Can you produce a statistically relevant bit of data showing this is happening more than cases of young very fit 14 year old boys dropping from miocarditis?
It's a shame that trying to find such data is impossible, or at least extremely difficult and what you find is suspect.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2022 12:20 am
by Screw_Michigan
smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:11 pm
Can you produce a statistically relevant bit of data showing this is happening more than cases of young very fit 14 year old boys dropping from miocarditis?
Fit 14 y/o boys aren't dropping dead from myocarditis. Try again. Also try spelling it correctly.
To be fair, the shots are based on the original Wuhan strain. They are doing a pretty decent job of reducing death in these later strains.
But they are in no way a vaccine at this point. They are for the original Wuhan strain but that is it.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2022 3:08 am
by smackaholic
Screw_Michigan wrote:
smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:11 pm
Can you produce a statistically relevant bit of data showing this is happening more than cases of young very fit 14 year old boys dropping from miocarditis?
Fit 14 y/o boys aren't dropping dead from myocarditis. Try again. Also try spelling it correctly.
They are not dropping in huge numbers, but they are dropping.
The question I have is what are the actual numbers.
How many drop from the jab compared to #19?
We should have all these numbers out in the open.
We should also have legitimate double blind studies on the efficacy of HCQ or ivermectin.
There was evidence these drugs might be helpful long before the vax trials even started. It 2 years later critics say no legit trials prove it works.
They don’t say the trials prove it doesn’t. They just pretend they haven’t been done.
That is absolute bullshit. If the verdict was in that it didn’t work, they’d announce it.
But it does work, so they’ll pretend they dont know until it burns itself out and then they’ll say oh well, guess we’ll never know.
I stopped reading when they called it horse dewormer.
Got any real, legit, large scale double blind studies?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 1:32 am
by Diego in Seattle
smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 1:26 am
I stopped reading when they called it horse dewormer.
Got any real, legit, large scale double blind studies?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You won't believe anything other than shit coming from Joe Rogan or some non-peer accepted/non-medical moron like Joe Rogaine. Not even going to bother.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 1:57 am
by smackaholic
Diego in Seattle wrote:
smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 1:26 am
I stopped reading when they called it horse dewormer.
Got any real, legit, large scale double blind studies?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You won't believe anything other than shit coming from Joe Rogan or some non-peer accepted/non-medical moron like Joe Rogaine. Not even going to bother.
Not at all. I’m willing to hear any other data.
There has been plenty of data showing early treatment with horse dewo…… ivermectin working.
The Big Pharma folks have dismissed these as illegitimate since they aren’t double blind trials.
What makes me suspicious is they’ve had more than enough time to produce such studies, but they haven’t.
Why?
There’s been more than enough time, especially given the fact that this drug has an extremely good record as being safe.
Do you agree with the decision made in some jurisdictions to prevent its use?
Off label use has been a thing forever. There is no reason to forbid it unless they’re scared of the result.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 3:23 pm
by Left Seater
Anyone who calls it horse dewormer has an agenda and cares nothing about helping people get better.
Remember all the liberal covidian lockdown Nazis patting the CCP for their severe lockdowns which allegedly stopped the spread?
Well, as anyone with half a brain knows, all you accomplish with such measures, besides economic, social, psychological carnage, is denying good old fashioned herd immunity which comes from enough people getting a wif of it.
We are now getting it via the very contagious but mild omnicold.
But the Chinese, who shut it down by locking everyone in their apartments, is now seeing a breakout.
No worries though. We got plenty of vaccines. Pfftttt.
Hopefully what rolls through there now is the omnicold variant which shouldn’t kill too many.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 3:35 pm
by Kierland
Says the guy who vaxxed.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2022 5:38 pm
by Screw_Michigan
smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Mar 19, 2022 2:55 pm
Yet another example of why lockdowns are a brain dead response to a virus that has already had wide spread.
Remember all the liberal covidian lockdown spam patting the CCP for their severe lockdowns which allegedly stopped the spread?
Well, as anyone with half a brain knows, all you accomplish with such measures, besides economic, social, psychological carnage, is denying good old fashioned herd immunity which comes from enough people getting a wif of it.
We are now getting it via the very contagious but mild omnicold.
But the Chinese, who shut it down by locking everyone in their apartments, is now seeing a breakout.
No worries though. We got plenty of vaccines. Pfftttt.
Hopefully what rolls through there now is the omnicold variant which shouldn’t kill too many.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Happy 2020!
Sincerely,
Suckaholic
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 1:15 am
by smackaholic
Kierland wrote:Says the guy who vaxxed.
Yes, I did. What does that have to do with the idiotic lockdowns?
Or are you one of the idiots that thought locking down until the magic jab appeared was a good strategy?
I think I’ve been pretty clear on my position here for quite some time but I know you’re a little slow, so I’ll give it again.
The initial lockdown to figure out WTF we were dealing with was reasonable.
Once we understood who the vulnerable population was, we should have concentrated on protecting them and got to work on vaccines for THEM.
We knew that the rest of the population was not at high risk and that natural exposure would lead to herd immunity. With a little luck, it would burn out before the vax even arrived.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 2:22 pm
by Kierland
Again “herd immunity” is not what you think it is. It’s vaxing not just the “vulnerable” because everyone is vulnerable. And to be clear there never was a lockdown. Courts were open, cops were arresting people and issuing tickets for stupid shit, big chains were open. The rich were getting theirs and it was spreading the virus while you sat around defending the big lie and bitching about science you know nothing about.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 5:10 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 2:22 pm
Again “herd immunity” is not what you think it is. It’s vaxing not just the “vulnerable” because everyone is vulnerable. And to be clear there never was a lockdown. Courts were open, cops were arresting people and issuing tickets for stupid shit, big chains were open. The rich were getting theirs and it was spreading the virus while you sat around defending the big lie and bitching about science you know nothing about.
Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 2:22 pm
Again “herd immunity” is not what you think it is. It’s vaxing not just the “vulnerable” because everyone is vulnerable. And to be clear there never was a lockdown. Courts were open, cops were arresting people and issuing tickets for stupid shit, big chains were open. The rich were getting theirs and it was spreading the virus while you sat around defending the big lie and bitching about science you know nothing about.
100% spot on
Shocker, Screwy doubles down on idiocy. Government was open and functioning, private industry was handcuffed. This is the stuff of liberal wet dreams.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2022 11:59 pm
by Kierland
Walmart was open the whole time you head in the sand douche and if you hate the government so much who do you think is out making DUI arrests and banning abortions, two of you pet peeves?
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:32 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Mar 20, 2022 2:22 pm
Again “herd immunity” is not what you think it is. It’s vaxing not just the “vulnerable” because everyone is vulnerable. And to be clear there never was a lockdown. Courts were open, cops were arresting people and issuing tickets for stupid shit, big chains were open. The rich were getting theirs and it was spreading the virus while you sat around defending the big lie and bitching about science you know nothing about.
Suckaholic is arguing August 2020 Covid policy because that is when his brain stopped working.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:28 am
by Softball Bat
Very nice interview with The Pasty Gangsta here.
The Covid discussion begins around 9:20, and I recommend you take time to listen to him.
Great stuff!
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:44 pm
by Screw_Michigan
I'll pass. These pasty douchebags at the bottom of this story disagree with the "Asswipe Gangster."
Can you imagine (yes, unfortunately many of you can) getting a 4th -----> vaccine <----- and then being thrilled that you will also be able to test yourself (for free) eight times for the virus that you have been vaccinated (and boosted x2) for?
rotf...
The disconnect from reality is just simply overwhelming.
Wow.
Go get -----> #5.
That's the ticket!
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2022 1:23 am
by Screw_Michigan
schmick wrote: ↑Tue Mar 29, 2022 6:29 am
If I gave my dog rabies vaxes 3 times in a year and he still got rabies, I'd be asking some questions
Give yourself the dog rabies vaccine and tell us what happens.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2022 4:37 am
by Softball Bat
Open Letter to Parents and Pediatricians Regarding COVID Vaccination
By Robert M. Rennebohm, MD
It is quite long, but you can read a well-articulated "short version" of the contents from pages 6-17.
I have so far only read the short version, but will dig into the full piece later.
No thanks. You lost the covid vaccine debate. As everyone but you knows, they work, they save lives, and they keep people out of the hospital. It's barely a cold for most.
Hope it was worth it!
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2022 4:12 am
by Softball Bat
This is how they roll.
They let you make a "choice" (get vax'd).
Then they later inform you of the truth. Truth = you are a lab rat.
Then they tell you a 180 degree lie. "People are dying because of misinformation."
You are a lab rat.
Happy?
You will not surely die
- Satan (Genesis 3:4)
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Fri May 06, 2022 3:24 am
by Softball Bat
Johnson & Johnson Vax Strictly Limited
US regulators on Thursday strictly limited who can receive Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine due to a rare but
serious risk of blood clots. The Food and Drug Administration said the shot should only be given to adults who
cannot receive a different vaccine or specifically request Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine. US authorities for months
have recommended that Americans starting their Covid-19 vaccinations use the Pfizer or Moderna shots instead.
FDA officials said in a statement that they decided to restrict Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine after taking another
look at data on the risk of life-threatening blood clots within two weeks of vaccination....
For people over 50 or 60, they'll probably have to get boosted every 6 months until we
get even better vaccines; so we're in for ongoing vaccination to stay absolutely safe.
- Billy Goats
Circle your calendar!
New and Improved!
Wtf are you getting boosted with?
Absolutely safe!
rotf...
Surreal.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 2:20 am
by Softball Bat
B. Gates coming out here telling folks they need a -----> booster <----- every 6 months is the equivalent of a megaphone blaring, "THE 'VACCINES' DON'T WORK!!!"
Many sheep will still line up.
lol
#clown_world
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 8:35 pm
by Left Seater
Vaccine, only in the sense of the newly changed definition of the CDC's version of the word.
Do the shots help prevent death and serious illness in some people? Yes.
Are they a vaccine? No.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 9:05 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Left Seater wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:35 pm
Vaccine, only in the sense of the newly changed definition of the CDC's version of the word.
Do the shots help prevent death and serious illness in some people? Yes.
Are they a vaccine? No.
Vaccine truther checks in
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 12:16 am
by Left Seater
At least you understand it is truth.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 12:39 am
by Softball Bat
LS wrote:Do the shots help prevent death and serious illness in some people? Yes.
They belch out this mantra, but it is an extremely short-sighted perspective.
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 1:42 am
by Screw_Michigan
Left Seater wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 12:16 am
At least you understand it is truth.
If you say so
Re: Ummmm
Posted: Wed May 18, 2022 1:43 am
by Screw_Michigan
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 12:39 am
They belch out this mantra, but it is an extremely short-sighted perspective.
