T1B

Posted: **Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:42 pm**

Minus 10

Um, get it while you can. 10?!
Does Vegas really expect the gp to lay on Baltimore with anything less than 21 1/2? 28?

I mean I was salavating, waiting for this game after a few weeks into the season but now I am about to explode. If there has been anything we can count on over the years, it's been betting against Favre in a dome, maybe The Spurs pounding The Clippers, The Devil Rays over The Yankees and The Steelers anihilating The Ravens (except during Lewis' monster year).

Maybe this will be the perfect jinx but I'll take this match up as The Treat of the evening. This one should be quite ugly. Take the half, take the game, time to go all in and double up.

10

How in the world do The Ravens stay within 10?!

Posted: **Tue Oct 25, 2005 6:27 pm**

W/ Ray Lewis and Ed Reed likely to be out, Steelers are gonna polax Bilitch and Willie Beaman.

Posted: **Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:52 pm**

Dumbass wrote:Minus 10

Um, get it while you can. 10?!
Does Vegas really expect the gp to lay on Baltimore with anything less than 21 1/2? 28?!

The line is still at 10.

It's only moved 1.5 since it opened.

The Patriots on the other hand, have improved 2 pts, to a 9 pt favorite. This puts one of my universal betting theories to the test. Anytime a line moves 2 or more pts, bet the opposite. It hits about 79% of the time.

Of course, the last time I posted a LOTW, my bet against Monday Night Winnner traveling across country the following week as a favorite (83% success rate) bit the dust.

Btw -- Reed and Lewis are definitely out. I'm surprised the line hasn't moved further.

Posted: **Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:54 pm**

Snooze Baton wrote:
Dumbass wrote:Minus 10

Um, get it while you can. 10?!
Does Vegas really expect the gp to lay on Baltimore with anything less than 21 1/2? 28?!

The line is still at 10.

It's only moved 1.5 since it opened.

The Patriots on the other hand, have improved 2 pts, to a 9 pt favorite. This puts one of my universal betting theories to the test. Anytime a line moves 2 or more pts, bet the opposite. It hits about 79% of the time.

Of course, the last time I posted a LOTW, my bet against Monday Night Winnner traveling across country the following week as a favorite (83% success rate) bit the dust.

Btw -- Reed and Lewis are definitely out. I'm surprised the line hasn't moved further.

Why? The Steelers don't traditional blow teams out. They get a lead and take the air out of the ball. Under the circumstances, I can understand why this game has a 10 point spread.

Posted: **Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:01 pm**

BSmack wrote:Why?

Because the betting public is stupid.

As an aside -- can you supply me with the Steelers record at home against the spread on Monday Night during the Cowher era?

I bet you it's 70%+

Posted: **Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:14 pm**

Snooze Baton wrote:
BSmack wrote:Why?
Because the betting public is stupid.

As an aside -- can you supply me with the Steelers record at home against the spread on Monday Night during the Cowher era?

I bet you it's 70%+

Sorry, I'm a football fan, not a degenerate gambler.

Posted: **Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:19 pm**

Snooze Baton wrote:
BSmack wrote:Why?
Because the betting public is stupid.

As an aside -- can you supply me with the Steelers record at home against the spread on Monday Night during the Cowher era?

I bet you it's 70%+

I bet you 99% of us in here could give a rat's a$$.....in other words, it's a real...snoozer

Posted: **Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:23 pm**

BSmack wrote:Sorry, I'm a football fan, not a degenerate gambler.

Okay then... be a well mannered lady and keep your mouth shut when the men are discussing the lines.

Posted: **Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:33 pm**

Snooze Baton wrote:
BSmack wrote:Sorry, I'm a football fan, not a degenerate gambler.
Okay then... be a well mannered lady and keep your mouth shut when the men are discussing the lines.

How about you STFU and stop being a useless shit troll?

Posted: **Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 pm**

The Ravens are scoring 11.5 ppg. To take them you need to assume they will allow less than 22 points to the Steelers on the road. Not likely. Lay the 10.

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:26 am**

BSmack wrote:
Snooze Baton wrote:
BSmack wrote:Why?
Because the betting public is stupid.

As an aside -- can you supply me with the Steelers record at home against the spread on Monday Night during the Cowher era?

