Re: ANTIFA hit-and-run
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 12:09 am
le
No. Because you're an ADHD fucking retard who adds nothing to any discussionElkcip wrote:Goober McTuber wrote:Jesus. Fucking. Christ. OTST. Again.
Because I don't agree with you?????
Probably sex with Africans.Elkcip wrote:If you ever want to meet in Madison I will meet you and whatever happens happens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Again. You're an ADHD-afflicted retard. Sure. I'll meet up with you. I'm sure you won't mind if I bring along "Harry, the silverback gorilla". OTST.Elkcip wrote:SEE MY ABOVE POST!
I am the only normal person here. You think shutyomouth is normal? A person that loves scat? A person that has sexual fantasies about poop is normal?
You are a communist! You want to take my goat and give it to the government. You are the reason we had a cold war.
Me...I'm the most handsome perfect American .....A Soldier of the year candidate.
Who is better?
Me....the perfect American?
You..the perfect coummunist?
If you ever want to meet in Madison I will meet you and whatever happens happens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Take your apples and your oranges and shove them up your ass you vile racist fuck. How does it feel to suck treasonous cock?88 wrote:Good lord. You people are deranged. Using your logic, do we now have to ban all tributes to FDR since he put Japanese Americans in prison camps during WWII?
Moving Sale wrote:Take your apples and your oranges and shove them up your ass you vile racist fuck. How does it feel to suck treasonous cock?88 wrote:Good lord. You people are deranged. Using your logic, do we now have to ban all tributes to FDR since he put Japanese Americans in prison camps during WWII?
Did somebody mention black cock ??BSmack wrote:Probably sex with Africans.Elkcip wrote:If you ever want to meet in Madison I will meet you and whatever happens happens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This picture says you are completely full of shit.Elkcip wrote: In nearly every video it shows the dude had a reason to fear for his life. Even before he plows into the crowd there are people surrounding and attacking his vehicle. After the event there is CLEAR and OBVIOUS evidence they threathened his life with sticks and clubs. He was DEFINETETELY in FEAR for his life.
Not that lonely. He's still got Alan.Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:Wow, are you ever hung up on the 80's...
How lonely is your life?
The only thing this pos will be found not guilty of in 2018 is having sex with a woman. Kinda like pickle and his many drag queens.Elkcip wrote:
Joe wrote:The only thing this pos will be found not guilty of in 2018 is having sex with a woman. Kinda like pickle and his many drag queens.
Which reports?Rooster wrote:The reports-- the ones that don't just lump everything together by saying "the clashes occurred" --have the fascist Antifa starting the fights by throwing stuff at the KKK/neo-Nazis. However, feel free to defend your Leftist brothers tooth and nail as you please, comrade.Mikey wrote:Why would they acknowledge something that's true only in what's left of your and the rest of your Nazi fucktard friends' oxycontin addled brains?Rooster wrote:I'm still waiting for the media and all the talking heads to acknowledge that the violence was started by the Left and their Antifa blackshirts.
GFY
By the way, I've enjoyed watching you ignore and avoid discussing all those scary stick carrying barefoot guys (OK one guy, maybe two) after calling me on it. It's a beautiful thing to behold seeing you slink away like a little snowflake when called out on your bullshit.Rooster wrote:By the way, I've enjoyed watching you ignore and avoid discussing holding weaponry after bringing it up and illustrating your point with pictures. It's a beautiful thing to behold seeing you dodge your own posts.
Mahatma Gandhi's statues of him walking with a stick for support is quite popular. This is attributed to his fondness for long walks, which were an integral part of his life. Terming it as the 'prince of exercises', he enjoyed them right from his high school days. Even when he was studying in London, he would save money by walking eight to ten miles a day . According to him, it was these walks that kept him away from illnesses throughout his stay in England and gave him a strong body . This habit served him well during the Dandi March in the year 1930, when he embarked on a walk from Sabarmati ashram to Dandi at the age of 60.
It is also believed that he walked around 79,000 kilometers between the year 1913 and 1938, as a part of his campaigns. That is enough to encompass the earth, twice.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life ... 192789.cms
And you want to compare this to the world's most famous pacifist carrying a walking stick? You always came across as a little slow on the uptake, but you are seriously retarded.A planned Unite the Right white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, drew nationwide attention as neo-Nazis with torches marched on the University of Virginia campus Friday night and officials called for a state of emergency amid protests Saturday morning.
Many Unite the Right protesters wore white nationalist and Nazi paraphernalia, a militia arrived armed with heavy weaponry and some individuals wore Ku Klux Klan imagery. Former KKK leader David Duke attended.
