T1B

Cross Traffic wrote:We have BODE on Kal!!! 2-0 baby!!!

Signed,
Alameda Coast Guard

maybe some tard could explain what that means???


the truth

well we know Texas Tech has MAJOR FUCKING BODE on CAL...


Trix...whatever...you start a post about SC, then when someone brings facts to the table you start whining about how no one in the PAC 10 has played UF, Tenn, or UGA...again...the reason prolly because those 3 schools are busy playing Georgia Southern (Georgia), Middle Tenn State and Fla Atlantic (FLA), and god knows who Tenn plays on a regular basis OOC (at least I give them credit for stepping up and playing Miami and ND recently)...

ok on topic...there is NO FUCKING WAY to determine if those other teams would go undefeated in the PAC 10...would SC go undefeated in the SEC? My guess 60/40 yes to no...back to killians point...SC HAS BEATEN every team put before them...and again not just pansy bottom feeder PAC 10 schools...we use the bowls to determine champions, and how conferences fare against one another...

2003 Orange Bowl - SC mops the floor with Iowa (who some say was better than tOSU that year)
2004 Rose Bowl - SC beats the shit out of scUM in a game that was not indicative by the score...
2005 Orange Bowl - SC gang bangs OU...

so there are 3 cases of playing some of the best from other conferences and SC laid waste to all of them...would they have done the same to UGA? Tenn? FUCKING A RIGHT...

between you and m2 you are giving serious run to board tards who have no fucking clue what they are talking about...

i still find it odd that m2 claims cal owns SC when scoreboard says otherwise...

buckeye_in_sc wrote:
Trix...whatever...you start a post about SC, then when someone brings facts to the table you start whining about how no one in the PAC 10 has played UF, Tenn, or UGA...

Can you read? One of the USC disciples brought up the SEC not me. It is easy to see when someone makes a grteat point because the person on the other end will resort to insults and smack instead of addressing the topic. I haven;t whined one bit but you keep 'reading' what you want.

ok on topic...there is NO FUCKING WAY to determine if those other teams would go undefeated in the PAC 10...would SC go undefeated in the SEC? My guess 60/40 yes to no...back to killians point...SC HAS BEATEN every team put before them...and again not just pansy bottom feeder PAC 10 schools...we use the bowls to determine champions, and how conferences fare against one another...

This explains a lot.....the TOPIC is USC's schedule and how easy it looks right now. I added that last part on the THIRD page. You really have digressed since I have spent time in here. You guys need to get out more. This gets funnier and funnier.

you're right it does get funnier and funnier slapping you around...



no the point was as soon as someone brought up the SEC schedule I knew you would go to the card of no insert team other than Bama, LSU, etc here...

and true to form...YOU DID...

T REX wrote:A test? One fucking test? And one good team? That is fucking pathetic. It is quite sad to see you guys get bent. Your hatred for me has clouded your judgments.....but it is funny to see you guys insult away. A bunch of fucking kids. Awwww.........sorry to mess up your little party but one test and one good team? That is your comeback? Please read your shit and get back to me.

I'm not bent about it. It's funny watching you kick your own ass repeatedly.

You're the one who should read the shit you spew in here. USC is the best team in the country and for you to repeatedly criticize their schedule is hilarious. When is the last time UF left the state for an OOC game, let alone play on the other side of the country? Don't give me your bullshit that they need to play a certain number of home games every year to be profitable. There is more than enough money rolling through the University of Florida Athletic Department.

With 12 games being the norm starting next season, let's see who UF adds as a OOC game. I think it's a safe bet that they won't be travleing.

This "hatred" of you is mainly how Gator fans are perceived as a whole. I only know a few Gator fans who have some perspective and actually think there is football played outside the SEC. You obviously don't.

Jimmy, if you posted an edited version of my take on ND Nation, you would get about 5 regulars who would agree with you, a few polly's who would point to Chow, Ogeron, et all leaving as a sign of cracks in the foundation and 43 newbies with posts like this "No way man, Weis iz awsom, we will pwn U$C and the condoms! ND rulz!"

Trixie, I'll break it down in simple english for you. USC is good. They will beat 90% of the teams in the country, 100% of the time. No other team can say that. If they played in the SEC, they would go undefeated. If they played in CUSA, they would go undefeated. If they played the top 11 teams in the country, 11 straight weeks, they would likely go undefeated. USC is that good.

You don't even know your own teams schedule, yet you try to run schedule smack on another school. You post shit like this and have no way to back it up. I know you don't like everyone's use of the word "tard". It offends your high class sensabilities. So, I will offer these to you:


I couldn't find any for the "heavy flow" days. Just make sure you pull it out in time. We wouldn't want you to get TSS, would we Douchy McTampon? I promise I won't make any more jokes about your man love for Urban. I'll just crack on the fact that you don't know your own teams fucking schedule and you make an excuse for everything that happens to your team. Continue to duck and dodge the fact that you don't know shit about your team, other teams, or anything about college football. Continue to run your weak ass smack. It really is enjoyable for the rest of us.

While T-Bag is trolling this entire forum, I do like the fact that this troll has insulted others yet when said troll gets smacked around, it resorts to "All you have is insults!"

Keep on trollin, T-Bitch. Whatever kind of chum you got, it's working.

Clearly Trix can't see the forrest for the trees:

Trix in this thread wrote:I haven;t whined one bit

Trix in this thread wrote: Left, you are just a bitter moron. Not your fault I guess. It's a result of poor breeding.

However, Trix just kicked his own ass and gave me the compliment that he was trying to give himself.

Trix in this thread wrote:It is easy to see when someone makes a grteat point because the person on the other end will resort to insults and smack instead of addressing the topic.

Thanks Trix!

California vs Alameda Coast Guard (CA)

Record: 0-2-0

11-20-1943

7-0

Berkeley, CA

11-04-1944

12-6

Berkeley, CA

any other explaination needed m2?

Cross Traffic wrote:

California vs Alameda Coast Guard (CA)

Record: 0-2-0

11-20-1943

7-0

Berkeley, CA

11-04-1944

12-6

Berkeley, CA

any other explaination needed m2?

Dude, the only stat in the world that matters is Kal vs. USC in the last 7 years. Did you not get the memo?

P.S. Big BSU fan? My wife's cousin just married the punter from Idaho from a couple years ago. Supposedly, he was like their best player. He said BSU was their rival. Now he lives here in Indiana and we're golf buddies. Big dude.

^^^^^

you also forgot to mention if Cal won every statistical category then the final score doesn't matter and Cal owns the Alemeda whatever...

is there some new rule where national champions are determined by game statistics and not wins and losses? because by m2 logic Cal would have won at least 5 NC's

I can see it now...just as Trix will say anything under Zook doesn't count m2 will say that Kal's excuse for sucking this season will be because Aaron Rogers is gone.

Jimmy Medalions wrote:I can see it now...just as Trix will say anything under Zook doesn't count m2 will say that Kal's excuse for sucking this season will be because Aaron Rogers is gone.

No man, didn't you see his Bab's esq post about the new JC QB? The "white Michael Vick"?

I did. Ayroob or whateverthefuck the guy's name is.

Prepare to be disappointed.

I hear he's like the sexiest male college athlete so we've got that going for us.

Sin,
m2=bitch

Indy, just started watching them last season, very enjoyable style of football. Now that I live up here, I am probably going to pick up season tix ($108 for field end zone bleachers, $20 more if you want to sit in the upper deck at the sides of the endzone)

MuchoBulls wrote:
With 12 games being the norm starting next season, let's see who UF adds as a OOC game. I think it's a safe bet that they won't be travleing.

It's called Miami. For the longest time UF played both. Did so again in the beginning of the 2000's and we are playing them again. Is there a better OOC when you play FSU and Miami EVERY YEAR????

I am sure you'll say some stupid response. Oh well. Its comical at this point.

Right. FSU during the Rix Era. m'kay, check. :roll:

not too mention last year was the first time FLA beat FSU in what 5 years or so? I mean great you are going to play FSU and Miami...that is true they really won't be traveling, i mean not leaving the state of FLA...

you see Trix...while it is all nice and good you play Miami and FSU but what about going to Texas? Going to SC? Hell even going to Washington? appears tOSU has no problem with their 5 or 6 home games a year...

here is tOSU's OOC schedule for the next couple of years:

2006 Northern Illinois - make sure you ask Maryland about them
2006 Texas at Texas
2007 Syracuse
2007 Washington at Washington
2008 Southern Cal at Southern Cal
2009 Southern Cal
2009 Miami of Florida - I believe at Miami
2010 Miami of Florida

so that is tOSU's OOC for the next few years...throw Michigan, Iowa, and Wisconsin on top of that. Not bad if I don't say so myself...

so don't hurt yourself patting yourself on the back about Miami...is that already signed or are you fucking guessing?

