T1B

Moving Sale wrote:Sensitive needs yards in Cali cost the same as reg yards. It's no diff than wanting to be housed at a prison close to your family.

So how do you explain Pelican Bay then ?? They can want all they want to, but in reality they put them there to keep them from running their criminal enterprises, and they still manage to do it by mail.

Mail? Yeah maybe 5%.
As far as it's cost*, that is on the CDC because almost no one wants to be in ad seg.

*I have no idea if it costs compared to gp or sny.

Moving Sale wrote:Mail? Yeah maybe 5%.
As far as it's cost*, that is on the CDC because almost no one wants to be in ad seg.

*I have no idea if it costs compared to gp or sny.

If they are in SHU then the cost goes way up.

Not sure what you mean by "way" higher.
But again, it makes no diff because cdc decides who will goto ad seg and sp housings.

Moving Sale wrote:Not sure what you mean by "way" higher.
But again, it makes no diff because cdc decides who will goto ad seg and sp housings.

That would be the inmate to guard ratio ..SHU versus GP.

schmick wrote:Now explain how special kid glove treatment is equal to general population

Since when is protecting prisoners likely to be assaulted "special treatment?"

When you were born did you think you were in a breath-holding contest?

Diego in Seattle wrote: When you were born did you think you were in a breath-holding contest?

Haha, rack

Derron wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:Not sure what you mean by "way" higher.
But again, it makes no diff because cdc decides who will goto ad seg and sp housings.

That would be the inmate to guard ratio ..SHU versus GP.

That doesn't define "way" any better than your last post.

Moving Sale wrote:

Derron wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:Not sure what you mean by "way" higher.
But again, it makes no diff because cdc decides who will goto ad seg and sp housings.

That would be the inmate to guard ratio ..SHU versus GP.

That doesn't define "way" any better than your last post.

Do I have to write a fucking book here ???

SHU holds prisoners that are confined to their cells 23 hours per day. They are the worst of the worst, some bat shit fucking criminally crazy. Usually takes a team of 5 to 7 CO's to make any kind of movement or escorted transfer. That takes a lot of staff per prisoner.

General population holds prisoners that do not require a ratio of 5 to 1 for simple movements or routine handling. That takes a lot less staff for normal procedures, probably closer to 30 to one or more. I could ask my bro in law who did 22 years as a CO there, but he does not give a fuck since he retired and earned every fucking dime of that retirement working in that shit hole.

You really are stupid. I know what ad seg and the shu are. I was in COR shu last month. I just don't know how much it costs, but again, so what? It has nothing to do with the cost of housing a trans.

Moving Sale wrote:You really are stupid. I know what ad seg and the shu are. I was in COR shu last month. I just don't know how much it costs, but again, so what? It has nothing to do with the cost of housing a trans.

Can you imagine what they would do with some little midget spinner like you in there ?? Throw you ass into GP and they would hang your ass off some big cock and spin you like a fucking top. Squeal like a little piggy...

So Moving Salen just got over on Duhrrron. Nothing to see here.

Diego in Seattle wrote:Please explain how putting someone in gp where there are persons known to have homicidal intentions towards them is "equal."

Using your logic, anyone could say "you can't put me in there, it's dangerous".

Exactly, asshole. Prison is not a very nice place for some reason. Don't fukk little girls and maybe we won't put you there.

I do agree that this POS should not go there. There is crystal clear evidence of what he did. He deserves a bullet in the head.

Diego in Seattle wrote:

schmick wrote:Now explain how special kid glove treatment is equal to general population

Since when is protecting prisoners likely to be assaulted "special treatment?"

When you were born did you think you were in a breath-holding contest?

They're all likely to be attacked. Too fukking bad for them.

Restrooms should be unisex, with attendants (plural) who are compensated well.

smackaholic wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:

schmick wrote:Now explain how special kid glove treatment is equal to general population

Since when is protecting prisoners likely to be assaulted "special treatment?"

