Yep that Pac10 aint no 1 team conference

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 1:03 am

What the fuck. Way to show up UCLA. What was the score of their other loss? 52-14!! To 6-5 AzSt. This is a top team to be sure

.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 1:19 am

What's your problem? We don't have to look respectable, we have a black head coach. Doesn't that make us politically correct? Plus we only pay our head coach 650 grand a year, so we save money.

We had a wonderful history in college basketball, so that is what we will concentrate on. As long as we have 1 on 3 black head coaches in the USA, we can continue to be mediocre and expect our alumni to be grateful.

Sincerely,

Dan Guerrero,

Politically, correct A.D...

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 1:25 am

108-33 in their 2 losses

Fuck the Pac10.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 1:34 am

WolverineSteve wrote: 2 losses[/b]

Fuck the Pac10.

2 losses. Eat your heart out.

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 1:35 am

you do have a point there. but UM would have won the MAC10.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 2:33 am

Pac-10 is an utter joke.....USC....not sure about. I guess we will find out. Texas played tOSU so we have a general idea of their strength. Fresno sucks. Arkansas sucks. And most of the Pac 10 does as well.

I will go out on a limb once I see the bowl match-ups and say the Pac 10 does poorly this year OOC.

Dumbass · Post by **Dumbass** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:03 pm

The Pac-10 sucks but stll manages to have 3-5 teams floating in and out of the top 25 annually. If it sucks s bad, when are your shit conferecnes going to shut them ou of the top 25 and post season bowls? Shit even the 2-4 loss Pac-10 teams manage to win their bowls aainst your over hyped schools. Man those heads are lodged way up there aren't they?

Dumbass · Post by **Dumbass** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:04 pm

SC,"not sure about".
Fuck Rex, you don't have a clue in college any better than you do in the NFL do you?

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:57 pm

Take a close look at how the Pac 10 did last year in bowl games. Not pretty. Cal got the shit kicked out of them in the Holiday bowl, UCLA got the shit kicked out of them by Wyoming. Are you kidding me, Wyoming? The only Pac 10 team to even show up was USC.

So Pac 10 fan needs to chill and accept the fact that Last year your conference as a whole was pretty down.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:06 pm

Dumbass wrote:SC,"not sure about".
Fuck Rex, you don't have a clue in college any better than you do in the NFL do you?

Are you saying that the Big 12 and Pac-10 are the two best conferences?

Roofer · Post by **Roofer** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:10 pm

Pac 10 fan....that's funny. I find it comical how the fans of the good but not great schools always want to ride the coattails of their conference, crying like little bitches how their conference schedule makes them a better team.

I want every Big 10, Big 12, ACC, SEC apologist to come in here and kiss every USC and other Pac 10 school backer's ass when the Trojans win their 3rd straight title. My guess is this place will be awfully quiet come Jan 5th.

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:18 pm

Why should anyone apologize roofer? The Pac-10 is a one team conference. UCLA sucks, oregon didn't play anyone. ASU and Cal are frauds, not that anyone took them seriously anyway so give me a break. One team does not make a conference.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:24 pm

Lax: The pac-10 bowl schedule is already suspect. UCLA(9-2) is playing a team with 7 wins while Oregon(10-1) gets 7 win Oklahoma(who seems to implode in January).

I guess its because the Swiss-10 gets no respect.

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:11 am

Trix....I'm betting that NW and Basanez shred that pourous UCLA D. Remember Radio had 3 weeks to prepare for SC. With a month to prepare maybe he'll only lose by 40.

Dumbass · Post by **Dumbass** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:36 pm

T REX wrote:
Dumbass wrote:SC,"not sure about".
Fuck Rex, you don't have a clue in college any better than you do in the NFL do you?
Are you saying that the Big 12 and Pac-10 are the two best conferences?

No, I am not saying shit except every fucking year we have to hear how the Pac-10 is soft and more often then not they step up and kick the shit out of these supposed powerhouses and then the excuses makers try and degrade their win for one reason or another. It happens time and time again and it is just so fucking tired. Someone is pulling last year up here well 2 years ago we heard the same shit and the Pac-10 rolled through the bowls with one loss and against many "tougher" schools including SC over Michigan and Cal over one of those Texas fucks but you guys never remember that shit. I mean, my God the excuse makers for Oklahoma last year and everyone saying how they weren't that good after the fact...talk about a joke. So save the selective memory too.

