bonus points if you can find something supported by ASCE, ASME, ACI, NEI or even the wankers at the NRC. Reach around references to other blog sites are just variations on a circle jerk that you seem fond of.

or just continue on with your self-flagellation

Go Coogs' wrote:I've never read an LTS post.

you've read one or two you've read them all. think of a combination of a skipping record and a one-trick pony.

No, Atom-clown, how about you offer any possible explanation for someone to believe the official story. Let's see you provide anything that would substantiate the notion of a 757 passing through that small round hole. I've presented clear photos of the hole, as well as just what an actual 757 would appear as it rammed into the pentagon.

What have you offered?

What exactly are you defending?

What are you?

As for the credibility of the various architects, engineers, and pilots, well let's see you refute them.

Why is it that you "supporters" of Don Rumsfeld and his alibi are so cringing and ducked for cover?

Nick's plain stated assertions have my panties in a wad

R-Jack wrote:I'm short on answers big guy. You okay with me getting clarification from the person who has them?

Yeah, and short on everything else. And..why can't you even attempt to offer some practical explanation for (randomly selected) WTC7 falling straight down in obvious controlled demolition? Why? How utterly fake are you? You're some some kind of putrid spoor hacked up by a drunk hillbilly (willers).

Seriously...."I'm short on answers"? That's your take? That's who and what you are?

atmdad wrote:Post a link...

You want spyware? Have a fire extinguisher ready if you're planning on clicking any of Nick's links.

R-Jack wrote:Then don't beat around the bush. Explain how the detailed shadow attack could be equal parts calculated and reckless?

Objection. Assumes facts not in evidience. There is no proof it was reckless, quite the contrary, you and hundreds of millions of other people feel for it.

Now tell me what happened with WTC7 please.

atmdad wrote:Post a link to a respected, peer-reviewed publication or conference proceedings that back up your claims. Bonus points if you can find something supported by ASCE, ASME, ACI, NEI or even the wankers at the NRC.

You are the one with the wacky "19 A-rabs did it" theory, so why don't you go first.

Moving Sale wrote:

atmdad wrote:Post a link to a respected, peer-reviewed publication or conference proceedings that back up your claims. Bonus points if you can find something supported by ASCE, ASME, ACI, NEI or even the wankers at the NRC.

You are the one with the wacky "19 A-rabs did it" theory, so why don't you go first.

Maybe it was more than 19? Maybe they were just the tip of the spear? Easily duped fanatics to provide a distraction. What if Arab ninjas were the ones who really rigged those buildings for "controlled demolition"? Do you have any evidence that this didn't happen?

atmdad wrote:Post a link to a respected, peer-reviewed publication or conference proceedings that back up your claims. Bonus points if you can find something supported by ASCE, ASME, ACI, NEI or even the wankers at the NRC. Reach around references to other blog sites are just variations on a circle jerk that you seem fond of.

What he said.

As to the OBL photo, I have it on good authority that the SEALs obeyed the White House directive to treat the body in accordance with Muslim religious protocols by washing it with streams of urine before wrapping it up and throwing him overboard. You can dispute that all you wish, but the guy who told me that knows the operators involved personally. In the absence of any other information about the disposal of OBL's body, I give that story great credence.

Moving Sale wrote: Objection. Assumes facts not in evidience. There is no proof it was reckless, quite the contrary, you and hundreds of millions of other people feel for it.

We're not in a courtroom pal. And yes, the pentagon attack was reckless in comparison to the planning, preparing and precision needed to pull off the WTC attack.

Shoot a missile, say it's a plane, take away cameras and hope for the best. Possible? Of course. Just seems like the people responsible for a WTC controlled demo would be a little more detailed than that.

Now tell me what happened with WTC7 please.

Obviously....it was held together with Twizzlers. Stupid fucks should've went with Red Vines. Way sturdier.

R-Jack wrote: Obviously....it was held together with Twizzlers.

Man...those things are delicious!

You know, even a guy like mvscal would have to temper his opinion on Muslims being a backwards, paleolithic collections of morons, to concede that they are at least clever enough to plan and execute an attack on the WTC and Pentagon. A view which Nick doesn't seem to share. In his American exceptionalist view, it's not possible for some "lesser" culture to "pull one over" on the greatest country on the face of the Earth. No way...not possible.

The idea that left-hand-ass-wiping goat rapers can humble "The Great Satan" doesn't pass muster with the ego check that Truthers subscribe to.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

R-Jack wrote: Obviously....it was held together with Twizzlers.