USC's OOC
2006 Notre Dame, @ Arkansas, Nebraska
2007 @ Notre Dame, @ Nebraska
2008 @ Colo St, Ohio State, Notre Dame
2009 @ Ohio State, @ Notre Dame

Trojans have an open date in 2007 and 2009, if Fla wants to come out to LA and play at the Coli theyre welcome to

UF-UM starting in 2008 in G-ville

Why is UF's schedule such a concern? We have a top 10-15 SOS every single year. I'm not sure what your point is......UF plays a tough schedule, throw in UM and FSU.....what the hell do you want?

PS The problem is that the UGA-UF game is held at a neutral site in JAX. You say don't pat yourself on the back but UM/FSU are OOC games and freaking difficult ones. Who else plays an OOC like that?

2005 Board Bitch Commentary:
Seeing m2 take a early lead, trix came back well with this thread but not to be denied m2 had to show up and make his bitchness known.

This is definately going to be a down to the wire race.

I see trix taking it late in the season after m2 quits posting due to cal sucking so badly.

T REX wrote:UF-UM starting in 2008 in G-ville

Is it another two year series or are we going to be able to see this series go on for a while?

Would be nice to see the gates sack up and actually play for the state crown every year.

I would also like to see UM and FSU on the schedule every year. They are trying to work it out so they can. Right now its a two gamer. Hopefully, it will turn into more.

T, just wondering, what is wrong with this thread? Do you think USC playing only 2 team in the top 25(none in the top 15) is a little weak? What is wrong with pointing it out?

T REX wrote:It's called Miami. For the longest time UF played both. Did so again in the beginning of the 2000's and we are playing them again. Is there a better OOC when you play FSU and Miami EVERY YEAR????

I am sure you'll say some stupid response. Oh well. Its comical at this point.

That deal has yet to be signed and might not. Miami is returning a game with us in either 2008 or 2009 and they have already filled those years with other opponents as well. I'm sure they will play UF at some point, but don't look for it to be annual.

UF and Miami wanted to play in Raymond James Stadium in 2008 and that was nixed.

Yes, your ineptitude is comical at this point. Carry with that head up Urban's ass.

T REX wrote:T, just wondering, what is wrong with this thread? Do you think USC playing only 2 team in the top 25(none in the top 15) is a little weak? What is wrong with pointing it out?

Because by pointing it out, you are saying without saying it that USC's success is partially based on their schedule, not their supperior talent. And by pointing out UF's schedule, you can then go back and say "Well of course we were 7-5, did you see our schedule?"

At first, I thought this was Trix. But after checking out the attire, it's the other flamer, m2....

Believe the Heupel wrote:
Believe it or not, Rex has a valid point about USC's schedule. Not saying that they wouldn't beat ass against anyone's schedule, but Nebraska used to take this very same criticism.

Actually, in the day, if Nebraska had Arkansas, Notre Dame and Fresno St as their OOC games, it would be noted that they stepped up from the Miami of Ohio's, Cincinnatti's, East Carolina, etc.....

Believe the Heupel wrote:

Killian wrote:

T REX wrote:T, just wondering, what is wrong with this thread? Do you think USC playing only 2 team in the top 25(none in the top 15) is a little weak? What is wrong with pointing it out?

Because by pointing it out, you are saying without saying it that USC's success is partially based on their schedule, not their supperior talent. And by pointing out UF's schedule, you can then go back and say "Well of course we were 7-5, did you see our schedule?"

Believe it or not, Rex has a valid point about USC's schedule. Not saying that they wouldn't beat ass against anyone's schedule, but Nebraska used to take this very same criticism. They were able to give starters a ton of rest and give backups a ton of reps preparing for next year because they were kicking the shit out of everyone. By the time bowl season came around, they had everyone healthy. Not only that, but if you play fairly lame competition all year, you can keep half of your playbook under wraps until the big game.

For the record, I think that USC had better coaching than anyone last year and better talent than just about any team they played. I think OU had a slight talent edge going into the Orange Bowl, but USC's staff thoroughly outcoached and outprepared ours. Not a knock on Stoops, really. I think that that USC staff last year will go down as one of those "legendary" type staffs like San Diego State had in the 60s with Don Coryelle, John Madden, and Joe Gibbs.

True, but USC is trying to schedule good OCC games each year. It's not their fault Notre Dame had blown for the last 3 years. They are trying to improve their schedule while the Pac-10 hopefully improves it's play from top to bottom. That having been said, USC's biggest threats the past few years have come from confrence foes. They kick the shit out of everyone else. Last year, the starters had to play the majority of the game against Oregon State, Stanford, and UCLA. I don't know about their other confrence games, but those were close.

