Page 1 of 1
Bowl Game Locks
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:27 am
by KC Scott
Oregon to cover 3 vs. Oklahoma
Absolute money in the bank.
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:57 am
by Degenerate
South Carolina -4.5 vs. Missouri. Spurrier would have the edge with less than ten minutes to prepare a game plan, much less a month.
S. Florida +6 vs. NC State.
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 3:45 am
by Van
Do I even need to say it?
Re: Bowl Game Locks
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 5:10 am
by Vito Corleone
KC Scott wrote:Oregon to cover 3 vs. Oklahoma
Absolute money in the bank.
Hell no, that game is a total toss-up
The real money is Texas to cover, the psudo-gamblers in the west coast are going to drive up the spread
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 5:17 am
by Van
Texas might cover all right...
...if those "pseudo-gamblers in the west coast" manage to drive the spread up...to thirty.
Texas might...
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 5:20 am
by PrimeX
Van, you need some fresh minnows. The current bait has grown quite stale.
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 7:10 pm
by Van
Depends on the angler's perspective.
I'm just enjoying Vito, is all. :-)
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 7:47 pm
by King Crimson
Degenerate wrote:South Carolina -4.5 vs. Missouri. Spurrier would have the edge with less than ten minutes to prepare a game plan, much less a month.
.
yer probably right....but Pinkel and Mizzou are so schizo, i'd stay away.
i do think there is money to be made by betting against every Big 12 team.
except maybe Tech, playing Bama is kind of a lucky break. if Bama played Michigan or Oregon at a neutral site, who do you think would be favored?
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 7:51 pm
by King Crimson
Van wrote:
I'm just enjoying Vito, is all. :-)
depends on your taste....you wouldn't be the first poster to do so.
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:27 pm
by The Seer
Northwestern
Ucla (-placekicker)
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:54 pm
by Adelpiero
The Seer wrote:Northwestern
Ucla (-placekicker)
What is the over/under? 90?
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:34 pm
by Vito Corleone
King Crimson wrote:Van wrote:
I'm just enjoying Vito, is all. :-)
depends on your taste....you wouldn't be the first poster to do so.
So how did I taste King?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:21 am
by Laxplayer
Texas will cover for about 1 1/2 quarters then the big question will be how many points over 50 SC scores.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 4:11 am
by War Stoops
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:01 am
by PSUFAN
Adelpiero wrote:The Seer wrote:Northwestern
Ucla (-placekicker)
What is the over/under? 90?
the game will not require a placekicker. the ball carriers will be given running starts and then handed the ball by officials, and defenders won't be encouraged to waylay them...in fact, they won't be welcome at the Camembert table if they aren't nice.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:48 pm
by The Seer
PSUFAN wrote:Adelpiero wrote:The Seer wrote:Northwestern
Ucla (-placekicker)
What is the over/under? 90?
the game will not require a placekicker. the ball carriers will be given running starts and then handed the ball by officials, and defenders won't be encouraged to waylay them...in fact, they won't be welcome at the Camembert table if they aren't nice.
You apparently don't mind hitting below the belt....
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 4:56 pm
by Cicero
Stone cold lead pipe lock.
Oklahoma over Oregon.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 5:51 pm
by PSUFAN
all in fun, brah.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:09 pm
by TheJON
Nebraksa +12 is your best bowl bet. Iowa +4 is one of the best bets. USC -7 is a good one too. Georgia - 8 1/2, Auburn -10 1/2, and UCLA -3 1/2 are also solid picks.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:21 pm
by Killian
TheJON wrote:Nebraksa +12 is your best bowl bet. Iowa +4 is one of the best bets. USC -7 is a good one too. Georgia - 8 1/2, Auburn -10 1/2, and UCLA -3 1/2 are also solid picks.
Yeah, we all know how well you did the last time you threw some of your picks up here.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:33 pm
by MClub
stfu. you root for notre dame. no right to talk. bitch.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:33 pm
by TheJON
I do pretty good against the spread. Bad weeks happen. Ball bounces funny sometimes.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 8:44 pm
by Killian
MClub wrote:stfu. you root for notre dame. no right to talk. bitch.
I forgot. Good call.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:38 pm
by MClub
'tis why i'm here. that and to say that manning/harrison comparison makes me blush now that a bunch of old men are sitting around, waiting to rip open a case of champagne...
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 9:41 pm
by Killian
MClub wrote:'tis why i'm here. that and to say that manning/harrison comparison makes me blush now that a bunch of old men are sitting around, waiting to rip open a case of champagne...
Heh. Yeah, I think Czonka and Mercury Morris are sweating, just a touch.
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 10:08 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Killian wrote:MClub wrote:'tis why i'm here. that and to say that manning/harrison comparison makes me blush now that a bunch of old men are sitting around, waiting to rip open a case of champagne...
Heh. Yeah, I think Czonka and
Mercury Morris are sweating, just a touch.
Didn't Mercury Morris do some time in prison for drugs? I would think he has bigger issues than this.
If, on the other hand, he's conquered those personal demons, more power to him.