Man...those things are delicious!

To each their own. They obviously suck ass for building. I doubt the conspirators didn't even have to waste any thermite on that demo.

R-Jack wrote: We're not in a courtroom pal. And yes, the pentagon attack was reckless in comparison to the planning, preparing and precision needed to pull off the WTC attack.

Courtroom or not your argument is still stupid. The evidience is that it was not reckless cause it worked on millions of tards like yourself. That's a FACT. All you have is supposition and an empty cranium. As for WTC7, nice white flag dumbfuck.

Ofailure,
You are asking me to prove a neg. Weak.

Okay, your collective surrender is accepted. And you are hereby remanded to the bowels of tedium, the outhouse of fear, and the drain of castrated minds. And of course you don't notice any difference because you've been curled there for a good while.

We've got nothing, Nick, you win....of course 9/11 was an inside job...

They actually have less than nothing. They rely on things that are physically impossible. Nice job lemmings.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:...of course 9/11 was an inside job...

Let me tell you, if I wasn't currently shape-shifting into an 8' reptile, on my way to visit the Queen Of England at Bohemian Grove...I'd give you a piece of my mind!
:x

If the Bilderburgs ever caught a whiff of me even discussing this with you, my Committee of 300 memebership would be revoked.

mvscal wrote:Maybe it was more than 19? Maybe they were just the tip of the spear? Easily duped fanatics to provide a distraction. What if Arab ninjas were the ones who really rigged those buildings for "controlled demolition"? Do you have any evidence that this didn't happen?

Funny that the Looney Troop has zero issues accepting that an entire administration murdered 3,000 of its own people, yet a radical militant organization known for instigating violence and terrorist attacks against those who defy them -- possibly through the aid of a "controlled demolition" -- well, that's just TOO FAR FETCHED.

"FEMA camps, people! We are being herded like sheep to the slaughter!!!!!!!!"

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

mvscal wrote:Maybe it was more than 19? Maybe they were just the tip of the spear? Easily duped fanatics to provide a distraction. What if Arab ninjas were the ones who really rigged those buildings for "controlled demolition"? Do you have any evidence that this didn't happen?

Funny that the Looney Troop has zero issues accepting that an entire administration murdered 3,000 of its own people, yet a radical militant organization known for instigating violence and terrorist attacks against those who defy them -- possibly through the aid of a "controlled demolition" -- well, that's just TOO FAR FETCHED.

I don't believe because there is no evidence of it.

Oh, and I'm pretty sure they used Dots not Twizzlers. Try picking those things out of your teeth. Indestructible.

Moving Sale wrote:I don't believe because there is no evidence of it.

And where is the evidence Chimpy is responsible? The same administration people like you lambasted for being incompetent was able to pull this off without a hitch?

The stand down at Otis. Your turn.

Moving Sale wrote:The evidience is that it was not reckless cause it worked on millions of tards like yourself. That's a FACT.

Stop getting hysterical. You're missing the point. You keep focusing on the result. I'm trying to make sense of the moment and the road it took to get there.

Out of the WTC and Petagon inside jobs.....which one was planned and performed better?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Oh, and I'm pretty sure they used Dots not Twizzlers. Try picking those things out of your teeth. Indestructible.

Stop going hysterical. Dots? Pull your head out of your ass. It's clearly Twizzlers.

The only way they could've brought down WTC7 with Dots support is if the Necro wafer foundation cracked.......which I guess is possible.

R-Jack wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:The evidience is that it was not reckless cause it worked on millions of tards like yourself. That's a FACT.

Stop getting hysterical. You're missing the point. You keep focusing on the result. I'm trying to make sense of the moment and the road it took to get there.

Out of the WTC and Petagon inside jobs.....which one was planned and performed better?

Again nice white flag on the WTC7 issue nancy. BushCo knew there were millions of stupid tards on 9-10-2001 you freaking moron. The result is just proof you have millions of stupid companions.

R-Jack, Mgo, Shlomo (b-juice)...it's okay...your surrender is accepted. Ease up on the pawing child-like attempts at humor and circle-jerk sarcasm.

You know..and that's a real start. :wink:

One day at a time.

C'mon, you're okay



But I'm not ... :twisted:

Moving Sale wrote:The stand down at Otis. Your turn.

Nice white flag.

WTF are you talking about? Are you too stupid to even know the facts surrounding the Otis stand down? You are dumber than I thought and I had you pegged at room temp IQ.