T1B

I ran poptart... from uston and the United States for being a nut job.

He'll NEVER set foot in the United States again.


You're welcome.






the truth

Jsc wrote:separation of church and state

How on earth would reversing Roe v. Wade be violating the 1st Amendment?

poptart wrote:loony toon

Jsc wrote:It is potential life, not life.

If it's not life, then why do they have to kill it?








Idiot

Stop it Goobs, don't you realize how contagious that is?

Mikey wrote:Stop it Goobs, don't you realize how contagious that is?

His idiocy or his yawning?

KC Scott wrote:The current unemployment rate is 5.3%

Do you expect anyone to buy that bullshit? (besides hand wringing liberals)

Sirfindafold wrote:

KC Scott wrote:The current unemployment rate is 5.3%

Do you expect anyone to buy that bullshit? (besides hand wringing liberals)

Certainly not hand wringing conservatives.

KC Scott wrote: The current unemployment rate is 5.3% -

Moron.

So, the untold millions currently out of the workforce just don't feel like working?

The non-fairytale number is over 10%. Probably over 20 if you include the seriously underemployed/part timers.

KC Scott wrote:You have truly turned into an ankle biting fucktard - You've lost this thread and yet continue to flail away

Here's the 5.3 labor bureau number dickeater http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000

You'll also notice I said

KC Scott wrote: The current unemployment rate is 5.3% - and that doesn't count the Degree workers pushing Starbucks.

So keep flailing your purse Nancy - I'm just laughing at what a whimpering little bitch you've become

Nobody gives a fuck what you say. You're stupid and wrong. The number is totally cooked. Labor participation rate is the lowest it has been since 1977. A sizable percentage of those who are working are working part time because their hours have been cut thanks to the Buttfuck You in the Mouth Health Care Act which was supposed to save everybody money.

It time to come to grips with the fact that you just aren't very bright. It's OK. You can stop trying to pretend that you have a clue.

Scott, you naive braindead couch hump stain. When your homobros at the lift and steam "gym" want to turn your rectal cavity into a meat socket you don't have to oblige them. Hell, the dirty tattered windsock you call your colon would even have a jizz drenched blondie snatch queef appalled. As for the backslaps you get from your poser moto buddies as you stumble cumdrunk out of the glory hole stall, yes they are happy you came along...

Shit, I forgot the point I was going to make.

Carry on.

I thought most accidents occur within five miles of the home

This thread is progressing nicely. Though you can't have a proper homosmack-IKYABWAI festival without inviting Tardspray.

R-Jack wrote:I thought most accidents occur within five miles of the home

KC Scott wrote:the economy would be better if 55 Million additional poverty babies had been added to this under reported number instead of aborted

Listen up faggots...

$cott, with omnipotent foresight, knowledge and wisdom, knew the ultimate fate of the 55 million innocents.

Best to just STFU and acknowledge such superior breeding.

poptart wrote:Promote sexual and family responsibility and stop killing off future taxpayers in huge numbers.

Scott wrote:69% of abortions are by women near or below the poverty line - did you really expect those potential humans to become contributing members of society?

Wagon wrote:$cott, with omnipotent foresight, knowledge and wisdom, knew the ultimate fate of the 55 million innocents.

Yes, it is pitiful.

Scott has confided with the board before that he was born into a not-so-stellar situation, and it could have easily been one in which abortion seemed appropriate.
Yet he was born, he overcame and he has thrived.
We all know how wealthy and successful he is.

Yet he thinks others should not be granted the same opportunity.
They should be killed in the womb.

:|


Scott, I know where you are coming from.
As we look at our current situation, yes, most abortions are in situations where the mother is low income.
But this is what YOUR policy has created.

A culture of destructive irresponsibility has been fostered.

If unwanted reproduction occurs, people do one of two things far too often.
1) kill the life in the womb
2) have the child and expect someone else to pay for it.

This was obviously not a sustainable model, yet we went down this road.
The stupidity of humans never ceases to amaze.

We MUST reverse this.


I noted -- look at how it was before Roe v. Wade in 1973.
Because abortion was illegal, there were not as many of them.
Kid were born into low income, and into poverty, but the prevailing view at that time was one of RESPONSIBILITY for your actions.
So people (and families) sucked it up, dealt with their responsibilities, and found a way to raise the child.
And of course people showed somewhat more sexual responsibility, also.

Was it all perfect back then?
Of course not.
There were horror stories, illegal abortions, neglected kids, fugged-up situations, and on and on...
The ills of humanity can never be stopped completely.

