T1B

Randy Moss
Chris Brown
Indy Def (This really isn't relevent but it is part of the trade)

for

Willie Parker
TJ Houshmandzadeh
Antwaan Randle El

6 pts for a TD,
1 pt for every reception,
1 point for every 10 yards rushing
1 pt for every 10 yards recieving

My team is the bottom 3.

Thanks for any imput

Who's on your roster?

D. McNabb
(Phi - QB)

Ro. Smith
(Den - WR)

A. Chatman
(GB - WR)

T. Houshmandzadeh
(Cin - WR)

T. Fisher
(GB - RB)

M. Moore
(Min - RB)

J. Wiggins
(Min - TE)

A. Randle El
(Pit - WR)

W. Parker
(Pit - RB)

J. Jones
(Dal - RB)

M. Brunell
(Was - QB)

M. Anderson
(Den - RB)

D. Jackson
(Sea - WR)

K- N. Kaeding

Detroit-DEF

I'd keep Moss and Brown. Moss when healthy is good for 15-18 points and Brown has played well as of late. Willie Parker is gonna get less red zone carries w/ Bettis healthy again and TJ is a #2 receiver.

Yea, I'd make that trade. In a heartbeat.

Cicero wrote:I'd keep Moss and Brown. Moss when healthy is good for 15-18 points and Brown has played well as of late. Willie Parker is gonna get less red zone carries w/ Bettis healthy again and TJ is a #2 receiver.

Thank's, that is what I thought. In the interest of full disclosure this trade had already been agreed upon, it just needs to go thru the waiver period. I am getting Moss and Brown, and this was proposed to me. The only thing that worries me is Brown and Moss being banged up. But still I have good depth at rb, and like you metioned Parker will not be getting as many carries, never mind goal line carries. Plus I know that Housh is having a really good year, and you could even say Moss is somewhat underachieving , but the potential with Moss is to much for me to pass up. Plus he is better than Housh. I will have no problem replacing Randle El.

I think he got a little too excited about Parkers performance this past sunday. Although I would keep him on my team if the trade proposal had not been proposed to me. I look at Parker having a great game against one of the worst rushing defenses, and not really doing much since week 2 before then. His team is 2nd to last place so in my opinion he is deperate.

BSmack wrote:Yea, I'd make that trade. In a heartbeat.

Thank's I appreciate your opinion.

RSoxFan wrote:Indy Def (This really isn't relevent but it is part of the trade).

Why? So far this season, they have outscored all of the others on both ends of that trade in most leagues.

kcdave wrote:

RSoxFan wrote:Indy Def (This really isn't relevent but it is part of the trade).

Why? So far this season, they have outscored all of the others on both ends of that trade in most leagues.

^^^^^^^^^^^

Exactly..it's extremely revelent, in fact it tips the scales heavily in favor of the trade IMO.....Hey, but what do I know, I'm scrounging the WW and Claims every week.

Perhaps using the word irrelevant in describing getting Indy's D was off. However I already have a team D that is near the top in FF team D rankings. Plus the Colts play more teams with good to great offenses in the second half, than they did in the first half. So I don't really expect them to keep this pace up. However I do have some great weeks to use them like week 10 against the Texans at a loud RCA Dome.