I bet you it's 70%+
Sorry, I'm a football fan, not a degenerate gambler.

Meaning, dipshit couldn't pick a football game if his life depended on it.
Steelers Steelers rah rah rah.

Um, it's the "degenerates" that have helped make this sport as popular as it is and it doesn't take a "degenerate" to throw a few bucks on a game once in a while. Shit, I haven't even made a bet since SC thumped Oklahoma. Once in a while you have to take a shot when it's there for the taking. You just have to be SMART ENOUGH to know when to take your chances.

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:32 am**

Dumbass wrote:Meaning, dipshit couldn't pick a football game if his life depended on it. Steelers Steelers rah rah rah. Um, it's the "degenerates" that have helped make this sport as popular as it is.

Whatever. If you want to lose your rent check to your online book, go right ahead.

Where do you stand? Can you supply me with the Steelers record at home against the spread on Monday Night during the Cowher era? Never mind that only one player is still on the Steelers from their Super Bowl XXX team.

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:46 am**

I'm still alive in my survivor pool and I took the Steelers instead of Tampa? What do you guys think?

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:18 pm**

Cosmo Kramer wrote:I'm still alive in my survivor pool and I took the Steelers instead of Tampa? What do you guys think?

You can't go wrong with either pick. Tim Rattay has had two weeks to brain dump the 49ers playbook into John Gruden's game plan. On the other hand, the Steelers should cruise over the Ravens' dilapitaded defense and broken down offense.

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:19 pm**

Dumbass wrote:Meaning, dipshit couldn't pick a football game if his life depended on it.

Steelers Steelers rah rah rah.

Fucking RACK... dude is definitely the most useless fucker in this forum. Never has a objective take... he can't discuss the Steelers rationally and he can't discuss other teams because he knows jack outside of the Steelers. What a fucking waste.

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:39 pm**

Snooze Baton wrote:Fucking RACK... dude is definitely the most useless fucker in this forum. Never has a objective take... he can't discuss the Steelers rationally and he can't discuss other teams because he knows jack outside of the Steelers. What a fucking waste.

Must have missed the Eagles-Broncos game thread. That you are riding PISC's nutsack is all the rest of us need to know about your "game".

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:49 pm**

BSmack wrote:That you are riding PISC's nutsack...

:roll: Nigga please.

I guess you missed the thread where I called your punkass out for being a subjective, takeless fuck. Dude is just agreeing with me...

Who gives a fuck that you threw your 2 cents in a game not involving the Steelers? I'm sure you supplied your usual shit takes.

You're useless.

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:57 pm**

Snooze Baton wrote:I guess you missed the thread where I called your punkass out for being a subjective, takeless fuck. Dude is just agreeing with me...

I guess you missed where PISC STARTED This thread.

You are a nobody who can't even come correct about who he (or she) roots for. So fuck you and your sister for trying to paint someone else as a homer when you can't even come straight you fucking fag.

Now, you want to talk football? Tell me why you think that line is wrong? It is a division game featuring two teams that are known to prefer ball control offenses and good defense. Indy vs Houston rated a 17 point line last week. You can't think this game is as potentialy lopsided as that game?

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:02 pm**

BSmack wrote:
Must have missed the Eagles-Broncos game thread.

I didn't miss it, I just quit posting in it when Steeler fan (e.g. you) decided that you have more at stake in the game than the fans of the two teams involved.

No matter, it's another thread you can chalk up as "kilt".

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:10 pm**

Felix wrote:
BSmack wrote:
Must have missed the Eagles-Broncos game thread.
I didn't miss it, I just quit posting in it when Steeler fan (e.g. you) decided that you have more at stake in the game than the fans of the two teams involved.

No matter, it's another thread you can chalk up as "kilt".

Christ Pinky, is there ever a time I can't count on you to whine, bitch and complain your way through life?

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:16 pm**

BSmack wrote:
Christ Pinky, is there ever a time I can't count on you to whine, bitch and complain your way through life?

Is there ever a time when you won't feel compelled to hit the submit button in every thread?

Christ bud, you're not that fucking interesting......

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:19 pm**

BSmack wrote:You are a nobody who can't even come correct about who he (or she) roots for.