When you were born did you think you were in a breath-holding contest?

They're all likely to be attacked. Too fukking bad for them.

One has to be extremely ignorant to think that the risk of being assaulted for transgenders is the same for non-transgenders.

Try reading my link, dumbfuck!

schmick wrote:The mentally ill get assaulted in prison, it's what happens. Culling them from the herd is better for mankind

Diego in Seattle wrote:One has to be extremely ignorant to think that the risk of being assaulted for transgenders is the same for non-transgenders.

Try reading my link, dumbfuck!

I never claimed the risk was the same. Of course a weak pussy is more likely to get his stool pushed in. Booo fukking hooo.

Prison sucks. Don't wanna go? Don't rape little girls. If you do, you get what you get. And if that's a little prison lovin' too fukking bad.

smackaholic wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:One has to be extremely ignorant to think that the risk of being assaulted for transgenders is the same for non-transgenders.

Try reading my link, dumbfuck!

I never claimed the risk was the same. Of course a weak pussy is more likely to get his stool pushed in. Booo fukking hooo.

Prison sucks. Don't wanna go? Don't rape little girls. If you do, you get what you get. And if that's a little prison lovin' too fukking bad.

Where in the Constitution does it say that every person who has been convicted of a felony gives up their right to life? Or the right to not be assaulted?

Diego in Seattle wrote:

smackaholic wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:One has to be extremely ignorant to think that the risk of being assaulted for transgenders is the same for non-transgenders.

Try reading my link, dumbfuck!

I never claimed the risk was the same. Of course a weak pussy is more likely to get his stool pushed in. Booo fukking hooo.

Prison sucks. Don't wanna go? Don't rape little girls. If you do, you get what you get. And if that's a little prison lovin' too fukking bad.

Where in the Constitution does it say that every person who has been convicted of a felony gives up their right to life? Or the right to not be assaulted?

It does not say that in the Constitution. That would be one of the flaws of that document. The right not to be assaulted ?? Don't do things that get you convicted of a felony and incarcerated with a bunch of degenerate pieces of shit who fuck each other in the ass. Felons do lose some basic rights..you should be able to do a little research and learn that.

Derron wrote:That would be one of the flaws of that document.

Then change the document. Simply ignoring the document makes the document as a whole worthless.

The right not to be assaulted ?? Don't do things that get you convicted of a felony and incarcerated with a bunch of degenerate pieces of shit who fuck each other in the ass.

What you're saying is that prison rape is part of the punishment for the crimes they committed. Can you hook me up with the statute that says that rape shall be part of the punishment for their crimes?

Felons do lose some basic rights..you should be able to do a little research and learn that.

They don't lose the rights enumerated in the 8th Amendment. If you had done a little basic research yourself you would know that. Try taking your own advice, slappy.

schmick wrote:What do suppose the dudes that wrote the constitution 200 years ago would have done to a man who pretends he's a woman so he can rape little girls in the bathroom?

They would put him in prison for a very long time, if not for life.

Do you think those guys would have said that you need to spend over 100,000 dollars a year to protect a criminal like that or do you think they would have had a criminal like that hanged?

That sort of money was unheard of back then. You can't make judgements of what the FF would have said in terms of today's financial values.

They didn't have criminals like that hanged. Try reading books instead of burning them.

Be honest with your answer, I know that honesty is alien to lefties but try

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta ... 7343028224

Supporter of pathological liar POTUS says what?

schmick wrote:Trump would have to serve 10 terms to come close to the amount of lies owebama told

I laffed

schmick wrote:Trump would have to serve 10 terms to come close to the amount of lies owebama told

And then he gave us the WhiteFishy contract.... :doh:

The jury is still out on The D's ability to close a deal, but admittedly, it isn't looking good so far.

But those clowns?

8 years of a sleepwalking economy, the middle east on fire and if you want your doctor, you can....uhhhh fukkk you, you'll get the doctor we give you.

