Page 1 of 1
Rush makes a good point
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:46 pm
by DrDetroit
At lunch I heard Rush wondering why the Bush administration didn't or refused to pursue the Sandy Burglar incident more aggressively than it did...
Any ideas?
Re: Rush makes a good point
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:53 pm
by BSmack
DrDetroit wrote:At lunch I heard Rush wondering why the Bush administration didn't or refused to pursue the Sandy Burglar incident more aggressively than it did...
Any ideas?
Because they knew they couldn't prove their case?
Yea, that's usualy the reason.
Re: Rush makes a good point
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:59 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:BSmack wrote:
Because they knew they couldn't prove their case?
Yea, that's usualy the reason.
Berger admitted it, dumbfuck.
Nobody said the Bush Administration was competent.
Re: Rush makes a good point
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:05 pm
by titlover
BSmack wrote:mvscal wrote:BSmack wrote:
Because they knew they couldn't prove their case?
Yea, that's usualy the reason.
Berger admitted it, dumbfuck.
Nobody said the Bush Administration was competent.
nor do they about you.
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:10 am
by Diogenes
The same reason there was no prosecution of his former boss's various crimes after their infestation of the white house was terminated...
A)The backlash from Bill Caligula's impeachment has the GOP gunshy about prosecuting prominent Dems
B)He's a uniter, not a divider.
And Rush still sucks.