I root for whomever my money is on... everyone knows this. I've started at least one hundred Lock Of The Week threads since SC3.

The Steelers dominate at home on Monday Nights. The Ravens have a shit offense going up a great D. The Ravens will be without their two best defensive players, Lewis and Reed. Roethleswhathisname is healthy, Ward is healthy, Parker is healthy, Bettis is healthy. The Ravens avg 11 pts/game. Anemic!! The Steelers "struggles" at home this year have come against playoff caliber opponents. Against a shit team, Tennessee, they won 34-7. This will be one of those rare instances where the line moves 2+ pts and the betting public will hit.

Did I mention the Ravens offense sux and they're missing Reed and Lewis?

My predictions:

Steelers will get 200+ yards rushing and their defense forces 3+ turnovers.

Steelers 30 Ravens 6

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:38 pm**

Snooze Baton wrote:
BSmack wrote:You are a nobody who can't even come correct about who he (or she) roots for.
I root for whomever my money is on... everyone knows this. I've started at least one hundred Lock Of The Week threads since SC3.

The Steelers dominate at home on Monday Nights. The Ravens have a shit offense going up a great D. The Ravens will be without their two best defensive players, Lewis and Reed. Roethleswhathisname is healthy, Ward is healthy, Parker is healthy, Bettis is healthy. The Ravens have averaged 9 pts/game is their last 6 contests. Anemic!! The Steelers "struggles" at home this year have come against playoff caliber opponents. Against a shit team, Tennessee, they won 34-7. This will be one of those rare instances where the line moves 2+ pts and the betting public will hit.

Did I mention the Ravens offense sux and they're missing Reed and Lewis?

My predictions:

Steelers will get 200+ yards rushing and their defense forces 3+ turnovers.

Steelers 30 Ravens 6

Hey, I hope you're right. I've got some FFL money riding on the Steelers D and Willie Parker and it wouldn't suck seeing tham hang 30 on the Ravens ever. But I'm thinking a 24-14 score with a garbage time TD for the Ravens would not be out of line. Not that the Steelers aren't capable of scoring more, but Cowher tends to take the air out of the ball as soon as he is able.

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:14 pm**

BSmack wrote:That you are riding PISC's nutsack is all the rest of us need to know about your "game".

...and if you are still one of those fools that don't think I know my gridiron... :roll:

Nobody needs to ride anyone's sack to know you're a tool and about 51 short of a full deck.

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:28 pm**

Oh and you have money in the JFFL.

That would be considered by many as gambling...I know the wives do.

One of us
One of us
One of us

Happy Halloween fuckos!
Wooooooooooo!

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:32 pm**

Dumbass wrote:Oh and you have money in the JFFL. That would be considered by many as gambling...I know the wives do.

The difference is in scale. I never said I didn't gamble. I said I wasn't a degenerate gambler like you.

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:12 pm**

BSmack wrote:
Dumbass wrote:Oh and you have money in the JFFL. That would be considered by many as gambling...I know the wives do.
The difference is in scale. I never said I didn't gamble. I said I wasn't a degenerate gambler like you.

You pass judgement on all like this without knowing the facts? Let's see you can't read the rules to fantasy football, can't read what I wrote here, hmmmmm...3 letters for ya, GED. Get on it.

What part did you not understand about not laying down since SC Oklahoma? Bwa! What'd I lay $300 maybe? Yup, gonna forelcose on my cardboard box soon. :roll: Gonna have to ask my dog if I can move in but he may not give me kitchen privledges.

Now quiet down, chode...unless you want to continue being tossed around like a rag doll being shredded by pitbulls.

Let's say goodnight now, to our favorite poodle.

Posted: **Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:25 pm**

Dumbass wrote:
BSmack wrote:
Dumbass wrote:Oh and you have money in the JFFL. That would be considered by many as gambling...I know the wives do.
The difference is in scale. I never said I didn't gamble. I said I wasn't a degenerate gambler like you.
You pass judgement on all like this without knowing the facts? Let's see you can't read the rules to fantasy football, can't read what I wrote here, hmmmmm...3 letters for ya, GED. Get on it.

