Were gonna :Shock: the World!

M2 · Post by M2 » Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:44 am

m2

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:04 am

l to r:

front row: no, no, no
back row: no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no

Kal is going to get plunger-raped, moron. Get ready.

M2 · Post by M2 » Sat Nov 12, 2005 5:50 am

:twisted:

m2

peter dragon · Post by **peter dragon** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 6:12 am

Jimmy Medalions wrote:l to r:

front row: no, no, no
back row: no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no

an uglier bunch of Cheerleaders resides only in michigan

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 6:51 am

Trojans 45 Baby Bears 13

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 7:22 am

Somehow I dont thiink laqueesha with the Seabiscuit tied to her head in the back row is one of those 1500 SAT and 4.2 GPA students M2ool is always bragging about.

I would say that the Oakland School of Children with Downs Syndrome has better looking children than that.

feCal won 9 of the first 10 vs USC, since then thet have won only 21 of 71

M2 · Post by M2 » Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:41 am

SoCalTrjn wrote:Somehow I dont thiink laqueesha with the Seabiscuit tied to her head in the back row is one of those 1500 SAT and 4.2 GPA students M2ool is always bragging about.

Of course... Mr. Book

SoCalTrjn wrote:I would say that the Oakland School of Children with Downs Syndrome has better looking children than that.

These young women may end up being CEO's of a company... while a "chick" from $C may reach her potential at 17 when she asks mommy and daddy for a "boob job".

Values are worth making sacrifices for...

m2

BlindRef · Post by **BlindRef** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:48 pm

peter dragon wrote: an uglier bunch of Cheerleaders resides only in michigan

Fuck you.

Its true though.

BlindRef · Post by **BlindRef** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 1:50 pm

m2 wrote:

These young women may end up being CEO's of a company... while a "chick" from $C may reach her potential at 17 when she asks mommy and daddy for a "boob job".

Values are worth making sacrifices for...

m2

No no no no

These ho's are looking for their MRS degree only. None of these sluts are becoming CEO's of anything except maybe their local Mary Kay distributor. Once they find their money making dork they'll start injecting the botox, and using a personal trainer so they can still get their fat ASSSS into their skirt for homecoming.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 6:45 pm

l to r

front row - no, no, no.

back row - no, probably, maybe, no, no, maybe, no.

Degenerate · Post by **Degenerate** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 7:05 pm

I met most of Michigan's national championship softball team when they visited DC earlier this year, and in all honesty, they look better*.

*'Cept for the freight train who went David Ortiz in the championship game.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 7:42 pm

Jimmy Medalions wrote:l to r:

front row: no, no, no
back row: no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no

Kal is going to get plunger-raped, moron. Get ready.

beautiful

buckeye_in_sc · Post by **buckeye_in_sc** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:37 pm

wait a minute you still pimping the game 2 FUCKING years ago?

You are a bigger retard than I thought mTard...

stuckinia · Post by **stuckinia** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:40 pm

Shock the world? All Cal has to do is lose by less the 3 TDs to do that.

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan · Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:02 pm

Congrats, m2ool. Only a board bitch of your stature could turn an entire group of CFB fans against a 19 point underdog to the undefeated, back-to-back defending national champs. I guarantee that if you didn't suck so bad, the vast majority of non-SC posters on here would be pulling for Cal.

Snake · Post by **Snake** » Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:21 pm

WTF, Joey aBOOBOO, this guy would be Ohio States 3rd stringer...............Cal f'in sucks............................

Rich Fader · Post by **Rich Fader** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 12:54 am

m2 wrote:We're gonna get The Shocker

FTFY.

Rich Fader is the truth

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 12:56 am

Cal has homely cheerleaders
Good thing they are all smart

Cross Traffic · Post by **Cross Traffic** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 1:04 am

Aboob 4 picks and 98 yards/

Nice performance Kal Kan.

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:21 am

Will someone take the plunger outta my ass!!!!

Thank you Ayoob...

m2

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 2:39 am

m2 wrote:

How did Michelle Wie sneak into that picture?

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 3:48 am

Looking at that pic, I seriously don't think a single one of those chicks would make any good SEC cheerleading squad, much less the USC Song Girls squad..

Maybe #'s 2,3 and 5 of the back row, but it's iffy at best. Laqueesha there in the back row with the orange hair and the garish eye shadow, she looks like a $2 whore trolling johns for a slice of pizza at Blondies in exchange for a bleeding starfish bacchanal in the public toilets.

Anyway, it's amazing how much run Cal Fan tries to get from a game two years ago. Matt Leinart was just a wet behind the ears pup in that one and still it took three fucking overtimes and it was USC's kicker who ultimately lost that game.

Three overtimes and some missed chipshot kicks away from three straight perfect seasons...

Anyway, Cal was lucky today that at this point in the season USC no longer has to concern themselves with BCS Style Points, otherwise today's final score could've easily ended up being something along the lines of Texas-Kansas...

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:04 am

Van wrote:
Anyway, Cal was lucky today that at this point in the season USC no longer has to concern themselves with BCS Style Points, otherwise today's final score could've easily ended up being something along the lines of Texas-Kansas...

Lucky???

Please explain...

Cal had 6 turnovers and still held $C to their second lowest scoring game this year by 1 point!!!

ND gave up 34... we gave up 35 with the worst qb in College Football!!!

Hell, our FB played qb against you and went 4 for 4 and a TD!!!

Van, get your head outta your ass...

