T1B

Posted: **Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:27 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:11 pm And same with Don the Con eh?
Or is he an exception?

Not an exception.

Show me examples of him or his family in businesses where there is no possible explanation for them being there other than his position as president, and you have a case.

Him or his son renting a hotel room is not that case. His daughter pimping whatever it is she is pimping, is not a case. She was peddling shit before pops ran.

Show me anything that comes anywhere close to Hunter the junkie being paid millions by a shady company in a country where his old man held the the purse springs.

You can't. Not even close.

Posted: **Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:30 pm**

smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:27 pm ...Hunter the junkie being paid millions by a shady company...

Notice how the media neglect to mention exactly what Hunter was being paid to do in THE Ukraine?

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 12:13 am**

smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:27 pm His daughter pimping whatever it is she is pimping, is not a case. She was peddling shit before pops ran.

You mean representing the US at the G12? Ivanka with her stellar academic credentials and history of national service, and all.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:23 am**

Was she paid an unexplainable amount of money for doing it?

Was she paid ANYTHING?

Say what you will about the Bad Orange Man. His 3 grown kids seem to have turned out OK. None are cokeheads, to the best of my knowledge. All work for the family business. And unlike pop, they all seem to behave reasonably well and not say stupid shit in public.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:29 am**

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:23 am Was she paid an unexplainable amount of money for doing it?

Was she paid ANYTHING?

Say what you will about the Bad Orange Man. His 3 grown kids seem to have turned out OK. None are cokeheads, to the best of my knowledge. All work for the family business. And unlike pop, they all seem to behave reasonably well and not say stupid shit in public.

Reasonably well?
Ivanka has more style grace and brains in just the tip of her clit, than screw and kierland will ever attain in a thousand lifetimes.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:31 am**

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 12:13 am
smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:27 pm His daughter pimping whatever it is she is pimping, is not a case. She was peddling shit before pops ran.
You mean representing the US at the G12? Ivanka with her stellar academic credentials and history of national service, and all.

I'm gonna get flak for saying this,
But ivanka has more style, grace, beauty and brains than your entire family, past present and future.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:33 am**

smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:23 am Was she paid an unexplainable amount of money for doing it?

Was she paid ANYTHING?

Say what you will about the Bad Orange Man. His 3 grown kids seem to have turned out OK. None are cokeheads, to the best of my knowledge. All work for the family business. And unlike pop, they all seem to behave reasonably well and not say stupid shit in public.

I would rather have Bad Orange Man's children be addicted to cocaine than enrich themselves at US taxpayer expense. In fact, we'd be better off if they were feasting at the US taxpayer trough to finance recreational blow habits. Cheaper than what they're doing right now.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:46 am**

smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:27 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:11 pm And same with Don the Con eh?
Or is he an exception?
Not an exception.

Show me examples of him or his family in businesses where there is no possible explanation for them being there other than his position as president, and you have a case.

Him or his son renting a hotel room is not that case. His daughter pimping whatever it is she is pimping, is not a case. She was peddling shit before pops ran.

Show me anything that comes anywhere close to Hunter the junkie being paid millions by a shady company in a country where his old man held the the purse springs.

You can't. Not even close.

Of course you can’t go ten fucking seconds without bitching about the other side. I was talking about Cheetolini trading dirt for our tax money. That’s what I was talking about you giving him a pass on, but yes Don the Con has his hands in many pies, you just don’t care. You already blew off millions in room rentals, Ivanolita’s patents and her husband’s loans, so not likely you would listen.
But run the process. You of all people has always trusted it.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:00 am**

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:46 am
smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:27 pm Not even close.
You of all people has always trusted it.

Tetanus and lacerations
Court orders and municipal bylaw infractions
Terrify the neighborhood
Trust The Landscaping

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:01 am**

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:00 am Tetanus and lacerations
Court orders and municipal bylaw infractions
Terrify the neighborhood
Trust The Landscaping

Dude, chill out already....