So who the fuck cares? You all suck against the best we have to offer, USC. You hate it that much that a west coast power has risen that now you have to take your shots whereever you can. Deal with it, SC is the shit and the rest of your schools do not rank. Some have come close but in the end, the team with the target on their back still finds a way to deflect the arrows and the best you have to offer after a month of healing and preparation has got wasted. I don't give a rat's ass anymore cuz it will never change. Oregon gets bounced AGAIN after only losing to SC. What a shock. A single chink in any Pac's armor will always be magnified in the scope of the nation.

Good luck, Texas. You're getting what you wish for and you'll be sorry. So get the "Texas was over rated" cards out. I am sure they will be pulled in a month. I know what everyone is going to pull out and you all know what I would have to say. It's put up or shut up. See you when the dust settles. Get your hats and make up on you rodeo clowns, the bulls are on Rose Parade once again and they wear Cardinal and Gold.

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 8:47 pm

remind me of the last Big pac10 victory by a member not named USC.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 9:22 pm

The last thing in the world Texas is is overrated. They're the second best team in the country. That's what they are rated. If SC beats them by 1 point or beats them by 20 points, Texas is still the second best team in the country. It would just mean that USC is THAT much better than anyone else.

If you want to say USC is ranked 1 through 10 and then Texas is 11, then yeah, you can say Texas is overrated. Other than that, they're perfectly rated as it is.

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:05 pm

Texas Tech
Wyoming

Both schools the Pac-10 lost to last year in bowl games.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 12:13 am

WolverineSteve wrote:remind me of the last Big pac10 victory by a member not named USC.

Ucla - 41

Oklahoma - 24

If SCum beats Texas by 40, I guess that redeems Ucla a tad, right?

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:00 am

seer...nothing can redeem UCLA.

Dumbass · Post by **Dumbass** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:44 am

The Seer wrote:
WolverineSteve wrote:remind me of the last Big pac10 victory by a member not named USC.

Ucla - 41

Oklahoma - 24

If SCum beats Texas by 40, I guess that redeems Ucla a tad, right?

See how short their memories can be?

It isn't like they get a crack at top notched teams every year either and who really wants to take the chance to lose to an "inferior" Pac-10 school when the nation gives them no respect. The bottom feeders which you take so many shots at still manage to show up when playing your "powerhouses".
...oh but OU sucks this year.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 5:40 am

Laxplayer wrote:seer...nothing can redeem UCLA.

LOL!!

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 6:36 am

Laxplayer wrote:seer...nothing can redeem UCLA.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 6:49 am

WolverineSteve wrote:What the fuck. Way to show up UCLA. What was the score of their other loss? 52-14!! To 6-5 AzSt. This is a top team to be sure .

LSU and Va Tech are the shit... literally.

Go bark up a tree you recognize there twit fan.

If anyone should say one conference sucks, it should be that the Big lEast should not get a gravytrain bowl.

Notre Dame started to fade when the NCAA limited scholarships. They would recruit guys to just keep them off of competitors' teams.

All of that changed with the new rules. Then you had pollsters giving reach arounds to teams in conferences that don't play outside competition to justify bloated rankings.

Yeah, but telling a Wolverine fan means what? Oh, I just wasted time on a post.

Idiot.

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan · Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:33 am

WolverineSteve wrote:What the fuck. Way to show up UCLA. What was the score of their other loss? 52-14!! To 6-5 AzSt. This is a top team to be sure .

Not that any UCLA fans are going to correct you, but that 52-14 trouncing was at the hands of 3-8 Arizona, not 6-5 Arizona St.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:19 pm

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:
Not that any UCLA fans are going to correct you, but that 52-14 trouncing was at the hands of 3-8 Arizona, not 6-5 Arizona St.

Don't you have anything better to do?

:x

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:22 pm

Well, based on your avatar, you have better things to do: UCLA BBall.

Already giving up eh?

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:23 pm

Sky wrote:
Already gave up after vomiting profusely at that limp wristed effort from your Bruins Saturday, eh?

FTFY-NC

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Wed Dec 07, 2005 9:27 pm

not to ever say anything nice about the bRuins but both of their losses were to Pac 10 teams, its not like they lost 3 OOC games before entering conference play

T1B

Yep that Pac10 aint no 1 team conference

Yep that Pac10 aint no 1 team conference

Re: Yep that Pac10 aint no 1 team conference

Re: Yep that Pac10 aint no 1 team conference

Re: Yep that Pac10 aint no 1 team conference