Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:22 pm
So?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:26 pm
Come on now 88. I expect that kind of cry baby shit from some people in here, but not from you. Zwick fumbled b/c he was in the game. Smith should have been in at the end of the game.
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 6:45 pm
I don't get it? Are we looking at some sort of foul? Is there something wrong with Zwick? Help me out.
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:10 pm
Its not illegal to punch in the nuts.
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:10 pm
Is he getting punched? Or is the defender's hand in the process of sliding down Zwick's jersey as he tackles Zwick?
Who cares one way or another. Implicitly there's an excuse being made. Explicitly it's doubtful what happened. In any case, the ball was fumbled and that's that.
Who cares one way or another. Implicitly there's an excuse being made. Explicitly it's doubtful what happened. In any case, the ball was fumbled and that's that.
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:12 pm
Texas is a team of gentlemen if we screw you we have the common decency to give you a reach around.Believe the Heupel wrote:He got punched in the nuts.
I don't think he was bitching about dirty plays-just commenting that you'd probably fumble too if you got punched in the nuts.
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:15 pm
Vito Corleone wrote:Texas is a team of gentlemen if we screw you we have the common decency to give you a reach around.Believe the Heupel wrote:He got punched in the nuts.
I don't think he was bitching about dirty plays-just commenting that you'd probably fumble too if you got punched in the nuts.
I laughed.Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:16 pm
Vito Corleone wrote:Texas is a team of gentlemen if we screw you we have the common decency to give you a reach around.Believe the Heupel wrote:He got punched in the nuts.
I don't think he was bitching about dirty plays-just commenting that you'd probably fumble too if you got punched in the nuts.
RACK
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 7:20 pm
For those who insinuate that 88's making an excuse or complaining... well, you don't know 88 well enough. Which also tells me that you should heed the 'read more post less' axiom.
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:18 pm
I can't wait for my month of servitude to be up so that I can change my sig to that...Vito Corleone wrote:Texas is a team of gentlemen if we screw you we have the common decency to give you a reach around.Believe the Heupel wrote:He got punched in the nuts.
I don't think he was bitching about dirty plays-just commenting that you'd probably fumble too if you got punched in the nuts.
the_ouskull
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:23 pm
I'll keep it fresh until then.the_ouskull wrote:I can't wait for my month of servitude to be up so that I can change my sig to that...Vito Corleone wrote:Texas is a team of gentlemen if we screw you we have the common decency to give you a reach around.Believe the Heupel wrote:He got punched in the nuts.
I don't think he was bitching about dirty plays-just commenting that you'd probably fumble too if you got punched in the nuts.
the_ouskull
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 8:48 pm
88 is not complaining. He is just perpetuating his string of thought provoking posts. 
Re: Why Zwick Fumbled Against Texas
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:08 pm
88 wrote:
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:49 pm
Totally missed the nut punch/grab.
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 11:41 pm
Vito Corleone wrote:Texas is a team of gentlemen if we screw you we have the common decency to give you a reach around.Believe the Heupel wrote:He got punched in the nuts.
I don't think he was bitching about dirty plays-just commenting that you'd probably fumble too if you got punched in the nuts.
I think that's the winner.
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 5:20 am
Zwick got a sack with a happy ending. gross.
CAPTION
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:30 pm
SACKED
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 3:55 am
I was at the Mckinley playoff game at the Rubber Bowl when he was a senior.........................I kind of got the feeling he would rather hold up a male pom-pom slinger by the nads than take a snap from the shotgun.............................