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:10 am**

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:00 am
Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 1:46 am
smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:27 pm Not even close.
You of all people has always trusted it.

Tetanus and lacerations
Court orders and municipal bylaw infractions
Terrify the neighborhood
Trust The Landscaping

hahahaha!

RACK!

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:09 am**

Kierland.
"So fucking what"?

"SO FUCKING WHAT??

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:01 pm**

The GOP's entire defense (now) is "who gives a shit."

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:40 pm**

88 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:52 am Ah, just wait. ~~Mueller~~ Schiff will soon get the goods...

Yeah because obstruction of justice is a LOL. You are a fucking POS.
Yes it was. So fucking what?

It completely blows up any efficacy it might have had to show Drump didn’t want a QPQ.
Yes it was. So fucking what?

see above
So President Z is a liar with integrity? You are a clown.

who said he is a liar?
According to who? Again, you are a clown.
According to your orange leader. “I want you to do us a favor though.”

Trump and his presidency since before the American people sent him to DC to drain the swamp, and you are going to actually assert that the FBI cleared Biden because they didn't investigate him? Clown show.
So he is in charge of the State Dept and can get them to do anything, but the FBI are run by a different branch of the government. You should have stuck to crickets and letting your trolls run the process. You suck at actual debate.

Cue up EatAPenis to call you God.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:44 pm**

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:01 pm The GOP's entire defense (now) is "who gives a shit."

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 4:02 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:44 pm
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:01 pm The GOP's entire defense (now) is "who gives a shit."

Hey moron?
She's a Reagan conservative who holds liberty sacrosanct.
That's the EXACT OPPOSITE of a fascist.
You'd know that if you had an IQ above retard levels.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 4:07 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:44 pm
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:01 pm The GOP's entire defense (now) is "who gives a shit."

Oh Low IQ pea brain?
When your government mandates that dudes with dicks must be allowed to shower with the girls in their lockers, at the high school level?
That's fascism. AND, it's your own leftist socialist party that's behind such legislation.
Is your low IQ able to grasp that?

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 4:12 pm**

Break out your trolls.
Flood the zone.
Say Raygun a lot.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88nazis

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 4:17 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 4:12 pm Break out your trolls.
Flood the zone.
Say Raygun a lot.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88nazis

Break out the drug addicts.
The low IQ's. too.
Say liberty lovers are fascists.
Lie a lot.
Sin,
Kierland Zedong.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 4:59 pm**

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 12:13 am
smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:27 pm His daughter pimping whatever it is she is pimping, is not a case. She was peddling shit before pops ran.
You mean representing the US at the G12? Ivanka with her stellar academic credentials and history of national service, and all.

Ivanka's precedents are Alice Roosevelt, Harriet Lane, Emily Donalson and Martha Jefferson. (Yeah, I looked those up.) No harm, no foul - Melania doesn't want it. Ivanka doesn't have vomit photos like the Bush twins, so...she's acceptable so far.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:00 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:44 pm
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 3:01 pm The GOP's entire defense (now) is "who gives a shit."

The shit she had to put up with ..

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:01 pm**

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:30 pm
smackaholic wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:27 pm ...Hunter the junkie being paid millions by a shady company...
Notice how the media neglect to mention exactly what Hunter was being paid to do in THE Ukraine?

10 million dollar question.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:35 pm**

Post IKYABWAI.
Raise white flags but never admit to it.
Flood the zone.
Trust the process.

Sin,
88ovens

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:41 pm**

88 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:56 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:01 pm
Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:30 pm Notice how the media neglect to mention exactly what Hunter was being paid to do in THE Ukraine?
10 million dollar question.

Well then answer the fucking question you stupid tards. You’ve had the WH for almost 3yrs.
You had both houses for 2.
You still have the Senate.
Can you not knock on a few doors? Maybe get a warrant or two? Can you not fill out a subpoena? Maybe have someone do like, I don’t know, an investigation?
Oh that’s right, the Deep State won’t let you.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 10:05 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:41 pm
88 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:56 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:01 pm
10 million dollar question.

