Page 1 of 1

A Conversation With Detard

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:47 pm
by BSmack
Image

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:56 pm
by mothster
so who is who

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 5:55 pm
by Mister Bushice
Republican apologists are rather easy to spot.

I wonder when Bush will look around him and realize "My administration has just as much corruption going on in and around it as any other one"?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 12:22 pm
by Diogenes
Let me know when they start taking illegal campaign contributions from PRC agents in exchange for military technology.



TIA.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 1:38 pm
by BSmack
Diogenes wrote:Let me know when they start taking illegal campaign contributions from PRC agents in exchange for military technology.
Have you forgotten the spy plane the PRC hijacked back in 2001?

Yea, the Bushites really stood up to China on that one.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 1:42 pm
by DrDetroit
PRC hijacked a US spy plane?

And that's your response to Clinton taking cash from Chinese military personnel in a quid pro quo for classified guidance technology?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:04 pm
by BSmack
DrDetroit wrote:PRC hijacked a US spy plane?

And that's your response to Clinton taking cash from Chinese military personnel in a quid pro quo for classified guidance technology?
Classified is a meaningless term.

sin

Valerie Plame

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:39 pm
by DrDetroit
Still trying to argue that Plame was a protected agent? LMAO!!

Sorry, but Joseph Wilson outted her then way before Rove mentioned that Plame, Wilson's wife, got Wilson his gig.

Also, recall, that even before Rove noted that to Novak, David Corn had already identified Plame as a CIA agent in The Nation.

Once again, you don't know wtf you are talking about.

Keep making an ass of yourself.

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:49 pm
by BSmack
DrDetroit wrote:Still trying to argue that Plame was a protected agent? LMAO!! Sorry, but Joseph Wilson outted her then way before Rove mentioned that Plame, Wilson's wife, got Wilson his gig. Also, recall, that even before Rove noted that to Novak, David Corn had already identified Plame as a CIA agent in The Nation. Once again, you don't know wtf you are talking about. Keep making an ass of yourself.
If it is as cut and dry as you say, why is Rove back testifying AGAIN?

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:59 pm
by DrDetroit
Well, one reason could be so that he could address some of the shit that Miller left behind. You are aware that those who testify before a grand jury are able to discuss in public their testimnoy, correct?

Nonetheless, before last week, he had already testified three times. That, by itself hardly suggests wrongdoing. Though I am not surprised to see you going that route.

And, if it was not as cut and dried as that, why hasn't Fitz indicted any one, yet? Or notified those who are targeted for indictment that they are targets?

Face it, Plame was not a protected agent and her CIA employment was well known.

Tell me, B, how likely is it that a CIA agent, once a covert agent, but since then publically known to be a CIA employee, be used in the future as a covert agent?

It simply doesn't make sense...but you people don't care about that...

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:25 am
by Diogenes
DrDetroit wrote:Still trying to argue that Plame was a protected agent? LMAO!!

Sorry, but Joseph Wilson outted her then way before Rove mentioned that Plame, Wilson's wife, got Wilson his gig.

Also, recall, that even before Rove noted that to Novak, David Corn had already identified Plame as a CIA agent in The Nation.
You forgot about the CIA accidentally outing her years before that which is why she was a permenant desk jockey, and hence not protected.




And the left still thinks Bill Caligula illegaly selling missle technology to the PRC is no big deal, appearantly.

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:35 am
by Gunslinger
Diogenes wrote:Let me know when they start taking illegal campaign contributions from PRC agents in exchange for military technology.



TIA.
Is that all you got is some shit about a President not even in fucking office?

You used this approach to BSmack. The only reason you post on this message board is because you know in this day and age if you expressed your opinion to a physical person, your posting while working welfare ass would get his panties pulled up around his face and punched in the throat.

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:57 pm
by Variable
Is that all you got is some shit about a President not even in fucking office?
Uh, obviously that's more than enough to get you to melt. Implying he needs his ass kicked? Bwahahahaha.

Sonofa... I hate it when they bring up that China crap! - Gunslinger

Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 8:50 pm
by Diogenes
My posting anything can make that little twit melt.

And the point has nothing to do with Former President Caliguli, it is all about the hypocricy and idiocy of the Bushhaters.