Really? Are you really this stupid, or just trolling, because it's pretty unbelievable coming from somebody who's actually made it through to some semblance of adulthood.Rooster wrote:So you're saying a stick is not a weapon now? Or are you saying a stick is only situationally a weapon if you tell us it is? Because you showed us two pictures after ranting about the horrahs of helmets, shields, and weapons. One had Ghandi and another guy holding what could either be a walking stick or a weapon depending on your perspective and another picture of a bunch of guys with helmets and shields and no weapons in their hands. Yet you tell us those guys are scarier than someone with a staff in his hand.
So you tell me, who in those two pictures was holding a weapon and who was protesting peacefully?
Don't just stand there with your dick in your hand-- explain how those different photos support your contention of who is peaceful and who is not. Because you must be a mind reader to know just what these people's intentions are by looking at some pics.
It is pretty clear that the fringe left was behaving as badly as the fringe right, prior to speed racer taking things to a new level. Bottom line is the fringe on both sides needs to just go away and be shunned by both parties and ideologies.2. The hard left seemed as hate-filled as alt-right. I saw club-wielding "antifa" beating white nationalists being led out of the park 2/2
I never said they weren't. I questioned Rooster's insistence that there were these "reports" that the lefties started the violence.Left Seater wrote:It is pretty clear that the fringe left was behaving as badly as the fringe right, prior to speed racer taking things to a new level.
Goober McTuber wrote:Left Seater wrote:It is pretty clear that the fringe left was behaving as badly as the fringe right, prior to speed racer taking things to a new level.
The reports are from Twitter feeds. Not exactly an unbiased news source, I'll freely admit. On the other hand, when the news media cannot bring itself to report that BLM and Antifa were involved in any fashion, but simply reports them as being "counter-protesters with no name or label, then we can't hardly count on them to report with any veracity on who started the riots, particularly if it was Leftist driven.
I never said they weren't. I questioned Rooster's insistence that there were these "reports" that the lefties started the violence.
Nice melt.Rooster wrote:Let's be clear here. Contrary to Mikey's assertion that I am somehow affiliated or sympathetic to neo-nazis or white supremacists, I can say with a clear conscience that they do not represent me or mine. That being said, I fully expect Mikey to attempt to smear me again in the manner he has been from the get-go.
My contention is that carrying stuff like helmets, shields, and even guns is not direct evidence of the intent to use said stuff in an unlawful manner. He disagreed with me. I then took him at his word and pointed out the in one of the pictures his example of peaceful protest the person was carrying something more deadly than a helmet or shield-- which were the only things that the individuals were carrying in another picture he posted.
Why is any of this relevant? Because it speaks to Mikey's desire to paint anyone who disagrees with him as being complicit in what happened in Charlottesville-- something he explicitly said. I emphatically reject that attempt to connect anyone or anything to racial violence, especially when it comes to BLM and other Leftist/racist organizations. Furthermore, that the press and now even Trump has given them a pass on the violence we've seen them initiate and participate in just goes to show how deeply it is ingrained to uncritically examine current events in today's popular culture. After all, for the past two years, what side of the political spectrum has been most culpable of violence and the suppression of free speech?
I rest my case.
You can't even tell what most of the people in that picture are carrying behind their shields. And it's been reported that some of that group were heavily armed. Of course, they would have all run for their lives were they to have been confronted by a skinny old man with a walking stick.Rooster wrote:I then took him at his word and pointed out the in one of the pictures his example of peaceful protest the person was carrying something more deadly than a helmet or shield-- which were the only things that the individuals were carrying in another picture he posted.
If they were smart. Like every Kung Fu movie ever made has an old dude with a stick who can whip ass.Goober McTuber wrote:Of course, they would have all run for their lives were they to have been confronted by a skinny old man with a walking stick.
Goober McTuber wrote:Of course, they would have all run for their lives were they to have been confronted by a skinny old man with a walking stick.
Precisely-- if they were carrying anything at all --which is not to say that nobody was, only that Mikey's contention that because they were intermingled among those who were, were dangerous. He was/is making a blind assumption that because they had what might be construed as a defense against an actual weapon, they were intent on violence.Goober McTuber wrote:You can't even tell what most of the people in that picture are carrying behind their shields.Rooster wrote:I then took him at his word and pointed out the in one of the pictures his example of peaceful protest the person was carrying something more deadly than a helmet or shield-- which were the only things that the individuals were carrying in another picture he posted.
Nice title you fucking Nazi.Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:ANTIFA hit-and-run