Page 1 of 1

Re: Jason Whitlock RIPS the Broncos

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:01 am
by Felix
The Denver Broncos are no threat to the Indianapolis Colts.
Shocking...shocking I tell you.....

What next, is he going to tell us that water is wet........

Not only are the Broncos no threat to the Colts, neither are any of the other teams in the league......

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:37 am
by Th
This defense could . . . . . . . . .

Image


But the offense couldn't. Would be a fun Superbowl to watch anyway, make Indy EARN it.

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:00 am
by BSmack
Th wrote:This defense could . . . . . . . . .

Image

But the offense couldn't. Would be a fun Superbowl to watch anyway, make Indy EARN it.
Back off the pipe. The Bears have played exactly one offense of Indy's calliber this year. And they got beat down like a rented mule doing it.

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:15 am
by godzilla2002
MONEY Paul, flat out MONEY!
You da man!!!

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 5:00 am
by Th
BSmack wrote:
Th wrote:This defense could . . . . . . . . .

Image

But the offense couldn't. Would be a fun Superbowl to watch anyway, make Indy EARN it.
Back off the pipe. The Bears have played exactly one offense of Indy's calliber this year. And they got beat down like a rented mule doing it.

And Indy hasn't played ONE defense that is half as good, or at least played like it, as the Bear's D is.

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 5:25 am
by Felix
Th wrote:This defense could . . . . . . . . .

Image


But the offense couldn't. Would be a fun Superbowl to watch anyway, make Indy EARN it.
If Chicago played a perfect...and I mean perfect game on both sides of the ball, I think they could stay within a couple of touchdowns....

but no closer....

Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 6:15 am
by Qbert
BSmack wrote:
Th wrote:This defense could . . . . . . . . .

Image

But the offense couldn't. Would be a fun Superbowl to watch anyway, make Indy EARN it.
Back off the pipe. The Bears have played exactly one offense of Indy's calliber this year. And they got beat down like a rented mule doing it.
and also....for about a 2 minute period of time..the Cleveland BROWNS made the Bears their Biiiiitch.

BROWNS 20
Bears 10

FACT is...the Bears D can only do so much. if their O continues to put them in shitty spots...well...the BROWNS have 'BODE now don't they???!!!!!

Bears = 1 and Done

the Seachicken out front shoulda told'ya.

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:05 am
by BSmack
Th wrote:And Indy hasn't played ONE defense that is half as good, or at least played like it, as the Bear's D is.
I take it you missed the Steelers/Bears highlights?

You put any of the top AFC teams in the NFC North and they are leading that piece of crap division by 3 games easy.

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:15 am
by T REX
The Bears has been gettign teh bounces all year....well, the averages will catch up to them. Look for NY, Sea, and TB to battle it out to see who goes to the guillotine in Detroit.

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:42 pm
by Cueball
Shit, I misread the title. Let me know when that fat bastard Whitlock takes the dirt nap, it'll be the best thing in print ever associated with his name :evil:

Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:30 pm
by Red
Whitlock had a pretty decent article today.
Blame rests with L.J.’s olé

JASON WHITLOCK

IRVING, Texas — If Sunday’s heartbreaking 31-28 loss to Dallas prevents the Chiefs from making the playoffs, it’s Larry Johnson’s fault.

Maybe you spent Sunday night cussing kicker Lawrence Tynes and long snapper Ed Perry for botching a would-be game-tying 41-yard field goal. Or maybe you’re mad at the officiating crew that properly flagged Derrick Johnson for holding (and mistakenly identified Greg Wesley as the culprit) on a critical fourth-down play in the game’s final minute. Or maybe you spent the evening lamenting KC’s bad luck, wondering how Patrick Surtain dropped an easy pick-6 interception.

Your angst and sorrow are misguided.

The Chiefs didn’t blow Sunday’s game in the fourth quarter. They lost the game, and perhaps ruined their season, just before halftime when Larry Johnson declined an opportunity to block Dallas linebacker Scott Fujita.

On second and goal at the Dallas 9, Fujita, the former Chief, sashayed right past Johnson as he flopped on the ground like a fish out of water. Fujita then barreled into quarterback Trent Green, separating KC’s QB from the football. Dallas’ Marcus Spears scooped up the ball and ran 59 yards, setting up the Cowboys at the KC 26 with 1 minute, 2 seconds left in the half. Drew Bledsoe hit tight end Jason Witten with a 26-yard TD pass, completing the good-old-fashioned game-turning 14-point swing.

When L.J. whiffed, the Chiefs were up 14-10 and about to tack on a touchdown, or at least a field goal. Instead, the Cowboys went into the halftime locker room ahead 17-14.

On the road, against a good team, when you’re in a tight playoff race, when your remaining schedule consists of playoff-caliber opponents, it’s criminal for a player to give an effort that weak on such an important play.

It’s selfish. It’s immature. It’s classic Randy Moss.

The play perfectly crystallizes (justifies) why Dick Vermeil and Al Saunders were reluctant to put their trust in Larry Johnson
. And let me be clear: I have no problem with Saunders choosing to throw the ball in that situation. Saunders called a beautiful game and did an excellent job of keeping the Cowboys’ defense off balance.

Nope. The only problem was Johnson’s flop.

“When they don’t block you real well, you should get to the quarterback,” Fujita said of his big play.

