T1B

...playing the Pat's at home ( and wiping their ass ), then the Stillers ( after they have a week off ) next the Raiduhs at Oakland, and then the Iggles at Philly ( after the have a bye ). Such is the rewards of a 12-4 thrashing of the AFC West.

No grapes here though...you have to beat the best eventially to make the playoffs....that is unless you happen to be in the NFC North or AFC East.

If the Chargers make the playoffs this year, Rivers needs to be shown the door. The Chargers are a very good football team and they by far have the toughest schedule in the NFL this year. Kinda wonder how Indy lucked out playing an Ivy League schedule while San Diego was taken out to the wood shed.

Cicero wrote:If the Chargers make the playoffs this year, Rivers needs to be shown the door. The Chargers are a very good football team and they by far have the toughest schedule in the NFL this year. Kinda wonder how Indy lucked out playing an Ivy League schedule while San Diego was taken out to the wood shed.

The schedule and which divisons play which is decided in advance... They just lucked out to be playing that shit division called the NFC West (plus that fact that other than Jax- their own division blows monkey cak as well)

Cicero wrote:and they by far have the toughest schedule in the NFL this year.

Huh? The Raiders, who have a fifth place schedule, traveled to NE and Philly in the first three weeks!

go fuck yourself.

Sirfindafold wrote: Huh? The Raiders, who have a fifth place schedule, traveled to NE and Philly in the first three weeks!

go fuck yourself.

Q: What difference does it make whether they play at NE and Philly in the first 3 weeks or in week 4 and 7?

A: None.

Raider apologist much or just a dumbass?

Don't answer, I'll go with "dumbass raider apologist" by default.

I'd tell you to "go fuck yourself" as well, but that would be repetitive.

Sirfindafold wrote:

Cicero wrote:and they by far have the toughest schedule in the NFL this year.

Huh? The Raiders, who have a fifth place schedule, traveled to NE and Philly in the first three weeks!

go fuck yourself.

I'm sorry your team sucks ass, but I just pointed out that the Chargers have the toughest schedule IMHO.

mvscal wrote:

War Wagon wrote:Q: What difference does it make whether they play at NE and Philly in the first 3 weeks or in week 4 and 7?

A: None.

Yeah...injuries don't make any difference at all.

Dumbfuck

Thank you. An informed bolt fan who knew that his team's fortunes were a little better playing against the Pats without Rodney Harrison and Matt Light.

Cicero wrote:

Sirfindafold wrote:

Cicero wrote:and they by far have the toughest schedule in the NFL this year.

Huh? The Raiders, who have a fifth place schedule, traveled to NE and Philly in the first three weeks!

go fuck yourself.

I'm sorry your team sucks ass, but I just pointed out that the Chargers have the toughest schedule IMHO.

You said they have the toughest schedule "by far". I disagree.

get fucked.

mvscal wrote: Yeah...injuries don't make any difference at all.

So, when rating SoS, one should take into account when the games are scheduled in order to take into account potential injuries. :roll:

Injuries go both ways "dumbfuck".

CM...first and foremost, go edit that 1st post. You WHIPPED our asses...not wiped!


ok?


You guys beat a good team that had a bunch of replacements that day.


/props!

Sirfindafold wrote:

Cicero wrote:and they by far have the toughest schedule in the NFL this year.

Huh? The Raiders, who have a fifth place schedule, traveled to NE and Philly in the first three weeks!

go fuck yourself.

A 5th place schedule?

I know the Raiders suck and all, but even they can't manage 5th in a 4 team division.

Sirfindafold wrote:

Cicero wrote:and they by far have the toughest schedule in the NFL this year.

Huh? The Raiders, who have a fifth place schedule, traveled to NE and Philly in the first three weeks!

And they still managed to lose to Kansas City in the middle of that three week run.

Actually the Pats are ranked 2nd in difficulty. First is Miami and that is because they play the Pats....

chowd103 wrote:CM...first and foremost, go edit that 1st post. You WHIPPED our asses...not wiped!


ok?


You guys beat a good team that had a bunch of replacements that day.


/props!

Wiped is usually associated with ass....however, whipped, whooped, wiped, ...they all work for me.

BTW, I was the first one to say it would have been a different game with Harrison and Bruschi in there.

mvscal wrote:.
To say that injuries had no effect on the outcome of the game is moronic...even for Chieffan. Beating an injury ravaged Patriot team is not even remotely comparable to beating a Patriot team at full strength.

Ok, but that's not what I said nor anything "even remotely comparable".

Sirfindaclue whines that the Raiders schedule is tougher than the Chargers based simply on when they had to play two games out of a 16 week schedule. That's moronic, even for 'duhfan, and apparently, a certain blotfan as well

Try reading within context next time before you come rushing in here with your pea shooter blazing, dumbfuck.

War Wagon wrote:Sirfindaclue whines that the Raiders schedule is tougher than the Chargers based simply on when they had to play two games out of a 16 week schedule. That's moronic, even for 'duhfan, and apparently, a certain blotfan as well

Try reading within context next time before you come rushing in here with your pea shooter blazing, dumbfuck.

Where did I say the Raiders schedule was tougher? I didn't. I took issue with statement that the chargers schedule is toughest "by far."

Damn you're dumb.

go fuck yourself.