USC is the UNLV basketball team from the early 90's. They have tons of talent, great coaching, and play in a weak confrence. That doesn't change the fact that they will still kick the shit out of every other team in the land. Now as far as the off the field stuff goes, who knows if they compare to UNLV. :wink:

Killian wrote:Now as far as the off the field stuff goes, who knows if they compare to UNLV. :wink:

No one compares to us!

Sincerely,
SMU

Killian wrote:

Believe the Heupel wrote:

Killian wrote: Because by pointing it out, you are saying without saying it that USC's success is partially based on their schedule, not their supperior talent. And by pointing out UF's schedule, you can then go back and say "Well of course we were 7-5, did you see our schedule?"

Believe it or not, Rex has a valid point about USC's schedule. Not saying that they wouldn't beat ass against anyone's schedule, but Nebraska used to take this very same criticism. They were able to give starters a ton of rest and give backups a ton of reps preparing for next year because they were kicking the shit out of everyone. By the time bowl season came around, they had everyone healthy. Not only that, but if you play fairly lame competition all year, you can keep half of your playbook under wraps until the big game.

For the record, I think that USC had better coaching than anyone last year and better talent than just about any team they played. I think OU had a slight talent edge going into the Orange Bowl, but USC's staff thoroughly outcoached and outprepared ours. Not a knock on Stoops, really. I think that that USC staff last year will go down as one of those "legendary" type staffs like San Diego State had in the 60s with Don Coryelle, John Madden, and Joe Gibbs.

True, but USC is trying to schedule good OCC games each year. It's not their fault Notre Dame had blown for the last 3 years. They are trying to improve their schedule while the Pac-10 hopefully improves it's play from top to bottom. That having been said, USC's biggest threats the past few years have come from confrence foes. They kick the shit out of everyone else. Last year, the starters had to play the majority of the game against Oregon State, Stanford, and UCLA. I don't know about their other confrence games, but those were close.

USC is the UNLV basketball team from the early 90's. They have tons of talent, great coaching, and play in a strong confrence. That doesn't change the fact that they will still kick the shit out of every other team in the land. Now as far as the off the field stuff goes, who knows if they compare to UNLV. :wink:

Deja vu all over again.


NC

The Seer wrote: Deja vu all over again.


NC

Yep, and it wasn't funny or correct the first time.

Killian wrote:

The Seer wrote: Deja vu all over again.


NC

Yep, and it wasn't funny or correct the first time.

MuchoBulls wrote:

T REX wrote:It's called Miami. For the longest time UF played both. Did so again in the beginning of the 2000's and we are playing them again. Is there a better OOC when you play FSU and Miami EVERY YEAR????

I am sure you'll say some stupid response. Oh well. Its comical at this point.

That deal has yet to be signed and might not. Miami is returning a game with us in either 2008 or 2009 and they have already filled those years with other opponents as well. I'm sure they will play UF at some point, but don't look for it to be annual.

UF and Miami wanted to play in Raymond James Stadium in 2008 and that was nixed.

Yes, your ineptitude is comical at this point. Carry with that head up Urban's ass.

Head up Urban's ass? You wonder why no new people come around? You can't even respond to a post without insulting another. This room dwindles every year because you people just go around firing off insults. There was a time when great threads were forefront and the razzing was just a by product. You can't wait to type back some insult instead of carrying on normal dialogue.

Killian wrote:
Because by pointing it out, you are saying without saying it that USC's success is partially based on their schedule, not their supperior talent. And by pointing out UF's schedule, you can then go back and say "Well of course we were 7-5, did you see our schedule?"

YOU are saying that not me. All I brought up was that they have a weak schedule. You and the others have added whatever else you perceive, not me. They have a weak schedule.

I never brought up UF's schedule first. One of you did. I have no idea what you are talking about. You and your 'pointing it out" and the assumptions that follow really take the cake. I have always taken my lumps for Florida whenever they play poorly. I am not sure Ron Zook was an excuse as much as a condition. Why so bitter?

Believe the Heupel wrote:

Killian wrote:

T REX wrote:T, just wondering, what is wrong with this thread? Do you think USC playing only 2 team in the top 25(none in the top 15) is a little weak? What is wrong with pointing it out?

Because by pointing it out, you are saying without saying it that USC's success is partially based on their schedule, not their supperior talent. And by pointing out UF's schedule, you can then go back and say "Well of course we were 7-5, did you see our schedule?"

Believe it or not, Rex has a valid point about USC's schedule. Not saying that they wouldn't beat ass against anyone's schedule, but Nebraska used to take this very same criticism. They were able to give starters a ton of rest and give backups a ton of reps preparing for next year because they were kicking the shit out of everyone. By the time bowl season came around, they had everyone healthy. Not only that, but if you play fairly lame competition all year, you can keep half of your playbook under wraps until the big game.

For the record, I think that USC had better coaching than anyone last year and better talent than just about any team they played. I think OU had a slight talent edge going into the Orange Bowl, but USC's staff thoroughly outcoached and outprepared ours. Not a knock on Stoops, really. I think that that USC staff last year will go down as one of those "legendary" type staffs like San Diego State had in the 60s with Don Coryelle, John Madden, and Joe Gibbs.

What's up BTH? I never even said that USC wasn't the best team, just their schedule sucks, that's all. Then you have all these guys add their own little perceptions and insults. Most can't even carry on a decent dialogue without gay-homo-urban smack. Where is the Zammer?

Curious but did Miami get the same ridicule when they were beating the hell out of everyone? the Big East was far worse then than the Pac 10 is now, and Miami never played the OOC schedule that USC plays, theyd play FSU and then Florida A&M and Middle Tenn St..
The Pac 10 normally suffers from poor rankings because of the Pac 10's OOC scheduling, top to bottom no other conf comes close to the OOC schedules he Pac 10 teams have the balls to play. Pac teams dont collectively enter conference play undefeated because of their tougher OOC schedules so when the better Pac 10 teams play its not always a battle of unbeatens. Also add the fact that Pac 10 teams play all the other Pac 10 teams (starting next season, they had only played 8 of 9) so there is no ducking other conference titans until a possible Conf Title game where again, 2 teams with fluffed up records compete.
Through 7 years of BCS Bowls 7 Pac 10 teams have participated, what other conference has come close to having 70% of their schools participate in BCS bowls?
People put too much weight in to rankings, which is why a playoff is needed. Most pollsters look only at teams records to determine their rank and not who those wins and losses are against or where those games were played. Not long ago Northwestern faced USC in the Rose Bowl, Northwestern was ranked in the top 3 in the nation and USC was ranked much lower but beat the shit out of Northwestern in the bowl game... Northwestern was still ranked higher than USC in the final poll because they had a better record, even though USC had beaten them.

Arguing with T Rex is like beating your head against the wall, its myopic south eastern thinking like his that gave Alabama the 1978 national title even though USC had the same record and went in to Birmingham and beat Alabama 24-14. He just doesnt get it, his entire life he was brainwashd in to beleiving that SEC football is the best and no one else knows how to play the game, no matter what evidence there is of other teams being better. Its the same mentality that allows Christian mythology to run so rampant in the south, someday the free thought movement will reach the south and southern children will be allowed to form their own opinions based on facts, proof and evidence and not what they're told by their dad while he is putting on his little gray suit to go reenact losing the war to the north

SoCalTrjn wrote:
Arguing with T Rex is like beating your head against the wall, its myopic south eastern thinking like his that gave Alabama the 1978 national title even though USC had the same record and went in to Birmingham and beat Alabama 24-14. He just doesnt get it, his entire life he was brainwashd in to beleiving that SEC football is the best and no one else knows how to play the game, no matter what evidence there is of other teams being better. Its the same mentality that allows Christian mythology to run so rampant in the south, someday the free thought movement will reach the south and southern children will be allowed to form their own opinions based on facts, proof and evidence and not what they're told by their dad while he is putting on his little gray suit to go reenact losing the war to the north

You sir, have no clue. I am from Michigan. A Yankee. I grew up with Schembechler, went to games at the Big House, half of my family went to UM, the other half to State. I went south where its warm and haven't looked back. Oh, I visit every year(during the summer) but if never see snow again I will be fine. I am also a non-practicing Catholic so your christian remark does not pertain to me either. The Civil War reference was....well.....an assumption beyond belief. What is wrong with you?Also, see 1993 when ND beat FSU and finished with the same record and FSU took the title.

SoCalTrjn wrote: so there is no ducking other conference titans until a possible Conf Title game where again, 2 teams with fluffed up records compete.

I guess this tells it all. Uh, the two respective TITANS from the two divisions(the teams with the BEST records not fluffed records - question - how can you fluff a conference record - if a TITAN is not playing in the title game that means that uhhhh, they are NOT A TITAN) play each other to determine the conference CHAMPION. Somewhere, somehow they will play....either in division or as division champs. Your comment does not make sense. I am not sure if you were trying to prop up the Pac-10 or rip on another conference, but it was a sad attempt.

you fluff a conf record by playing Vandy, Miss St, Ole Miss, Kentucky + OOC foes the Citadel, Louisiana Monroe and Georgia Southern.