But since Roe v. Wade, the societal degradation, irresponsibility, financial dependency, death and overall mayhem has increased.
By a LOT.
And our nation's financial situation has degraded tremendously over that period of time.
No coincidence.


The death must stop.
The welfare state must be seriously dialed back, also.
It would take a period of adjustment, and many would suffer, no doubt.

But again, this is what YOUR policy has created.
Irresponsibility is what was created and fostered.

I promote life, sexual responsibility, personal responsibility and family responsibility.
I promote prosperity for the nation.

poptart wrote:I noted -- look at how it was before Roe v. Wade in 1973.
Because abortion was illegal, there were not as many of them.

Care to back up your claim with some statistics as to how many abortions were happening prior to Roe v. Wade?

How many women died from abortions prior to Roe v. Wade?

How do you feel about the Plan B pill? Since it merely prevents eggs from being fertilized, there's no existing life being killed. Care to tell us where you stand on that?

poptart wrote:But since Roe v. Wade, the societal degradation, irresponsibility, financial dependency, death and overall mayhem has increased.
By a LOT.
And our nation's financial situation has degraded tremendously over that period of time.
No coincidence connection whatsoever.

FTFY

poptart wrote:A culture of destructive irresponsibility has been fostered.

At all levels of society.

Diego wrote:Care to back up your claim with some statistics as to how many abortions were happening prior to Roe v. Wade?

How many women died from abortions prior to Roe v. Wade?

How do you feel about the Plan B pill? Since it merely prevents eggs from being fertilized, there's no existing life being killed. Care to tell us where you stand on that?

1. It's difficult (or impossible?) to find completely trustworthy stats on abortion when they were still illegal. I base my comment on common sense -- something which has frankly been lacking from people on your end of this discussion.

2. If a woman dies while killing off the life within her womb, which she chose to create, I consider it sort of a "Darwin" scenario, don't you? I feel bad about the whole situation, but recognize that what rightfully might come to this woman -----> has come.

3. I believe life begins at conception. I don't believe that "Plan B" prevents (in most cases) the egg from being fertilized, as you claim.

Oh, so it's better to be dead than poor? Is that your "take"? Why are you such a pussy?

KC Scott wrote:Far Better to have not been born than born into life of Starvation, filth, disease, neglect, abuse

Based on what? Your totally uninformed opinion? The people born into such lives might have a different perspective.

Melt on...

So what would create the greatest meltage?

1. mvscal's daughter impregnated by a person of color
2. Schmick's #1 son bringing home his boyfriend
3. Papa Willie's bucket of KFC being stolen by a black man
4. Wolfie waking up to another President Clinton

KC Scott wrote:Far Better to have not been born than born into life of Starvation, filth, disease, neglect, abuse

More to the point - Why do you fear death, Faggot?

Glad to see you've isolated the human gene that gifts intelligence and propensity towards achievement amongst the rich.

Maybe the clanging of free weights in your ears has given you a migraine.



$cott, grab a towel. it's time to hit the...






...showers.

Goober McTuber wrote:So what would create the greatest meltage?

1. mvscal's daughter impregnated by a person of color
2. Schmick's #1 son bringing home his boyfriend
3. Papa Willie's bucket of KFC being stolen by a black man
4. Wolfie waking up to another President Clinton

5. Goobs discovering a "closed for business" sign in the window of his favorite beauty salon.

Scott wrote:Starvation, filth, disease, neglect, abuse - you don't give a rat fuck about any of these things as long as a new little soul your cult could potentially add to it's ranks makes it out of the womb.
It's not your problem anymore, and don't use your tax dollars to help it
Reprehensible.

The guy who promotes government-sanctioned massacre is outraged and is calling other people reprehensible.

lol

poptart wrote:But since Roe v. Wade, the societal degradation, irresponsibility, financial dependency, death and overall mayhem has increased.
By a LOT.
And our nation's financial situation has degraded tremendously over that period of time.
No coincidence.

Scott wrote:No connection whatsoever

You were complaining that we wouldn't be able to pay to support all of the low-income kids that would be created if people stopped aborting them -- and I had to point out to you that we've been following your policy now for 40 years.
According to you, we've saved ourself a boatload of money this way.
Yet over that period of time we've run continuing deficits and have 36 times the debt we had prior to Roe v. Wade.

Where is the evidence that your policy makes more fiscal sense for us?

We see none.
We seen the OPPOSITE -- and dramatically so.