I think in this coming year, you will see the republicans start to fall in line as they realize that they'll get Corkered if they don't. And if the economy continues to build steam, some dems will do the same.

Diego in Seattle wrote:
And then he gave us the WhiteFishy contract....

Care to cite any tidbit of info,,, and I mean ANY, that shows that Trump had anything to do with the Whitefish contract (which was accepted because PR Power didn't have any money for a down payment)?

Go ahead, take your time. I mean, I know it triggered yet another trumpertantrum, but calm down, and make your case (I'll help youout -- you said something ignorant and stupid)... since the AP just released a story about the contract, and it had nothing to do with Trump or the feds.

Seriously, 'holic....that's the closest you can come to criticizing tRump?

Are you even capable of staying on the subject of the current administration?

Dinsdale wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:
And then he gave us the WhiteFishy contract....

Care to cite any tidbit of info,,, and I mean ANY, that shows that Trump had anything to do with the Whitefish contract (which was accepted because PR Power didn't have any money for a down payment)?

Diego in Seattle wrote:Seriously, 'holic....that's the closest you can come to criticizing tRump?

Are you even capable of staying on the subject of the current administration?

About how the economy is just kicking ass and nobody in the Middle East or any of the terrorists have even thought to fuck with him yet ??

Derron wrote: About how the economy is just kicking ass

Hahah, you attribute this to Trump? Moron.

So if Obama or Hillary were president you think the market would be as high?

The answer is no it wouldn't. Unemployment would likely be higher though....

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Derron wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:Seriously, 'holic....that's the closest you can come to criticizing tRump?

Are you even capable of staying on the subject of the current administration?

About how the economy is just kicking ass and nobody in the Middle East or any of the terrorists have even thought to fuck with him yet ??

48% of Americans hold 0 stocks.

Try again!

Joe in PB wrote:So if Obama or Hillary were president you think the market would be as high?

The answer is no it wouldn't. Unemployment would likely be higher though....

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

STFU Nostradumbass.

You can cry about Trump all you want, but corporate America has been bullish ever since he was elected. I've received more interest with my resume the last 10 months than pretty much the entirety of Obama's tenure. That is just the way it is, and I welcome the change.

Not my fault you are still looking for a job you stupid fuck.
But by all means try and prove your point using a fallacy.

Been employed, just many more opportunities. Kinda like you being donkey mounted cell to cell down at the county correctional center.

I have a career not a job. That must have been what threw me off. I would drop smack on you about your job but I, unlike you, don't follow your life like you follow mine. You are just not that interesting.

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Derron wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:Seriously, 'holic....that's the closest you can come to criticizing tRump?

Are you even capable of staying on the subject of the current administration?

About how the economy is just kicking ass and nobody in the Middle East or any of the terrorists have even thought to fuck with him yet ??

48% of Americans hold 0 stocks.

Try again!

That has about zero to do with the economy kicking ass. I am far from upper middle class and I hold investments, because I want to have an actual retirement . Those investments have done better in the last 10 months than in the last 3 years combined. The trades are booming, jobs by the hundreds of thousands need filled. Business's are thriving, business confidence is greater now than ever before. Even with all the fucking taxes and fees the liberals have laid on business in the last 8 years.

But go ahead and continue your denial that the economy is doing well. What about terrorists fucking with the US ??

Derron wrote:But go ahead and continue your denial that the economy is doing well. What about terrorists fucking with the US ??

We should deport them.

Where should we have sent Stephen Paddock?

Joe in PB wrote:I've received more interest with my resume the last 10 months than pretty much the entirety of Obama's tenure.

I'm sorry your resume goes as deep as burger flipping and cash register jockeying. Why don't you get some relevant skills? That will make your job prospects not dependent on who's president.

Screwy, the opportunities I'm talking about aren't a bigger broom for a bigger room. Something I'm sure you can understand.

Unemployment is near an all time low, and yes, when Obama was president I felt the sting of reverse discrimination.



Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk