Page 1 of 1

The Packers pass on Freddie...

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:27 am
by Cosmo Kramer
http://postcrescent.packersnews.com/arc ... 3359.shtml


Freddie Mitchell must really suck if the Packers are letting Favre throw the burrito to a guy named Taco :lol:

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:34 am
by BBMarley
Its not that he sucks-- he's okay... but the little bit of talent is not worth the major amount of mouth that comes with it.

Re: The Packers pass on Freddie...

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:02 pm
by jiminphilly
Cosmo Kramer wrote:http://postcrescent.packersnews.com/arc ... 3359.shtml


Freddie Mitchell must really suck..
It shouldn't have taken a story like this for you to realize how bad Freddy is.

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:39 pm
by BSmack
I guess even the Packers don't have a use for a guy who runs poor routes, is not overly fast and shoots off his mouth.

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 3:51 pm
by jiminphilly
BSmack wrote:I guess even the Packers don't have a use for a guy who runs poor routes, is not overly fast and shoots off his mouth.
If probably didn't help that Freddie introduced himself as "the 4th and 26 guy"

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 4:17 pm
by BSmack
jiminphilly wrote:
BSmack wrote:I guess even the Packers don't have a use for a guy who runs poor routes, is not overly fast and shoots off his mouth.
If probably didn't help that Freddie introduced himself as "the 4th and 26 guy"
Yep, it was at that point that they realized Freddie NEEDS 26 yards to get open.

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 4:25 pm
by jiminphilly
BSmack wrote:
jiminphilly wrote:
BSmack wrote:I guess even the Packers don't have a use for a guy who runs poor routes, is not overly fast and shoots off his mouth.
If probably didn't help that Freddie introduced himself as "the 4th and 26 guy"
Yep, it was at that point that they realized Freddie NEEDS 26 yards to get open.
Its more time than anything. McNabb had a play last year where he scrambled away from the Cowboys rush, throw across his body 60 yards down field to Freddie on the fly. (freddie was caught just after he caught it :lol: :lol: .)

The joke in the city was that it took Freddie 12 seconds to get open.

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 4:43 pm
by ChargerMike
The fact the Raiders sat on the sidelines while the Chiefs took a flyer on Freddie should speak volumns. bwah..sucks for Chiefan :oops: and scoreboard Raiders.

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 5:32 pm
by Cosmo Kramer
jiminphilly wrote:
BSmack wrote:I guess even the Packers don't have a use for a guy who runs poor routes, is not overly fast and shoots off his mouth.
If probably didn't help that Freddie introduced himself as "the 4th and 26 guy"

RACK! :lol:

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 6:30 pm
by Cosmo Kramer
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:The fact the Raiders sat on the sidelines while the Chiefs took a flyer on Freddie should speak volumns. bwah..sucks for Chiefan :oops: and scoreboard Raiders.
How do you figure, Mike? It doesn't suck for ChiefFan at all- Dude's NOT on our roster, so why the hell would we care? :roll:
OMG I can't believe that I'm going to say this, but Paul is correct! :shock:

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 6:35 pm
by BSmack
Cosmo Kramer wrote:
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:The fact the Raiders sat on the sidelines while the Chiefs took a flyer on Freddie should speak volumns. bwah..sucks for Chiefan :oops: and scoreboard Raiders.
How do you figure, Mike? It doesn't suck for ChiefFan at all- Dude's NOT on our roster, so why the hell would we care? :roll:
OMG I can't believe that I'm going to say this, but Paul is correct! :shock:
I think what Mike was getting at was that the Chiefs STILL need a #2 reciever opposite Quittison.

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 6:41 pm
by Cosmo Kramer
BSmack wrote:
Cosmo Kramer wrote:
KC Paul 3.0 wrote: How do you figure, Mike? It doesn't suck for ChiefFan at all- Dude's NOT on our roster, so why the hell would we care? :roll:
OMG I can't believe that I'm going to say this, but Paul is correct! :shock:
I think what Mike was getting at was that the Chiefs STILL need a #2 reciever opposite Quittison.


KCP was stating ,in fact whether or not they need a #2 receiver, they passed on Freddie.

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:36 pm
by ChargerMike
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:The fact the Raiders sat on the sidelines while the Chiefs took a flyer on Freddie should speak volumns. bwah..sucks for Chiefan :oops: and scoreboard Raiders.
How do you figure, Mike? It doesn't suck for ChiefFan at all- Dude's NOT on our roster, so why the hell would we care? :roll:

He's not on ANYONE'S team Paul...My statement was true, the Chiefs actually brought Freddie in to K.C. Of course he didn't stick....he doesn't stick anywhere, that's what this thread is about.

I was talking EMBARRASMENT for K.C. for being desperate enough to give him a call...like I said :oops: :oops: :oops:

Re: The Packers pass on Freddie...

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 5:49 am
by frodo_biguns
Cosmo Kramer wrote:http://postcrescent.packersnews.com/arc ... 3359.shtml


Freddie Mitchell must really suck if the Packers are letting Favre throw the burrito to a guy named Taco :lol:
Think it had anything to do with?
Fourth-and-26.

Image

It's time to begin the debate on whether that was the single greatest play in Eagles' history, that swing of Donovan McNabb's arm and that catch by Freddie Mitchell that converted a fourth-and-26 with 1 minute, 12 seconds left in the fourth quarter Sunday that did nothing less than save the Eagles' season.
I gotta believe it was payback time in a sick demented Packer way.

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:28 pm
by Truman
ChargerMike wrote:The fact the Raiders sat on the sidelines while the Chiefs took a flyer on Freddie should speak volumns. bwah..sucks for Chiefan :oops: and scoreboard Raiders.
Believe it or not, Mike... He almost made the team. The team doc told Freddie to go get his knee scoped after he injured it in training camp this past summer. Instead, Freddie chose a more "holotropic" healing approach. Grandpa Dick got tired of waiting five weeks for a two-week injury to heal, so he cut his ass.

By all accounts, Freddie was having a good camp. Reportedly, he was a solid citizen (one of the few who wasn't arrested in River Falls, anyway) and well-liked by his teammates. The Chiefs even brought him in a couple of weeks ago for another look, but apparently he couldn't crack the vaunted # 2 Receiver triumverate of Dante Hall, Marc Boerigter, and Chris Horn because "he doesn't play special teams."

Still wouldn't surprise me to see him in Chiefs gear should another wideout go down....