T1B

IndyFrisco on Sept. 15th wrote:Since the introduction of the BCS, every year there seems to be a bridesmaid, a team who lost early on but is the team that "is now playing better than anyone out there".

Last year, it was Cal (lost to USC), the year before it was USC (lost to Cal), the year before that Miami/OSU was legit, and the year before that it was Oregon (lost to Stanford) and so on.

When I started this thread, I wasn't thinking this was a Pac 10 thing. You DO remember though the arguments we had in here from these schools' fans that their teams "were playing better than anyone at that time of year".

SO who is it going to be this year? Which team will have an early loss but then run the table and claim they deserve to be i the BCS title game?

Snake on December 3rd wrote:worthless teams to play in the championship game since Nebraska and Okalahoma..................Colorado couldn't beat a 3rd place MAC team if the kicker was a girl giving Blow jobs to everyone including the scout team...............................USC could of gotten 3 blind homeless 50 year olds with walkers, put them in the backfield, and they all would have gone for over a hundred.........Colorado would have gotten their ass handed to them by the ZIPS............................................

bottom line, Big 12 sucks, PAC 10 will always suck........................................9-1 team gets their ass handed to them.............................I wont start with the big 12............Playoff is needed, these are not the 2 best teams playing ball right now.................................................

Snake on December 3rd wrote:Steve, no one wants to play Ohio St. right now...........................