What part did you not understand about not laying down since SC Oklahoma? Bwa! What'd I lay $300 maybe? Yup, gonna forelcose on my cardboard box soon. :roll: Gonna have to ask my dog if I can move in but he may not give me kitchen privledges.

Methinks the dumbass doth protest too much. A little sensitive? Not going to the meetings these days?

Posted: **Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:47 pm**

BSmack wrote:Hey, I hope you're right. I've got some FFL money riding on the Steelers D and Willie Parker and it wouldn't suck seeing tham hang 30 on the Ravens ever.

BSmack wrote:Sorry, I'm a football fan, not a degenerate gambler.

No irony here.

BTW, FFL is still gay.

Posted: **Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:00 pm**

Diogenes wrote:
BSmack wrote:Hey, I hope you're right. I've got some FFL money riding on the Steelers D and Willie Parker and it wouldn't suck seeing tham hang 30 on the Ravens ever.

BSmack wrote:Sorry, I'm a football fan, not a degenerate gambler.
No irony here.

BTW, FFL is still gay.

You obviously don't know what a degenerate gambler is.

Posted: **Sat Oct 29, 2005 7:05 pm**

I gamble and I'm a degenerate, doesn't that count for something?

Of course I only bet on actual games played by real teams...

Posted: **Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:03 am**

You obviously don't know what an idiot is.
Me thinks, you're so desperate to impress, you'll say anything just to reply without realizing how retarded it is.

God damn, it is fucking hilarious how there is always one guy every year that enjoys getting the shit kicked out of him all season long.

Come on, give us another weak ass come back. You haven't had a good one yet and the whole board knows it.

Posted: **Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:20 am**

Dumbass wrote:You obviously don't know what an idiot is.

Anything like a dumbass?

Me thinks, you're so desperate to impress, you'll say anything just to reply without realizing how retarded it is.

Ignorance and irony, how fresh.

Posted: **Tue Nov 01, 2005 5:35 am**

So how much did the degenerate gamblers lay on the game?

Posted: **Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:42 pm**

After watching the Bills cover a line that moved 2+ pts the night before, I stayed away. I should have stuck with my "system":

Snooze Baton wrote:This will be one of those rare instances where the line moves 2+ pts and the betting public will hit.

You can almost always count on the betting public to take a beating.

Btw -- the Steelers are now 11-0 on Monday night at home under Cowher.

Don't go beating your chest though... you stated that Tampa was a good pick earlier in the week in a different thread.

Posted: **Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:47 pm**

Snooze Baton wrote:After watching the Bills cover a line that moved 2+ pts the night before, I stayed away. I should have stuck with my "system":

Snooze Baton wrote:This will be one of those rare instances where the line moves 2+ pts and the betting public will hit.
You can almost always count on the betting public to take a beating.

Btw -- the Steelers are now 11-0 on Monday night at home under Cowher.

Don't go beating your chest though... you stated that Tampa was a good pick earlier in the week in a different thread.

If you recall, the topic of this thread was wether or not a 10 point line was too little for this game. My take was that it was more than reasonable.

As for the Tampa-SF game, I don't remember a take on that game. But I did think about Tampa Bay for my suicide pool pick before going with New England.

But hey, you want real balls? I know a guy who picked Houston in his suicide pool this week. Now that takes some sack.

Posted: **Tue Nov 01, 2005 12:59 pm**

I remember reading about a Cleveland player complaining about "not getting respect" because Vegas had the audacity to have installed winless Houston as the favorite heading into the game.

Posted: **Tue Nov 01, 2005 2:41 pm**

KUTTER wrote:The Ravens are scoring 11.5 ppg. To take them you need to assume they will allow less than 22 points to the Steelers on the road. Not likely. Lay the 10.

BLOORF!!!!!

Posted: **Wed Nov 02, 2005 7:57 am**

$0

This degenrate went to Six Flags Magic Mountain and forgot to lay down! Woo Hoo. Was ready to make up on a bad poker weekend so now I fele like I'm even...coulda been a lot worse.

Freakin' spreads.

Two 5/14 weeks..I am on fire!

Finally took down Goliath though, what a freaking ride!

T1B

Steelers -10?!

Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!

Re: Steelers -10?!