Page 1 of 1

Welcome to the Furher Bunker 2005

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:38 pm
by BSmack
Do you think he's having spanking parties with Harriet Miers and Condi Rice as he orders imaginary divisions into battle?

President of the United States is a bitter, frustrated, raving batshit loon

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:41 pm
by DrDetroit
Since when is a reporters speculation of a President's behavior relevant?

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:44 pm
by BSmack
DrDetroit wrote:Since when is a reporters speculation of a President's behavior relevant?
The Daily News Washington Bureau Chief is in a better postition to assess the mental state of the President than you.

You may now put your head back in the sand.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:50 pm
by DrDetroit
The Daily News Washington Bureau Chief is merely closer to the White House than I am. Period. That you rely on this guy as a barmometer of the President's mental state is quite revealing.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:52 pm
by BSmack
DrDetroit wrote:The Daily News Washington Bureau Chief is merely closer to the White House than I am. Period. That you rely on this guy as a barmometer of the President's mental state is quite revealing.
Do you seriously think a major daily newspaper would allow their Washington Bureau Chief to write a piece like that if he DIDN'T have multiple sources?

Your boy is cracking.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:54 pm
by DrDetroit
BSmack wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:The Daily News Washington Bureau Chief is merely closer to the White House than I am. Period. That you rely on this guy as a barmometer of the President's mental state is quite revealing.
Do you seriously think a major daily newspaper would allow their Washington Bureau Chief to write a piece like that if he DIDN'T have multiple sources?

Your boy is cracking.
Bwahahahaaaaa...his editors actually care about the alleged sources he has??

I'm sorry, but lets drop the pretense here and just admit that his article simple reflects what he perceives the President's behavior/attitude to be and that he only sought those alleged "sources" that agreed with him...okay?

Come on...there's unanimous agreement that the President is behaving this way?

If you want to see cracking, you need look no further than your party's leadership.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:57 pm
by BSmack
DrDetroit wrote:Come on...there's unanimous agreement that the President is behaving this way?
You failed logic. Didn't you?

Feel free to cite something to rebutt this article. I'm sure Rove ...err Libby... err Delay... err Frist..

Shit, is there a Republican NOT being indicted?

Anyway, I'm sure Free Republic will have your talking points up in an hour.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:00 pm
by DrDetroit
How exactly do you rebut anonymous sources? of whom you do not know their relationship to the principal, level of interaction, or otherwise?

I failed logic because I choose not to accept the rumor-mongering of anonymous sources telling a one-sided story??

DeLay gets indicted and now the entire Republican Party has been indicted?? Yet, you're going to assert that Bush is cracking?? Bwahahahahahaaa!!!

BTW - your sarcastic appeal to whatever sources I might rely on for information only demonstrates that you, too, don't even buy what this hack is selling.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:02 pm
by BSmack
DrDetroit wrote:I failed logic.
I know.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:04 pm
by JHawkBCD
Who gives a shit?

So he reads the riot act to some staffers that prove to be fuck ups every now & then. So fucking what? It's not like he's shoving cigars up their asses.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:05 pm
by BSmack
JHawkBCD wrote:Who gives a shit?

So he reads the riot act to some staffers that prove to be fuck ups every now & then. So fucking what? It's not like he's shoving cigars up their asses.
No, he leaves that to the MPs.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:07 pm
by BBMarley
BSmack wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:The Daily News Washington Bureau Chief is merely closer to the White House than I am. Period. That you rely on this guy as a barmometer of the President's mental state is quite revealing.
Do you seriously think a major daily newspaper would allow their Washington Bureau Chief to write a piece like that if he DIDN'T have multiple sources?
You're right.... News sources never report anything without verifying it!

Sin,

Image

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:08 pm
by Cicero
Will the libs be this bitter when Hillary loses in 2008?

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:10 pm
by BSmack
BBMarley wrote:You're right.... News sources never report anything without verifying it!
The difference is Turd Blossom is too busy to plant stories at CBS.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:10 pm
by BSmack
Cicero wrote:Will the libs be this bitter when Hillary loses in 2008?
No, they will support the Democratic nominee. And that won't be Hillary.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:12 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:
Cicero wrote:Will the libs be this bitter when Hillary loses in 2008?
Just in case y'all consider me a lib,
You are a lib. So save the bullshit.
Compared to you, Himmler was a liberal.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:31 pm
by Tom In VA
Libby and Rove have been indicted ?

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:37 pm
by Tom In VA
Sudden Sam wrote:
Tom In VA wrote:Libby and Rove have been indicted ?

One doesn't need to be indicted to be exposed as scum.
You implying that no proof or evidence, that a trial by jury is not necessary ?

I see. So why do we have laws against slander ?

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:57 pm
by tough love
"The President is just unhappy in general and casting blame all about," said one Bush insider.
Someone tell daddy's little idiot to check out a mirror.
What's his problem, anyway.
It's not like he was going to run again, or does he not know that.

Anywho, the po$er can take his place in history next to the likes of the other poli_butchers.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:15 pm
by Variable
Image
L to R: BSmack, Detroit

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:17 pm
by BSmack
Mike,

You should wytch a Louisville Slugger in the hands of the chick on the left and send it to Dave. He'd love it.

Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:41 pm
by Variable
Even better, I asked 3putt to do it for me. :D

Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:06 am
by Nishlord
Bush usually reserves his celebrated temper for senior aides because he knows they can take it.
What 'celebrated temper' might this be? 'Celebrated inability to stop speaking like a window-licker', more like.

Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:05 pm
by DrDetroit
He quietly explained how Rove's arrival had poisoned the judicial climate by putting politics above matters of law and justice—"collateral damage," he called it, from the win-at-all-costs attitude that now prevails in judicial races.
Oh, that's what he calls it...okay.
"We were trying to counter the positives from that ad," a former Rove staffer told me, explaining that some within the See camp initiated a whisper campaign that Kennedy was a pedophile. "
Nice anonymous sourcing... :roll:
"What Rove does," says Joe Perkins, "is try to make something so bad for a family...
Thanks, Joe, for your impression of Rove.

There you go, SS, always a mirror for the other guy's opinion.