Hand-wring on, if you feel the need, but you are really making no sense at all.

poptart wrote:You were complaining that we wouldn't be able to pay to support all of the low-income kids that would be created if people stopped aborting them -- and I had to point out to you that we've been following your policy now for 40 years.

This is what you said...

Then explain who pays for that baby that the mother doesn't want - because you don't want your taxes going for welfare, subsidized housing or medicaid

- Scott



Due to 55 million kids being snuffed out before we have had to pay for these things, yes, of course my statement is accurate.
This is my accurate statement...

poptart wrote:According to you, we've saved ourself a boatload of money this way.

We didn't have to pay for welfare, housing, or medicaid for any of them, right?

Is water wet?

Scott wrote:On a side not - I also found it interesting in South Korea last year there were 340,000 Abortions - compared to 440,000 Births - even though Abortion is "illegal" there

1. As noted previously, when something is illegal, pulling numbers on it is like pulling things out of your ass. Not that you would know anything about that.

2. South Korea's birth rate has been in decline for many years now, and it isn't because the abortion rate is rising, 'tard. lol

Just 8.6 babies per 1,000 South Koreans were born last year, the lowest level since the country began keeping records in 1970, the national statistics agency said. In 1970, there were 31.2 babies born per thousand people.
http://blogs.wsj.com/korearealtime/2014 ... on-record/
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=ks&v=25

3. We are talking about America. Prior to Roe v. Wade, there were abortions. If Roe v. Wade were overturned, there would still be abortions. There will always be abortions. We're talking about what the government should sanction. I say it has a duty to stand for life. It's a basic principle. And only a fool would think the abortion rate would not lower if it was illegal. Shrink the welfare state along with outlawing abortion and you'll be taking positive steps toward correcting a very bad and ugly cultural. situation.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:So what would create the greatest meltage?

1. mvscal's daughter impregnated by a person of color
2. Schmick's #1 son bringing home his boyfriend
3. Papa Willie's bucket of KFC being stolen by a black man
4. Wolfie waking up to another President Clinton

5. Goobs discovering a "closed for business" sign in the window of his favorite beauty salon.

Beauty salon? We're talking spa experience.

6. Esthetician over-heating the wax.

KC Scott wrote:You and I agree on one thing, you pathetic old cunt - I don't want my tax dollars spent supporting kids nobody wants either

The difference is while you would condemn them to a life of misery and neglect, I would spare them that injustice and not have them brought into that world

So what about the old folks there Herr Scott ??

Time to start whacking them to keep those Social Security payments coming ?? I mean those old folks are just a fucking drain on society. Maybe you and Herr Mengle could find a better way to deal with them..

Derron wrote:

KC Scott wrote:You and I agree on one thing, you pathetic old cunt - I don't want my tax dollars spent supporting kids nobody wants either

The difference is while you would condemn them to a life of misery and neglect, I would spare them that injustice and not have them brought into that world

So what about the old folks there Herr Scott ??

Time to start whacking them to keep those Social Security payments coming ?? I mean those old folks are just a fucking drain on society. Maybe you and Herr Mengle could find a better way to deal with them..

Pro-Birthers not Pro-Lifers. This Catholic Nun gets it:

"I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is."

http://www.alternet.org/gender/why-true ... ds-explode

Catholics are hard left, social justice wingnuts. You are guaranteed a right to life not a free ride through life.

mvscal wrote:Catholics are hard left, social justice wingnuts.

The laity, to some degree...

mvscal wrote:Catholics are hard left, social justice wingnuts.

To some small degree, perhaps the ones you are aquainted and most familiar with.

St. Louis Catholics, for sure, were born on 3rd base and think they smacked a triple.

But it's impossible to broad brush a billion Catholics spread all over the world with such a characterization and ridiculous to even try to define Catholics like that in general.

mvscal wrote:You are guaranteed a right to life not a free ride through life.

Yeah, damn fetuses. I wish they'd get off their lazy asses and support themselves. Should at least have a part-time job by 2 years old, I say.

War Wagon wrote:

mvscal wrote:Catholics are hard left, social justice wingnuts.

To some small degree, perhaps the ones you are aquainted and most familiar with.

St. Louis Catholics, for sure, were born on 3rd base and think they smacked a triple.

But it's impossible to broad brush a billion Catholics spread all over the world with such a characterization and ridiculous to even try to define Catholics like that in general.

No, he is right. Catholics, as a whole are pretty close to being full on commie. There is a fairly sizable exception to this rule in the states, but most of the rest are in 3rd world shitholes which makes them by default, looking for a handout.