If Levy played qb this game... it could have easily been Cal 35 and $C 10.

the truth

Snake · Post by **Snake** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:09 am

m2 wrote:
Van wrote:
Anyway, Cal was lucky today that at this point in the season USC no longer has to concern themselves with BCS Style Points, otherwise today's final score could've easily ended up being something along the lines of Texas-Kansas...
Lucky???

Please explain...

Cal had 6 turnovers and still held $C to their second lowest scoring game this year by 1 point!!!

ND gave up 34... we gave up 35 with the worst qb in College Football!!!

Hell, our FB played qb against you and went 4 for 4 and a TD!!!

Van, get your head outta your ass...

If Levy played qb this game... it could have easily been Cal 35 and $C 10.

the truth

"give me a C. give an A. give me a L.......................you guys SUCK......................................

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 4:34 am

I'm shocked. Shocked that the Baby Bears allowed the Trojans to easily assrape them on their own field! NIIICE prediction there "truth"

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 5:29 am

Jsc810 wrote:WTF? Did you see Cal player head-butt USC running back? What a puss move.

thats why he went to feCal, typical Golden Bear move

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 6:07 am

for pete's sake, rack this thread.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 9:27 pm

m2, tell me you didn't just post that USC might've lost 35-10 had Levy played QB for Cal...

That's just wicked scary myopic.

USC well and truly called off the dogs in this one...early. Had Carroll wished to open up the offense all game long Leinart would've passed for somewhere in the neighborhood of 500 yards and USC easily rings up 50+ points.

I take it you didn't see the first quarter, and the ease with which USC threw the ball on Cal...

Before you got that one garbage time cosmetic TD Cal had only three points with only four minutes left in the game and a long way to travel to score.

USC was never threatened. After they built up a comfortable lead they just cruised home.

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 4:18 am

Last year

m2L wrote: we owned USC in stats, we were totaly dominant, USC cheated, my pussy hurts, Rodgers is better than Leinart, everyone will want to go to Cal now, Tedford owns Carroll...

this year

m2L wrote: We had a full back lead our team down the field and score a TD, he completed 100% of his passes, we dominated the turnover statistic, USC cheated, my pussy hurts, Levy is better than Leinart, Tedford owns Carroll

I wonder what color the sky is in windchime land

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Nov 14, 2005 6:45 pm

Van wrote:m2, tell me you didn't just post that USC might've lost 35-10 had Levy played QB for Cal...

That's just wicked scary myopic.

Leinart:Start Levy!

"You did a great job,"
Levy said Leinart told him. "Hope you're starting next week."

Van wrote: Had Carroll wished to open up the offense all game long Leinart would've passed for somewhere in the neighborhood of 500 yards and USC easily rings up 50+ points.

I take it you didn't see the first quarter, and the ease with which USC threw the ball on Cal...

Van, you need understand why Leinart didn't throw for 500 yards and $C didn't run up 50 plus points... It wasn't because they didn't want to. Cal took away the big play from the $C offense and Leinart took what was given him. (The short passing game)

Here's a link for you to learn about it...

Oregonian: Tedford showed how to beat USC

Quote

Tedford crafted a game plan built on a ball-control offense and a defense that snuffed USC's running game, took away the deep pass and the explosion plays, and forced the Trojans to throw short and grind on offense.

m2

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:16 pm

m2 wrote:Quote

Tedford crafted a game plan built on a ball-control offense and a defense that snuffed USC's running game, took away the deep pass and the explosion plays, and forced the Trojans to throw short and grind on offense.
m2

Ball control?

Ayoob missed the memo.

snuffed our running game? Are you saying that 200 yards on the ground is getting snuffed? How ignorant are you, again?

BTW, the Oregonian clearly doesn't get it, because we haven't been relying on the deep pass for lotsa games now. We haven't needed to.

Throwing short...is a bad thing? Last I checked the score was 35-3 with our backups in by the third quarter. Kal got a cosmetic TD in the waning moments against our fourth string defense.

You lost and there is no moral issue here.

Kal sucks. Again.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:20 pm

^^^^^

Too bad they still dropped 35+ on your ass. Guess he did a great job of not letting score 50.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:34 pm

m2 wrote:Hell, our FB played qb against you and went 4 for 4 and a TD!!!

When did the NCAA grant Dan Kendra another year of eligibility?

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 7:35 pm

^^^^

Fuuck. We could use him.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:23 pm

Killian wrote: When did the NCAA grant Dan Kendra another year of eligibility?

Ahh...Dan Kendra. A name that makes my stomach turn. The beginning of the end of great FSU QBs with him getting hurt preseason forcing Wienke to play a year early.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:26 pm

If he doesnt get hurt then we possibly dont go to 3 straight title games.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:31 pm

How you figure?

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:43 pm

I think Weinke taking Kendra's spot was a great thing for FSU.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 9:46 pm

Weinke was a badass who holds tons of passing records. I dont know how Kendra could have done much better. If Weinke doesnt get hurt vs. Virginia in 98, I think we beat Tennecleats.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 10:10 pm

If Dan Kendra doesnt get hurt, we dont lose to NCST due to sophmore mistakes and we beat Tenn undefeated.

I see us winning back to back titles with kendra. And Wienke losing again to OU in 00.

Kendra beat out Wienke for the #1 QB spot. Why wouldnt he been better?

T1B

Were gonna :Shock: the World!

Were gonna :Shock: the World!

Re: Were gonna :Shock: the World!