Page 1 of 1

The One Reason I Oppose the Death Penalty

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:07 pm
by See You Next Wednesday
Witness Clears Man Executed In Texas for 1985 Slaying
HOUSTON -- A decade after Ruben Cantu was executed for capital murder, the only witness to the crime is recanting and his co-defendant says Cantu, then 17, was not even with him that night.

The victim was shot nine times with a rifle during an attempted robbery before the gunman shot the only witness.

That witness, Juan Moreno, told the Houston Chronicle for its Sunday editions that Cantu was not the killer. Moreno said he identified him at the 1985 trial because he felt pressured and feared authorities.

Cantu, who had maintained his innocence, was executed on Aug. 24, 1993, at age 26. "Texas murdered an innocent person," co-defendant David Garza said.

Sam D. Millsap Jr., the district attorney who handled the case, said he never should have sought the death penalty in a case based on testimony from a witness who identified a suspect only after police showed him a photo three times.

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:34 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:Well if a convicted murderer says he's innocent it must be true.
How about the guy who was shot?

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:45 pm
by See You Next Wednesday
So you are sure he is guilty despite the fact that there are now no witnesses that he committed the crime and the prosecuting attorney think s that it was a mistake?

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:04 pm
by Cuda
See You Next Wednesday wrote:So you are sure he is guilty despite the fact that there are now no witnesses that he committed the crime and the prosecuting attorney think s that it was a mistake?
No, I think he's guilty because not only is his accomplice a lying sack of shit, he waited 10 years too fucking long to think up an alternate set of lies that he thinks might get him out of jail.

Having a dumb fuck like you take up his cause isn't exactly a positive factor in his favor either