Page 1 of 1

Ucla could be the worst 8-1 team in history.....

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:28 am
by The Seer
This post was typed at midway through the 2nd qtr.....

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:42 am
by WolverineSteve
I'd have to agree. Considering they could be 4-4 right now.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:17 am
by MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
Nice try at reverse psychology there, Seer, but we're all familiar with UCLA's SOP by now.

UCLA 45
UA 38

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:30 am
by Shoalzie
I think we should learn from watching UCLA and USC that no game is decided after 30 minutes. Until they lose, they haven't lost... :wink:

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 1:35 am
by Laxplayer
Uh, they've lost....45-7. 10:00 left in the 3rd.....they've lost big.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:13 am
by WolverineSteve
Fucking pathetic!

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:14 am
by Sky
Well at least someone finally showed what the real UCLA looks like.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:50 am
by The Seer
Ucla is 1-9 in November under Doe-rrell. Drew Olson (Paus) was never mentioned by me as being anything but a below avg QB having an uncharacteristic year.

Ucla might eke out a win vs. Az St.

Then giving Doe-rrell 2 weeks to plan vs. SuC, we will get beat by 60.

Go to a mid-range bowl and get beat by 40.

Doe-rrell sucks as a "coach".

They've begun the last 5 games like they sleepwalk.

A "coach" would recognize that tendency and correct it. Doe-rrell let is get worse as the season went on. But, hey! It's Ucla and we are still "politically correct" having one of the 3 black head "coaches" in the country.....and that apparently amounts to more than creating and sustaining high expectations of excellence....

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:53 am
by The Seer
Image

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:24 am
by stuckinia
Are you watching the VT game? Where can I get a heavy duty shower rod?

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:29 am
by Jimmy Medalions
Well, that should clear up some of the Heisman debates out there.

I thought UCLA would lose. Never thought they'd get butcher-raped like that. unWar.

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:30 am
by Jimmy Medalions
ps On a positive note, Kal lost. :lol:

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:58 am
by Shoalzie
Laxplayer wrote:Uh, they've lost....45-7. 10:00 left in the 3rd.....they've lost big.

Yeah, that was a pathetic effort. Nothing quite like seeing a national title contender blow it all by getting rolled by a 2-win team. Absolutely hideous...

Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:18 pm
by Laxplayer
I had Oregon as one of our 5 losses on the way to the Rose Bowl.
Sin,
M2

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:20 pm
by Killian
I think heavy consideration should go to ND in 2002 after the BC game.

Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:44 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
I was hoping UCLA would be undefeated by the time they played SC. That would've finally been a Pac 10 game that people all around the country would've cared about.