Johnson is a marvelous talent. But it’s perfectly fair to question whether Johnson is a winner. Johnson is great when you hand him the football, when it’s time for him to pile up yards and improve his leverage for a reworked contract. Johnson rushed for 143 yards and three touchdowns on Sunday. He set a Chiefs record for consecutive 100-yard games, cracking triple digits for the sixth straight game.

But Johnson’s half-hearted and soft pass-blocking effort undermined Kansas City’s offensive attack. It wasn’t just that one critical play. The Cowboys ran over and around Johnson every time he was asked to block.

“We were looking for opportunities to go one on one with their backs,” Fujita said diplomatically.


Kansas City fullback Tony Richardson might be the best blocking back in football. It’s difficult to believe that Dallas’ linebackers were looking for opportunities to go one-on-one with Richardson. By the fourth quarter, the Chiefs’ coaching staff acknowledged Johnson’s lack of toughness and put him on the sideline in obvious passing situations.

Embarrassing. Johnson has whined and rebelled and complained for three years. I thought some of his complaints were legitimate. Sunday, he looked like a running back who needed to take his diapers off. By refusing to cowboy-up and take on Fujita or any rusher, Johnson sold out his teammates. The Chiefs were reduced to playing training-camp-cut casualty Dee Brown in passing situations.

Of course, after the game Johnson declined to talk.

Vermeil wouldn’t elaborate on the sack and fumble, saying he’d like to look at game film.

“We’d like to block that guy,” Vermeil said.

Running-backs coach James Saxon declined to comment.

Yeah, the Chiefs have to handle Johnson with kid gloves now. The Chiefs have no idea whether their other special-needs running back, Priest Holmes, will choose to play again. Johnson has all the power. Like his predecessor, he can do whatever he wants.

Priest didn’t like to practice, communicate or honor a contract he deemed unfair. But when Priest was on the field, you could never question his courage, effort or willingness to sacrifice for his teammates.

Johnson’s play Sunday raised all sorts of questions.
Or is Whitlock not a credible source this week?

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:26 am
by DallasFanatic
You go to the luck card in one thread and then agree with the statement "The Chiefs didn’t blow Sunday’s game in the fourth quarter. They lost the game.."

You flop like a fish out of water Paul. Now take that loss and stick it up your ass.

:twisted:

Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 3:07 am
by KC Scott
Denver
Cincy
Jax
KC
SD

Put any of these teams in the NFC and they'd be favored to represent in the Super Bowl

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:26 pm
by Red
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Nope, Fatlock pretty much nailed it. Any questions?
I want the old Paul back.

BTW, I think he nailed it on both articles cited in this thread.

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 9:52 pm
by Nixhex
KC Paul 3.0 wrote: With LJ running over, around, and THROUGH your pathetic run defense Al Saunders once again got too cute with the play calling and opted to PASS inside the Crackwagon red zone. I thought he learned after the Buffalo debacle, but I clearly was wrong.
I kind of disagree with you here Paul. It was 2nd and Goal from the 9. While Johnson was demolishing their run defense it's not really a bad call in that spot. However, I would like the Chiefs to do more than just look for Gonzalez when passing in the red zone. I know they've hit a few other players for passing td's in the red zone besides Gonzalez but all too often it seems he's the only option.

I'd like to see a 3 tight end set with Wilson, Dunn & Gonzalez in a situation like this. You could keep Dunn in to help block with LJ. Send Gonzalez out and send Wilson out on a delay. You could run with LJ while having extra blockers. There's multiple options here and I think it would be very hard to defend.

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 10:15 pm
by JHawkBCD
Nixhex wrote:I'd like to see a 3 tight end set with Wilson, Dunn & Gonzalez in a situation like this. You could keep Dunn in to help block with LJ. Send Gonzalez out and send Wilson out on a delay. You could run with LJ while having extra blockers. There's multiple options here and I think it would be very hard to defend.
Fuck that, I'd just be happy if Wilson would run a simple route correctly. He looked like a total dumbass after Green chewed his ass for not being where he was supposed to be on a simple route in the 1st Q vs Dallas.

Furthermore, the prospect of stretching the defense downfield to open up running lanes is pretty much negated if you have three TE's lumbering accross midfield.

Get over the thought that Kris Wilson gives this offense any type of game-breaking dynamic. If he did, we would have seen a flash of it by now. Dude is nothing more than another bad early round KC draft pick.

Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2005 10:27 pm
by Nixhex
JHawkBCD wrote:
Nixhex wrote:I'd like to see a 3 tight end set with Wilson, Dunn & Gonzalez in a situation like this. You could keep Dunn in to help block with LJ. Send Gonzalez out and send Wilson out on a delay. You could run with LJ while having extra blockers. There's multiple options here and I think it would be very hard to defend.
Fuck that, I'd just be happy if Wilson would run a simple route correctly. He looked like a total dumbass after Green chewed his ass for not being where he was supposed to be on a simple route in the 1st Q vs Dallas.

Furthermore, the prospect of stretching the defense downfield to open up running lanes is pretty much negated if you have three TE's lumbering accross midfield.

Get over the thought that Kris Wilson gives this offense any type of game-breaking dynamic. If he did, we would have seen a flash of it by now. Dude is nothing more than another bad early round KC draft pick.
Dude did look bad on that pass. It looked like he didn't recognize the blitz and cut his route short. He should have at least looked for the ball sooner. He was wide open and may have scored. Just another missed opportunity in that game.