Well then answer the fucking question you stupid tards. You’ve had the WH for almost 3yrs.
You had both houses for 2.
You still have the Senate.
Can you not knock on a few doors? Maybe get a warrant or two? Can you not fill out a subpoena? Maybe have someone do like, I don’t know, an investigation?
Oh that’s right, the Deep State won’t let you.

What do you think is going on right now?
Bull Durham is about to shatter your world.
Hold on tight.

Posted: **Fri Nov 22, 2019 11:34 pm**

So 16 months with many convictions is a witch hunt but almost three years with zero to show is about to shatter my world.

Abandon the process dude.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:32 am**

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 11:34 pm So 16 months with many convictions is a witch hunt but almost three years with zero to show is about to shatter my world.

Abandon the process dude.

It's not three years because Jeff sessions was recused.
The clock started in February when Barr became the AG.
Got it now?

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:24 am**

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:20 pm the FBI have found no evidence other than its shady looking, which it is. No ledger, no tape, no bank records, no testimony, no depositions, no charges.

You would actually have to investigate in order to find such evidence. You even admit that it "looks shady" on the surface.

Politically connected crackhead with no business experience is appointed to a million dollar a year no show job with a Ukrainian firm under investigation for corruption...an investigation which was dropped when the crackhead's sperm donor who happened to the the VPOTUS threatened to withhold $1 billion in aid unless Ukraine fired the prosecutor who was investigating the firm which employed his useless crackhead son.

When did the Mueller level investigation looking into this happen? Where is that report? At least in this case there is prima facie evidence of the Vice President of the United States engaging in corrupt behavior.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:33 am**

Lots of things "look shady" but are legit.

The Bidens and Ukraine have no other explanation.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:35 am**

smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:33 am

The Bidens and Ukraine have no other explanation.

Neither did Prince Andrew about his leisure activities on Cho-Mo Island.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:02 am**

mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:24 am
Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:20 pm the FBI have found no evidence other than its shady looking, which it is. No ledger, no tape, no bank records, no testimony, no depositions, no charges.

You would actually have to investigate in order to find such evidence. You even admit that it "looks shady" on the surface.

Politically connected crackhead with no business experience is appointed to a million dollar a year no show job with a Ukrainian firm under investigation for corruption...an investigation which was dropped when the crackhead's sperm donor who happened to the the VPOTUS threatened to withhold $1 billion in aid unless Ukraine fired the prosecutor who was investigating the firm which employed his useless crackhead son.

When did the Mueller level investigation looking into this happen? Where is that report? At least in this case there is prima facie evidence of the Vice President of the United States engaging in corrupt behavior.

Again for the racists and the pedophilic. Go ahead and investigate. Why haven’t you already? What’s stopping you now?
Your tweaked out, pill snorting orange leader should have found something by now.

He thinks the server is like a box you pick up and scurry out of the country from an American company he says is owned by a Ukrainian.
Well beyond the looking glass.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:13 pm**

On Fox News’ The Five, Dana Perino tried to dampen expectations about the the much-anticipated Justice Department review of possible FISA abuses in surveilling Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, effectively warning the show’s staunchly pro-Trump audience that the findings “will be underwhelming.”

Perino’s conclusion came after a New York Times story on Friday offered an early look at the watchdog report, which came out Friday. In it, the Times confirms an earlier report that an FBI lawyer doctored evidence used in the FISA application process, which the president then touted on Friday morning’s Fox & Friends and claimed that he thought the abuse “goes to the highest levels.” Instead, the story says that, while the investigation was at times “sloppy” and “unprofessional,” the surveillance of the Trump campaign was ultimately justified and that there was no political bias among top officials in the FBI like James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Peter Strzok.

“The report debunks a series of conspiracy theories and insinuations about the F.B.I. that Mr. Trump and his allies have put forward over the past two years,” the Times notes.

At which point, Juan Williams appeared on screen staring into the camera and shaking his head while saying in a I-told-you-so manner: “Nothing.”

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/dana-perino ... upporters/

Any pinhead who thinks scoundrels are going to be rounded up and prosecuted after the fact is...

Well, a fucking pinhead.

Swamp drain?

LMAO!

Nope.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:26 pm**

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:13 pm On Fox News’ The Five, Dana Perino tried to dampen expectations about the the much-anticipated Justice Department review of possible FISA abuses in surveilling Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, effectively warning the show’s staunchly pro-Trump audience that the findings “will be underwhelming.”

Perino’s conclusion came after a New York Times story on Friday offered an early look at the watchdog report, which came out Friday. In it, the Times confirms an earlier report that an FBI lawyer doctored evidence used in the FISA application process, which the president then touted on Friday morning’s Fox & Friends and claimed that he thought the abuse “goes to the highest levels.” Instead, the story says that, while the investigation was at times “sloppy” and “unprofessional,” the surveillance of the Trump campaign was ultimately justified and that there was no political bias among top officials in the FBI like James Comey, Andrew McCabe, and Peter Strzok.

“The report debunks a series of conspiracy theories and insinuations about the F.B.I. that Mr. Trump and his allies have put forward over the past two years,” the Times notes.

At which point, Juan Williams appeared on screen staring into the camera and shaking his head while saying in a I-told-you-so manner: “Nothing.”

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/dana-perino ... upporters/

Any pinhead who thinks scoundrels are going to be rounded up and prosecuted after the fact is...

Well, a fucking pinhead.

Swamp drain?

LMAO!

Nope.

When you or anyone quotes the NY times or Washington post,
We must respectfully laugh in your idiot face.

"Sloppy" "careless" "unprofessional". LMFAO!

Once again, left wing propaganda rears it's ugly head in the left wing socialist press.

I've studied politics longer than you've been alive cock socket.

When the DOJ is done, top officials from the FBI and Obama administration, will be indicted.

Wrap your STD mouth around that certainty and slurp it up

I'm never wrong about politics.

Go to Vegas now, and put your life savings on this. Indictments are forthcoming.

If you don't put money on that certainty?
You are a low IQ cocksucking fool.

Good luck.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:38 pm**

I've noticed that you post about cock sucking quite often.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:52 pm**

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:38 pm I've noticed that you post about cock sucking quite often.

When debating politics with dim-witted left wingers? It's extremely helpful to use graphic imagery to hit your point home.

You didn't think I enjoy ACTUAL "cocksucking" did you?

It's easy to get the wrong impression on messages boards these days.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:04 pm**

EAP wrote:You didn't think I enjoy ACTUAL "cocksucking" did you?

I think you enjoy being throat fucked.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:12 pm**

Slap wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:04 pm
EAP wrote:You didn't think I enjoy ACTUAL "cocksucking" did you?
I think you enjoy being throat fucked.

Your thimble won't get past the lips even. So throat fuck is out for you, unless you get one of those Wilt Chamberlain chocolate dongs.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:31 pm**

At the end of the day,
Sondland openly admitted that he asked the president what he wanted.
And the president said, "nothing".
Quote, "I want absolutely nothing". end quote.

Now we can move on to REAL criminal matters.

It's BULL DURHAM TIME!

you left wing socialists had better strap yourselves in and hold on for dear life.

This is gonna make watergate look like jaywalking.

Obama had better retain noted attorney David Boies.

Cause 88 won't take it.

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:44 pm**

That was after he knew he had been caught and had talked to the lawyers. Like Dumb Dumb Donald would say QPQ on his own.
You people are idiots (or like 88, evil).

Posted: **Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:56 pm**

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 8:44 pm That was after he knew he had been caught and had talked to the lawyers. Like Dumb Dumb Donald would say QPQ on his own.
You people are idiots (or like 88, evil).

After he knew he'd been caught?
That's your arguement counselor? A presumption on your part?
Try that shit again and I'll slap you with contempt.

T1B

Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland

Re: Ambassador Sondland